[Please dont overreact]

We cant catch the ball we have no one who can catch , game over 

[get some recievers]

Forget the lineman get some people who can catch the dang football , Rogers is a joke as NFL receiver , I get so tired of guys who cant catch the football geeez   what a poor first half 

[Le’Raven Clark is awful]

11 hours ago, J@son said:

 

Should we have gotten rid of luck? He missed a lot of time the past couple of years

big difference in a torn labrium and a hamstring

[Le’Raven Clark is awful]

3 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

So you have a degree in the medical field or at least are an experienced physical therapist to be able to make such a claim? 

No but if you cant get on the field get rid of em 

[what is it with these hamstring injuries and the Colts ???]

I mean what are we doing wrong? , AC has been out 9 weeks now , TY runs down the field and pulls his , Mack also , I mean I just don't understand , I would bet we have more of em than any team in the league

[Le’Raven Clark is awful]

3 hours ago, Defjamz26 said:

You can guarantee a holding penalty every time he starts. I know people will say Luck was mostly well protected Thursday night but Clark is still a liability. I can’t believe that he’s the one OL that is actually healthy. 4 games he’s started, and already 3 holding penalties. This is going to be a long season until/if Castonzo comes back.

Well Ac he needs to start earning his check , what had it been now 9 weeks for hammy? That in itself is redciulous 

[Tarrell Basham Waived]

I hope we don't have another guy we let go too soon , remember the man that went to Buffalo we gave up on 

[Again I will say, Ballard is not impressing me]

13 minutes ago, threeflight said:

So far I have seen him bungle the QB and coach situation last year, have what is turning out to be a TERRIBLE draft last year, do next to  nothing in FA the last 2 years despite having more money than Soros, and now....this years draft is turning out to be middling at best (drafting a guard that early was pointless for example), and he has completely FAILED at helping Luck with offensive help.  

 

We have a plethora of average RBs, and our Wrs, even with Hilton, are below average.  Due to injuries Luck has Ebron as his # 1 target.

 

Cmon.

 

Either he is totally tanking this year, or he has no idea what he is doing.  Either way....I don't like it.

Give the man time , I see a lot of improvement , you cant do it all in one year, another good draft and some fa and we will be there 

 

[i'm proud of this team....]

10 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

In a hostile environment we fought hard. Now yes there were turnovers and many drops however the future is bright and tonight the colts have shown the nation that a new danger is coming soon so stay tune...

with the cap space we have and one more good draft we will be in the hunt next year . I think Cane will be ok , 

[We can be 4-4 heading into bye]

If we are 4 and 4  we will be in good shape , I really wanted that game last week though

[dumb timeout in ot]

when you have a defense that is tired and you want to go for the win and go 4th and 4  you run the play , that cost us a timeout and gave the defense time to huddle over there , come on Frank you have to be two plays ahead in that spot , you also need to used the no huddle more , we had em on the ropes until you tried getting them to go offsides and then had to call TO  , drives me nuts

[Let’s Look at Positives (Week 3)]

I agree  we are playing better than anyone of the experts said we would 

[This team will be ok after we get ne out of the way]

Yea I am disappointed two games as losses that could have been wins , but as a fan all you can ask for is a shot at the victory and we had a shot at both games we lost . This team is young , very young we must remember that but will only get better as the season goes on and don't forget Luck hasn't played in a while give the man some time 

[Lets discuss the offense]

on the last field goal we made that 3rd down play call to Jordon in the flat was bad, like we were going to just settle for three and also if you look at the throw to Ebron , Erick was wide open

Quote

 

 

[How long is Constanzo going to be out ?]

This guy has been out for months now , I mean how long does it take for a o lineman to heal from this? ,Heck he has only practiced what twice since camp ???    I know hamstring injuries can take a while but how much longer ? 

[is Mack reinjured?]

Thanks 

[is Mack reinjured?]

I didn't see him much in the 4th quarter .please tell me he is ok   

[Not going for 2]

1 minute ago, Btown_Colt said:

Your correct. Sorry I thought you was the OP, which is who I was replying to with my first post, not yours. I agree with you, so not sure why you replied to my post like you did. It’s all good. 

yea ITs all good  I was just saying with the 3 on the first drive we wouldn't have never thought about going for two 

[Not going for 2]

1 minute ago, Btown_Colt said:

Yea, well you were talking about going for two so that we would of played the last drive differently, which isn’t the case. Try to follow along. Yes going for two MIGHT have made it so that we only needed a FG to tie the game, but it would not of changed the last drive that much. You don’t think we would of tried to push the ball down the field and go for the win?

no I said if we would have got 3 on the first drive we would have been down by 1 nt 4 and a filed goal to win would have been all we needed right , so that last pass to Jack would have probably never happened , we were in range and in my opinion would have ran the ball and the clock down for the winning FG   just my opinion

[Not going for 2]

12 minutes ago, coltsorioles said:

I knew it was a mistake when they got up by 12 and did not go for 2.   If they make it at the end you only need a field goal. It's simple mathematics, 3rd quarter you go for 2 in that situation

Is this Indy Oriole ???? 

[Not going for 2]

1 minute ago, Btown_Colt said:

Did we lose by a FG? Then who cares?

 no but that would have changed the way we would have played on the last drive , we were talking about going for two   where I grew up 3 was a higher number than 2 

[Not going for 2]

5 minutes ago, coltsorioles said:

I knew it was a mistake when they got up by 12 and did not go for 2.   If they make it at the end you only need a field goal. It's simple mathematics, 3rd quarter you go for 2 in that situation

If we get three on the first drive we would not have to even think about this 

[can someone explain this rule ???]

Unless I missed this , I though when a pass was deemed uncatchable or overthrown the PI would not going to be  called , has this rule been changed ?  On the Gathers play he had no chance of catching that ball  help me here please

[Luck has got to learn whem to throw the ball away]

I been watching Colts football long before it came to Indy , I know the game , and like I say when you have three points and then end up with nothing it will kill you more times than not 

[Jack freakin Doyle... SMH]

2 hours ago, MB-ColtsFan said:

Agree.  Posts like this make me think they're made out of anger and any assemblanse of logical thinking.  Doyle has proven his toughness.  He has been known to fumble, but to call him soft?  Nope.

we needed a td make the catch and fall down and run the next play , those two * after the catch just take time off the clock