Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

MaoBerry

Member
  • Posts

    737
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MaoBerry

  1. Players get serious injuries all the time. Allen is 23, young guys are always better at recovering vs say a guy in his 30's, Gronkowski has had multiple serious injuries, yet he is still producing mega numbers. Allen was the better player last year, and we have no reason to suspect that will be any different. Allen is just overall a better player, and Fleener has done nothing to prove otherwise

     

     

    I seriously hope so as well. But you guys are thinking of dwayne allen of old before the busted hip. That might not be what we get next year. That was one of the worst possible injuries to substain.

  2. Mcnary rogers and whalen all look good. These udfa could propel us to great things.

     

     

    Our UDRFA'S are looking to be stars/above average role players! I'm thrilled with them! And we added kory sheets for next year! REALLY EXCITED ABOUT THAT!

  3. I'm a Stanford fan.   So, I'm also a Griff Whalen fan.

     

    But what would give anyone the idea that Whalen could be a #1 receiver?!?    I mean....   seriously?!?

     

    This is a guy who has been on the practice squad for some of this year...   who got waived off the active roster once and fortunately not picked up by another team...  and we then reclaimed him for the PS.

     

    In a perfect world now,  he'd be a #5, behind Wayne, Hiltons, DHB (if he had worked out) and Brazil.   

     

    Whalen is not a guy who will threaten a top quality team as the #1 receiver.   Those teams will find a way to take Griff completely out of the game.     The same way teams have taken Hilton out of the game for a few weeks when he was offered up as the #1.

     

    A #1 receiver is someone who should strike fear into an opponent.   Someone they have to plan and account for.   Someone who might even command a double-team.    Griff Whalen doesn't do any of that.    And I say that as a Griff Whalen fan...........

     

    Whalen is not a #1.   Neither is Hilton....   he might someday be a #2,  but he's not there yet.

     

    Luck can make a lot of people look good....    better than they really are....    but he's not a miracle worker.

     

    Just sayin.....

     

     

     

    Its rogers that's contributing so much to luck's new found success. He's opening up everybody else within the offense, because teams are double and triple teaming da'rick.

  4. I don't think we'd bring him in in any official capacity. The politics would be unclear, and that's not good. But I definitely think he has something to offer a team, including ours. I assume that Grigson talks to guys like him all the time. If not, he should.

     

    If Jimmy Raye III leaves this offseason, I'd like to have Pioli in that #2 job.

     

    I told you that pioli was a * and a control freak, but you didn't believe me. He gets people fired, if they even speak to him (true story) and you want this type of guy on our colts? NNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOO TTTTTTTHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNKKKKKSSSSSSSSS.

  5. Let's just say luck puts up these (4,000 25 TDS) type of numbers for a career (i expect he'll eventually put together a string of 35-40+ TDS THOUGH), then he'll still be a H.O.FAMER. He's looking at 60,000+ 350+ for a career...pretty good and if you throw in 2-4 rings, maybe G.O.A.T.

  6. So your telling me that in the 2 whole games he has been in as a rookie is all you need to see and have enough film on him to determine he is a bust.  Forgive me if I can't take your word for that.  

     

    Holmes is a rookie who not only has he himself been injured but having no continuity on the O line would hinder any type of progression this rookie could have.  He may end up not being a world beater, but calling him a bust this quickly is highly irresponsible to say the least

     

     

     

     

     

    I wasn't refering to his NFL play, just what i've seen of him in the past.

  7. in the Jewish religion technically the child is the same religion as the mother if one is really religious and it doesnt matter if mother is Jewish or non Jwish, if one is really religious the Jewish religion says s a child born from a non Jewish mother is not considered Jewish  without an orthodox  conversion by said mother prior to the birth ( which is way hard ) the child is that same religion as the mother, and if that child is thus non Jewish would then need an orthodox conversion to to become Jewish

     

    Yet My  Jewish cousin of Jewish Parents is married to  a non Jew who never converted but they are raising the children Jewish even though techniquely they aren't

     

    Yes that has to be stressful, what holidays does one take off from school, i think, at least in the past u had to declare such at least In Ny in my time , does one get Bar / Bat mitzvahed or not , etc etc, ,

     

    I  have many a friend with mixed marriages as far as religion and though the marriage  of a spoullmate is wonderful , u never know what may come up and what others may think, esp other children can be harsh, best of Luck

     

    Topics I hope are all thought out ahead of time as can cause friction I imagine

     

    many of my friends have converted using the conservative or reformed ways ( a much easier process ) , whatever works for one is just fine, being happy is what is important in my opinion

     

    and like my cousin whose wife never converted I dont care, she too is my cousin now, just let all be happy

     

    Thats enough, now to catch up on things , have a good day

     

     

    I'm so tired of all of this. It doesn't really matter anymore...does it? I only care about my family now...screw the rest.

×
×
  • Create New...