Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Comparing Pittman to other WRs


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, DougDew said:

Just sayin'. when Brown first started playing for Philly there were some things on the field that struck me as him not being the classiest guy, or a Diva with a temper. 

 

That trade was always a head scratcher, so maybe there were behind the scenes issues that the GM saw that made him not eager to hitch TENs wagon to Brown with a pricey contract, that the general fan base didn't understand.  Just looking back at the situation now. 

 

WR 1 receivers seem to be getting traded a lot lately.  Adams, Brown, Diggs, Hill, the list goes on and on.  Teams looking for that missing piece to try and get them to the top.  Brown has never come across as a troublemaker to me.  Crosby is threatening to ask for a trade if Pierce is not their coach.  Does that mean he is a trouble maker and you don’t want him on your team?  Not to me it doesn’t.  He could force a trade as well.  Brown has been paid.  It’s not about money for him.  He is not happy right now just as Crosby is not happy right now.  Different circumstances sure but not a big deal in my mind.  Both elite players worth having on your team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, lester said:

 

It is my opinion, from the outside looking in, that Michael Pittman Jr. is laying deep roots, personally, in the Indy area. He bought a farm with a custom residence within just the last few months. He has been steadily improving the homestead, buying machinery, and adding to his livestock. You don't make that purchase, with that timing, if you're really expecting to move on shortly.

Yep. Seems like Indy might even end up being his home post retirement with everything he is doing. His wife is from Michigan. Her dad has a  farm in Michigan. So Indy would be a nice place to settle and still be close enough to her family.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

I can’t remember which podcast I was listening too yesterday but I think it was one of the media ones. But apparently Pittmans dad had been in around leaving comments on fans instagrams saying Pittman will be back.

I would be shocked if Pittman is not brought back.  Ballard has always signed and rewarded his own players who have performed.  Many thought JT was gone with his contract dispute but here he is. Ballard said in his press conference they are close.  I think he’s coming back.  We just don’t know the contract details yet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/16/2024 at 8:21 AM, lollygagger8 said:

If we had a QB that wore contacts that could actually see the number 14, there would've been more shots down the field when Pierce was wide open. Pittman would in turn benefit from having the safeties clear out. 

 

Pittman is hard as nails. The poor guy hasn't had a legit QB since he came to Indy, so putting those kind of numbers up despite that is impressive. 

 

Pay Pittman, and add another WR that can create separation. 

 

Thank LG for this knowledgeable, common since response. 

 Of the long list of top receivers, Pittman is more like Keenan Allen. But certainly more physical. We need a Reggie sized, very quick and fast guy that can get open quick to complement our passing attack. 

 Given that, Pitts receptions will go down but his ypc and TD's will go up. This season he neared his potential. He is a very good player.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/18/2024 at 10:24 AM, richard pallo said:

I would be shocked if Pittman is not brought back.  Ballard has always signed and rewarded his own players who have performed.  Many thought JT was gone with his contract dispute but here he is. Ballard said in his press conference they are close.  I think he’s coming back.  We just don’t know the contract details yet.

Ballard didn’t really say they are close in terms of a contract he said they would work to keep him which really doesn’t mean much.  
 

I think Pittman is coming back don’t get me wrong but Pittman made it pretty clear his preference is to test the market so I don’t think he’s saying that while being close to a new contract with the Colts.  I do think the Colts will tag him to keep him from getting on the open market and then I think a long term deal will be done.

 

Honestly, I’d bet Pittman is on the back burner right now for Ballard because he knows he can tag him and deal with him later.  He’s probably more busy making decisions on guys like Moore, Grover, Blackmon, Moss, and Minshew who will be true free agents if they don’t get deals done.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

Ballard didn’t really say they are close in terms of a contract he said they would work to keep him which really doesn’t mean much.  
 

I think Pittman is coming back don’t get me wrong but Pittman made it pretty clear his preference is to test the market so I don’t think he’s saying that while being close to a new contract with the Colts.  I do think the Colts will tag him to keep him from getting on the open market and then I think a long term deal will be done.

