Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

CJ Stroud


King Colt

Recommended Posts

On 1/18/2024 at 2:17 PM, Superman said:

 

But that's a good thing, IMO. I don't want to be in a cupcake division, I want our team to have a significant measuring stick opponent every year, and twice a year is even better. I want us to be striving to keep up with a team with a hotshot young QB. The more, the better. It raises the bar for our own team.


iron sharpens iron. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/14/2024 at 8:13 AM, 2006Coltsbestever said:

The people that didn't want AR would say the same thing. Let's see him beat a real team. Trevor and Stroud both are good, but people need to quit the AR hate is my point.

i havent seen any ar hate on here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/16/2024 at 9:25 AM, Superman said:

 

He had good production, and his talent was obvious. But from the ground up, he was awkward and fundamentally flawed as a passer. He got better in some areas, but he still has some of the same issues with fundamentals.

 

CJ Stroud is much more fundamentally sound, more disciplined, better from the pocket, he's a quicker decision maker, I think he's more accurate to all levels of the field, and his arm is almost as good. He's not as athletic and fast, and he probably can't make crazy throws 50 yards downfield while he's scrambling the way Watson could, but we just saw him make a pretty good throw on the run against us.

 

I'd agree that Stroud is a better passer, all things considered. He's already displaying a mastery of some of the things that Watson never improved on.


You might be the biggest supporter of Stroud in our community.   And, to your credit, you were on his bandwagon before the draft. 
 

So I have questions for you….   Why were you so high on Stroud when other Ohio State QBs struggled so much when they reached the NFL.  Fields?   Haskins?   The view has always been that Ohio State only asks their QB to read half the field on each play, and when they get to the NFL they struggle badly to read the entire field.  So you knew that yet it didn’t stop you from believing Stroud would be the exception.  So I’m curious as to why and how you came to believe in Stroud more than anyone else? 
 

Thanks in advance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, OLD FAN MAN said:

i havent seen any ar hate on here

I don't think I am going senile but when I see posts like = AR is too injury prone to make it in the league, he isn't a good passer, we should have taken Levis, and a poster even called AR 'Glass' Richardson, I am not sure how you don't consider that hate. These types of posts have come from at least different 10 posters. I can only go by what I read my friend and to me that is some hate. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, sb41champs said:

I'm considering drafting both CJ Stroud - AND - Jordan Love in next seasons fantasy football draft!!

 

OR - Jordan Love - AND - Anthony Richardson!!

 

AR 100% for the extra rushing yards but wait till Rounds 5 or 6. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chad72 said:

 

AR 100% for the extra rushing yards but wait till Rounds 5 or 6. 

I got Lamar in round 3 this year. Mahomes, Allen, Hurts were gone by end of round 2. All of my draft picks were hits besides Josh Jacobs (pick 13). I should have just drafted AJ Brown at pick 12 and Ceedee at pick 13

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:


You might be the biggest supporter of Stroud in our community.   And, to your credit, you were on his bandwagon before the draft. 
 

So I have questions for you….   Why were you so high on Stroud when other Ohio State QBs struggled so much when they reached the NFL.  Fields?   Haskins?   The view has always been that Ohio State only asks their QB to read half the field on each play, and when they get to the NFL they struggle badly to read the entire field.  So you knew that yet it didn’t stop you from believing Stroud would be the exception.  So I’m curious as to why and how you came to believe in Stroud more than anyone else? 
 

Thanks in advance. 

