Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

AFC South and AFC Playoff picture/ Remaining Schedules (MERGE) Updated OP + on page 4


w87r

Recommended Posts

Coming off the bye week, it's time to lock in.

 

Will keep this updated as season progresses:

 

• (overall record, division record, conference record, SOS, SOV)(remaining schedule)

 

Tie Breaker Order:

https://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/nfl-tie-breaking-procedures/

Division:

Quote

The following procedures will be used to break standings ties for postseason playoffs and to determine regular-season schedules.

 

NOTE: Tie games count as one-half win and one-half loss for both clubs.

 

TO BREAK A TIE WITHIN A DIVISION

If, at the end of the regular season, two or more clubs in the same division finish with identical won-lost-tied percentages, the following steps will be taken until a champion is determined.

 

Two Clubs 

 

1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs)

2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division

3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games

4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference

5. Strength of victory

6. Strength of schedule

7. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed

8. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed

9. Best net points in common games

10. Best net points in all games

11. Best net touchdowns in all games

12.Coin toss

 

Three or More Clubs

 

(Note: If two clubs remain tied after a third club or other clubs are eliminated during any step, the tiebreaker reverts to step 1 of the two-club format.)

 

1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games among the clubs)

2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division

3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games

4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference

5. Strength of victory

6. Strength of schedule

7. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed

8. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed

9. Best net points in common games

10. Best net points in all games

11. Best net touchdowns in all games

12. Coin toss

Conference:

Quote

If the tied clubs are from the same division, apply the division tiebreaker.

If the tied clubs are from different divisions, apply the following steps:

 

Two Clubs

 

1. Head-to-head, if applicable

2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference

3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four

4. Strength of victory

5. Strength of schedule

6. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed

7. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed

8. Best net points in conference games

9. Best net points in all games

10.Best net touchdowns in all games

11. Coin toss

 

Three or More Clubs

 

(Note: If two clubs remain tied after a third club or other clubs are eliminated, the tiebreaker reverts to step 1 of the applicable two-club format.)

 

Apply the division tiebreaker to eliminate all but the highest-ranked club in each division prior to proceeding to step 2. The original seeding within a division upon application of the division tiebreaker remains the same for all subsequent applications of the procedure that are necessary to identify the two wild card participants.

 

1. Head-to-head sweep (applicable only if one club has defeated each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others)

2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference

3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four

4. Strength of victory

5. Strength of schedule

6. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed

7. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed

8. Best net points in conference games

9. Best net points in all games

10. Best net touchdowns in all games

11. Coin toss

 

When the first wild card team has been identified, the procedure is repeated to name the second wild card (i.e., eliminate all but the highest-ranked club in each division prior to proceeding to step 2). In situations where three or more teams from the same division are involved in the procedure, the original seeding of the teams remains the same for subsequent applications of the tiebreaker if the top-ranked team in that division qualifies for a wild card berth.

 

Updated Week 12 Standings:

 

* - Still to play

 

AFC South Standings:

Jags 8-3, 4-1, 6-2(Bengals, @Browns, Ravens, @Bucs, Panthers, @Titans)

Colts 6-5 , 2-2, 4-3(@Titans, @Bengals, Steelers, @Falcons, Raiders, Texans)

Texans 6-5, 1-2, 3-3(Broncos, @Jets, @Titans, Browns, Titans, @Colts)

Titans 4-7, 0-2, 2-5(Colts, @Dolphins, Texans, Seahawks, @Texans, Jaguars)

 

 

 

AFC Playoff Picture:

1. Ravens 9-3, 3-2, 6-3, .504, .470 (Bye, Rams, @Jaguars, @49ers, Dolphins, Steelers)

2. Chiefs 8-3, 3-1, 6-1, .557, .494 (@Packers, Bills, Raiders, Bengals, @Chargers)

3. Jaguars 8-3, 4-1, 6-2, .549, .506 (Bengals, @Browns, Ravens, @Bucs, Panthers, @Titans)

4. Dolphins 8-3, 3-1, 6-2, .419, .311 (@Commanders, Titans, Jets, Cowboys, @Ravens, Bills)

5. Steelers 7-4, 3-1, 5-3, .561, .506 (Cardinals, Patriots, @Colts, Bengals, @Seahawks, @Ravens)

6. Browns 7-4, 3-2, 5-3, .556, .519 (@Rams, Jaguars, Bears, @Texans, Jets, @Bengals)

7. Colts 6-5, 2-2, 4-3, .484, .388 (@Titans, @Bengals, Steelers, @Falcons, Raiders, Texans)

 