 

Honestly, I’d bet Pittman is on the back burner right now for Ballard because he knows he can tag him and deal with him later.  He’s probably more busy making decisions on guys like Moore, Grover, Blackmon, Moss, and Minshew who will be true free agents if they don’t get deals done.  

Pittman did say he didn’t want any contract talks going on until after the season was over. So yes they aren’t close because no talks. I am sure they have started talks now though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/15/2024 at 5:15 PM, Solid84 said:

I agree every team needs a guy like him and I'd like to keep him for the right price. I hope we don't go above $20m per year, but I think Ballard will give him near Tag level money.

I think Ballard will have to pay him large. These type of receivers are very hard to come by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

I keep seeing colt fans wanting evens to go with Pittman. I watched today he is the exact same WR as Pittman. He runs the same routes ect.  Some of the deep stuff Pittman will get with a better QB like AR. There is no room for Evan’s and he is not the the kind of WR colt fans have been wanting.

Evans had 2 fewer TDs this season, than Pittman does in his entire career.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

That isn’t my point. I am talking routes ect. Colt fans  want a WR that can take the top off a defense. That is not Evan’s. 

He averages around 15 yards per catch. That would work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

That isn’t my point. I am talking routes ect. Colts want a WR that can take the top off a defense. That is not Evan’s. 

Ok. 

 

Not sure what you're talking about, but carry on. He averages 15.9ypc for his career. Can't believe you watched that game today and came away with that conclusion. Evans almost single handedly brought them back. 

 

 

If presented the option, I am signing Evans to a 2-3 yr deal $20-$22 per season

 

Tag and trading Pittman 

 

 

Hopefully going into the draft with (2) 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evans has been in the league 10 seasons and has 10 1000 yards seasons. NO other WR has done that. Only reason I don't want Evans is he's 30 (turning 31 this year) and that doesn't really align with our window.

 

I also think Evans wants to go to a contender.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, Evans average depth of target is 15.2 this season (15.0 for his career). Pittman is 8.1 this year and 8.6 for his career. I don't get where you get the idea they run the same routes, but they definitely do not.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ShuteAt168 said:

He averages around 15 yards per catch. That would work. 

I watched today. A lot of crossing routes ect. Pittmans yards per catch will go up with a QB that can actually throw farther downfield. Evan the deep one Evan’s got today it wasn’t a ton of separation. A good dime by baker.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

Evans has been in the league 10 seasons and has 10 1000 yards seasons. NO other WR has done that. Only reason I don't want Evans is he's 30 (turning 31 this year) and that doesn't really align with our window.

 

I also think Evans wants to go to a contender.

 

While I agree, Evans would not mind going to a team like the Texans with Stroud to take them from where the Bucs are in the middle of the pack, to where the Chiefs and Bengals are, IMO. That is what scares me most because the Texans - they grabbed Teair Tart off waivers, Derek Barnett off waivers, didn't mind giving up a future 1st for Will Anderson and most certainly have a lot of cap space to go after Evans. If anything, I bet the Texans end up with Evans or Higgins in the FA market.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, chad72 said:

 

While I agree, Evans would not mind going to a team like the Texans with Stroud to take them from where the Bucs are in the middle of the pack, to where the Chiefs and Bengals are, IMO. That is what scares me most because the Texans - they grabbed Teair Tart off waivers, Derek Barnett off waivers, didn't mind giving up a future 1st for Will Anderson and most certainly have a lot of cap space to go after Evans. If anything, I bet the Texans end up with Evans or Higgins in the FA market.

Evans could go to the Texans, because they have Stroud. They KNOW they have their guy and he's ready NOW. I wouldn't be surprised if the Texans are REALLY aggressive this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Texans don’t need a WR1 or WR2.

No, but Evans is better than anything they have and if he's willing to sign for cheap for at chance at a ring within the next 3 years, why not? The Texans will be looking at every opportunity to get better this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

Evans has been in the league 10 seasons and has 10 1000 yards seasons. NO other WR has done that. Only reason I don't want Evans is he's 30 (turning 31 this year) and that doesn't really align with our window.

