Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2022 Game #4, Titans @ Colts..


NFLfan

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Yes, but they get a huge bump in evaluating the total score of their roster.  They arguably have the 3 best players at their respective positions. Donald, Ramsey and Kupp.

Dude, stop.

Look the total roster. Stacked. 

Obviously you know the roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Lawrence was near worst in QBR all 2021.

Now top 10 with a new coach.... The coach actually that called plays in Philly. 

lawrence was a rookie last year of course he is gonna get better his second year .  i think your putting to much into coaching  players win games .   look at josh mcdaniels without brady or adam gase without manning .   bill billichick looks average without brady now  .   we need talent players are losing one on one battles nonstop  all year

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, having come from the Falcons, I acknowledge that Ryan has looked horrible so far this year. However, I was told that this team had an elite run game and OL as well as a top 10 defense. I honestly wasn't expecting the QB to make the run game and defense non-existent, but that appears to be what has happened. That makes absolutely no sense to me, but it is what it is. I feel bad for everyone, all around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, coming on strong said:

lawrence was a rookie last year of course he is gonna get better his second year .  i think your putting to much into coaching  players win games .   look at josh mcdaniels without brady or adam gase without manning .   bill billichick looks average without brady now  .   we need talent players are losing one on one battles nonstop  all year

 

as true as it is that Ballard hasn’t replaced the right guys, Frank needs to go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll try to be a bit positive.

 

The OL is doing a bit better at pass blocking this week. They just are abysmal at run blocking now...

 

 

Our TEs are doing well receiving. They just suck at run blocking now without Doyle.

 

Our CBs are doing pretty well. Because the Titans don't need to do anything else besides run the ball and dumping the ball short

 

Matt Ryan gets a chance to come back again lmaoo

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JediXMan said:

 Colts lucky to be down 14 any good team would've buried them already lol.


Not really, no one team in the NFL executes flawless for 60 minutes. Other than a dropped Henry pass and bad time management that cost them 7 points, the Titans haven’t turned it over and played like a Top 10 team, IMO.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And to add insult to injury, the teams we are losing to are just plain not good. Texans will be 0-3 after today, and we are so bad as fans that a mod said after our first game "who says the Texans are bad"? Well I did then and I do now. And the Titans are average at best. May as well start Foles or Ehlinger, can't be worse than this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TaylorTheStudMuffin said:

The fact you can’t blame everyone is laughable.

It's pretty clear...

 

All the excuses... Pick one...

Wentz is bad... (he's gone now)

We need to hit layups and will win (welp we're like #1 in RB pass targets)... lol

It's OL.... Our OL is grading better this year despite Pinter. 

It's our WRs... well Dulin and Campbell are performing when actually get targets, instead of forcing early reads to Pitt

It's our TEs... Well Mo catches balls when get calls. Woods looking good when targeted. Frank's crush (Granson) gets most targets.

 

It's everyone, but not Frank, right! lol

Why does team play better after they abandon his scheme/script? lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RobertAP said:

You know, having come from the Falcons, I acknowledge that Ryan has looked horrible so far this year. However, I was told that this team had an elite run game and OL as well as a top 10 defense. I honestly wasn't expecting the QB to make the run game and defense non-existent, but that appears to be what has happened. That makes absolutely no sense to me, but it is what it is. I feel bad for everyone, all around.

the media has crowned ballard as a top gm  and his teams are overrated .     all his players he signed to big contracts are playing bad every single one .    nelson smith kelly moore buckner  yannick .   show me how many guys this year so far are playing elite ?   the team looks average .   i dont know what people here see this looks like a 6 win team but i am told this team is very talented and its all franks fault .  i doubt even if peterson was coaching this team is a playoff team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheMiz said:

And yet, he'd be #4 on the Bengals, #3 on the Rams...but, at least we got an expensive guard and Will backer

Jamarr is a top 5 receiver in the league...

Higgins and Pitt are on the same level

 

Kupp is a top 3 receiver in the league

Allen Robinson is absolutely not better than Pittman

 

What a horrible argument 

 

"Justin Herbert would be #2 on the Bills and Chiefs"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, EastStreet said:

It's pretty clear...

 

All the excuses... Pick one...

Wentz is bad... (he's gone now)

We need to hit layups and will win (welp we're like #1 in RB pass targets)... lol

It's OL.... Our OL is grading better this year despite Pinter. 

It's our WRs... well Dulin and Campbell are performing when actually get targets, instead of forcing early reads to Pitt

It's our TEs... Well Mo catches balls when get calls. Woods looking good when targeted. Frank's crush (Granson) gets most targets.

 

It's everyone, but not Frank, right! lol

Why does team play better after they abandon his scheme/script? lol

 

Lost all credibility when you said the OL really isn’t that bad lolololol. Defense has played atrociously, OL has played atrociously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, coming on strong said:

he is a number 1 on this team  but he is not elite  yet

 

Yep, Pittman is a #1 on the Colts only. He's a classic #2 since he doesn't have elite speed. We have no reliable WR with elite speed, and everyone saw that before the season except Ballard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 😂😂 😂! Too bad the laughing reaction is gone. Lol
    • iF hEs RaNkEd #1 tHeN He HaS tO Be eLiTe RiGhT?  
    • I am not a big believer in hiring the so called offensive mind. I believe that is the role of a competent qb coach and offensive coordinator. We are playing a coach in Tomlin who is maybe the best coach in the league and he was a defensive coach. Williams is not struggling because of coaching. They have no run game and he is constantly getting pressured and that is on the GM. They didn't invest in the Oline. They built their receiver group in the draft and through free agency.  A solid Oline would have taken pressure off of Williams. The Colts are actually built well to insulate a rookie qb and give him time to grown.  If you look deep into Fields stats, he is still a bad qb. They are just not putting a lot on his plate, running the ball down teams throats and playing strong D.
    • Apparently it is that hard to grasp. They're the #1 ranked  OL through 3 weeks. Not over the entire season. Not over the course of several seasons. They're #1 right now. They're giving a better performance than the other 31 OL. That does not automatically mean they're playing at an elite level. What if no OL is playing at an elite level?   Imagine you're in school in a class of 30. The class is given a test. You get the highest score with a B-. All that means is you had the highest grade but no one scored a perfect, or elite, grade.    Can you grasp it now or do I need to get out the crayons?
    • I think teams are going to give up the run and force offence to march down the field on a 10 play drive and score. They are going to take away the big play and make Richardson throw intermediate and short passes. The defense believes that he will throw up a pick and/or the offense will stall.  Although,  I dislike the cover 2 defense, it is perfect against a guy like Richardson. The Colts have not shown that they can put long drives together. It is early and it is up to Richardson to make teams attack more. If they continue to run with success and Richardson makes those easy plays.  Then it is a different ball game and it opens up everything. Quite simple actually, lol.  If Taylor is pounding the rock against 4 man fronts because Richardson has improved his accuracy.  Then the D will have to pick their poison. Do you play up to stop the run, short and intermediate passes? Or do they play back to stop the big play? Richardson's evolution, if it happens, will stress the defense probably like no other qb because of his skill set.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...