 

Still in Hunt:

8. Texans 6-5, 1-2, 3-3, .488, .463 (Broncos, @Jets, @Titans, Browns, Titans, @Colts)

9. Broncos 6-5, 1-2, 3-4, .516, .522 (@Texans, @Chargers, @Lions, Patriots, Chargers, @Raiders)

10. Bills 6-6, 2-2, 3-5, .474, .420 (Bye, @Chiefs, Cowboys, @Chargers, Patriots, @Dolphins)

11. Bengals 5-6, 0-4, 1-6, .552, .474 (@Jaguars, Colts, Vikings, @Steelers, @Chiefs, Browns)

12. Raiders 5-7, 1-2, 3-5, .485, .375 (Bye, Vikings, Chargers, @Chiefs, @Colts, Broncos)

 

 

Not Officially Out:

13. Chargers 4-7, 1-1, 2-4, .553, .400 (@Patriots, Broncos, @Raiders, Bills, @Broncos, Chiefs)

14. Titans 4-7, 0-2, 2-5, .500, .341 (Colts, @Dolphins, Texans, Seahawks, @Texans, Jaguars)

15. Jets 4-7, 1-3, 2-6, .536, .565 (Falcons, Texans, @Dolphins, Commanders, @Browns, @Patriots)

16. Patriots 2-9, 2-2, 2-4, .544, .435 (Chargers, @Steelers, Chiefs, @Broncos, @Bills, Jets) 

 

 

 

Will update SoS + SoV, after MNF

 

 

Colts are in the playoffs, let's keep it that way.

  • Thanks 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

It looks like if the Steelers and Bills lose next week and we win, then we move up to 7th place. We would have a better Conference record than the Steelers and Bills.

Yeah, if we lose anymore Bucs and Falcons would be the ideal scenario. Outside of not losing anymore, of course.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

As much as I want jags to win the division if Texans win that game next week and colts beat Bucs or gets really interesting.

As can be seen by remaining schedules all these teams will be beating up on each other.

 

 

10 wins in probably the magic number I think.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

To add to this, we have a better Conference record over the Broncos too.

Yeah that's an advantage we have on every team below us.

 

Tied with Steelers and little % points behind the Texans.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, w87r said:

Yeah that's an advantage we have on every team below us.

 

Tied with Steelers and little % points behind the Texans.


It’s a matter of time the Broncos close that gap, IMO. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OLD FAN MAN said:

colts need to win out even then it will be hard to make the playoffs 

Yeah right.

 

Colts win out, 100% in the playoffs.

 

Colts win out, they will have a good chance at the Division Title.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, chad72 said:


It’s a matter of time the Broncos close that gap, IMO. 
 

 

They got a pretty tough road.

 

And being 1.5 games behind in the conference is a decent cushion.

 

4 minutes ago, chad72 said:


5-2 is doable with Burrow banged up and Steelers stinking it up

No doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

I just realized there is a football  game next Friday. Is that new? It’s Dolphins vs jets.

Yep, 3 on Thursday, 1 on Friday 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, csmopar said:

Well this season sure has surprised me. I’ll leave it at that. The AFC behind the Chiefs is still wide open 

If Chiefs lose to the Eagles tomorrow night Baltimore will be the #1 seed.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depending on tiebreakers, 9-8 could get us in. 10 to be safe but possibly 9 may do it? I think we can go 4-3 looking at our schedule. We definitely would have to beat the Steelers and Bengals in that scenario. 

