Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2022 Colts at Bill (Pre Season) Post Game Thoughts


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 243
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 hours ago, Solid84 said:

I hate Hines up the gut and don’t see it being a play with a high success rate. I guess the only real explanation is wanting to keep the defense honest, which has some merit of course. If he never runs the ball defenses are going to notice that and stop defending it. 

Never runs the ball?    Even last year he ran the ball over 50 times,  and some of them worked well because he averaged nearly 5 yards a carry, a career high.  

Id also like less up the middle.   Just enough to keep defenses honest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, w87r said:

trying to out smart everyone.


Lindsey, Tyson seem to be a couple good options. 

I agree.  Its like Reich thinks no one will expect Hines running up the middle.  Its kind of a sneak attack.


But Hines has had successful runs up the middle, the 14 yard run for example.


Its just that fans over-react when Hines gets stuffed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sir, I was just trying to help you out. No good deed goes unpunished! 
    • Not the least bit surprised to hear from you at this moment.   You see me in an uncomfortable conversation (with a moderator no less) and you seize the moment to take a shot at me.  And you try to act like you’re giving me a sincere explanation of what you’re doing.   Like you have an ounce of credibility with me.      This is not the first time you’ve done this.  While I may not be surprised, I’m certainly disappointed.   
    • Things have now gone from bad to worse.     After I explained myself, I was kind of hoping you’d simply come back with “I’m sorry, I misunderstood you,  may bad.”  And we’d be done with this.  It would be over.      But instead, you double down on the roommate issue and follow up by questioning everything I said by breaking down some of my comments and what you think I really meant by them.     In other words, you’re telling me my motive, my meaning, as if you know my meaning better than I do.    It’s interesting to me…. I was recently told there’s an unofficial moderator policy:  don’t attack the poster, attack the argument.    Well, I don’t see that here.  You attacked me personally the first time and instead of a simple apology, you’ve double downed on a bad hand by attacking me personally AGAIN.      Why you’re comfortable telling me you know my meaning , my intention, better than I do is mystifying to me.  And frankly, I think you’re comfortable doing this because one of us is a moderator, and it certainly is NOT me.     I’ll say it again: you misunderstood my meaning, and intention,  the first time, and you’ve misunderstood me even worse the second time.   As I said before, I’m happy to withdraw and apologize for “go figure”, but the negative inference was not my intention.  Poorly phrased, I give you (in two posts now).   I don’t know what else to say…. I’m hoping this brings this very unfortunate exchange to an end.       
    • I don't think Worthy is a good fit for Richardson's skill set. Think tall with a large catch radius for Richardson to be successful. I don't think u pair a smurf wr with a qb who may have accuracy issues. That's just me
    • https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/nfl-draft-week-begins-michael-breaks-down-potential/id1458884463?i=1000653230340   Think it is a good listen. Bout 17:30 mins in talks about corners and defense, but the whole podcast is a good listen. He says only  bout 12 first rounders in this draft compared to what Ballard said in 19-21. I thought it was an interesting take. 
  • Members

  • Create New...