Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

The Colts could offer him an Assistant HC position. I wouldn't let him touch the offense. But he's got the experience to help guide SS, if needed.

Posted

Bradley has plenty of head coach experience & most fans don’t like him. I think we need something more innovative. Doesn’t have to be a young coach, but we need someone who is willing to change their philosophy as the game changes (unlike Bradley). 
 

The last few weeks he’s looked better. It will be interesting to see if he stays next year or not. I’d prefer he’s gone 

  • Like 4
Posted
21 minutes ago, jemack said:

The Colts could offer him an Assistant HC position. I wouldn't let him touch the offense. But he's got the experience to help guide SS, if needed.

 

Can he make it to the facility without an OWI? 

  • Like 4
Posted
28 minutes ago, AKB said:

Bradley doesn't deserve to be fired. Despite what the narrative of fans is. 

I don't know what the answer is but I do know under Gus we don't blitz near enough (putting the fear into QB's and making them rush their throws) and we give up way too many 3rd and longs. As in 3rd and 8's, 9's, 10's, etc.. Can't win doing that. If you have a team 3rd and 8 or longer, you should hold them 75% of the time.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I don't know what the answer is but I do know under Gus we don't blitz near enough (putting the fear into QB's and making rush their throws) and we give up way too many 3rd and longs. As in 3rd and 8's, 9's, 10's, etc.. Can't win doing that. If you have a team 3rd and 8 or longer, you should hold them 75% of the time.

You can win a lot of games doing that.  Unfortunately the offense has not been doing their part.  So I would say the answer is the offense needs to stay on the field and score some points.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, richard pallo said:

You can win a lot of games doing that.  Unfortunately the offense has not been doing their part.  So I would say the answer is the offense needs to stay on the field and score some points.

Really? So making opposing QB's on 3rd and long's look like Tom Brady every week is a recipe for winning? We have made bad QB's look great. Have you watched the last 2 years? I hate our scheme. We will have to agree to disagree on this one. Our D is way to inconsistent; it can play well for a half like it did last week, then we start giving up huge chunks of yards at times.

  • Like 3
Posted
11 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Really? So making opposing QB's on 3rd and long's look like Tom Brady every week is a recipe for winning? We have made bad QB's look great. Have you watched the last 2 years? I hate our scheme. We will have to agree to disagree on this one. Our D is way to inconsistent; it can play well for a half like it did last week, then we start giving up huge chunks of yards at times.

We can disagree.  The offense hasn’t held up their end of the bargain all year.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, ColtStrong2013 said:

 

Can he make it to the facility without an OWI? 

Sure, Irsay could be his sobriety coach. 😳

  • Like 4
Posted

Not to defend Gus, but you need decent DBs to play aggressive D.  We have one good CB and he’s in the slot, the others are average at best. Our safety’s are maybe average and the LBs aren’t great in coverage.

 

The lack of an inventive D is as much on Ballard as it is on Gus.  

  • Like 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

Not to defend Gus, but you need decent DBs to play aggressive D.  We have one good CB and he’s in the slot, the others are average at best. Our safety’s are maybe average and the LBs aren’t great in coverage.

 

The lack of an inventive D is as much on Ballard as it is on Gus.  

Nothing wrong with putting some perspective on the subject.  I would imagine that they thought Brent’s and Flowers would be the starters.  Both gone.  You do the best you can with the talent you have.  Most of our games are decided by fewer than seven points.  So there’s not much there to be mad about.  They have been improving too so let’s hope they can keep it up.  

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, richard pallo said:

We can disagree.  The offense hasn’t held up their end of the bargain all year.

could it be that we dont have the right kind of talent for the gus system?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Smonroe said:

Not to defend Gus, but you need decent DBs to play aggressive D.  We have one good CB and he’s in the slot, the others are average at best. Our safety’s are maybe average and the LBs aren’t great in coverage.

 

The lack of an inventive D is as much on Ballard as it is on Gus.  

I like jones

  • Like 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, OLD FAN MAN said:

could it be that we dont have the right kind of talent for the gus system?

I would tend to doubt that because he’s been here awhile and Ballard should know what’s required.  Having said that Ballard drives me crazy with his propensity to draft players with a history of injuries.  That’s adding extra risk especially for higher draft picks.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Nothing wrong with putting some perspective on the subject.  I would imagine that they thought Brent’s and Flowers would be the starters.  Both gone.  You do the best you can with the talent you have.  Most of our games are decided by fewer than seven points.  So there’s not much there to be mad about.  They have been improving too so let’s hope they can keep it up.  


So that’s the key point - “you do the best you can with the talent you have”.  
 

Is Gus doing the best with that talent?  As you said, they’ve improved but still gave up the most points the Jets scored this year.  They’ve given up career bests to several players.   The run D is still not very good.  
 

Let’s see how they do against what should be the best offense they’ve seen so far.  

Posted
6 minutes ago, Smonroe said:


So that’s the key point - “you do the best you can with the talent you have”.  
 

Is Gus doing the best with that talent?  As you said, they’ve improved but still gave up the most points the Jets scored this year.  They’ve given up career bests to several players.   The run D is still not very good.  
 

Let’s see how they do against what should be the best offense they’ve seen so far.  

