runthepost
-
Posts
5,346 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by runthepost
-
-
9 hours ago, NFLfan said:
I agree. Does anyone remember when the Eagles were named "the Dream Team" after they won free agency that year? It did not help them win anything the following season.
Eagles signed lock down man corners then went to a zone scheme. Sneed can play both
-
4 Yrs 76M 55M guaranteed lol wow
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Superman said:
Not a lot for the trade. I wonder what the contract winds up being.
4 Yrs 88M if I guess. He (Sneed) previously declined 4 yrs 80M from the Titans like a week ago
-
Yall remember when it was stated trades don’t get announced till after a physical is passed? Those damn trolls on Twitter
“Trade is pending physical for Sneed”
-
1
-
-
Every team wants to get better in the division we are bringing back everyone from a 9-8 season
-
27 minutes ago, richard pallo said:
In a new BR article tonight Dianna Russini is reporting that the Chiefs were originally asking for a 2nd pick for Sneed. They really want to move Sneed. She now thinks multiple picks will get it done. She mentioned picks 46, 82, and 117 would get the deal done with the Colts. Does she know something? The hangup is the contract for Sneed. He definitely doesn’t want to play on the tag. It sounds like he has moved off his position of wanting to be the highest paid corner. So now it’s a matter of agreeing on the contract. She now thinks the Colts are the front runner to land Sneed. Another team could jump in but his market has cooled somewhat throughout the league but the Colts seem the most likely in her mind. Albert Breer was also mentioned in the article. He thinks Sneed will be traded before the draft.
The front runner was always the Titans. Chiefs insider stated the Titans and Chiefs had an agreement that fell through, then Destin ran with that story of the colts and chiefs were nearing a trade
-
1
-
-
Looks like I was right the team that they agreed with earlier was the titans but Sneed didn’t agree to the contract with the Titans. So in theory Adam was right
-
10 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:
Some seem obsessed with having to win a Super Bowl with Richardson on his rookie deal to the point I kinda think some think there is no chance to win one after that because of his contract.
Well look at the last three QBs to win Super Bowls, Mahomes, Stafford, and Brady. None were on a rookie deal. There is life after a rookie deal for a QB and a chance to still win Super Bowls.
Now I will agree your best chance to acquire talent is when a QB is on his rookie deal and I’ll agree you have more room for error with acquiring players while they are on a rookie deal. However, if you know what you are doing you can still do those things after a QB is past his rookie deal.
The key for Ballard is he has to produce something to get to that point. If this team isn’t getting to the playoffs and winning the division by the end of Richardson’s rookie deal he isn’t going to be here for a second contract with Richardson, if he earns one, which is still an if.
My point is though the Colts don’t have to go all in at the expense of their future over the next few years like some seem to want. They need to grow the roster which is what I think Ballard is trying to do. He’s trying to put younger players, especially on offense, to grow with Richardson.
I’ll admit I don’t totally agree with the plan on defense but I’ll also acknowledge it’s not a final product yet. I’ll also acknowledge that the Colts seem to like their roster on defense more than some fans do. Last thing I also don’t think the biggest issue with the Colts defense is the players I think it’s the DC and as long as Bradley is here I think their overall success on defense will be limited regardless of who they put out there.
Mahomes first superbowl was on his rookie deal
-
1
-
-
Looks like the Titans was the team the Chiefs agreed in a trade for Sneed with. Trade got declined because Sneed wanted more than 4 years 80M that was offered by the Titans
-
47 minutes ago, hoosierhawk said:
Absolutely no proof the D would have been better even though you spent 20M more which we currently don't have considering paying the draft choices. I prefer that we signed our own who are very good players and still have some bucks left to sign possible a CB and FS that is still left in FA.
Really surprised you continue to be a Colt fan. Seems the only player you express as liking is AR.
Defense was ranked those the bottom last season even with us playing against 10 rookies and backup QBs
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, Colts1324 said:
If we aren’t resigning Blackmon, I see no way we don’t sign Simmons or Diggs. We were weak there last year. Blackmon was the only bright spot.
Not sure if Gilmore would be interested in returning, BUT that could make sense if he wants to mentor the young guys. Curious on how he graded out last year
Gilmore got roasted in the playoffs plus he wants to go to a contender which we aren’t
-
2 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:
Do you ever stop and think this was almost done and sneed had a change of heart. He never said that about jeudy or Parker.
You think all the elite to mid level analysts are missing on info that some blogger named Dustin and his mysterious Twitter source ( who has deleted his account) are finding out before they do?
-
Jerry Jeudy, DeVante Parker, now Sneed have been almost deals according to Dustin
-
1
-
-
-
Now can we ban tweets from that clown Dustin?
-
So all those guys like Dustin and whatevercolt are clowns on Twitter
-
The big dawg commented and said no comments on colts and sneed
-
31 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:
Actually Diana’s info was 100% exactly what Destin said. He had been vindicated. She said she almost fired off a tweet saying it was done and had been traded.
It’s been 5 days since he said they are ironing out the details and the trade is done. We still waiting on a physical from Friday correct?
-
If the Sneed trade doesn’t go through can we ban tweets from these wannabe insiders who have no sources? Or have less than 2k followers
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, richard pallo said:
They would still do it once it’s completed. I don’t think the Chiefs would stick it to Ballard. I think Ballard would trust them.
You do physicals for the team that wants you not your old team. That’s how trades get bounced if x player fails physical for new team. Same rules apply to NBA. Caris LeVert failed a physical with the Pacers due to a tumor but the trade went thru because the Pacers accepted an additional draft pick
-
20 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:
What if his agent and everyone is just quiet . It happens. Things do get past those guys because everyone keeps tight lips. If the agent is quiet then nothing is getting out to those guys.
Then why are you believing Dustin and some other random on Twitter?
-
12 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:
Final details could be as simple as having to come to Indy for a physical. Thst could take a couple days.
So something like that would have been reported by Ian or Schef hours/days ago
-
Well one of the big boys just commented
-
1
-
-
Until Schef or Ian report this it’s all just junk at the end of the day
Colts offseason discussion / Ballard Grievances (merge)
in Colts Football
Posted
They have to play like 4 key players next year. It helps they have McDuffie who was an all pro CB last year too