Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

TomDiggs

Member
  • Posts

    955
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by TomDiggs

  1. 6 hours ago, VikingsFanInChennai said:

    You had a good draft last year for Washington. 

     

    Go ahead and pick a team of your choice, that will make it clear for everyone else to know which teams are still available.

     

    I will make a list of teams followed by participants who have got their teams assigned. 

    I'll take the Falcons and if we have to double up on teams let me know and I will grab another

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. 3 minutes ago, shasta519 said:

     

    Yep. Unless Ollie parlayed last year into a promotion, it would seem like the FO and coaching staff agreed to an extent.

     

    And if it was that the Colts fired him, watch out for the whiplash from how fast the narrative turns into "well the pass rush wasn't really that good." After so many of Colts Twitter have said it was really good.

     

    I always find analysis fascinating if only because you can always seemingly find metrics to support whatever narrative you want to tell.

     

    Oh the Colts are top-10 or Top-5 in sacks.

     

    But the Colts are bottom 10 in pressure rate.

     

    But then the Colts are top-10 as a team in PFF pass rush grade

     

    And the Colts finished top-5 in Pass rush win rate. (https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/38356170/2023-nfl-pass-rush-run-stop-blocking-win-rate-rankings-top-players-teams#teams)

    At the end of the day, I am all for looking for what is deemed an upgrade. Hell, I was speculative of Sparano Jr when hired and he turned the same OL group we had into a much better group.

     

    So I am hopeful. Especially with some of the talent on that DL that should keep ascending. 

     

    But I am admittedly not certain that Todd Wash is that guy. And for all intents and purposes he will likely at least be the first person linked to the opening. 

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  3. I definitely found this a bit odd.

     

    Earlier this offseason Zach Hicks hinted that the Colts might make a move to bring in more of a vet presence at DL coach.

     

    Cited names like Todd Wash and Brentson Buckner.

     

    Still a bit surprising since the Colts have been a top-10 sack unit under Ollie's guidance the last two years and finished w the Indy team sack record this past year finishing top-5 in the NFL.

     

    I wonder what they are looking to do differently or what direction they are heading in as a result here.

     

    Will be curious to hear more in the future. 

     

     

    • Like 1
  4. I found this graphic both fascinating and super informative in terms of how we are doing in the trenches.

     

    Takes both PFF grade and ESPN win-rate into account. (clink twitter link to see it bigger. The small image is just a preview and doesn't do it justice)

     

    Bottom line:

     

    Colts are above average in pass protection and pass rush (wow!, for once) and are straight up elite in run blocking and run D.

     

    Very telling that on the run blocking and run D front, the Colts and Eagles are almost a direct overlay on each other. 

     

    Steichen's staff and schemes are somehow not getting enough credit, despite the kudos they are already getting. They are basically taking the same offensive line and almost the same defensive front and making them worlds better than last year. It may only be two games, but so far this team's future looks echelons brighter than it has in a long time. 

     

     

     

    F6aS5dAXMAAObsP.jpg

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
  5. 5 hours ago, Solid84 said:

    Smith wasn’t “credited” with at least one sack he let through, possibly two. I believe pff made a boo boo. 

    Smith was having a go of it but i will say this.....he was often times matching up w Allen, who was an absolute game wrecker yesterday. Allen ended up w a top-10 Edge grade for the week at 86.9. So Smith had his hands full and had to also deal w the least reliable and least effective member of our line playing beside him too. 

     

    I will also say this, on at least one of the sacks he "allowed" he did a great job of running the defender (Walker) off and past where Richardson was set up. AR should have been able to step up and dump it off.  Instead the defender looped around to complete the sack. Braden did his job and it still resulted in a sack. That is probably the type of play PFF doesn't ding him for. 

     

    The potential is high for this unit if they can just settle RG. But I am not very hopeful about that since we have known that all off-season and have not seen moves made.

     

    Maybe Sills can be an answer, but I am not sure. 

     

    And there is a complete and total void of quality OL play across the league. So many teams are hurting for OL talent, so there is not much just hanging out there to solve issues sadly. 


    Note: this is the video of the Walker sack on Braden.

