jonjon
-
Posts
959 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by jonjon
-
-
We can find backup RBs all over the place. Hines is showing his skills as a return man that our brilliant coaches didn't take enough advantage of. For that matter if they had a clue how to use him as a RB he would have done better as well.
- 1
-
: facepalm :
-
I'm positive we suck.
- 2
-
Taylor only has 10 carries because.......
-
lol - the rants and scapegoating are in full swing
-
So does Ryan suck because of a bad OL or does he just suck?
-
5 hours ago, CoachLite said:
Don't you wonder why it doesn't seem to be working?
I wonder more why coaches continue to keep trying it when it's clear it isn't working.
-
PS to those of us clamoring for Taylor to get the ball a lot more...well he did. How'd that work out? Maybe that's not necessarily the answer every time. I'm all for giving him the carries, but if it's not working...
-
1 hour ago, Gramz said:
Full disclosure....I thought we'd get clobbered.
So glad I was wrong.
Same. tbh I would have settled for losing if we were competitive. Never expected this! Didn't see the game but sounds like our D really stepped up while our O although clutch in the end, is still weak, and our OL still blows.
-
Nice recap, esp the last (#5) paragraph. Summed it up well. This is what's so frustrating...Ballard thinks he has about all the horses he needs and doesn't need more quality FAs. That's delusional.
https://www.nfl.com/news/matt-ryan-to-indianapolis-five-biggest-takeaways-from-colts-falcons-trade
- 1
-
Highly unlikely Strong lasts to our 3d round pick.
-
1 hour ago, ColtJax said:
My issue with Ballard is, he seems to always be discount shopping.
Exactly. Ballard acts like he's managing a 401K. Again I'm not suggesting he go crazy and put us in cap hell, but he goes too far the other way. God forbid he "overpay" for someone (in his mind), even if it's a huge upgrade and desperately needed. He'd rather stick with guys who have been backups and bit players for a reason. If you're going to do that, why even bother with Ryan? It just doesn't make sense. And there were guys who could have really upgraded us that didn't cost a ton. Schuster is making what $3-4M a year? He would have been a nice addition. etc.
Anyway, we will see. A lot of good comments here even though I don't agree with all of them. I wonder if Harrison is still in good shape. ;-)
- 1
-
4 hours ago, John Hammonds said:
Colts Fans: If Ballard doesn't address the pass rush, I'm gonna lose it!
Ballard trades for Ngakue
Colts Fans: If Ballard doesn't address the quarterback, I'm gonna lose it!
Ballard acquires Ryan
Colts Fans: If Ballard doesn't add a wide receiver, I'm gonna lose it!
Let the man work. We can complain about the team he's built after he's built it.
Where's the fun in that ;-)
I never complained about the pass rush or the QB situation. In fact, while I thought it was a highly risky if not flat out dumb move going in, I applauded cutting his losses with Wentz this year and would have been fine taking our lumps this year with Sam E or whoever and aiming for the QB of the future next year.
But as I've said before, acquiring Ryan now - a talented but aging QB - shifts us from a potential rebuild to win-now mode. That means surrounding top talent like Ryan and Taylor with as much supporting cast as you can. Ballard doesn't appear to be even trying to do that. He seems convinced he has all the talent he needs on offense, which is laughable. We are IMO as we stand now a borderline wild card-level team, but not SB caliber. We can address some needs in the draft, but drafting 2d-tier (or less) WRs or OL doesn't bode well to get us to the next level.
- 4
-
5 minutes ago, Stephen said:
Hope we can get Dotson at wr that guy is a monster
I doubt we'll get any of those top tier guys, but we can hope. WR crop is deep. If not, maybe one of the top-rated TEs and do a lot of 2 TE sets.
-
21 hours ago, shasta519 said:
Wentz for an older Matt Ryan, who hasn’t really been a better QB than Wentz the past few years
You can't be serious? Ryan has played well despite diddly poo to work with. Their WRs look worse than ours. He's lost Jones, Ridley, all he really has is PItts. Worthless RBs and not exactly an elite OL.
I think the Ryan move was great, and lucky for us. But Ballard doesn't appear to be making ANY effort to upgrade in key places like WR, OL, TE (I could go on). Getting Ryan is a "win now" move but he isn't acting like it.
He's made some great moves of us while he's been here but also some serious whiffs. I'm seriously questioning if we still should have him as GM.
- 5
- 1
Ballard FA Grievances Thread (Merge)
in Colts Football
Posted
Really? How many kickoff returns for TDs has Moss had?
Hines was laughably misused here. His contract was a SNAFU, I get that, but I'd rather him over Moss easily. To each their own.