 

I also think Evans wants to go to a contender.

Evans kinda fits the timeline well, imo. 

 

If he's here for a couple years, and we get compensation for Pittman, we can draft a WR early to replace Evans when time is up. Gives us another weapon in the room, while having extra picks as well.

 

 

He might not be interested? But if I was presented the opportunity, that's probably the route I would look to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Solid84 said:

No, but Evans is better than anything they have and if he's willing to sign for cheap for at chance at a ring within the next 3 years, why not? The Texans will be looking at every opportunity to get better this offseason.

Colds have just a good chance of winning a ring getting Richardson back as Texans. Some of you are way too worried about Texans. Colts are going to be a problem too. Texans couldn’t stop a dual threat QB this weekend. Or stop Richardson when we played them.

1 minute ago, w87r said:

Evans kinda fits the timeline well, imo. 

 

If he's here for a couple years, and we get compensation for Pittman, we can draft a WR early to replace Evans when time is up. Gives us another weapon in the room, while having extra picks as well.

 

 

He might not be interested? But if I was presented the opportunity, that's probably the route I would look to go.

What are toy talking about. You want to get rid of Pittman and Sign Evan’s? that’s not a smart move.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, w87r said:

Evans kinda fits the timeline well, imo. 

 

If he's here for a couple years, and we get compensation for Pittman, we can draft a WR early to replace Evans when time is up. Gives us another weapon in the room, while having extra picks as well.

 

 

He might not be interested? But if I was presented the opportunity, that's probably the route I would look to go.

Evans is hands down better than Pittman, but I just think it's a bad signal to send to the locker room. IF Pittman wants to leave AND Evans would want to play here I could see it. But, I don't think Pittman wants to leave - I just think he's posturing - and I don't think Evans wants to play here. I think he wants a ring. If I was him I'd have my agent call up the Bills right now in fact..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Colds have just a good chance of winning a ring getting Richardson back as Texans. Some of you are way too worried about Texans. Colts are going to be a problem too. Texans couldn’t stop a dual threat QB this weekend. Or stop Richardson when we played them.

What are toy talking about. You want to get rid of Pittman and Sign Evan’s? that’s not a smart move.

Pittman is already halfway out the door.

 

50/50 best he returns as we sit here today, imo. We are in a 6 week holding pattern, until it's official tag time. He isn't agreeing to a long term deal without seeing the market, unless we break the bank. So essentially he is franchise Tagged, right now, imo.

 

 

So yes, if we can get Mike Evans for 2-3 years(maybe more) and a couple picks for Pittman (who potentially wants to head West). I am doing it.

 

It's all a hypothetical.

 

I've said numerous times, that I want Pittman back and would even give him a 5yr $100m deal. Whether that's enough, or too much, doesn't really matter. Just saying that is my preference, but I have my doubts that's what will end up happening at this moment.(him playing here in 24)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, w87r said:

Pittman is already halfway out the door.

 

50/50 best he returns as we sit here today, imo. We are in a 6 week holding pattern, until it's official tag time. He isn't agreeing to a long term deal without seeing the market, unless we break the bank. So essentially he is franchise Tagged, right now, imo.

 

 

So yes, if we can get Mike Evans for 2-3 years(maybe more) and a couple picks for Pittman (who potentially wants to head West). I am doing it.

 

It's all a hypothetical.

 

I've said numerous times, that I want Pittman back and would even give him a 5yr $100m deal. Whether that's enough, or too much, doesn't really matter. Just saying that is my preference, but I have my doubts that's what will end up happening at this moment.(him playing here in 24)

No he isn’t. You seem to be projecting your wishes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For whatever it’s worth….

 

One major advantage that Pitt has over Evans is that he’s 4 years younger.   Evans is 30 now, and will be 31 at the start of next season.  And wide receivers tend to age rapidly, one year you’re very good, and the fall off can be shockingly swift.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Solid84 said:

Evans is hands down better than Pittman, but I just think it's a bad signal to send to the locker room. IF Pittman wants to leave AND Evans would want to play here I could see it. But, I don't think Pittman wants to leave - I just think he's posturing - and I don't think Evans wants to play here. I think he wants a ring. If I was him I'd have my agent call up the Bills right now in fact..