We really don’t know.  There is no way you or I will know if he is doing the best he can with the talent he has.   They see them everyday and see how hard they work and respond to coaching.  They are all talented players just to make it to the league.  How far they go is up to the players, coaches and the talent they have been given.  I would expect the higher talented player to generally outperform the lesser talented player.  That’s how I see it anyway.  

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Hard pass on Del Rio.  I always felt good about him being on the Jaguars sideline when the Colts played them back in the day.  I wouldn’t want him on the Colts staff.  He’s a guy who should have peaked at LB coach. 

  • Like 3
Posted
15 hours ago, jemack said:

The Colts could offer him an Assistant HC position. I wouldn't let him touch the offense. But he's got the experience to help guide SS, if needed.

No

  • Thanks 1
Posted

No matter who the DC is, we will either never be able to stop the run or will always leave wrs wide open. Been this way since ‘84. After all, there is no D in Inianapolis!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 11/23/2024 at 11:27 AM, Colts1324 said:

Bradley has plenty of head coach experience & most fans don’t like him. I think we need something more innovative. Doesn’t have to be a young coach, but we need someone who is willing to change their philosophy as the game changes (unlike Bradley). 
 

The last few weeks he’s looked better. It will be interesting to see if he stays next year or not. I’d prefer he’s gone 

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting a different outcome. This is insane!

Posted

Gus is a safe, experienced, and mediocre DC who perfectly fits the Colts' aspirations.  So I doubt they move on from him.  My own dislike for him goes way back, so I wouldn't have hired him in the first place, but he does fit the Ballard & ownership model.

 

Jack Del Rio still has a lot to learn.  He would be worse than Gus.

Posted
On 11/24/2024 at 12:37 AM, Hawkeyecolt said:

Hard pass on Del Rio.  I always felt good about him being on the Jaguars sideline when the Colts played them back in the day.  I wouldn’t want him on the Colts staff.  He’s a guy who should have peaked at LB coach. 

He was good while coaching the Raiders, but they canned him when Jon Gruden came back and we all know how that has worked out for the franchise - since them the team has moved again, they've had 5 different Head Coaches (2 interim) and the franchise has returned to the laughingstock that it was when they were drafting in the top 5 year after year.

Posted

Speaking of the Raiders they will almost surely fire Antonio Pierce after the season, if he makes it that far.  I think he's got a lot to him in his future as a DC.  He's a very strong motivator on that side of the ball.  Also since he is failing miserably in his first head coach shot under one of the most poorly run organizations in the league, owners won't try to hire him away for a while.  And if and when they do, that hiring will come with a third round compensation pick.

 

So I'd have my eye on Pierce as a DC option for next season.  Criticism on him, which would be fair, is that he hasn't really served in the DC role.  But given his path from LB Coach to being chosen due to his leadership to be interim head coach, and his performance with the defensive production after he took over, I think he is going to be a DC from this point forward.  And yes there is no telling how he'll do.  My projection, however, is that he will be a very good DC for some team.  I'd rather have him in place than someone that I know is mediocre as hell.  

Posted
On 11/23/2024 at 12:17 PM, jemack said:

The Colts could offer him an Assistant HC position. I wouldn't let him touch the offense. But he's got the experience to help guide SS, if needed.

I don't. He's horrible le and past his prime years ago.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Allen had zero receivers to throw too those first years..he didn't just magically get better with accuracy his third year ..he got better cause diggs joined the team..
    • I hope he can last till the Colts pick.
    • The more I consider it, the more concerned I get.  When I look at the first year statistical comparisons that I posted earlier, Mitchell looks a whole lot more like Phillip Dorsett than he does anyone else.   Mitchell - 13 games | 7 starts | 20 catches on 45 targets (44.4%) | 254 yds | 0 TD's | 19.5 yds/game Downs - 17 games | 9 starts | 68 catches on 98 targets (69.4%) | 771 yds | 2 TD's | 45.4 yds/game Pittman - 13 games | 8 starts | 40 catches on 51 targets (65.6%) | 503 yds | 1 TD | 38.7 yds/game Moncrief - 16 games | 2 starts | 32 catches on 49 targets (65.3%) | 444 yds | 3 TD's | 27.8 yds/game Hilton - 15 games | 1 start | 50 catches on 90 targets (55.6%) | 861 yds | 7 TD's | 57.4 yds/game Dorsett - 11 games | 0 starts | 18 catches on 39 targets (46.2%) | 225 yds | 1 TD | 20.5 yds/game Wayne - 13 games | 9 starts | 27 catches on 49 targets (55.1%) | 345 yds | 0 TD's | 26.5 yds/game
    • As we go through our discussions and observations for Richardson, we've mostly used two quarterbacks as comparison:  Josh Allen (for his early inaccuracy, strong arm, and ability to run) and Cam Newton (for his imposing physicality and strong arm). There's one other quarterback that I feel needs to be in the conversation: Justin Fields Through his career in Chicago, he was a phenomenon running the ball.  He ran for over 1100 yards in 2022!  But he had a lot less success throwing the ball.  So much so that the team finally decided to move on from him after only 3 seasons. I'm not saying "Richardson is exactly like Fields".  But I am saying that the comparison has merit, and bears watching.
    • I implore you to go back and watch the tape from his first 2 seasons. His accuracy was woeful.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...