Moore And Mudd?

[WoolMagnet]

I'm surprised thre isn't more discussion on the loss of Moore and Mudd.

Especially Mudd since our OL is young and developing.

IMO, this is bigger than the Session, Hayden,johnson losses.

Look around the league. How many teams have ex-head coaches as their Off and Def coaches behind their head coach.

I'm not exactly sure why, but I just don't have the confidence in our coaching staff (top to bottom) as I do for some of these "dream team" coaching staffs.

Is it just me?

[Coltswarriors]

I hated seeing Mudd on TV coaching the Eagles. :barf:

Moore is with the Jets now, correct?

[PatBeachIsBoss]

Yes he should heip Dirty Sanchez

[WoolMagnet]

Speaking of Sanchez, did anyone notice his rating in the new QBR quarterback rating system?

Average, at best.

[21isSuperman]

Speaking of Sanchez, did anyone notice his rating in the new QBR quarterback rating system?

Average, at best.

That would be because Sanchez has had an average career in terms of personal achievement. He hasn't thrown for over 4000 yards, he hasn't thrown more than 30 touchdowns, his highest QB rating for one season was 75.8, he has thrown more INTs than TDs. Yeah, I understand he only has 2 seasons under his belt, but he hasn't shown great progression. He isn't consistent enough; he will have one great game, then have a terrible game the next week. He has been lucky enough to have a strong defense and a good running game, that's why he has made it to 2 AFC Championship games.

Getting back to the topic, I'm not that concerned. I have a feeling Mudd was somewhat to blame for our poor running game. He preferred smaller, more agile O-linemen compared to bigger, stronger guys. That let our O-line get pushed around by the defense, so there weren't many rushing lanes for our RBs. Manning is pretty much our offensive coach and as long as he is there, I think we will be fine regardless of who leaves. Peyton understands our system perfectly and will be able to adjust our blocking scheme or teach it to the new guys.

[21isSuperman]

Speaking of Sanchez, did anyone notice his rating in the new QBR quarterback rating system?

Average, at best.

That would be because Sanchez has had an average career in terms of personal achievement. He hasn't thrown for over 4000 yards, he hasn't thrown more than 30 touchdowns, his highest QB rating for one season was 75.8, he has thrown more INTs than TDs. Yeah, I understand he only has 2 seasons under his belt, but he hasn't shown great progression. He isn't consistent enough; he will have one great game, then have a terrible game the next week. He has been lucky enough to have a strong defense and a good running game, that's why he has made it to 2 AFC Championship games.

Getting back to the topic, I'm not that concerned. I have a feeling Mudd was somewhat to blame for our poor running game. He preferred smaller, more agile O-linemen compared to bigger, stronger guys. That let our O-line get pushed around by the defense, so there weren't many rushing lanes for our RBs. Manning is pretty much our offensive coach and as long as he is there, I think we will be fine regardless of who leaves. Peyton understands our system perfectly and will be able to adjust our blocking scheme or teach it to the new guys.

[WoolMagnet]

That would be because Sanchez has had an average career in terms of personal achievement. He hasn't thrown for over 4000 yards, he hasn't thrown more than 30 touchdowns, his highest QB rating for one season was 75.8, he has thrown more INTs than TDs. Yeah, I understand he only has 2 seasons under his belt, but he hasn't shown great progression. He isn't consistent enough; he will have one great game, then have a terrible game the next week. He has been lucky enough to have a strong defense and a good running game, that's why he has made it to 2 AFC Championship games.

Getting back to the topic, I'm not that concerned. I have a feeling Mudd was somewhat to blame for our poor running game. He preferred smaller, more agile O-linemen compared to bigger, stronger guys. That let our O-line get pushed around by the defense, so there weren't many rushing lanes for our RBs. Manning is pretty much our offensive coach and as long as he is there, I think we will be fine regardless of who leaves. Peyton understands our system perfectly and will be able to adjust our blocking scheme or teach it to the new guys.

I have no idea how it really worked but.....

I was under the impression Polian brought in the OL and Mudd made diamonds out of coal.

Let's face it, except for Ugoh, we really didn't draft much "top" OL since Glenn really.

Mudd seemd to have 4th rd, 6th rd, and UDFA to work with.

Maybe you're right , maybe his "expertise" was more pass-block.

It's hard to tell, really just how good an OL coach he was here. Peyton had alot to do with the OL looking better than they were perhaps.

I kinda feel teams should "scout" coaches each year the as closely as they do players.

[mightisright]

I'm surprised thre isn't more discussion on the loss of Moore and Mudd.

Especially Mudd since our OL is young and developing.

IMO, this is bigger than the Session, Hayden,johnson losses.

Look around the league. How many teams have ex-head coaches as their Off and Def coaches behind their head coach.

I'm not exactly sure why, but I just don't have the confidence in our coaching staff (top to bottom) as I do for some of these "dream team" coaching staffs.

Is it just me?

IT'S NOT JUST YOU! I want to give them the benefit of the doubt, b/c of the injuries last year, but if they don't do well this year I'm gonna rethink my opinion of the coaching staff. It scares me that Mudd and Moore are now telling those teams exactly how to beat us!

[ReMeDy]

IT'S NOT JUST YOU! I want to give them the benefit of the doubt, b/c of the injuries last year, but if they don't do well this year I'm gonna rethink my opinion of the coaching staff. It scares me that Mudd and Moore are now telling those teams exactly how to beat us!

Well when playoffs come, yea, but this season we don't even play the Jets and Eagles. Personally, if Moore had to join a team, I'm ecstatic he joined the Jets, because they play New England twice a year!

[mightisright]

Well when playoffs come, yea, but this season we don't even play the Jets and Eagles. Personally, if Moore had to join a team, I'm ecstatic he joined the Jets, because they play New England twice a year!

Because they have a better shot at beating the Pats? How does them beating the Pats help us? Other than possibly in standings.

[coltfaninnewyork]

I was dissappointed that mudd retired,and to be back coaching after one year.I think he was missed last year.I would feel a lot better if he was coaching for us.