 

I can't really see why Evans would want to play here, given other options that could be available. Re-signing MPJ is the path of least resistance and the one this team will take.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Solid84 said:

Evans is hands down better than Pittman, but I just think it's a bad signal to send to the locker room. IF Pittman wants to leave AND Evans would want to play here I could see it. But, I don't think Pittman wants to leave - I just think he's posturing - and I don't think Evans wants to play here. I think he wants a ring. If I was him I'd have my agent call up the Bills right now in fact..

Evans is building on his Hall of Fame career and I severely doubt he comes here. What makes people think that the Colts are closer to winning it all than the Bucs? Are we forgetting that they just  made the playoffs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, w87r said:

Pittman is already halfway out the door.

 

I do not agree. Not even in the slightest. Pittman is homesteading in Indiana.

 

MPJ doesn't want to go anywhere. Ballard does not want him to go anywhere.

 

Right now, both sides are just peacocking over whatever the final number will be.

Snip20240122_4.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Evans is building on his Hall of Fame career and I severely doubt he comes here. What makes people think that the Colts are closer to winning it all than the Bucs? Are we forgetting that they just  made the playoffs?


Well….  For starters, the Colts beat the Bucs head to head.  
 

And the reason the Bucs are in the playoffs, is that they won the weakest conference in the NFL.   Yes, the NFC South is viewed as much weaker than the AFC South. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, lester said:

 

I do not agree. Not even in the slightest. Pittman is homesteading in Indiana.

 

MPJ doesn't want to go anywhere. Ballard does not want him to go anywhere.

 

Right now, both sides are just peacocking over whatever the final number will be.

Snip20240122_4.jpg

Yeah Pittman actions do not show he is half way  out the door.  Buying the farm and all the animals is not something you do when you are thinking about leaving. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Remember that when someone has an opposing view lol! 


LOL!

 

I’ve never thought of you as anything other than an arm chair QB.   I don’t care about other points of view, I’m totally fine with opposing views.   
 

You get pushback from me and many others because you post what are perceived as poor arguments.   I’ve never called you a troll, but many others have.  
 

All I care about is the quality of the argument.   From time to time, you’ve made good arguments and I’ve said so.   But when you don’t, I try to say so and explain the flaw in the argument.  
 

All I really care about is the quality of the argument.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Remember that when someone has an opposing view lol! 


One other point….

 

Let’s not forget that you’re the same guy who starting around the pre-season you stated you were going to give Ballard a pass all season long.  That you understood what was going to happen this season.  The Colts were going to play their rookies and other young players to give them much needed experience.   You said you were on board with all of it.  And you said it multiple times over a period of weeks and months. 
 

And what did it take?   6-8 weeks?   And suddenly you flip-flopped and were back bashing Ballard.  Considering the Colts were starting the backup and Taylor wasn’t playing the Colts had either met or exceeded expectations.  Yet you did a complete 180 and you were back to bashing Ballard.   
 

