VaAllDay757
-
Posts
2,128 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by VaAllDay757
-
-
Yeah we have bigger needs than rb at the 1st round....if o line can get right mack can be our guy
-
It sounds like if and IF he has a setback then he will require surgery again which I hope it's not the case
-
He's better at guard than tackle anyway keep good at guard
-
3 hours ago, Valpo2004 said:
I like Mack as a #2 back but I think we need someone who's better between the tackles. Mack's pretty good on outside runs, but he doesn't seem to be that good between the tackles.
It's more of the o line not making a hole than mack because mack had some nice runs in some tight holes but he is better for the outside runs
-
No hairston tomorrow....yeah this secondary is all to pieces
-
Yeah...some of these grades aren't right
-
Expect the bills to run it more.....if chuck was smart he would've study that game where peterman threw 5 picks and see how their o line got blasted that game
-
I think this will be one those surprise wins that the colts will get 21-14 colts
-
Injury bug does not stop
-
Might as well put melvin on IR too no need to risk it if a bone broke in his hand
-
33 minutes ago, dgambill said:
Funny last couple years if Toler or Robinson got beat for a TD once a game we didn't give them a pass. It might not be the only thing they are evaluating their performance on but that doesn't mean that it doesn't have an overall HUGE effect on it. That's like saying I got a F on the midterm but I don't understand because I got some B's on my other assignments and I don't understand why I'm doing so poorly in the class....fact is those big plays are huge. They happen we get it..but we can't excuse it either. So if he plays 16 games and gives up 16 tds on bad covers are you going to be ok with that? There is a middle ground....perhaps they looked at all things but considering the timing of the play and the result and how bad it was blown they decided it was a critical play in the game and the result is it was a bad performance.
Difference is toler and robinson got beat all game which wilson did not but yeah it was his fault he got beat on that one play but I will take that over getting burned all game because the other team will keep picking on you and after that one play wilson didn't slack up
-
2 hours ago, aaron11 said:
he has missed a lot of time for various reasons. he was hurt when we drafted him then went on IR with a serious knee injury after a few games. he is great at playing the ball in the air, but not much else
13 missed tackles in one year in college, and now i see why. hes not any good at it
he cant afford to lose a step with this injury either. if he comes back and plays well ill admit i was wrong, but if teams get tape on him and he stops getting interceptions he will have to get a lot better at the rest of the game
Ok but when the season started he was ready and got 3 ints early so it's no telling what would've been if he kept playing he putting up a good rookie resume
-
We will see
-
John simon has a 3 year deal he's coming back regardless
-
2 hours ago, aaron11 said:
sucks at tackling. the only thing he does well is play the ball in the air
he had like three good plays and went on IR. couldn't get healthy in the off season either
He's on IR because someone chopped him down at his knee....what does that have to do witg his skills of ability?
-
Try again
-
6 hours ago, Coltfreak said:
He got beat multiple times. He was average at best. Maybe playing time will help. But he was not worth all this complaining about him not playing. He is not better than VD Melvin Hairston or Desir. He was only in due to necessity
Multiple times? When was these other times? Wilson definitely played better than davis would had and hairston gave up 2 touchdowns but when bortles got sacked and fumbled it was because he was looking in wilson direction and nothing was there
-
Hooker....overrated?????? Lol that is too funny
-
2 hours ago, dgambill said:
I understand his playing time is very limited....but fact is he hasn't shown much to even get on the field..much less make an impact....at least Werner was getting playing time and making tackles. But I've said all along I understand how big the leap is from the MAC to the NFL is...and this isn't Khalil Mack so we need to give him some time.
Shown what? To be honest I don't he fits our scheme he's had little to no time on the field and werner was a 1st round pick usually most 1st round picks starts during the season.....just give him more time it will show
-
2 minutes ago, aaron11 said:
one of the biggest plays of the game
what plays were you watching?
Ok and again what do you expect he hasn't played since week 2? If you evaluating his performance off of one play then you just as blind the next person
-
1 hour ago, dgambill said:
I'm happy for him but at this point he still trails Bjorn for sacks during his rookie season. He has been basically invisible. I think next year it would appropriate to expect to see him making a contribution. Coming from Ohio University the level of talent he is going up against is a huge leap. A good offseason and hopefully he can come in ready next year to attack.
Well werner was a starter since day 1 and basham is just a project for right now so his snaps are very limited
-
5 hours ago, aaron11 said:
he wasnt good yesterday
we should just play the best guys and not worry about where they were drafted
Who was you watching? He only got beat on one play
-
Well he did ok yesterday aside from getting beat on that deep pass hopefully he gets more reps now that desir has an injury
-
Well he's not inactive today he will most likely play finally we can see him on the field again keep milton and moore off the field unless it's for special teams
Chubb at #3 or #4 would be ...
in NFL Draft, Scouting, and Free Agent Talk
Posted
Oh I thought you was talking the rb but yeah I expect our 1st round pick to be o lineman