Zach Wilson got Benched!!
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
To summarize. Young is a small person by NFL standards, who has a great brain for the game but not a great arm. And is very athletic but not really athletically elite. Maybe Young could be described as being an athletic version of Chad Pennington? Not unlike Purdy or Bennett. Where was Chad drafted?
-
Beats me. But generally speaking, I think having teams "prove their innocence" by measuring how many minorities are hired...and incentivizing it if the results aren't good enough.... is a method that creates weird processes that defy common sense, IMO, if not defying the spirit of rule making and enforcement. LIke the rooney rule. Requiring minorities to be "interviewed" means nothing when it comes to deciding who to hire from a pool of interviewed candidates. Now, many people are seeing the flaws with the process, because the process is weird. It lacked common sense the day it was passed. And they admit it now because they are not getting the results they want. Just backwards as *. A rational process doesn't make decisions like that. That's why I called it nonsense.
-
By MikeCurtis · Posted
First off.. Thanks Superman for writing this up on Young I would be very happy with either Young or Stroud as our pick In regards to Richardson If teams trade up and both Young and Stroud are gone (I think its a small chance) But.... If that happens, I would consider taking Richardson over Levis at 4 I really dont want to give up 2 firsts and 2 2nds and a player for a move up to 1 -
Yes. I could be negative and see only how every Qb we take could bust...and with the questions each has any one of them could be a bust, but I look at this pretty optimistically. We need a QB, and I think this draft presents a lot of possibilities and choices that could work out for the best. Trade up for the elite guy and he works out. Stand Pat for the second best guy and he works out. Trade back and pick up a traitsy player who needs a year to develop in a year where we have no chance of going to the SB anyway. There are about 5 or 6 QBs that could all work for us depending upon if the investment is correct. As a fan, I can't see me criticizing any of the picks or moves Ballard makes this draft when it comes to QBs. But, as a fan, I reserve the right to later say...."He should have known better" if it doesn't work out. He's getting paid to know better.
-
This definitely makes sense. People seem fixated on Chicago taking Anderson or Carter. Poles has said his main objective has and will be to help Fields by surrounding him with talent. That starts up front. Even if they trade down in the top 4, I feel they will trade down again to stock picks. Anderson and Carter are nice players but I don't see Poles taking a risk on one player. He is more of the obtain more picks and increase chances of upgrading talent guy.
-
-
Members
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now