Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Trade targets


Coltivated

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, LiveAndLetAddai said:

 If they get routed by the Chiefs, which is more likely than not, I could see the Colts trying to trade their own players for picks, not the other way around.

No way.  Not this early in our division.  Even with a loss to the Chiefs there is no way they are going down that road.  It’s only two games into a 17 game season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, richard pallo said:

No way.  Not this early in our division.  Even with a loss to the Chiefs there is no way they are going down that road.  It’s only two games into a 17 game season.  

If they get routed there are two fundamental problems, one coaching and two lack of motivation, both are not going to change, unless change happens.  I also did not say trade immeadiately, you have several weeks until the deadline and want to sell high.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Boondoggle said:

I'd call both the Chiefs and Rams and try to shake a receiver loose from one of them.  Both those teams have guys who should be available.

 

Chiefs have Smith-Schuster who came in as a vet and missed time in camp with injury and is now behind the eight ball.  The other two depth types have looked good so maybe they're willing to talk moving him.

 

Rams have a UDFA who caught everything in preseason in McCutcheon who has yet to play.  Also they have a round 2 flyweight/speed type in Atwell who hasn't been able to crack the starting lineup.  Neither of them are going to play much so they'd take a pick just gotta haggle.

 

Goal would be a player who can insulate us from injury and give Ryan another option to help him get that ball out quick.

I could see this a possibility. OBJ probably going back to the Rams next month.

 

That might shake someone loose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Boondoggle said:

I'd call both the Chiefs and Rams and try to shake a receiver loose from one of them.  Both those teams have guys who should be available.

 

Chiefs have Smith-Schuster who came in as a vet and missed time in camp with injury and is now behind the eight ball.  The other two depth types have looked good so maybe they're willing to talk moving him.

 

Rams have a UDFA who caught everything in preseason in McCutcheon who has yet to play.  Also they have a round 2 flyweight/speed type in Atwell who hasn't been able to crack the starting lineup.  Neither of them are going to play much so they'd take a pick just gotta haggle.

 

Goal would be a player who can insulate us from injury and give Ryan another option to help him get that ball out quick.

I get your points and I totally agree that we should target our thin WR group/depth if CB is making a trade. 

But how different would be unproven rookies and UDFA's to the ones we have? 

If a trade is made, it should be a proven vet that gives us not only smthn on the field but a leadership present, too, I think. 

In my opinion it ain't helpin Matty to get another WR with a 6th or 7th round pick trade. Have enough of those on our roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ColtsGermany said:

I get your points and I totally agree that we should target our thin WR group/depth if CB is making a trade. 

But how different would be unproven rookies and UDFA's to the ones we have? 

If a trade is made, it should be a proven vet that gives us not only smthn on the field but a leadership present, too, I think. 

In my opinion it ain't helpin Matty to get another WR with a 6th or 7th round pick trade. Have enough of those on our roster.

I think the importance is finding a third wideout.  That doesn't need to be some pricey vet.  In fact you can limit yourself to possession type options who can function as a third wheel out there for the QB to dump the ball and stay ahead of the chains.  If you do go with a vet then it will probably be someone with questions, or a guy whose best days are behind him and that's fine for what we need.  It won't be an ideal piece because those are too pricey for this late, i.e. in the season.

 

Our guys are not getting it done.  So basically it would be taking a mid to late round pick and rolling the dice that you can give your QB a little help.  There is still a season to win here.  It's not over yet.  The Colts are still thinking playoffs even if it sounds unlikely given the first two games.  Whether they choose a good option comes down to how well the GM sees the talent.  There's plenty of those types of options out there, and if you really wanted to be frugal you could raid a PS squad option.