You're entitled to any opinion you want.  You're even entitled to change your mind. Plenty of people do that.   But it’s hard to take that seriously when you do it after the team is meeting or exceeding expectations.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here’s a fun exercise! Let’s go over a list of players who have signed, or re-signed here after actually hitting free agency (if top free agents don’t want to come here then surely they don’t stay after hitting FA, right?) and where they have ranked in those free agency classes from credible media outlets!    2012 (Per CBS Sports top 100) Reggie Wayne (Re-signed) -22 Cory Redding - 39 Samson Satele - 68 2013 (Per NFL[dot]com top 85) Gosder Cherilus - 46 LaRon Landry - 57 2014 (Per NFL[dot]com top 101) Hakeem Nicks - 22 Art Jones - 32 D’Qwell Jackson - 49 2015 (Per NFL[dot]com top 101) Andre Johnson - 20 Frank Gore - 29 Trent Cole - 31 Kendall Langford - 64   2016 (Per NFL[dot]com top 99) Patrick Robinson - 79   2017 (Per NFL[dot]com top 101) Jonathan Hankins - 11 Jabaal Sheard - 29 Jack Doyle (Re-signed) - 61 John Simon - 64 Darius Butler (Re-signed) - 100 Margus Hunt - 101   2018 (Per anyone and everyone) None   2019 (Per NFL[dot]com top 101) Justin Houston - 8 Devin Funchess - 45 Pierre Desir (Re-signed) - 46 Clayton Geathers (Re-signed) - 63 2020 (Per NFL[dot]com top 101) Philip Rivers - 11 Anthony Costanzo (Re-signed) - 12 2021 (Per NFL[dot]com top 101) TY Hilton (Re-signed) - 33 Eric Fisher - 42 Xavier Rhodes - 53 Marlon Mack (Re-signed) - 79 Al-Quadin Muhammad (Re-signed) - 99 2022 (Per NFL[dot]com top 101) Stephon Gilmore - 12 2023 (Per NFL[dot]com top 101) Samson Ebukam - 58 Gardner Minshew - 95   2024 (Per NFL[dot]com top 101) Julian Blackmon (Re-signed) - 35 Kenny Moore (Re-signed) - 38 Grover Stewart (Re-signed) - 40   Regardless of how any of these signings actually worked out, it’s time to give the argument that top free agents won’t come here the old yeller treatment and bury it. It’s nonsense. 
    • Because some are here to be right not support the Colts.
    • Huh?   Are you under the impression that a head coach — any head coach — approaches all 17 regular season games like a playoff game?   They don’t.      So I don’t care what Wash is doing with Daniels, they’re not the same player.  Daniels is far more experienced than AR, so how Wash uses JD is going to be different than how Steichen uses AR.     So my point is that Steichen can try to do both….   groom Richardson AND win games.  It doesn’t have to be one or the other.  It can be both.  Sorry we see this differently.  
    • Because we have a GM who won’t really attempt to do business.    Ryan Grigson didn’t have a problem landing free agents.   Andre Johnson was a superstar when he came here. We didn’t know he was washed up until after he got here and he got out on the field.    Does the name “Frank Gore” ring a bell? At all? He’s only a hall of fame player, so maybe you’ve never heard of him.   Corey Redding signed here late in his career, and he helped get Pagano’s 3-4 off the ground.    Mike Adams came here and promptly made a pair of pro-bowls.    Gosder Cherilus was considered one of the best right tackles in the league when he signed here, despite how it turned out.    Ahmad Bradshaw came here before injuries derailed his career for good.    LaRon Landry was a heavily sought after free agent, and chose to come here to make the bank to buy his juice.    Erik Walden came here and far exceeded the deal he was on.    Art Jones had a lot of interest around the league when he signed here before injuries and getting hooked up with LaRon Landry’s juice dealer got in the way.   D’qwell Jackson signed here after being one of the league’s leading tacklers for the Browns and made a pro bowl that same year.    Hakeem Nicks signed here after starting a winning Super Bowl for the Giants and having a 1K+ yards and 10+ TD season. He had multiple 1K yard seasons under his belt on arrival.    What about trades? Vontae Davis came here in a trade. Glaze over it with the benefit of hindsight all you want, but Trent Richardson was 1 year removed from being the 3rd overall pick, and had put up 1K yards rushing as a rookie when he landed in town.     Hell, even Ballard has been able to land some high quality free agents when he’s actually been willing to make a deal. Philip Rivers and Stephon Gilmore didn’t wind up here because the league told them they had to be here.    The facts that these free agents all signed here aren’t untrue simply because you either don’t remember them, or just flat out don’t know them. Luckily someone writes these signings down somewhere for the sake of posterity, so we can look back on those official records and prove that they did in fact happen, despite the claims to the contrary. 
    • It literally says games started 0 lol. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...