Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Best players to add to Colts roster or PS?


fire cartier

Recommended Posts

  • Shive changed the title to Best players to add to Colts roster or PS?
On 8/31/2022 at 5:57 PM, sb41champs said:

Nope - Will Fuller has been a bust for two teams now and can't stay healthy!!

 

You are correct that Fuller has had a lot of injuries which have kept him off the field recently throughout his career, but I don't think he has been a total bust when he has been on the field and healthy. In the four seasons before last, he never had less than 423 yards in a season. His high was 879 yards in 2020 with eight touchdowns. From a production perspective, players like Patmon, Dulin, Campbell (Injuries as well), and Strachan have not sniffed anywhere close to those numbers. The same can be said for Beasley from a production standpoint (Covid-status well documented). The question is, can those guys still produce at that level and could they do it for the Colts? If the aforementioned Colts players don't prove that they can add some actual production this year, the Colts would be well-served to explore some of these other options whether it is Fuller, Beasley, OBJ, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, philba101 said:

You are correct that Fuller has had a lot of injuries which have kept him off the field recently throughout his career, but I don't think he has been a total bust when he has been on the field and healthy. In the four seasons before last, he never had less than 423 yards in a season. His high was 879 yards in 2020 with eight touchdowns. From a production perspective, players like Patmon, Dulin, Campbell (Injuries as well), and Strachan have not sniffed anywhere close to those numbers. The same can be said for Beasley from a production standpoint (Covid-status well documented). The question is, can those guys still produce at that level and could they do it for the Colts? If the aforementioned Colts players don't prove that they can add some actual production this year, the Colts would be well-served to explore some of these other options whether it is Fuller, Beasley, OBJ, etc.

It doesn't hurt to keep their cell numbers on speed dial!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is it, and that's how I saw Ballard's pushback -- he's always going to be small. So what do you do with that? Whether they were talking about Worthy or someone else, I don't think Ballard's point was that he needs to put on 10-12 pounds and he won't be able to. I think the point was you can't count on that, so judge his body as it is now.   As for Worthy, he's not much smaller than Josh Downs. At a certain point, small is small. If you draft a guy like that, you need to be comfortable with his size, not betting that he's going to get bigger.
    • Dobbs doesn't strike me as being team president/GM material, and the fact that there has been little movement, little evolution in Ballard's approach in 8 years, tells me Dobbs is more of a yes man, a rubber stamp man.  Other teams can see that.  If Dobbs, or anyone, were actually challenging Ballard from time to time, you might see a change in approach occasionally.
    • If I can find it, I’ll post it. But I think with most teams, they don’t have a plan for TEs. They just draft them just because. Steichen is a guy that seems to have a plan for the players that are drafted. And we’ve seen in Ballard’s recent presser that getting guys the staff can create a plan for is important to them.   This past season we drafted Downs who was different from the receivers that Ballard typically drafts. He had a lot of success because of his own ability, but Shane also schemed up ways to get him favorable match ups. I think Bowers is the type of guy that would flourish with Shane scheming him up. He’s a mismatch against LBs and safeties.
    • Well it’s expensive to move up into the top five.  He said in his presser moving up for Harrison is a “fantasy “.  I would guess he’s referring to pick 4 or there about.   That’s expensive.  I don’t consider he meant that high when he mentioned striking distance.  For me striking distance starts at pick 9.   Probably costing our 2nd round pick as well.  Let’s face it the only 2nd rd picks where Ballard acquired a great player with were Leonard and Taylor.  Leonard in the 30’s and Taylor pick 41.  We would be giving up 46 with a chance to get elite.  Pick 46 would probably get good not even great if he used it.  I’m hoping he tries for greatness this time and stays or moves up.  Please don’t trade back.  That’s all I ask.
  • Members

    • James

      James 796

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,293

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tfunky14

      tfunky14 171

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • boo2202

      boo2202 666

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,253

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 20,732

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Defjamz26

      Defjamz26 4,616

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,151

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,734

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nevbot

      Nevbot 119

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...