7 minutes ago, csmopar said:

Well this season sure has surprised me. I’ll leave it at that. The AFC behind the Chiefs is still wide open 

I think it is fun if anything else. Compared to last year I love this haha 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Colts have to win the next three games if they want to make the playoffs. I know there are plenty of scenarios where they can still make it. However, they need to be sitting at 8-5 going into the last 4 games bc they will probably all be tough. All four of those teams may be fighting for a playoff spot. Would make some great football to end the year no matter what!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, w87r said:

9. Colts 5-5, 2-2, 4-3, .490, .392 (Bucs, @Titans, @Bengals, Steelers, @Falcons, Raiders, Texans)

10. Bengals 5-5, 0-3, 1-5, .540, .458 (Steelers, @Jaguars, Colts, Vikings, @Steelers, @Chiefs, Browns)

11. Raiders 5-6, 1-1, 3-4, .455, .347 (Chiefs, Bye, Vikings, Chargers, @Chiefs, @Colts, Broncos)

12. Broncos 4-5, 1-2, 2-4, .511, .475 (Vikings, Browns, @Texans, @Chargers, @Lions, Patriots, Chargers, @Raiders)

Change in standings:

 

9. Colts 5-5, 2-2, 4-3, .490, .392 (Bucs, @Titans, @Bengals, Steelers, @Falcons, Raiders, Texans)

10. Broncos 5-5, 1-2, 2-4, .515, .500  (Browns, @Texans, @Chargers, @Lions, Patriots, Chargers, @Raiders)

11. Bengals 5-5, 0-3, 1-5, .540, .458 (Steelers, @Jaguars, Colts, Vikings, @Steelers, @Chiefs, Browns)

12. Raiders 5-6, 1-1, 3-4, .455, .347 (Chiefs, Bye, Vikings, Chargers, @Chiefs, @Colts, Broncos)

 

 

Edit: will update OP to reflect 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, w87r said:

If Chiefs lose to the Eagles tomorrow night Baltimore will be the #1 seed.


Chiefs and Eagles in a Super Bowl rematch in MNF!!    Ya think that might get great ratings?!?    I typically don’t care too much about non-Colts games, but this one?    I’ll be parked in front of my big screen.   
 

Should I count the number of Taylor Swift references?     

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, w87r said:

Coming off the bye week, it's time to lock in.

 

Will keep this updated as season progresses:

 

• (overall record, division record, conference record, SOS, SOV)(remaining schedule)

 

Tie Breaker Order:

https://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/nfl-tie-breaking-procedures/

Division:

Conference:

 

AFC South Standings:

Jags 7-3, 3-1, 5-2(@Texans, Bengals, @Browns, Ravens, @Bucs, Panthers, @Titans)

Texans 6-4, 1-1, 3-2(Jaguars, Broncos, @Jets, @Titans, Browns, Titans, @Colts)

Colts 5-5 , 2-2, 4-3(Bucs, @Titans, @Bengals, Steelers, @Falcons, Raiders, Texans)

Titans 3-7, 0-2, 2-5(Panthers, Colts, @Dolphins, Texans, Seahawks, @Texans, Jaguars)

 

 

 

AFC Playoff Picture:

1. Chiefs 7-2, 2-1, 5-1, .534, .507 (Eagles, @Raiders, @Packers, Bills, Raiders, Bengals, @Chargers)

2. Ravens 8-3, 3-2, 5-3, .545, .525 (@Chargers, Rams, @Jaguars @49ers, Dolphins, Steelers)

3. Jaguars 7-3, 3-1, 5-2, .531, .471 (@Texans, Bengals, @Browns, Ravens, @Bucs, Panthers, @Titans)

4. Dolphins 7-3, 2-1, 5-2, .414, .296 (@Jets, @Commanders, Titans, Jets, Cowboys, @Ravens, Bills)

5. Browns 7-3, 3-2, 5-2, .545, .493 (@Broncos, @Rams, Jaguars, Bears, @Texans, Jets, @Bengals)

6. Texans 6-4, 1-1, 3-2, .465, .483 (Jaguars, Broncos, @Jets, @Titans, Browns, Titans, @Colts)

7. Steelers 6-4, 2-1, 4-3, .560, .492 (@Bengals, Cardinals, Patriots, @Colts, Bengals, @Seahawks, @Ravens)

 

Still in Hunt:

