Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Flash7

Senior Member
  • Posts

    4,129
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Flash7

  1. 17 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

    I’ve said this before, but I think it’s worth repeating…. 
     

    When a poster expresses interest in filling a roster spot the Colts are showing almost no interest in filling the spot with a quality veteran.   They are filling the spot with some fringe young-ish player that is either a practice squad guy or a backup on the depth chart.   But not a starter.   
     

    Whether it’s RG or CB or S or WR or RB, the Colts have not shown any interest in signing a quality veteran.   To me, the Colts are screaming and telegraphing that they’re fine finishing in the bottom-10 of the league, perhaps even the bottom-5.  
     

    How clear do the Colts have to make it? 
     

    But to what end? To get a better spot in the draft?

     

    Who have we drafted that's a difference maker? Jonathan Taylor? That's about it and it's not going well.

     

    Pittman is okay, not a star. Pierce? Anyone?

     

    Really though. Who's been a difference maker where we can find comfort in this strategy? 

  2. 23 hours ago, Jared Cisneros said:

    I couldn't disagree more with this. Andrew Luck wasn't clutch IMO. He started off slow in the majority of games (whether it be because of a low football IQ, poor coaching, or the poor team around him), and he came back late in games because teams played the prevent defense and allowed the Colts to make comebacks late in games. Yes, Luck probably overachieved % wise in how many 4th quarter comebacks he made, but he put this team in a bad situation most games by starting off slow and having to comeback late. Even the Chiefs playoff game happened that way in 2013. It was a lot of fun watching it, but Luck padded his stats pretty well, and if teams played him in the 2nd half like the 1st half, Luck would have been an average or worse QB.

    1. I agree that there were some times where Luck made bad plays and put the team in a bad situation.

     

    At the same time, I think:

     

    2. It's MORE likely that the team underperformed and put Luck in a bad situation.

     

    When Luck was playing, the Colts did not have a good O-line. They had NO run game and an average to really bad defense. They also had several different offensive coordinators, so there was no continuity. The result of all of this was an overall bad team and that bad team would often find themselves behind in many games.

     

    To his detriment, Luck was a team player. He wanted to abide by the system and allow his coaches and teammates to shine in victory. They could not. So, often Luck would have to take it upon himself to fight for first downs, just to keep drives alive. (Broncos TD drive). This would entail Luck diving and reaching for first downs or TDs while getting hit, (Chiefs Playoff Win).  This would include running through defenders to keep drives alive, otherwise they would lose. (Green Bay Miracle Game). He put his body on the line in order to win and did what was necessary when the system and the team failed him. That's what I saw as the main reason for the 4th quarter comebacks.

     

    You could easily see a parallel universe where Luck played for a team with a great O-line, a great run game, and a stout defense, and he doesn't have to perform those 4th quarter heroics. He would still make some bonehead plays from time-to-time, as all QBs do, but maybe the team could overcome them without Luck having to ball out.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  3. 11 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:


    That same prayer was answered last year with Raimann.   There’s a reasonable expectation it can happen this year with Freeland. 
     

    I’ve given you a mountain of facts.  All you’ve responded with is a mountain of opinion.   Not sure why you won’t accept it?  

    How else is player development supposed to work? You draft a player that has the traits you covet, work with them to improve, and develop them over time. Some times it works out well, like with Raimann, and sometimes it doesn't.

     

    What's the expectation? We just draft All-Pros all the time, right out of the gate?

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 2
  4. 34 minutes ago, csmopar said:

    Which proves my point entirely. he had decided to retire and still chose to mislead everyone. 

    If you're referring to luck warming up during his final preseason game, then yes I agree. That was misleading.

     

    If you're referring to the interview you posted, then no. That was weeks prior to his retirement. He had not intended to retire at that time.

