evilleseniorfan

Member
  • Content count

    143
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

23

Uncategorized

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

3,602 profile views
  1. Sorry I spelled it wrong! Sorry you don't like the contract terms. The POINT is, is this a key piece we need NOW to rebuild this defense NOW?
  2. grand slam FA run by breaking their mold and investing in Hawkins to a long term (7 yr) , ($7M/yr.) contract. He's young and could provide a core piece for our new defense for several years. Are there other quality options available? Draft or other?
  3. Why no conversation about Hankins

    This seems like the 7 yr. $49 mil deal that needs to get done
  4. Why no conversation about Hankins

    THANKS FOR ALL OF THE INFO. GO COLTS
  5. Why no conversation about Hankins

    Thanks for the info Dirty M. He seems like a young, long term building block. A better option that Poe
  6. in the 1st through 4th rounds of this draft. Surely it is a year to fix our secondary for the next several years. Further, those 4th round picks we have may yield a NT, a RB, a LB and maybe a DE. I'm more optimistic about this draft than any in the last several years.
  7. They're obviously having a problem. Maybe they'd be interested in Dorsette and a 4th or ? Then we'd have a T.Y. clone. Not likely, but a significant upgrade
  8. Which one?

    After the 2016 draft, I posted "How could we pass on Whitehair in the 2nd round." Nothing else to be said.
  9. How could we pass on Whitehair in the second round?

     

    I like a lot of what we did, but we could have hit a grant slam by securing the core of the Offensive Line, with Mewhort/Kelly/Whiterhair, for Luck's entire career and chose not too.  Instead we went with a Safety, a LB with bad knees and character issues, and a back up Center.  WHY?  Is it the GM or the scouting staff?