3nk1du
-
Posts
169 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by 3nk1du
-
-
Armstead is ranked higher because his ceiling but Anderson could be a good starter for many 3-4 teams, i think we can get him if we trade up on the 3rd.
-
Carter isn't the kind of CB we want i think he could be a better S for us, but teams with zone coverage are gonna take him on the late 2nd or early 3rd.
TY Montgomery is gonna be a 4th rounder at worse, he has a good set of tools. i would rather take the boy from Hobart Marpet he is this year Joel Bitonio or Larry Wardford, he handled really well all the DTs. -
I think he would trade up on the 3rd to get Henry Anderson, if we got a DT on the first, or trade up on the 3rd to get T. Coleman maybe.
-
He won't make through waivers so i would give this 4th because he isn't going back to Miami. The problem is that Chip K. is gonna try to get him i think he is willing to give a 2-3 to get him.
I think with Coleman and Mathis we got a strong locker room to teach him about being a pro, that would be a medium risk - high reward, Werner isn't a stud but he is serviceable so i wouldn't trade him.
-
Adongo, Carter, Heenan, Mumba make the 53
Actually i can see Carter, Heenan, Mumba.
But i'm hyped with Adongo.
-
Rivers on contract year plus age plus you get a younger QB with high ceiling i can see that trade.
-
He wasn't better than G.Whalen because Whalen wasn't sexy but he played "safe" but a couple of bad plays(i think the front office told him that he was about to begin replaced so he tried too hard to make plays), i wouldn't mind to take TY Montgomery around the 5th if he still there, he could be a good number 3-5 WR and he is an excellent returner. I think we are gonna make D. Carter or D. Moncrief return the kicks Cribbs isn't gonna make the team.
-
No way Sheltons there at 29... major stretch.
If Chicago passses at 7..
..Cleveland at 12 is an option..
..49ers at 15 are an option..
..Texans at 16 are an option..
..Chargers at 17 are an option..
..Browns again at 19 are an option..
..Steelers at 22 are an option..
..Lions at 23 are an option..
..Cardinals at 24 are an option..
..Ravens at 26 are an option..
..Cowboys at 27 are an option..
..Broncos at 28 are an option..
Way too many options for him to fall that far. I can't even imagine any scenario where he falls to 29.
I agree with some of those possibilities but
SF aren't taking a NT they need CB, WR
Steelers need to refresh his secondary too,
Lions is a mayor option but i think they don't use a NT like Danny,
Cardinals if Danny felt that far they are gonna take him,
Ravens they could but they have Tim Jernigan,
Cowboys like Cardinals would take him on a heart beat but if they don't get AP they are gonna take a RB,
Broncos like Cards,
I think Danny is gonna be a top 15 pick but i still think that a scenario where he fell to us isn't that crazy.
-
I think the only dangerous PR or KR is TY but no way he would take those, so i would take G. Whalen he can be a good 4/5 WR and can PR/KR also he has had a couple of good st stops.
-
That is so twisted... Steroids won't hurt your perception of a football player but Cocaine oh that one will? That doesn't seem odd to you? lol Just an observation
If a kid wants to show "the best" of him, some teams would consider take him because he wants to win (yeah cheating isn't the way) and you can put on line with the kind of proteins and supplements but if he is getting cocaine he could be a yonki and those are true wildcards but i'm also remembering Brazil he was developing well but 3 times caught smoking weed that was just stupid, R. Gregory can fall but i don't see him falling from 19 because when V.Miller was coming out of college he had some issues also but the talent is worth the risk.
But he failed with weed so i don't see him falling from top 10.
-
Arik Armstead(he is kind of raw but he has all the tools to be an excellent 3-4 DE).
If M. Peters still on the board i would take him that would make the Colts CB one of the best of the league but trouble players hasn't been handled really well on Indy(Da'Rick, Purifloy).
Otherwise i would trade down and get another 2nd and maybe a 3rd, we could get a serviceable S or an ILB.
-
I can see him signing with us!!!!
1 day contract and retire is the only possible way to sign him we are right now full of OLB(Werner,Walden,Mathis,Newsome,Adongo,Cole,Johnson) 7, no way we bring one more on those 7 we have our 4-5 to go to the season.
-
I'm not sold with Doyle at FB position i think he looks good but since that's not his natural position i think a true fullback could be a big time contributor to the team, i know Doyle has filled really well but IMO if we get a true FB he would make this offense better, i think Doyle doesn't have the ideal frame to be a FB(he is little to tall).