I knew Stroud would be good because he had elite accuracy and his arm talent was the best in the class. Plus the Georgia game down his best weapon he destroyed that defense but his kicker lost that game

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, runthepost said:

I knew Stroud would be good because he had elite accuracy and his arm talent was the best in the class. Plus the Georgia game down his best weapon he destroyed that defense but his kicker lost that game


Fields had elite accuracy.   So did Haskins before him.   It’s easier when you’re only reading half the field which is what Ohio State QBs are trained to do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stroud had the best season out of the rookie QB's and deserves ROY IMO. Having said that, he could very easily have an average season next year. Whether it be knick knack injuries, or the team isn't playing as good. It has happened a lot to QBs coming off a good season. Most people in here were saying after last season that Trevor Lawrence was great, and the Jags would dominate the division for years. Look what happened there. I am one that never gets caught up in the moment and I am never sold on a player unless I see a player have 3 or even 4 good to great seasons. I am sold on guys like Mahomes, Lamar, even Allen and Burrow, Burrow has beaten Mahomes in a Title Game at KC and Allen has been consistently good for at least 4 years now. Lets let next season play out before we crown Stroud King of the Universe chuckling homer simpson GIF. I would not be shocked at all if Lawrence and AR both played better than Stroud next season. Not saying it will happen but it would not shock me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:


You might be the biggest supporter of Stroud in our community.   And, to your credit, you were on his bandwagon before the draft. 
 

So I have questions for you….   Why were you so high on Stroud when other Ohio State QBs struggled so much when they reached the NFL.  Fields?   Haskins?   The view has always been that Ohio State only asks their QB to read half the field on each play, and when they get to the NFL they struggle badly to read the entire field.  So you knew that yet it didn’t stop you from believing Stroud would be the exception.  So I’m curious as to why and how you came to believe in Stroud more than anyone else? 
 

Thanks in advance. 

 

I've never subscribed to the 'all QBs from this school will struggle' line of thinking. Scout the player, not the school. The Ohio State thing wasn't a big hurdle for me to get over.

 

Stuff like that might matter at times, but it's situational. For example, Tennessee runs such an extremely modified offensive scheme that you have to acknowledge how simple they make it for the QB to produce, and then you have to look for examples of the traits and abilities that will be used in the NFL. So I might have discounted Hendon Hooker coming out, but that's because I didn't see enough NFL traits.

 

In Stroud's case, I saw more NFL traits from him -- specifically as a passer -- than from any other QB in the draft class. I don't want to compare him to Fields and Haskins directly, but I believe that some of the passing game restrictions that were in place with those players were pretty much done away with when Stroud was the QB. He was not only a half field read passer, at times he scanned the entire field and went through full progressions. Not every drop back, no one does, but often enough that it was obvious he could do it. And when his primary reads were covered, he could find the check down in rhythm. He did not rely on his legs to make plays, which was one of the major questions about his projection, but a big part of why is because he was always able command the pocket and make a play with his arm. 

 

He had a bit of a boost from playing with such a talented receiving corps, and he had a good OL as well. That all made things a little easier for him from the pocket. Sometimes he'd be slow to come off his first read, but part of that was probably him relying on his receivers dynamic ability to create separation. 

 

The other traits like accuracy and mechanics really separated him from other QB prospects as well, and set him apart from the previous Ohio State guys. He was more technically proficient than anyone else, IMO, and it wasn't particularly close. And he has a really good arm, it doesn't blow anyone away, but he can make all the throws you need him to make.

 

My big questions where about what he would do if he wasn't surrounded by elite talent at WR, whether he could speed up his processing in the pocket, and whether he had enough quickness/athleticism to avoid pressure in the NFL. Those are the reasons I wasn't advocating moving up to draft him. But everything else was pretty obviously already there. He had fewer question marks than anyone else, he was really good in the areas that I cared about most, and IMO he has no disqualifying factors.

 

I'm not crowning him just yet, but I'm not surprised by his success, and I expect him to continue getting better.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Superman said:

 

I've never subscribed to the 'all QBs from this school will struggle' line of thinking. Scout the player, not the school. The Ohio State thing wasn't a big hurdle for me to get over.

 

Stuff like that might matter at times, but it's situational. For example, Tennessee runs such an extremely modified offensive scheme that you have to acknowledge how simple they make it for the QB to produce, and then you have to look for examples of the traits and abilities that will be used in the NFL. So I might have discounted Hendon Hooker coming out, but that's because I didn't see enough NFL traits.

