Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, OLD FAN MAN said:

whatever it takes go all out to  trade  draft picks for bowers the next kelse or gronk  a game changer, but ballard wont 

Why would the Raiders give up a gem like Bowers? They need to build on the talent not get rid of it. Their next QB needs to have someone to play catch with! 
 

If the Colts would just prioritize the position for once they could find their own guy in the draft….or maybe, dare I say, sign a free agent?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Hoose said:

Why would the Raiders give up a gem like Bowers? They need to build on the talent not get rid of it. Their next QB needs to have someone to play catch with! 
 

If the Colts would just prioritize the position for once they could find their own guy in the draft….or maybe, dare I say, sign a free agent?

the raiders have to do whatever they can to get a qb, that means they may trade anyone for draft picks for draft capital to move up to draft a qb or trade for one. imo a te is no help if they dont have a qb

Posted

The Raiders have only 2 games left against teams with loosing records.

Jags and Saints.

If they win only 1 more game(probable), it will probably be a top 4 pick in the draft. They have all their picks and future picks plus some additional mid and late round picks.

RIGHT NOW I don't see the neccesarity for them to sell Bowers. 

The teams above them are all qb needy teams,too. So collect picks for what, if nobody in front of you is willing to make a trade, knowing that the Raiders will pick a QB,too?

In that scenario,they may take a shot at Lawrence for a 2nd rounder maybe?(Really don't know what he's worth).

All in all, I can't see them trade Bowers to us nor any other team that can't give them a better draft position through that trade. (Like Jags,Titans, Giants or whoever picks in top 3).

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, ColtsGermany said:

The Raiders have only 2 games left against teams with loosing records.

Jags and Saints.

If they win only 1 more game(probable), it will probably be a top 4 pick in the draft. They have all their picks and future picks plus some additional mid and late round picks.

RIGHT NOW I don't see the neccesarity for them to sell Bowers. 

The teams above them are all qb needy teams,too. So collect picks for what, if nobody in front of you is willing to make a trade, knowing that the Raiders will pick a QB,too?

In that scenario,they may take a shot at Lawrence for a 2nd rounder maybe?(Really don't know what he's worth).

All in all, I can't see them trade Bowers to us nor any other team that can't give them a better draft position through that trade. (Like Jags,Titans, Giants or whoever picks in top 3).

i know maybe wishful thinking because i want us to get bowers or a te like him

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, OLD FAN MAN said:

i know maybe wishful thinking because i want us to get bowers or a te like him

Yeah, I'm with you.

He's hell of a TE and every team would be thankful to have him on the roster.

But maybe we're lucky to find a gem on our own somehow.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The more I consider it, the more concerned I get.  When I look at the first year statistical comparisons that I posted earlier, Mitchell looks a whole lot more like Phillip Dorsett than he does anyone else.   Mitchell - 13 games | 7 starts | 20 catches on 45 targets (44.4%) | 254 yds | 0 TD's | 19.5 yds/game Downs - 17 games | 9 starts | 68 catches on 98 targets (69.4%) | 771 yds | 2 TD's | 45.4 yds/game Pittman - 13 games | 8 starts | 40 catches on 51 targets (65.6%) | 503 yds | 1 TD | 38.7 yds/game Moncrief - 16 games | 2 starts | 32 catches on 49 targets (65.3%) | 444 yds | 3 TD's | 27.8 yds/game Hilton - 15 games | 1 start | 50 catches on 90 targets (55.6%) | 861 yds | 7 TD's | 57.4 yds/game Dorsett - 11 games | 0 starts | 18 catches on 39 targets (46.2%) | 225 yds | 1 TD | 20.5 yds/game Wayne - 13 games | 9 starts | 27 catches on 49 targets (55.1%) | 345 yds | 0 TD's | 26.5 yds/game
    • As we go through our discussions and observations for Richardson, we've mostly used two quarterbacks as comparison:  Josh Allen (for his early inaccuracy, strong arm, and ability to run) and Cam Newton (for his imposing physicality and strong arm). There's one other quarterback that I feel needs to be in the conversation: Justin Fields Through his career in Chicago, he was a phenomenon running the ball.  He ran for over 1100 yards in 2022!  But he had a lot less success throwing the ball.  So much so that the team finally decided to move on from him after only 3 seasons. I'm not saying "Richardson is exactly like Fields".  But I am saying that the comparison has merit, and bears watching.
    • I implore you to go back and watch the tape from his first 2 seasons. His accuracy was woeful.
    • Nice. I’ve heard people say they think he’s a 1st round caliber corner. I hope he goes to the Senior Bowl.
    • Yup. May be a faster version of Brent’s.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...