     

     

    https://www.nfl.com/videos/travon-walker-flies-past-braden-smith-to-sack-richardson

     

    No way this is on Braden. The ball is snapped from the 19. He runs Walker past the QB back at the 8 yard line back 11 yards behind the line of scrimmage. At that point (6 second mark) Richardson steps up and has a WIDE OPEN RB in the flat to his left with no defender within 15 yards. He also has another WIDE OPEN receiver across the middle at the 24 with no defender within at least 8 yards. You do not get more wide open for either dump off. And yet he took a sack there. That is stuff that will be cleaned up in time. 

    • Like 3
  6. For all of those saying the Colts "low-balled" Hunt  or whatever other narrative you want to play out in your mind, it was reported that basically the Colts' offer was already better than the Saints' offer. We knew that when they called to get him up here during his Saints' visit.

     

    That said, one of the Saints' beat writers confirmed it. Basically, the Saints and Colts offers were similar but sounds like the Colts had more guaranteed money and didn't backload it like the Sants did. 

     

    Definitely seems like Hunt visited, got our offer and now is basically wanting to take other visits to other interested teams and shop our offer around to see if he can beat it.

     

    It is what it is. These vets that are unsigned will start signing soon since camps and off-season activities are mostly over as pre-season games kick off and prep for the season in truly here now. 

     

    So we will see where people land in short order.

     

     

     

    • Like 3
  7. 1 hour ago, Fluke_33 said:

    Taylor in April was asked about his contract and said he signed the paper and would honor it and that the next contract would work itself out when it was time .  He wasn’t worried.    (This is discussed on the podcast by mike Lombardi)
     

    what happened between April and now?  I assume the new agent came in after he said those things  

     

    I think it is just posturing.  I think he plays out this year for the colts.  

     

    I think the agent switch is one thing but the bigger thing was the RB conference call that was had.

     

    Back in April, guys like Saquon, Jacobs and Pollard were all franchise tagged. There was still some hope that they would get their big long-term contracts before the July 17th deadline.

    When that deadline came and went and none of them got a deal and they saw the landscape of the RB market, things changed and they had that conference call.

     

    It was basically shortly after that time that most likely the trade request came in and all this drama escalated.

     

    I said it in another post and others touched on it here, but JT is carrying the flag for all RBs it seems in trying to re-set the market and trying to fix a downward RB trend that the league has had coming for awhile. 

     

    And he is getting steamrolled as he tries to do this. 

     

    Just totally unfortunate. 

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 1
  8. 6 hours ago, NFLfan said:

     

    Can there be a compromise?

     

    The Vikings have a player, D. Hunter, who was in the same situation -- he was in camp this month but not practicing. He was under contract for this last year of a long term deal. This weekend, he was given a new one-year contract that works for him and the team. He wanted a long-term deal which the GM was not ready to give. So, to compromise, Hunter was given a deal and will make more money this year. He can sign with any team, including us, next year. If he leaves we get a 3rd round comp pick. It works for player and team.

     

    The Colts are better with JT than without him and definitely without the distraction.

     

    I thought of this as a potential option when stuff first started. But almost no way now.

     

    Hunter was odd too....he was set to make $4.9M and the Vikings gave him $17M with another $3M in incentives AND a no tag clause to report this year. 

     

    Hunter won that big-time. 

    JT has zero leverage here. He could maybe maybe maybe get a Saquon type deal where there's a small sweetener. But no way the colts give up the tag provision and no incentive for them to give him any big money when he has almost no options. 

     

    Just ugly. 

    • Like 1
  9. 1 hour ago, TimetobringDfence! said:

    If he holds out all year he'll never see a nice contract. He'll be lucky if a contender will take him on a lower offer if he is smart enough to sign. LeVeon 2.0

    Agreed w this take in general. But Mainly because I think the NFL has learned from the Le’Veon Bell situation. 
     

    for what it’s worth, Bell sat a year. He had made around $16M for his entire career in five years before sitting a year. Then he got another $27M the next two years he came back from the jets before he was done. And he was never the same player. 
     

    so he got his money in the end but probably could have earned a lot more just staying put and continuing down the path he was on. 
     

    history exists for us to learn from it. That’s literally the entire point of people studying history lol 

     

    JT is taking a page out of the wrong book if he even considers sitting. Not to mention the contract tolling. 
     

    but make no mistake , if he sits everyone loses. His value continues to plummet in any trade. His loses a year of earnings and a better chance at a payday. 
     

    but if he was LeVeon 2.0 he’d likely be content w that $27M he got for two years. Lol

     

     

    i just think like you suggested that he can’t be Le’veon 2.0 because no team is gonna make the jets mistake if he sits. He needs to go the saquon route and just show up and maybe even ask for a little more guaranteed this year. Saquon got like an extra $1M. And yes that’s a tag and not under contract like JT. But man he probably has to either suck it up and play or scrape for any tiny win he can get 

     

    such a sucky situation all around. 