 

You gotta remember all GMs have memories on guys as they ranked them out during their draft years.  Plus all manner of scouting files with their reports and whatnot.  So these guys who are on PS around the league or bottom of different team rosters will include some that Ballard liked when they were coming out.  Difficulty is in trying to get someone you like for cheap in the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He just said MHJ trade up is fantasy land. Some like Steve Smith and Zierlein are ranking Nabers ahead of MHJ so both of those you can pretty much scratch off the trade up list unless they are some how available around pick 10-13. Very unlikely!
    • 2006 has that winning 11 games is enough mentality like so many here. Having a SB level right side of our o-line should be priority one. We are far from it.  We need a shutdown corner that can go man on the many great 4.3 running WR's. This simply allows the deep safety to defend everything else. Instead of Ballard sticking him in the middle of the field knowing that one of his slow corners will get beat deep.  We need a LB for development and depth that can cover better.  And yes a 3rd receiver that gets open quick that can also threaten deep.  With faster, better players on D, Gus could blitz 5 more times a game to get the pressure we need.  I have No Doubt Steichen has taken Ownership, Ballard and his staff to school regarding what we have and what we need.   Pray that 4-5 of our current very young players can become really solid by seasons end. Plus 3-4 really nice draft picks and 2025 and beyond we can be reckoned with.  We need to be amongst the very Best at running the dang ball and pass blocking.   I think if I could move back 5 spots and take Mims at RT and move Smith over that would be great.  Then use the necessary draft capital to get LB Cooper and CB from Rutgers Melton. I would expect Ballard to take Leggett over a CB. That would be a good move to.  I would feel really good about our prospects.
    • I couldn't agree more with the bolded statement.  Once a player is on the team, the only thing his draft position does for him (aside from the money) is maybe give him a little more time to develop.  Mainly because teams are reluctant to admit that their research didn't pan out and they want to see their guy succeed.   As far as defense, I feel the number one responsibility of the GM and the coach is to help the franchise QB be the franchise QB, if you get what I mean.  And until that's proven, if it means sacrificing a need on defense in order to enhance the QB's arsenal, so be it.  But that's just me...    
    • Yeah I didn’t get the impression he felt a huge need to draft a CB.    He was asked about mentioning YAC guys and he said every team wants them. The Colts have had meetings with the two top YAC guys in the draft - Brock Bowers and Malachi Corley. I absolutely think we’re taking Bowers if he falls to us and I even think we may jump up a couple of picks to land him.    If Bowers gets taken ahead of us I feel pretty certain we’re trading back hoping to land another 3rd rounder.    I didn’t catch if they were talking about draft targets or players already on the roster when they talked about on dimensional guys? My initial thought was Pierce.    I think it’s a given we’re taking at least one Olineman this draft, but that’s not really anything new. 
    • My guesses based on this presser:   - Ballard will NOT draft a CB in the 1st... maybe at all? Everything he's saying seems to suggest he likes the group we have and he wants to see them play and have a chance to develop. I'm almost certain if Mitchell for example is there at 15... we pass on him... either for trade back or for an offensive weapon... or DE? - Ballard WILL trade back. If not in the 1st... then later in the draft... but most probably in the 1st. IMO he pretty much advertised to his potential customers by telling them how many 1st round grades he has. Teams 19-21 are welcome to call and will receive warm greetings from Ballard. Rams, Steelers, Dolphins?  - He seemed to be talking about a specific someone one dimensional offensive weapon when he was talking about them just having had a meeting about a certain player... about whether them and the coaching staff see the way he can be used the same way... and if they agree on this, IMO this is a potential target for the Colts. The names that come to mind - Brian Thomas Jr and Xavier Worthy... A lot of the other WRs are more well rounded...  - The Colts LOVE the OL class both at the top and in depth. I have seen some OL experts suggest there might be 10 starting centers in this draft... and the OTs class in the 1st is like nothing I've ever seen. Can we draft an OL in the 1st? Doubt it... but absolutely expect a few shots on day 2 and 3.   
  • Members

    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,730

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MB-ColtsFan

      MB-ColtsFan 2,654

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 13,762

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,199

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Iron Colt

      Iron Colt 128

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,775

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,442

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 309

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,286

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DoubleE Colt

      DoubleE Colt 331

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...