Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:


I don’t know how many snaps Shaq played….

 

But he had 2 tackles.  1 solo; 1 assisted. 
 

FWIW:   13 other defensive players had more total tackles than Shaq.  
 

He played 14 of 82 snaps 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 12/8/2023 at 10:25 PM, OLD FAN MAN said:

shaq will start sunday night at middle linebacker for the eagles  per espn. what a gift ballard gave the eagles

 

12 hours ago, OLD FAN MAN said:

i will watch shaq play mb tonight and see if gus just used him wrong

Well I watched too. And Leonard looked like his 2023 self, IE slow and out of place . 2 tackles. I still don’t think he’ll return to All pro form. I don’t think he’ll get halfway back to that. 
 

as for the “gift” Ballard gave. Shaq has been outplayed by his replacement even. Twice now. That should tell you something.

 

and as much as I don’t like Bradley’s scheme, scheme can’t make a player faster than he physically can go, though it can mask it at times. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, csmopar said:

 

Well I watched too. And Leonard looked like his 2023 self, IE slow and out of place . 2 tackles. I still don’t think he’ll return to All pro form. I don’t think he’ll get halfway back to that. 
 

as for the “gift” Ballard gave. Shaq has been outplayed by his replacement even. Twice now. That should tell you something.

 

and as much as I don’t like Bradley’s scheme, scheme can’t make a player faster than he physically can go, though it can mask it at times. 

 

I am not sure how much Shaq can contribute for the Eagles. We will see. If I had to guess, he won't be used as an every down starter, just for breathers.

  • Like 1
Posted

Unfortunately it appears Shaq’s performance has not improved in Matt Patricia’s system either.  It’s hard watching him get blown out of the play and always being a couple steps behind.  You only knew he was out there tonight because he came running into the shot as soon as the play was over.  
 

Maybe give it one more off season to see if his quick twitch improves but at this point he’s really starting to damage his legacy.  It’s a shame. 

Posted
6 hours ago, RollerColt said:

Opposing offenses are now exploiting the Eagles linebacker weaknesses. 


The Eagles are a mess and it didn’t help Hurts was battling an illness.

Posted

Shaq either completely lost his abilities, or he came back way too early! The only question is, would another full healthy offseason help him get back into his pre-injury self? Now that he’s not a Colt anymore, I dont really care if he gets back to old Darius or not, just as long as he won’t get in the path of the Colts winning ways in the future.

Posted
35 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

I have a feeling he'll be a game influencing force in the playoffs. 

That remains to be seen, he was making plays while unblocked against a subpar Giants team so I'm not ready to say that he's back to being the "Maniac" of old just yet. The Colts gave him every opportunity to demonstrate that

he could still contribute at a high level and when they saw that they had more productive players than him, I think they did him a favor by cutting him loose early enough for him to catch on with another playoff contenter this season where he wouldn't be asked to do as much as he was here, and showed that he no longer could.

  • Like 2
Posted


Bottom line:   Neither Ballard, Steichen or Irsay wanted Leonard on the team anymore.   
 

They released Leonard so he was free to sign with any team he wanted.   So even if Philly goes on to win the Super Bowl that doesn’t mean releasing Leonard was wrong.   Colts Nation should say congratulations to Shaq and stay focused on the future of Indianapolis.  
 

Posted

 

He and the Eagles beat an eliminated and QB riddled Giants team…

 

They’ve got the Cardinals and then Giants again before the playoffs. Really seems like it’ll be two weeks of over inflating egos. 
 

Good luck to him. 

Posted
On 12/26/2023 at 2:36 PM, Lancer1 said:

That remains to be seen, he was making plays while unblocked against a subpar Giants team so I'm not ready to say that he's back to being the "Maniac" of old just yet. The Colts gave him every opportunity to demonstrate that

he could still contribute at a high level and when they saw that they had more productive players than him, I think they did him a favor by cutting him loose early enough for him to catch on with another playoff contenter this season where he wouldn't be asked to do as much as he was here, and showed that he no longer could.

Absolutely,  I was shocked when I originally saw the article and went back and watched the game.  On every play he made he was completely untouched.  Nothing changed,  you touch Leonard he’s out of the play.  
 

like us all I was sad to see him go and wished him well.   Now he’s starting to wear me out. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Eberflus gave up a bunch of open catches also.   Leonard was a freak. His range, length, and instincts were on another level. The guys we have now are more physical tacklers, but the rest of the comparison would not be kind to them. 
    • No doubt talent is a thing, and I think that point applies more directly to EJ Speed. But the other three are top tacklers whose miss rate is probably in line with other top tacklers in the league. So applying this to all four of them seems like it's stretching to make an indictment of a group of players, rather than identifying the specific players who are actually a problem.   And since LO (former poster here, btw) is calling out those four players for having 40% of the team's missed tackles, I think it's worth asking whether that percentage generally holds up around the league. It stands to reason that the highest volume tacklers on the team also have the most missed tackles on the team. So is the stat actually noteworthy? I don't know the answer, I'm asking a genuine question.   There's also the volume of plays against -- Colts are first at 873, which means even with an average rate of missed tackles, they'd be near the top of the league.    Again, I'm not trying to defend them, we miss too many tackles for sure. Just wondering what the point is, if there actually is one.    It also seems like he's using different missed tackle stats than you are. He might be using PFR, before they updated with Week 13 stats. If so, he left off Jaylon Jones, who now has 12 missed tackles.
    • I always liked Glowinski, even when he was ridiculed on this forum, I thought he played alright while with the Colts. Have to admit I was surprised when he struggled with the Giants. Glad his first game back with us was successful. 
    • They are about the same height and weight. Other than that they’re completely different players 
    • Wait, AR doesn't do that??  I've seen AR force it to Pittman on more than one occasion.  Hopefully he doesn't do that against the Broncos.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...