BigQungus

Yes I'm sad, but at the same time, Caroline Cann is the perfect name for a reporter of the Carolina Panthers who has Cam Newton for a QB

It's a Grand Canyon sized leap to call this a holdout.

McCoy. I'm not convinced at all of Suh's scheme fit, and I also think he could go overpriced very easily. That right there is enough to not sign him and notice I didn't even mention culture or whatever. The problem is that we don't really have room for 2 more interior d linemen

Well even if you don't factor in the character concerns, the signing still doesn't make too much sense

What makes you think there's a good chance we sign him? Just because some posters and media are drawing the connection, doesn't mean it's actually there

I agree that we shouldn't sign Such, but your logic is faulty. There are other circumstances for why a team doesn't bring a player back. And anyways, I don't judge necessarily how good I think a player is based on other teams' evaluation of said player.

The national media isn't sold on Luck as a "generational" QB, but if he plays like how I know he can, then without a doubt he will be nationally regarded as a generational QB He was predicting 2 Super Bowl appearances and 1 Super Bowl win for Luck, which I think is realistic

I chose exactly what you chose

I agree with you for the most part, but he looked really good last year when he wasn't injured

He'll have to block at some point. Maybe our WR corp is hit with injuries. Maybe he's a decoy. Maybe T.Y. catches a slant and Campbell is upfield so he has to block a DB while T.Y. takes it to the house.

How many SB calibre teams have we faced last year? We faced the Chiefs. We faced the Patriots when almost half of our starters were injured. Then who?

Well I still think that the trade wasn't worth it, but whatever. I do agree that we shouldn't say things with certainty before the season actually starts, but I get why people are highly skeptical of Jones.

Relative to most box safeties, Willis actually has pretty good coverage skills. And his athleticism isn't bad at all, so I'm not sure where you got that...

And was it worth it? Anyways, I'm not sure, and maybe I'm wrong, but I'm not sure that's what he's saying in the first place. He said "The stories have not been completely written yet, but two years in, the Bears look a lot smarter with Trubisky than the Niners with Thomas (who might not make it to Year 3, per some reports)." To me, that sounds like he's saying the Bears are looking like they're winning the trade because they drafted Trubisky instead of Solomon Thomas