     

    • Like 8
  10. The JT thing is so messed up (just from a common business sense standpoint). He's a legit smart kid. His agent is a clown (lots of old tweets of his are popping up that are baddddddd). 

    Sure, his agent got Leonard his money, but this is just not smart. Do the simple math.

    Current franchise RB tag: $10.1M

    In this current market if you use that number and then factor in a tag at 1.20X and 1.44X it (the going rate for double and triple tagging) then that would be 

    2023: $4.3M (last yr of rookie deal)
    2024: $10.1M
    2025: $12.1M
    2026: $17.4M

    4/$44M

    Even with high estimates of next year's RB tag possibly rising to the $13M range due to the taggings of guys this year that would be:

    2023: $4.3M
    2024: $13.0M
    2025: $15.7M
    2026: $22.6M

    $4/$56M

     

    So the absolute most you could reasonably expect is a 3 year extension at around $40M-$52M and that is like max max max.

     

    Which the Colts would never do because you can simply tag him yearly and pay the same figures with little to no risk. No dead cap. No risk of paying an injured player and seeing him not re-live his previous elite level (like we have seen a bit Q and Leonard).

    The truth is JT is probably a great comp to Nick Chubb. Similar skills and value. Chubb got 3 years and $36M at the peak of the RB market that has since tanked.

    If JT got a 3 yr extension for $36M  that would be like being tagged 3 yrs in a row at today's rate. And probably more than fair. 

    He clearly wants more. The Colts won't pay more. Smart.

    In the end, if JT does what Le'veon did he will regret it.

    More likely he eventually honors the deal and plays and tries to ball out or he signs a slightly enhanced deal like Ekeler and Barkley did to just play this year like he should.

    The reality is if he were smart he would have kept quiet, balled out and then hoped that Pittman did the same. Colts would only be able to tag one of them. Instead this just got super ugly. 

     

    • Like 9
  11. Ill do my best to roll w whatever works for the league.

     

    Time-wise, anything in the range of 6pm-8pm ET is tough for me since that is dinner and putting to bed time for my 5 and 1 year old. 

     

    So even a shift to 8pm ET or 9pm ET on any day will work for me. Considering our draft typically took around an hour or so I would hope that wouldn't put us on too late.

     

    Otherwise i would have to vote for something midday like the 20th and 26th listed. 

     

    But I recognize i am just one of many. 

    • Like 1
  12. 18 minutes ago, Dingus McGirt said:

    Not a “tough break” in any fashion.

    Not disagreeing with your sentiment. Since i clearly stated it's hard to feel bad for him after what he did right after i said that. 

     

    That being said i meant "tough break" in the literal definition of the idiom. As in "An adverse circumstance resulting in misfortune or hardships". 

     

    I totally get if you are focusing on the "bad luck" type of aspect of it then there isn't any tough break in any fashion. 

     

    That was not my intent w the statement. Clearly, luck had nothing to do with this. It was all stupidity and defiance as it appears currently. 

     

    Just clearing up that I am in no way, shape or form justifying or saying "poor Rodgers" in this case. This is his own doing and he deserves whatever punishment he gets. 

     

    • Like 2
  13. 2 hours ago, w87r said:

    I'm thinking he loses a vesting year, and his contract would pick up where it left off.

     

     

    Haven't found the verbiage yet, but if Franchise tagged players don't report by a certain date they lose that year of service, so would think the same would apply in this instance 

     

    https://nflpa.com/active-players/faq/what-is-a-credited-season-and-what-does-it-mean-to-be-vested

     

    Not specifically listed here, but says you need to be active for 3 games, or on IR, PUP etc.

     

    I am assuming the closest precedence we have to this for reference is Ridley's situation.

