To all the users saying no, saying that this is a terrible idea, etc.
Are you the same posters that are crying and complaining that we didn't select a guy like Collins or Goldman or some defensive guy over Phillip Dorsett?
Picks now are worth more then picks later. I think most people would agree with that. If we trade our pick for high-second (a guy "worth" a hypothetical first-round pick) then I don't see how it makes a difference long term.
1 "First Round guy" in 2015 and 1 "First Round guy" in 2016 = 2 first round picks.
2 "First Round guys" in 2015 and 0 "First Round guys" in 2016 = 2 first round picks.
It's the same difference.
Unless you are suggesting that the defenders available at the top of round 2 are NOT guys with first round grades. In that case, why are we still criticizing Grigson and the guys for passing on them for a WR with a clear first round grade on their board?
Would you be okay with trading our 2016 first pick to move to top of the 2nd?
in Colts Football
Posted
This is exactly right!