Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts @ Jaguars  

22 members have voted

  1. 1. With JT out today, how many yards do you expect from the backup running backs?

    • fewer than 50 yards
    • 50 to 100 yards
    • 101 to 140 yards
    • 141 yards or more
  2. 2. How many sacks do you expect from the Colts defense?

  3. 3. Who wins?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 10/06/2024 at 05:15 PM

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

When a QB throws for that many yards, they are usually on the losing side. They have to throw a lot to make a comeback..

lol Lawrence threw for 371

Posted
2 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

we scored 34 points though. 

 

True. I meant that throwing for that many yards usually means that the other team is scoring a lot. (Which was your original point. My bad.)

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, coming on strong said:

Its a good thing in general when a owner is patient .   Now being way to patient is a huge issue , keeping grigson so long ended lucks career .   Ballard should be a head scout not a GM

 

Agreed on all points.   I could never figure out why Grigson, a former O-lineman himself, didn't focus on protecting Andrew.   I think life after Peyton showed us how much he carried the team in a lot of games.  

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, GwinnettColt said:

 

Agreed on all points.   I could never figure out why Grigson, a former O-lineman himself, didn't focus on protecting Andrew.   I think life after Peyton showed us how much he carried the team in a lot of games.  

I dont know why people here seem so scared of replacing ballard .   were under .500 with him its not like he is so great .

  • Like 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, CoachLite said:

Who was the driving force for hiring and keeping Bradley? If it was Mr. Irsay, he should retire. Anyone else should be canned.

 

I'm actually wondering what life will look like for the Colts when Jim retires and leaves it to his daughters.  Jim doesn't seem to care much about football, just antique guitars, collecting obscure items (like the On the Road manuscript).  

Posted
3 minutes ago, coming on strong said:

I dont know why people here seem so scared of replacing ballard .   were under .500 with him its not like he is so great .

 

He seemed pretty prudent at first, in my opinion.  Then Luck left.  I wasn't sure who was actually making the decisions at QB.  I thought we would ride with Jacoby and then try to draft one but we ended up starting a QB carousel.  I didn't know if that was Irsay are Ballard.  If it was Irsay, he really isn't any different from Jerry Jones on that point.  

Posted
4 minutes ago, GwinnettColt said:

 

He seemed pretty prudent at first, in my opinion.  Then Luck left.  I wasn't sure who was actually making the decisions at QB.  I thought we would ride with Jacoby and then try to draft one but we ended up starting a QB carousel.  I didn't know if that was Irsay are Ballard.  If it was Irsay, he really isn't any different from Jerry Jones on that point.  

ballard is way to arrogant   he believed he had a super bowl roster after luck left and could just plug in old QBs .

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

What are they supposed to do with this many injuries. 

Well, we can blame that forever if you want. But at some point, it becomes a problem that just starts to matter less. Every team deals with injuries. It’s an excuse I just don’t care to use anymore 

  • Like 1
  • NFLfan locked and unfeatured this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm  disappointed  in ad rookie year. I had hoped he would have the kind of impact that bowers is having with the raiders or Hilton his rookie year. Ad Mitchell will be better  down the line, but I expected more .
    • Richardson would have those same turnovers too. Not trying to sound like a Richardon hater cuz I really think he is the guy and is our future but lets not pretend like he wasn't the least effective QB in the NFL before the benching. Flacco, with all of his garbage tunrovers, completed over 50% of his passes in both games, something Richardon struggles to do which puts our defense out on the field more.
    • Defense held Detroit to 24. Had the offense  showed up that game we could have challenged  them. Defense played well enough  in bills and vikings game to win, but offense  didn't  do enough. The key is the running game. We need 21 taylor. Gus has to be more aggressive  on defense .
    • I disagree  particularly  the bills game. Richardson  is better at evading  the sack plus flacco single  handily lost us that game with turnovers
    • I disagree. Our defense is not good enough to make noise in the playoffs. The bills vikings game would have been the same with Richardson if not worse. The only reason he improved is because he started working harder after getting scared by the benching. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...