8. Bills 6-5, 2-2, 3-5, .438, .429 (@Eagles, Bye, @Chiefs, Cowboys, @Chargers, Patriots, @Dolphins)

9. Colts 5-5, 2-2, 4-3, .490, .392 (Bucs, @Titans, @Bengals, Steelers, @Falcons, Raiders, Texans)

10. Broncos 5-5, 1-2, 2-4, .515, .500 (Browns, @Texans, @Chargers, @Lions, Patriots, Chargers, @Raiders)

11. Bengals 5-5, 0-3, 1-5, .540, .458 (Steelers, @Jaguars, Colts, Vikings, @Steelers, @Chiefs, Browns)

12. Raiders 5-6, 1-1, 3-4, .455, .347 (Chiefs, Bye, Vikings, Chargers, @Chiefs, @Colts, Broncos)

13. Chargers 4-6, 1-1, 2-3, .540, .439 (Ravens, @Patriots, Broncos, @Raiders, Bills, @Broncos, Chiefs)

14. Jets 4-6, 1-2, 2-5, .515, .525 (Dolphins, Falcons, Texans, @Dolphins, Commanders, @Browns, @Patriots)

 

 

Not Officially Out:

15. Titans 3-7, 0-2, 2-5, .550, .433 (Panthers, Colts, @Dolphins, Texans, Seahawks, @Texans, Jaguars)

16. Patriots 2-8, 2-2, 2-4, .570, .474 (@Giants, Chargers, @Steelers, Chiefs, @Broncos, @Bills, Jets) 

 

 

 

Will update it after MNF this week, and then will keep it updated throughout the rest of the season.


Also….    Thanks for doing this.   Your post may get the most traffic here for the rest of the season!     :worthy:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • w87r pinned and unpinned this topic
On 11/19/2023 at 8:07 PM, w87r said:

1. Chiefs 7-2, 2-1, 5-1, .534, .507 (Eagles, @Raiders, @Packers, Bills, Raiders, Bengals, @Chargers)

2. Ravens 8-3, 3-2, 5-3, .545, .525 (@Chargers, Rams, @Jaguars @49ers, Dolphins, Steelers)

Change in Standings:

 

1. Ravens 8-3, 3-2, 5-3, .541, .519 (@Chargers, Rams, @Jaguars @49ers, Dolphins, Steelers)

2. Chiefs 7-3, 2-1, 5-1, .569, .500 (@Raiders, @Packers, Bills, Raiders, Bengals, @Chargers)

 

 

OP will be updated as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/19/2023 at 8:07 PM, w87r said:

AFC Playoff Picture:

1. Ravens 8-3, 3-2, 5-3, .541, .519 (@Chargers, Rams, @Jaguars @49ers, Dolphins, Steelers)

2. Chiefs 7-3, 2-1, 5-1, .569, .500 (@Raiders, @Packers, Bills, Raiders, Bengals, @Chargers)

3. Jaguars 7-3, 3-1, 5-2, .535, .479 (@Texans, Bengals, @Browns, Ravens, @Bucs, Panthers, @Titans)

4. Dolphins 7-3, 2-1, 5-2, .427, .306 (@Jets, @Commanders, Titans, Jets, Cowboys, @Ravens, Bills)

5. Browns 7-3, 3-2, 5-2, .544, .500 (@Broncos, @Rams, Jaguars, Bears, @Texans, Jets, @Bengals)

6. Texans 6-4, 1-1, 3-2, .461, .475 (Jaguars, Broncos, @Jets, @Titans, Browns, Titans, @Colts)

7. Steelers 6-4, 2-1, 4-3, .569, .500 (@Bengals, Cardinals, Patriots, @Colts, Bengals, @Seahawks, @Ravens)

 

Still in Hunt:

8. Bills 6-5, 2-2, 3-5, .442, .429 (@Eagles, Bye, @Chiefs, Cowboys, @Chargers, Patriots, @Dolphins)

9. Colts 5-5, 2-2, 4-3, .495, .392 (Bucs, @Titans, @Bengals, Steelers, @Falcons, Raiders, Texans)

10. Broncos 5-5, 1-2, 2-4, .505, .491 (Browns, @Texans, @Chargers, @Lions, Patriots, Chargers, @Raiders)

11. Bengals 5-5, 0-3, 1-5, .548, .481 (Steelers, @Jaguars, Colts, Vikings, @Steelers, @Chiefs, Browns)

12. Raiders 5-6, 1-1, 3-4, .469, .353 (Chiefs, Bye, Vikings, Chargers, @Chiefs, @Colts, Broncos)

13. Chargers 4-6, 1-1, 2-3, .524, .419 (Ravens, @Patriots, Broncos, @Raiders, Bills, @Broncos, Chiefs)

14. Jets 4-6, 1-2, 2-5, .519, .548 (Dolphins, Falcons, Texans, @Dolphins, Commanders, @Browns, @Patriots)

 