 

In Stroud's case, I saw more NFL traits from him -- specifically as a passer -- than from any other QB in the draft class. I don't want to compare him to Fields and Haskins directly, but I believe that some of the passing game restrictions that were in place with those players were pretty much done away with when Stroud was the QB. He was not only a half field read passer, at times he scanned the entire field and went through full progressions. Not every drop back, no one does, but often enough that it was obvious he could do it. And when his primary reads were covered, he could find the check down in rhythm. He did not rely on his legs to make plays, which was one of the major questions about his projection, but a big part of why is because he was always able command the pocket and make a play with his arm. 

 

He had a bit of a boost from playing with such a talented receiving corps, and he had a good OL as well. That all made things a little easier for him from the pocket. Sometimes he'd be slow to come off his first read, but part of that was probably him relying on his receivers dynamic ability to create separation. 

 

The other traits like accuracy and mechanics really separated him from other QB prospects as well, and set him apart from the previous Ohio State guys. He was more technically proficient than anyone else, IMO, and it wasn't particularly close. And he has a really good arm, it doesn't blow anyone away, but he can make all the throws you need him to make.

 

My big questions where about what he would do if he wasn't surrounded by elite talent at WR, whether he could speed up his processing in the pocket, and whether he had enough quickness/athleticism to avoid pressure in the NFL. Those are the reasons I wasn't advocating moving up to draft him. But everything else was pretty obviously already there. He had fewer question marks than anyone else, he was really good in the areas that I cared about most, and IMO he has no disqualifying factors.

 

I'm not crowning him just yet, but I'm not surprised by his success, and I expect him to continue getting better.


Good analysis.   This was exactly what I was looking for from you.  It’s why I asked. 
 

Thanks for the very good 411.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To use an off season surgery as an excuse is bollocks....    He needs to step up his game and start performing. In many ways he honestly looks like one of the 5 worst QB´s in the league and again, to use a shoulder surgery as an excuse is just pure bollocks.   There simply is no development in his game, and his huge upside is what? tell me?    I don´t think one second that we will ever come close to winning anything with him as our QB.   and to make things worse read this: https://www.espn.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2176813
    • And yet, PFF didn't grade him all that high last year.  My response to this is that the scheme is designed for the MLB and the SS to make most of the tackles.  And they do. But last year, Franklin allowed a 77% completion rate with 10.2 yards per completion, and 7.9 yards per target.  In summary, he makes a lot of tackles by scheme, but he also allows a lot of completions. I don't think of him a Great.  Or even Good.  He's Fair.   https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/F/FranZa00.htm  
    • Probably still won’t shut people up lol. But that is interesting  We are 3 games in after a shoulder surgery. What are you talking about.
    • Every bottom feeder team has a good player or two. Are the colts a bottom feeder? At times they play like it.    the “forum GMs” as you call them, don’t dislike when a player does well. They just hate when the team sucks. There’s nothing wrong with that. And no one here says some of the Colts players aren’t good players.    the Colts stunk it up pretty bad in the first two weeks, lost game one again a stat that we have held for over a decade. In must win games, the colts perform exceptionally awful with a mind boggling level of consistency under this regime.    the good players that the Colts have tend to also not show up in those games and make any game changing plays.    ok so Franklin can tackle. So what? Yeah the forum GMs are shaking with rage because of that!   
    • The huge difference is that you could see the progress in peytons game and how he always learned and keept going. and in year two, he really took off and started to show why we picked him.   With AR, things just getting worse, game after game... I wouldn't mind if we traded him for some picks next season.
  • Members

    • Superman

      Superman 22,114

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jal8908

      jal8908 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,921

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Reboot

      Reboot 46

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyJoe

      IndyJoe 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 13,472

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,634

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pelt

      Pelt 1,251

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 216

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ThorstenDenmark

      ThorstenDenmark 343

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...