Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2022 Week 15 Around-the-NFL Game Discussions Thread


NFLfan

Recommended Posts

Just now, IinD said:

Crazy because even though people love him now, there were tons of people and analysts who thought he was your typical Oregon QB who never succeeds in the NFL.

 

He's good.. Lol

He's the piano man but played lovely music today. :thmup:. He is actually a top 10 QB in the league but has to prove he can win in the playoffs like a Mahomes or Allen or Burrow before I say the man is great.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, chad72 said:


Burrow plays like the next Brady. Composed, clock control, you’re never out of the game with him, doesn’t easily turn the ball over and keeps the opposing QB off the field.

I "get" that.  That part is true.

 

I like Joe's cool attitude.  I like how he responds when people compare them.  "He's Tom--I'm Joe."

 

I like that He takes responsibility and doesn’t throw baby like tantrums on the field. 

 

I like watching him and Mahomes and Allen.  They are the "now" and the "future" of the league. 

 

I wish we had a QB like one of them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gramz said:

I "get" that.  That part is true.

 

I like Joe's cool attitude.  I like how he responds when people compare them.  "He's Tom--I'm Joe."

 

I like that He takes responsibility and doesn’t throw baby like tantrums on the field. 

 

I like watching him and Mahomes and Allen.  They are the "now" and the "future" of the league. 

 

I wish we had a QB like one of them.

 

Burrow is the real deal, love the kid but I don't see them beating KC or Buffalo. I know they beat KC last year but that was a rare meltdown by Mahomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

What I love is, when Trolls that make fun of us after we lose in a bad way but a someone like @NFLUpdisappears after that comical, hilarious way his team lost in those Pats. NFLup said it was hilarious and entertaining the way we lost, back at you pal - meet this guy Go Away Reaction GIF by MOODMAN- Karma baby!

 

Who is NFLup? Not me. haha I think @IrsaysArmy once thought I was NFLup. His line of questioning confused me until I realized he mistook me for NFLup. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The site created their own way of trying to compare the value of a any player, regardless of position.  Over time, they call it the "weighted average value" or "wAV".  I don't know how well it works out, but at least they tried!   If you want to read through their exhaustive methodology, here's the link for it. https://www.sports-reference.com/blog/approximate-value-methodology/  
    • How many players from the Baltimore Colts are in the Ring of Honor?
    • To continue kicking the dead horse of sacks/pressures...   I decided to compile some numbers from PFR, to investigate whether the Colts sack/pressure ratio on defense in 2023 is an outlier, and unsustainable. The Colts were 5th in total sacks, but 24th in pressures. I think that's an anomaly, so let me share the numbers that support my case.   In 2023, the Colts defense had 51 sacks on 127 pressures, converting 40% of their pressures into sacks. (From this point forward, I'll use the term "sack rate" in reference to this ratio.) This is the second highest sack rate in 2023, and the fourth highest sack rate of any team in the last five years (42% twice, 45% once). It's my opinion that this high sack rate is an unsustainable outlier.   From 2019 to 2023, the league-wide sack rate was 27% (6,362 sacks, on 23,204 pressures). In 2019, 28% (1,276 sacks, 4,585 pressures). 2020, 24% (1,135 sacks, 4,739 pressures). (Lowest sack rate and number of sacks) 2021, 25% (1,244 sacks, 5,056 pressures). (Highest total pressures) 2022, 30% (1,297 sacks, 4,325 pressures). (Lowest total pressures) 2023, 31% (1,410 sacks, 4,449 pressures). (Highest sack rate and number of sacks) It's only a five year sample, so I wouldn't say for sure that there's a trend in either direction. It's interesting that the two highest sack total and sack rate years were 2022 and 2023, so maybe there's a trend forming; but I think understanding how many QBs have been injured lately would help to explain the recent increase. In 2019, the lowest sack rate was 20% (Bears), and the highest was 34% (Panthers). 2020, the lowest was 14% (Raiders; this is also the lowest sack rate for all five years), highest was 36% (Rams). 2021, the lowest was 17% (Falcons), highest was 39% (Bears). 2022, the lowest was 21% (Jaguars), highest was 45% (Saints; this is also the highest sack rate for all five years). 2023, the lowest was 22% (Lions), and the highest was 42% (Ravens; Colts were second, at 40%).  And for comparison: The Colts sack rate for the last five years: 31.6% (209 sacks, 661 pressures) 2019, 31% (3 points above league average) 2020, 27% (3 points above league average) 2021, 28% (3 points above league average) 2022, 33% (3 points above league average) 2023, 40% (9 points above league average) So that’s a lot of info. It’s not comprehensive, it’s actually a really small sample. I’m also not analyzing the quality of the defenses, because pass rush is just one element of a successful defense.   The questions I set out to answer were 1) Whether the Colts 40% pressure to sack rate is an outlier, and I think it’s obvious that it is an outlier. Out of 160 results (32 teams x five seasons), it’s the fourth highest sack rate of any team defense since 2019, and it’s 13 points higher than the average sack rate during those five years. Compared to the Colts own performance, the 2023 sack rate is 7 points higher than 2022 (Bradley’s first year), and it’s more than 8 points higher than their five year average. So I think it’s clearly an outlier result.   And 2) Whether that sack rate is sustainable, I think this is less conclusive, but the sample indicates that it’s not sustainable. From 2019 to 2022, the Colts have a history of outperforming the league average sack rate, by 3 points each year. But in 2023, that tripled to 9 points above league average. And it’s by far the highest sack rate the Colts posted in the five year sample. So I think calling it unsustainable is accurate. (It's more likely that the Colts will be closer to 3 points above league average in 2024; with a similar number of total pressures, that would cost the defense about 10 total sacks.)   Just to further support the idea that it’s not sustainable, I looked at the Ravens sack rate over the last five years, simply because they led the league in sack rate in 2023. They went 42%, 38%, 22%, 22%, 26%, and over the five years, they averaged a 29% sack rate. So they've been well above the league average the last two seasons, but below league average the previous three seasons, and only 2 points higher than league average overall.    That’s a lot, so what’s my point? To be clear, I'm not saying that having a high sack rate is a bad thing, or that pressures are more important than sacks.    What I'm saying is a team converting 40% of their pressures into sacks is a statistical outlier, and it would be a mistake for the Colts to rely on converting pressures to sacks at such a high rate moving forward. That's not reliable output, based on recent history and trends. Even converting 30% of pressures to sacks is above typical league average, but at least that seems reasonable for the Colts' defense.   So if the Colts want to reach that 50+ sack threshold again in 2024, 127 total pressures (7.5/game) won't get it done. We need to count on having a sack rate closer to 30% than 40%, and that means we need to be closer to pressuring the QB 170 times total (10/game) next season. 
    • Good. I want to see this offense and Richardson shut up the naysayers. 
    • I get it, for the most part I agree with this post. 
  • Members

    • AwesomeAustin

      AwesomeAustin 2,514

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 165

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Archer

      Archer 1,802

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • G8R

      G8R 59

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 11,103

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 21,157

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Hammonds

      John Hammonds 5,079

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 2,680

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NYFAN

      NYFAN 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 12,955

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...