I think Gore was behind a good FB on the 50% of the snaps and i know that offensive line is really nasty but if you check those highlights the FB always made a good block.
-
A 3rd for a FB? Hell no.
We don't need a FB. Doyle, Allen and even Fleener on occasion have performed more than sufficiently. It's essentially a waste of a roster spot.
I was watching a couple of Stanford games with Luck, and the FB always had great plays, i mean on any other scheme i wouldn't trade for a FB or i would be fine without one but this "non-West Coast offense" needs one IMO.
-
After reinforcing the RB position with Gore(he always had a FB with SF), i think we really need FB because Doyle,Allen have filled the position but they aren't a true FB.I think we don't have a true FB(on the roster right now) and Pep's scheme needs one so i'm not sure about the FB prospects this draft but i would trade a 3rd with Oak for M. Reece his cap is around 3.5M i think we can afford him because Pep's scheme maximize the FB and Reece is a playmaker, he would be a great adition to the team and we could have Gore,Herron, Ballard/Z.Tipton, because we'd took a RB on the 3rd round this year(but this class is filled with RB talent so that would be the only think against trading a 3rd, IMO).
So what do you think about the FB position this year?
and what do you think about a trade with Oak? -
Carter is a sure 2nd rounder. No way we get him that late.
-
left side is good with Castonzo and Mewhort. No reason to think that the line play in the playoffs wasn't helped by Holmes joining the starting line so he should be the center. On the right side GC played very well at tackles his first year here and it is well documented he had injury issues last year so you assume that if he's full healthy he revert bsck to the GC from two years ago. That leaves one hole at right guard that the guard from the Eagles should fill. Everyone else is for depth.
I think Harrison had a good start but he declined really fast(i think Chuck did say that he didn't have the stamina necessary to play on the NFL a problem for almost every rookie) so i gonna love the fight for the starting C position btw Harrison and Holmes whoever who wins it we won, i'm a little concert about the right side but i think if Gosder is healthy we have a good OL. I think we are gonna draft a T to replace Gosder eventually.
-
I can see Hardy and Johnson coming to Indy but really i don't think we should bring AJ(because we need to develop DM and with our scheme he wouldn't see the field as much as all of us wishes to), and Hardy isn't a fit for the system so i would take Jay Cutler for Chicago 1st pick this year and the next cut him and get Danny Shelton and having 2 first rounders the next year would be awesome but that's so unrealistic.
-
The problem is that he is gonna command a deal like Vontae(or more), remember we didn't lose because we couldn't defend the pass we lose because we couldn't stop the RUN.
-
We don't really need another WR, we need a freaking running game, i mean against the Patriots everybody knew that we were passsing and then they just put the LBs on coverage and let 3/4 press Andrew because they knew that we couldn't run so i would prefer to take Iupati than Maclin but i'm not a fan of them, i hope we take Ngata and Wilfork 2 years.
-
I think he had a good game when he played Guard, he isn't that bad, actually i was surprised when i found about him being cut.
-
J.J. Watt he is really likable, he works soo hard and he plays with such passion he is the kind of guy you always dream to have on your team.
-
I was thinking about we haven't found the right guys to play 3-4(hybrid 4-3) and we have struggled really bad to find a NT, and a partner to Freeman at ILB and our OLB aren't great, so would be too crazy to try to change to 4-3 i mean i think we don't truly have player that are just set to play 3-4 besides Chapman.
We could play something likeAdams FA/Draft/Brown
Toler Walden Freeman FA/Draft Davis
Mathis Jones RJF/Hughes Werner/Newsome
Jones is very versatile, he could play on any inside position.
Mathis, Werner and Newsome were DE (4-3), Newsome best plays are when he is playing DE.
Freeman is undersized to play 3-4.
Walden i think isn't the right fit but may do the transition well.
I think our scheme doesn't work if we don't have the anchor at NT.
Would you change to 4-3 or would you stay with 3-4(hybrid)?
-
People we don't need a superstar RB , we need a RB that can complement the Colts offense , if we get a good RB(after 2nd round) he could became great because the defenses are always looking for Luck , we need to put our best player on the position where he can win games, so i would prefer to get Duke Jonhson on the 3/4th. But IMO Zurlon looked good on really few snaps i think he is the kind of RB that you want to have if you are gonna run btw the tackles.
Round 1 Mock Multiple Trades
in NFL Draft, Scouting, and Free Agent Talk
Posted
Raiders got robbed, i think if Mariota still there when the raiders pick then they are gonna get at least 2 first rounders + 1/2 seconds (Cle,Phi).