Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Shane Bond

Senior Member
  • Posts

    4,024
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Shane Bond

  1. 17 hours ago, BOTT said:

    Pete had to sell his soul to the devil.  Seahawks have been very lucky in the playoffs the last couple yrs.

    So when they win, they are lucky.

    17 hours ago, BOTT said:

    I wouldn't call that bad luck.  Poor play calling and a poor decision to throw it.

    When they lose, its poor decision.

     

    Extremely accurate analysis, yet again !

  2. 46 minutes ago, ViriLudant said:

    Question:. How will the Chiefs score 28+ without Maclin?  

     

    I honestly do not see the Chiefs scoring much.  Hightower will be back, the Patriots' secondary will be completely happy, as will Chandler Jones.

    20 will be enough

  3. 19 minutes ago, SkyBane said:

    You can't compare a QB 0-6 in 7 years to 0-7 in 13 years for a head coach. Even then, Peyton still catches flak nationally as the king of one and done so idk if that's the correlation you want to be making to defend Mediocre Marvin.

    More towards Andy Dalton when people say he hasn't won and really its about trusting.

     

    If Jerome Hill didn't fumble, they will be taking kneel and win the game. Cant directly blame Marvin for that.

  4. 2 hours ago, chad72 said:

     

    Looking at it objectively, with banged up opponents coming into their place, we could very well see a Peyton vs Brady final chapter. However, Peyton vs Brady has happened only 3 times in the playoffs, thanks to the 9 one-and-dones on Peyton's side mainly :), and only once when they were #1 and #2 (2013). We will see if it happens as predicted.

    Chiefs are the threat for Broncos this year.

     

    That pass rush with deep secondary is lethal. Pats will be lucky to win that game.

  5. 9 hours ago, dgambill said:

    I love Peyton...love him...and Tom is unbelievable...best post season qb of all time and on that MT Rushmore of QBs...but someday they won't be playing anymore...and I wonder what we will all talk about lol.

    Don't worry.

     

    The Brady crap will happen in this forum even after they are dead.

  6. 13 hours ago, buffalo34 said:

    After the Steelers/Bengals game last night, the local news here came on. It was apparently huge news that Tom Brady took a picture of himself watching the games.

     

    Let me simplify the story for you: Football player watches football games. I'm shocked I tell you, I am in complete utter shock that he would ever think of doing that! What's next, we see a picture of Brady sleeping at 3AM because that's what he does overnight?

     

    Please Chiefs, put up another 2014 MNF performance against these guys so I don't need to listen to this crap until at least September. Although, the Patriots' performance in the final month or so has helped a bit.

    Do you live in Boston?

  7. 4 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

    Good weather....Kc's defense is stout..I'd say 27.       27-17

    KC is so conservative and they will be moreso without Maclin.  NE has multiple injuries but not so much defensively.  The evil 'Dollar Bill' will lock down the Chiefs shorthanded offense.

    You know I'm not an NE fan.....but this isn't a 3-point game

     

    I don't know how NE will score 27 with that KC defense. Time will tell.

  8. Just now, oldunclemark said:

    I just asked you what you thought about KC and NE. I told you what I thought. I think NE is 10 points better and the 11-game KC win streak does not impress me that much because of who they beat.

    You seem upset but remember  its a message board. You can say what you want and deny it later.

    Or you can say nothing. We're here for you, Shane.

     

    Meanwhile..NE by 10..get you bet down

     

    I am now realizing message board doesn't monitor if posters take medication.

     

    All I am saying is your original post claiming I said something earlier is wrong. Prove it. But no, you have nothing to prove nor admit it and continue to type your non sense.

     

    To the topic, I believe KC has a good chance to beat NE.

  9. 12 hours ago, oldunclemark said:

    Shane..YOU don't even believe KC will win at NE without Maclijn.

    You said so earlier today.remember???

    Do you remember what you write?

     

    Reply to this post. when I did I say earlier?. Show me that post. Stop dancing around this.

     

    Show me the post where you think I said I don't believe KC will not win without Maclin.

  10. 8 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

    Cincy vs. NE....that's hwat we were talking about when you dropped by...

    chime in with an opinion whenever...and later, you can deny you said it.

    That's the fun of a message board

    I have asked you 3 times to show me the post where I said KC will have no chance with NE. You are yet to show it. Get your medication and comeback. Stop typing garbage here.

     

     

  11. Just now, oldunclemark said:

         Nobody says Dude. 

    Back to the point. What are you saying about NE and KC?   That's what I was discussing when you joined in

    You can say what you want.

    Don't be afraid

     

    Tell me when you are back to your sense and know who are talking, we can discuss.

  12. 18 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

     

    Whether you WANT it called or not does not matter. The rules are the rules. A penalty should have been called on the hit on Bernard, as he was hit with the crown of his helmet. That is against the rules whether we like the rules or not.

     

    Also, a penalty should have been called on Porter for going onto the field and yelling at opposing players.

     

     

    Yes, preventing hits to the head is top priority. That is why a flag should have been called on that hit on Bernard. You're contradicting yourself a bit. Don't give me that Bernard was a runner... if protecting players' heads is top priority, as you wrote, then that should have been a flag. ColtsBlueFL explained it well.

    He is quoting me for someone else's posts lol

     

    Dude is losing it. Don't bother rationalizing with him and waste your time.

  13. Just now, oldunclemark said:

    I think you're denying what you said.

    But that's okay. Its a message board

    What am I denying?. You really have lost it.

     

    Go back to your original post quoting me. You said, I have posted earlier that KC has no chance.

     

    Show me where I posted that?.  Show me and stop rambling your non sense.

  14. 2 hours ago, oldunclemark said:

    Well, you now say that KC which won, has a better chance to beat NE than Pittsburgh, who lost.

    That's obviously true...You said a lot there.

    Huh you seem to be lost.

     

    You originally claimed that I posted about KC having no chance against NE which I never did. Show me that post?. You misunderstood me for someone else and you are having a hard time admit it and started rambling. I understand how annoying and baseless you can get with how some non-peyton fans view you.

  15. 5 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

    Clearly....

    New England will beat KC by 10...'Shady' Tom Brady vs. the master of the 3-yard pass Alex Smith

    ..in New England..Pats have 2 weeks rest

    NE is a significantly better team than KC on offense..

     

    ....just remember who told you

     

     

    I always remember, I hope you do and not get confused with posters :)

  16. Just now, oldunclemark said:

    KC has the best chance of the 2 wild card teams ....but you don't think they WILL win do you?

     That's 10-point win for NE at home

    I am not Las Vegas calling games.

     

    I am telling you, KC has the best chance to beat NE. On any given day, anything can happen.

     

    What makes you think favoring NE so much?. Can you quantify something other than your Nostradamous one liners.

×
×
  • Create New...