-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
OK, Brady Boy!!! That is what I will call you because if there is a Pro-Brady argument to be made, I see you first in line on this forum. It is all good but we have to keep things objective as well. In a match up of even teams, fielding a complete team that does all the small things in close games in playoffs does matter. That is where the coaching matters, and that has been a big reason Belichick forced teams to play 60 minutes and won so many close games. No doubt, you need an elite QB to win at the highest level. However, let us not diminish Belichick just because he has 5 key starters opt out due to Covid and a QB that cannot hit the broad side of a barn accurately and the fact that the talent level on the Patriots has been diminishing due to Belichick being an average GM. Belichick is a great coach but an average GM, IMO, and Brady realized the talent level on his team was not good enough, been deteriorating a while, and bolted. If Belichick had someone like, say, a Nick Foles, his team would be doing much better than they are now. Not AFC best level but definitely better than 2-4. The difference between Brady and Cam Newton is dramatic. -
By RollerColt · Posted
The Indianapolis Colts: Lose to the Jags, who have lost to everyone else. Beat the Bears, who have defeated everyone. The Bears beat the Buccaneers and Tom Brady, who destroyed Aaron Rogers and the Packers and the Raiders. The Raiders smoked the Chiefs. Nothing makes sense in this world. -
By runthepost · Posted
I would take him and hopefully we can get AJ Green too -
-
i would accept an opposing qb getting 170 yards every game, thats not a winning number unless we turn it over
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.