-
Posts
2,845 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Tsarquise
-
-
1 hour ago, pacolts56 said:
They’re ripe for the picking!
Okay, Vanderjagt
-
58 minutes ago, Superman said:
First, judging any unit strictly by yardage is fallacious from the start.
But why do people act like the teams we've played aren't relevant?
This seven game stretch started against the Bills. They were starting a QB that signed 10 days earlier, who hadn't been on a roster since last season.
The stretch includes a game against Bortles, who has now been benched because he's terrible (and we gave up 300 yards and 2 TDs to him). It includes another game against his replacement, who is also terrible. We didn't have to worry about Fournette in the second game, either.
We knocked Mariota out of the game after two quarters, then finished against Blaine Gabbert.
We also played the listless Raiders (without Cooper), and the Dolphins with Tannehill fresh off an extended absence. The defense wasn't particularly good in either of those games.
The defense deserves credit for playing well, especially against bad offenses. I'm not saying they shouldn't be recognized for taking care of business, when they do. And that's different than earlier this season, when the defense got shredded by Sam Darnold, for instance.
But the opposition absolutely matters. We can acknowledge improved play from the defense without pretending the opposition isn't relevant.
You make a pretty valid point.
-
1 hour ago, NorthernBlue said:
If we get into the playoffs I don't really care who we play, since it's been a while. I'd just like to see some January football
That being said, I'd like our chances against Houston either home or away. I think if we somehow steal the south, we'd have a better shot against a Pittsburgh or Baltimore at home, but if we end going to Baltimore or Pittsburgh, I don't think we'd win. KC or LAC I feel is an L.
And NE should be an L too. But if we play them, we're gonna win. Just watch.
Yeah, we have not been to the playoffs since 2014. I truly miss the Colts being there. Truly took it for granted, not any more.
- 1
-
3 hours ago, Superman said:
I think I allowed for the learning curve, the young players, and the new DC. I also mentioned the injuries, which have surely had an impact.
But I personally don't put a lot of stock in yardage rankings, so I can't say what I expected from those rankings coming into the season. I'm fine with the Colts having decent yardage rankings, but I think yardage stats provided a very limited idea of how good a team actually is, in any phase.
And in recent weeks, we've played teams with serious issues at QB: Mariota was playing like trash, then got hurt and set us up against Blaine Gabbert; Tannehill was coming back from injury but still had an efficient game; Kessler completed 75% of his throws against us (good game from the defense, but it seems like anyone can hit 70% on us); Watson was efficient as well, and the defense wasn't exactly stout on that last drive.
The defense being top 15 in total yardage isn't arguable, and it's a positive. But I don't think that it means the defense is good. And when you include a lot of other stats, and consider the opposition, and watch how they perform, I don't see how we can claim this defense is good. Especially against the pass.
They're 11th in DVOA as well.
https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamdef
70 percent completion rate doesn't mean much when you're throwing check downs all game. Not sure if the opposing doing that, but just saying.
-
1 hour ago, pgt_rob said:
I'm thinking this is either going to be a close game similar to the game against the Texans or we get completely blown out and Luck is throwing 55 times. I don't have a great feeling about this one. Hopefully we get the win either way!
There is nothing to suggest we get blown out.
- 2
-
1 hour ago, BlueCollarColts said:
At this point, I think Pittsburgh may be sitting at home come Playoff time. They could easily lose two more games with how they've looked so far.
Yeah, looks like they'll be 8-7-1
-
The Colts giveth, and the Colts taketh away.
- 1
-
Yeah, this is nonsense.
-
Pretty much all of the noteable colts players from the Manning era are better than their current counterparts.
- 4
-
Just now, Nesjan3 said:
Its the fact that we could have gone to OT or won had Frank called for FGs.
That is hindsight; the Colts would have won if Hines breaks the goal line and makes a touchdown.
- 2
-
1 minute ago, #12. said:
Damn, this is Pep-like. Where's the short passing game?
Just get a drive going. Get points.
They have been passing short.