  5. 15 minutes ago, csmopar said:

    His own comments in the December interview speak to that. He said he knew he was going to retire before OTAs even started. So yeah it’s plenty of evidence

    Here's the timeline from that article:

    " Luck told his family and close friends. Wilson advised him to sleep on it. When they spoke two days later, Luck was resolute. Ballard tried to appeal to Luck's competitive fire, but it was gone. Reich implored him to not rush a big decision, but Luck didn't think it had been rushed. When Wilson met with Ballard to finalize the paperwork, both men cried. Luck savored his final days in pro football."  - ESPN Andrew Luck finally reveals why he walked away from the NFL

     

    The decision to retire was made within a few days of his actual retirement. He admitted to having thoughts about retiring, but kept working to come back until his body forced him to decide. The answers he provided in the interview were genuine, at the time.

     

    He did say he regretted the timing of his retirement, but that alludes more to how it affected the team in hindsight. He does not regret retiring, rather he wished the team could have done better without him.

  6. 2 hours ago, csmopar said:

     


    here’s one from 4 August 2019…  18 days prior to his “retirement” . Clearly says at least twice that he will be ready to start week 1. 
     

    peter: “Opening day is 5 weeks away, any doubt in your mind that you will play?”

     

    Luck: “No, I certainly believe I will.”

     

    Evidence is enough for me.


     

    I chose to use a video so no one could say that he was misquoted. There’s also an article on the athletic that quotes luck on August 16th, 2019 as saying “We are taking it slow, but there is no doubt that I will be ready on September 8”. 

    But somehow this isn't evidence that he honestly believed he would play week 1? This isn't evidence that he was going through rehab to get ready to play with and for his teammates?

     

    When it was LATER revealed that his lower leg injury was not healing as fast and that he would miss part of the season and go through extensive rehab all over again, something he promised himself he would not do again, THEN he knew it was time to retire. He did not this during this interview.

  7. Along with NCF, I'm one of the biggest A. Luck fans, but I don't think he belongs in the HOF. I also think he would feel unworthy.

     

    Barry Sanders played only 9 years in the NLF and made it into the HOF, as well as Calvin Johnson, who played for 9 years and made it into the HOF. Andrew Luck only played for 7 years. And I don't think he had the impact on his position the way Barry and Megatron have had on theirs.

    • Like 3
  8. Coach Pagano had Andrew Luck. But in the time that Luck was injured and unable to play, Pagano had success with guys like Matt Hasslebeck, Clipboard Jesus, and Tolzien.

     

    Chuck Pagano's record with the Colts:  54-43.

     

    Frank Reich's record with the Colts:  41-40-1

     

    Frank Reich only had Andrew Luck for 1 year. That year the Colts started out horribly (1-5) mainly due to Luck coming back from shoulder injury and he was not able to make all of the throws. (Brissett coming in for Luck to throw a hail Mary pass to end the game). The offense was severely limited the first 6 games. But, once Luck got better and more strength in his shoulder, the offense opened up and the Colts went 9-1 the rest of the season.

     

    I think that if Frank Reich and Andrew Luck continued to play together, this wouldn't even be a question. Frank's offense was perfectly suited for Andrew. It kept him safe with quick reads, quick passes, and from time-to-time, deep shots., backed up by a good run game. We really missed out on what could have been.

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
  9. We had these players:

     

    1. Peyton Manning

    2. Marvin Harrison

    3. Reggie Wayne

    4. Edgerrin James

    5. Brandon Stokely

    6. Dallas Clark

    7. Dwight Freeney

    8 Robert Mathis

    9. Bob Sanders

     

     

    These guys were elite football players and we won 1 Super Bowl. We have NOTHING in comparison to the type of talent we used to have. I can easily see why we are ranked so low when comparing our current talent to what Colts fans were used to at one time.

  10. 3 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

    Grigson had Luck for 5 years healthy, Ballard had Luck 1 year and when we had Luck we went 10-6 and beat the Division Champion Texans easily on their home turf in 2018. Hell If I had Andrew Luck for 5 years I could win 50 games The Simpsons GIF by KiwiGo (KGO)

    So it's fair to say that without Luck, Grigson too would have struggled, kind of like Ballard is now.

     

    image.png.c1f3ef9349d1c24c4f152e84337d584a.png

×
×
  • Create New...