 

Not Officially Out:

15. Titans 3-7, 0-2, 2-5, .545, .433 (Panthers, Colts, @Dolphins, Texans, Seahawks, @Texans, Jaguars)

16. Patriots 2-8, 2-2, 2-4, .573, .476 (@Giants, Chargers, @Steelers, Chiefs, @Broncos, @Bills, Jets) 

Updated OP.

 

Updated SOS, SOV as well.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Makes it even more interesting with browns and bengals starting QB out with injuries. Steelers have no offense. 

Yep, but Browns have proved they can win several times without Watson

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • w87r changed the title to AFC South and AFC Playoff picture/ Remaining Schedules (MERGE) Updated OP + on page 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Because a person who is accurately tuned into the forum would know that the laugh was commentary about the entire JT saga and how some were saying that you should not pay a RB because they get injured, and the laugh not just some adolescent giggle over an isolated thumb injury.  And here he is injured after the 4th game or so?  Tuned in folks wouldn't carry on about it.      
    • This exactly. Our season has been over since week 5 and we are 6-5 and in the hunt for the playoffs. These season has been pleasing except for the elephant in the room. But everyone thought our roster was complete hot dog water and we were gonna be the laughing stock of the year. That's not been the case.. 
    • As a matter of discussing hypotheticals and possibilities, you have to speculate facts then form opinions to have a discussion.   If you came to this forum only allowed to speak to about actual facts as they are, nobody here knows enough about the Colts to actually have much to say.      What I said was probably in response to somebody else implying my opinion was not valid because I did not support it with a Link.   As a the topic of JT, there are two layers here that folks are blending into one.     There was a period of time when JT said that he wanted to be traded.  At that point I expressed an opinion about what his trade value would be given the fact that he wanted a new contract with any team...and...the other team thinking JT would not return to the Colts.  I said I'd take two 4th rounders, when everybody else said that he was a good enough player to command a 2nd or a 1st.  The 2 4th rounders was not reflective of JT as a talent, but reflective of the stalemate situation where it seemed the Colts would have to sort of dump him because of JTs stubbornness.  Part of that stubbornness was based upon the reports (rumors) that he wanted $18m per year and the wide spread indications that JT was exaggerating an injury to get out of Indy.  If all of that was true, then certain speculative discussions can spiral away from that centerpiece.  During that time, I never expressed an attitude that losing JT would be a great loss.  I didn't cry about not having him on the Colts.   Since I don't know what the poster is referring to when asked why he thinks I "dislike" JT, I can only assume its because of that.   Do you follow so far?   Then out of nowhere, its announced that JT has signed a contract for $14m.  So the idea that JT was being stubborn in not wanting to play for Indy, wanting $18m per year, and exaggerating an injury were pretty much debunked.....Therefore, all speculative discussions that were based upon those negative reports about JTs attitude disappear instantly.  They no longer exist because the basis was never true to begin with.   Now we have a guy who wasn't exaggerating his injury, and was fine with playing for the Colts.  I that case don't have an issue with $14m for JT (negotiating with him trying to get him back to the club when he "had a bad attitude" is different).  And if you ever wanted to research my comments, I never said anything about how many millions of dollars he should be paid.  As a matter of practice, I never do that about any player because my sense of compensation or price with just about anything does not seem to reflect what others might pay for it...and I'm not just talking about football.    As a general rule though I'd say that teams should not get into a bidding war paying top dollar to retain non impact or nonballhandling positions.     
    • Oh, I agree. Although I still get frustrated with several aspects of this team, overall, I'm somewhat pleased that we are 6-5 and trending in the right direction in many ways. My point was, that even with our schedule, I just don't feel very confidant that the playoffs are likely.
    • Eh I’d rather we put the money towards other areas of need. Although if the price is right I’d like to have him, I just don’t think he’ll take what we want to pay.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...