Bubba_Rebel
-
Posts
129 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Bubba_Rebel
-
-
Just now, PrincetonTiger said:
Lets not
-
So let's offer them Brissett and a 3 for Mack!!!!
-
2 hours ago, Coffeedrinker said:
Didn't Peyton do an RPO offense for years? The difference is he made his decision presnap instead of after the snap.
Tom Moore gave Peyton a Run to the right, Run to the left or Pass play. Peyton chose it at the line
-
1 hour ago, Flash7 said:
Also, this is a rebuild, so it’ll take more than this draft to address every need.
We should have gotten 17 picks..what's Ballard thinking?
-
People that understand winning football and how important depth and quality line play is love this draft... The other people don't.
-
3
-
-
Some of y'all should sue your brain for non support...the contract is ridiculously high...is he even a top 5 center in football? I would probably not have him in the top 10.. and he is now the highest paid...
-
1
-
-
10 hours ago, jshipp23 said:
I think Quincy will THRIVE in that defense, he is tailor made for it, and Hairston as well...
There is a reason they were drafted last year...the move to 4-3 has been in works the minute Ballard agreed to be GM
-
I rather have someone who at least calls plays...
-
3 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:
If one of the assistants hired by the Colts can say he talked with McDaniels and was given the impression that McDaniels was taking the Colts job then yes there could be something. Verbal agreements do mean something when they can be proved.
Put him on stand and also I'm willing to bet that there could have been a agreement between McDaniels and Ballard a while back due to having same agent... Kraft caught wind and orchastrated this to hurt Indy..knowing McDaniels wasn't going to leave...
-
1 minute ago, JimJaime said:
No it isn't. Yours was awful. The Colts hired people work with McDaniels like my example. Yours was random expenses that the Colts didn't do.
Signing people to contracts isn't an expense? They were doing this awaiting the arrival of the HC. Just as my family would be there awaiting my arrival
-
1 minute ago, JimJaime said:
Your example makes no sense. A better example be they hired people who I would work with who I recommended and they hired. Guess what.. only an * hired the supporting cast before they have the main man on board UNLESS they really wanted them.
No it's a good example based on an agreement being made enough to make a financial decision on other parties and AGAIN we could not sign McFraud until after super bowl.and we signed people based on his list that we could to take them off market
-
Just now, JimJaime said:
Liar-- Colts told McDaniels that Luck will be good to go.. if it comes out he isn't the COLTS By your strict definition are liars. Now who knows maybe they honestly thought he would be but he ended up not being . But your def they are liars. Thank you for playing.
Where did they lie about Luck or is that just made up?
-
17 minutes ago, JimJaime said:
Maybe I should use an example to show my point: say you got a job offer paying you more and a promotion and you give your notice but have not signed the offer letter yet. The owner of your company comes to you and offers you more money and you decide to stay. You call your potential future employer tell them you changed your mind and stay with your current employer. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED HERE. People are allowed to change their mind.
Now does this make him able HC any other team but NE? God I doubt he ever gets a sniff again but it isn't fraud.
Well to use your example... The new employer pays off my mortgage and moves my family to another home and enrolls my kids into private school based on my agreement with him.. then I say, sorry not coming..I never agreed right *wink wink*
-
2 minutes ago, JimJaime said:
Under the impression is not legally binding. It is also only fraud if you can PROVE he knowingly had no intention of tKing the job. You can not prove that.
Well I'm not a employee of the Colts..I bet they could
-
I never said anything about getting picks.. I think they should sue his pants off for fraud and bankrupt him and go after Patriots if they were in on fraud as conspirators. Sorry sunshine try again
-
Just now, eseae said:
Lol.... Yep, that's just what they should do.
They have no recourse. Period.
Sure they do... If they were under the i.pression based on multiple contacts verbally and possible writing about his desire to service as coach. Provided names for assistant coaches, we hire said coaches and now he backs out..it's fraud period and we should make him an example
-
Find a post that said anything about you knowing he would back out..
-
1 minute ago, DougDew said:
If the Colts had a verbal contract with Josh, they can go after Josh.....but Josh ain't got no draft picks.
If NE meddled at the last minute, then possibly. But Josh is saying he returned with no promises made by NE.
I would bankrupt him and go after the Patriots if they offer to pay for him for conspiracy to commit fraud
-
1 hour ago, JimJaime said:
Wow! The Pats retained their OC he was not hired as a head coach. The colts should and won't get a damn thing. Was what he did wrong? Yup is it the Pats fault? Nope he made a last minute decision NOT ago take the job, BB had already been HC for the Jets for a whole day.. thus the 1st round pick.. and the best use of a first rounde in pats history.
Now ow I do believe McDaniels was promised the HC JOB WHEN BB retires but that's speculation at best. What I see happening is BB retires as coach but remains president of player operations... like Coughlin.
You have to understand that the Colts signed other assistants based on their agreement AND he hasn't even call them to tell this info and are just as shocked...he had a voided verbal contract and the Colts can go after him or his current team if they were mislead. It's fraud
-
1 hour ago, GusFring said:
Did they really sign the DC before McDaniels? If so, Ballard looks horrible right now.
McDaniels couldn't get signed before Monday.. he gave us a list and we signed the people he wanted... He was calling other assistants today...Ballard is fine and did all he could
-
Think about the staff.alreasy signed that a new HC has to work with...I think it would be Toub..he's the only one that could step in and try and salvage this with same staff being a new HC
-
-
I like this person's thoughts
-
4 hours ago, BProland85 said:
Mcdaniels could then eventually transition playcalling duties to Defillipo and take the Bellichick route of overseeing game flow and having input on both the O and D.
Why would we want that? McDaniels is, arguably, the top OC in the game
Mindset: Why it cost us
in Colts Football
Posted
I'm sorry.. I never post here..but this is a load of bunk. You must have missed the stories said of Luck at half time the other game yelling at the team and them coming out and back.. I believe against Tenn. Luck is statistically a better QB and a playoff QB at this point in their careers. It took Peyton 6 or so years to win a playoff game... Luck won his 4th last week. Peyton was good and is the best ever. But, you forget how bad he played in the playoffs and a fan will rememeber the stat line Luck had today,.on his worse day, was better than Manning's worse day during playoff time