     

    When Ridley had his suspension, he was heading into the final year of his rookie deal as well (although for him it was his 5th year option. But still similar).

     

    In Ridley's case, he did not get paid for that 2022 season and the contract deferred so that his final season was then upon reinstatement (which is now this coming 2023 season). 

     

    So, my guess would be that once the league rules on if he is suspended and for how long, that contract of his will defer until he is reinstated (when or if that is) and the Colts would hold his rights for that final coming year whenever it is.

     

    That being said, his $2.743M remaining year on his contract only has like $36K in dead money if he is cut. So, the Colts could feasibly cut him at any time during this process and just handle that tiny cap acceleration now and be done with it.

     

    I imagine this will all come down to what the final details are and how significant the league deems the suspension as being worthy of. 

     

    I feel pretty confident it will likely be one of those "indefinite suspensions" with a minimum duration.

     

    Likely more than that minimum 1-year duration that Ridley and some of the Lions' players got recently if all the details and extent of the wagers are accurate.

     

    Really sucks for this kid. He has so much promise and potential and it was his time to shine. 

     

    He made the most of his opportunity when you consider that he is really truly not the prototypical Ballard type of long, lengthy CB.

     

    He just balled out and made plays when he had the chance and was finally getting his true opportunity. Tough break, but hard to really feel bad when he admittedly did stuff that everyone had to know they couldn't do with the league's recent sternness on the issue. Oof. 

    • Like 2
  14. I had a couple that I have to pay homage to:

     

    DJ Khaled- "All I Do is Win"

     

    And then I just had to throw it back to my youth:

     

    Joe Esposito - You're The Best Around

     

     

     

    At the end of the day this is the first time in a long time I thought the Colts killed the draft and arguably had the best draft in the entire league. Top-5 at a minimum in my mind. 

     

     

    Although I badly wanted to post a random, out of left field type of song with no explanation just to make people scratch their heads. :-D

     

    Snow-Informer was gonna be my throw-away head scratcher :-) 

     

  15. As others have posted, this is no surprise. Kiper hates hates hates the Colts.

     

    Calvert Hall alum in Bmore. Always hated them for leaving. Also had the tiff with Tobin when Tobin was the GM for the Colts back in the 90s. 

     

    The crazy thing is that heading into day 3, 3 of Kiper's top 4 remaining players were Ringo, Ade Ade, Freeland and Rush.

     

    The Colts walked away with 3 of his top 4 remaining players heading into day 3. And also got Downs at a very big value.
     

    So essentially the only picks Kiper is downgrading on is AR over Levis and Brents.

     

    Kiper did not love the Brents pick because he had other corners rated higher. 

     

    The dumb thing is he still had AR ranked 7th overall compared to Levis at 4. That is not nearly enough to downgrade someone.

     

    And he had Brents as his 10th rated CB. And the guys he had ahead of him that were available when the Colts picked Brent were all taken within 16 picks of Brents other than Ringo. 

     

    So the Colts walked away with Kiper's:

     

    QB- #4

    RB- #19

    WR- #8

    TE- #10

    OT- #7, #17

    DT- #5

    OLB- #22

    CB- #10, #11, #26

    S- #14

     

    I look at that haul and basically say that the Colts came away with a top-20 prospect relative to their position in 10 of their 12 picks by Kiper's rankings with only Titus Leo and Jaylon Jones falling outside that range.

     

    Genuinely almost all over sites gave the Colts an A+, A or A-.

     

    I am usually super harsh on our draft. This is the first year in a long time that i cam out thinking we nailed it. I probably would not give us anything lower than an initial A rating and think we genuinely had a top-5 draft with teams like Pitt, Philly, Az, and maybe one of NYG/TB. Cleveland also had a strong draft for their limited picks.

     

    This was a great weekend. Even if Kiper sees it as a bottom-5 type of grade which is absolutely silly. 

    • Like 1
  16. FWIW I remember reading somewhere where some colts members and players thought a change in coaching was all it would take and that we had some of the right players in-house to recapture former glory

     

     

    im Not sure I personally believe that. But I do think sparano jr worked wonders for Andrew Thomas who went from being called a bust to a top-5 OT under him in NY

     

    so I have higher hopes than most

     

     

    i still would like to add some interior OL guys post draft like most of us would

     

    but we shall see 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...