Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

wesd2890

Member
  • Posts

    589
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by wesd2890

  1. Thats what I say for the interior line in regards to Trent's run game, but nobody wants to admit that. Not comparing Trent to Luck by any means, but that the interior line is killing us! It's just funny how that arguement can be used simultaneously but is only logical to most people in refrence with the Luck statement.

    Hey hey hey!! Stop that.. we all know the o line is the best and doesnt have anything to do with trents struggles, only lucks. :sarcasm:

  2. What's the title?

    Believe it or not its called.. "cardboard" lol.. that was one done in Seattle.. but there was one on 60 minutes a few years back as well. Plus when i lived in d.c it was on the daily news pretty often.. to warn people not give money because of the scamming.. you ever see the footage of the panhandler that was done for the day and he walked down the alley and it shows him pulling out in a porche(not spelled right i know)

  3. But who would that have been?

    Without knowing what i know now.. id say alec ogletree.. had a better 40 and is a little bigger..he played alot of coverage in college but was good at it.. not much of a pass rusher but i personally think its easier to teach pass rushing than it is zone coverages and man assignments, plus the footwork you need to drop on coverage.

  4. You don't start in the NFL for 7 years, including rehabbing from micro fracture surgery and continuing to keep the knee in playing shape, if you are lazy.

    Clowneys played in nfl for 7 years?.. you must of misunderstood or i just entered the twlight zone

    Edit.. i think we both misunderstood eachother.. i apologize

  5. Drafting is always a crapshoot. let's assume that rush LB/DE was our targeted position. Who would have been an alternative?

    I'm not saying that if you know everything you know now, that's not fair. Who would we have taken instead of Werner with the information we had at that time. Datone Jones? He hasn't exactly burned up the league.

    Now, if you think we should have gone for a different position, that's a different story.

    I agree with the position we targeted.. i personally would have taken a player that has played in our prototype type of scheme. Someone that didnt have to be completely retaught the game. Thats all.. but like you said its not fair to say if we knew now what we didnt then.

  6. step into the dark narrow alley near union station & jackson st. all us homeless folks will back there passing around booze bottles & roasting wieners on a trashcan fire

    we'll be celebrating because we always make a KILLING panhandling off the naive tourists that show up for the colts games

    In all seriousness.. panhandlers can make some serious cash.. you ever see the documentary of professional panhandlers.. lmao.. its amazing

  7. He's not lazy. Ludicrous. I'm not sure what you do for a living, but there's no way you outwork a starting NFL athlete.

    You can critique his play, but calling him lazy is, well, just lazy.

    In supermanlucks defense, there were numerous college teammates calling him lazy and poor work ethic. You are right none of us could out work an nfl player.. none of us are 6'6 250 pounds either.

  8. We're in a 4-3 as much or more than we're in a 3-4. I get what you're saying though, he's not a coverage guy.

    Yeah.. hard for a vet to change into a cover guy(ex. Dwight freeney) let alone a fresh rookie lol.. just saying he was a german guy that only played american football in college.. then we draft him and ask him to completely change the little game he did have.. it wasnt a very good 1st round pick IMO considering the other options.. not saying he cant be good now or in future.. but to much development needed for a 1st rounder

  9. It isnt because of twitter wars that he doesnt get votes.. he isnt a highlight reel player.. people dont hear his name or see him make plays.. colts fans are giving mike adams flack for being voted high.. but the reason he is, is because hes a highlight reel type player.. hes tied 2nd with most INTs this year.. plain and simple.. if you dont make the highlights, your not gonna be voted.

  10. how is Dwayne allen on it and not fleener?

    Yeah this is crazy.. kinda proves the popularity theory lol.. i personally think fleener is better than most of the list.. its crazy that its possible that we wont have a defensive pro bowl player.

  11. Browns fans need to chill why is dansby, skrine, hoyer, cundiff, greco, bryant, kruger, lanning, whitner and haden (who has had a terrible year)

    In skrines defense he does have one more INT than davis.. and only one less pass defended.. not saying hes better.. but i do see why people(browns fans) would vote for him.. im interested on where vontae will land on the nfls top 100 list.. itll be interesting to see if he makes it this year.

  12. Peterson? He be on there for the wrong reasons. He gives up more TDs than he defends passes

    @evansilva: Patrick Peterson has allowed a league-high 8 TD passes, per @PFF.

    That pff stat was on Dec 2nd I don't know what he did this past Sunday..And only has 5 passes defensed

    Lol i hear ya.. not saying he deserves it.. just sayin hes more of a house hold name people hear alot.. and the reason is because hes a playmaker.. peterson has only two less INTs than vontae.. and vontae has played 2 years longer.. im not saying hes playing better than vontae this year because obviously hes not but he does get more respect from fans players and coaches.

×
×
  • Create New...