-
I still can't believe Bortles is still.on the bench. Lol
-
15 minutes ago, Chrisaaron1023 said:
Dang... Who scrapped the jags last week?
Wow, the Bills beat them last week.
-
Cody Kessler is worse than Bortes. Why is he starting?
-
I liked the call to go for it, low risk, high reward. That simple.
- 1
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, NewEra said:
Wow, Ramsey's a *. Acts like he's going to help Luck then pulls his hand
Yeah, I noticed that, too. Lol
- 1
-
34 minutes ago, JColts72 said:
99.9 run 1st down. Just like chuck days.
Yeah, was thinking it was very pagano-era-esque .
-
33 minutes ago, needanoline63 said:
Jaguars still have a defense. Those were just bad play calls honestly
Yeah, bad calling. My thoughts, too. Fortunately, we have a good drive going now.
-
What a horrible star on offense. Run, run, pass for interception.
- 1
-
56 minutes ago, Smoke317 said:
I can't believe so many so called Colts fans are on our forum talking about they can see how LVE can be seen as above Leonard as Defensive Rookie of the Year right now. That's ridiculous. Leonard's stats are much better than LVE's. It's almost like you guys are advocating that LVE should get the award and justifying it. It would be a complete robbery. LVE only leads in passes defended (9 to 4) and 1 more interception (2 to 1).
Leonard has him beat in tackles 114 to 102, sacks (6 to 0), Tackles for loss, forced fumbles (4 to 0), fumble recoveries (2 to 0). And here's the kicker: Leonard has missed a game and these stats include last night's game for LVE and Leonard still has to play this Sunday to pad his stats even more. Leonard leads all rookies in tackles, forced fumbles, tied for the lead in recoveries, and is 2nd in sacks.
So as of "right now", the only way LVE gets the DROY award is through politics and politics alone. He doesn't deserve the DROY over Leonard. Nor does Chubb. They've got a lot of work to do over the next 5 weeks to overtake the Maniac. Because as of "right now" he's out front. And only prime time nonsense and politics can take it from him. And I'm stunned that y'all seem ok with that.
Who is LVE?
- 1
-
What a great pick.
-
7 hours ago, Superman said:
We're holding Manning responsible for the entire offense. The 2010 Jets game is an example of why I don't think that works. Manning was 18/26, 225 yards, 1 TD, 108 passer rating. He had a solid game, not spectacular, but good enough to win. The Colts had no run game, the OL was terrible all year, and the Jets were a very good defense. The Colts only scored 16 points, but do we blame Manning for that? I don't think we should.
With the game on the line and down 2 points, the Colts get the ball at their own 20 yard line with 2:36 left in the game. They go 48 yards in eight plays and kick the go-ahead field goal with 57 seconds left. They're giving the ball back to Mark Sanchez's offense. This game should have been won by the Colts, on the road.
Instead, the kickoff team gives up a 47 yard return, then the defense gives up 40 yards in four plays, setting up a 32 yard FG by the Jets to win the game, 17-16. They were also helped by an inexplicable timeout called by the Colts head coach with 29 seconds left, when the Jets appeared to be content to set up for a longer FG, around 50 yards.
No turnovers by the Colts offense, and they delivered a lead with less than a minute left. This should have been a Colts win. Instead, we blame Manning because the offense didn't play better.
I don't really remember anyone blaming Manning for that loss; he had no weapons... I think he had Blair White lol. Should have been a win. Definitely not the offenses fault for that loss.
A lot of losses were due to fumbles or drops.
Also, I'm talking about the offense in general being blamed for losses as opposed to the defense, not Manning vs the rest of the team.
-
38 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:
Browns are no slouch either.
Yeah, I forgot they have already been beaten by them. Ravens are going down lol
-
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:
Ravens still have at KC and at LA Chargers - good luck with that
Yeah, definitely losses. ATL, I feel, will probably beat them, too.
- 1
Houston (-6.5) at NY Jets (12-15-18)
in NFL General
Posted
I can't believe we lost to the Jets.