• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation



  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

3,602 profile views
  1. Sorry I spelled it wrong! Sorry you don't like the contract terms. The POINT is, is this a key piece we need NOW to rebuild this defense NOW?
  2. grand slam FA run by breaking their mold and investing in Hawkins to a long term (7 yr) , ($7M/yr.) contract. He's young and could provide a core piece for our new defense for several years. Are there other quality options available? Draft or other?
  3. Why no conversation about Hankins

    This seems like the 7 yr. $49 mil deal that needs to get done
  4. Why no conversation about Hankins

  5. Why no conversation about Hankins

    Thanks for the info Dirty M. He seems like a young, long term building block. A better option that Poe
  6. in the 1st through 4th rounds of this draft. Surely it is a year to fix our secondary for the next several years. Further, those 4th round picks we have may yield a NT, a RB, a LB and maybe a DE. I'm more optimistic about this draft than any in the last several years.
  7. They're obviously having a problem. Maybe they'd be interested in Dorsette and a 4th or ? Then we'd have a T.Y. clone. Not likely, but a significant upgrade
  8. Which one?

    After the 2016 draft, I posted "How could we pass on Whitehair in the 2nd round." Nothing else to be said.
  9. How could we pass on Whitehair in the second round?


    I like a lot of what we did, but we could have hit a grant slam by securing the core of the Offensive Line, with Mewhort/Kelly/Whiterhair, for Luck's entire career and chose not too.  Instead we went with a Safety, a LB with bad knees and character issues, and a back up Center.  WHY?  Is it the GM or the scouting staff?