Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

My thoughts at 42


Recommended Posts

Of course, these rankings have little to do with Ballard's board, but it's all I have to go with....

 

Obviously, if they trade out, this becomes moot. I studied 6 "Big Board" rankings. B/R, PFF, D. Jeremiah, CBS, Sporting News, and Walter's. I would like to start with the TE position. Here is where each had their first TE slotted. It is obviously not a high end year for talent at the TE position. Based on these rankings, I would guess that TE will not be the pick at #42.

 

NFL.com - #60

PFF.com - #60

B/report - #51

CBS.com - #72

SP/news - #42

Walter's - #64

 

I also rule out RB, QB. Edge is unique in that there are a lot of talent available between 35-48...but I don't see them going d-line again this draft early. Not because they are only drafting for need, but because those positions will lose out to those needed (If they're =, go with the need). 

 

Wr is kind of odd. I looked at trade value, and moving up 5 spots from the #42 spot to get "that WR" that might fall, is a 50 point jump. That is the exact value of our 4th rounder at #122. Do I think Ballard would give a 4th to move up 5 spots? Really doubting it....but let's look at it anyway. Here is the same sites and where they place WR from #37 - #42... One slot outside that is put in ( ). 

 

NFL.com - None

PFF.com - None

B/report - #41 Alec Pierce (#36  Justyn Ross.....#43 Khalil Shakir)

CBS.com - None

SP/news - #41 John Metchie

Walter's - None (#43 George Pickens)

 

OT is similar

 

NFL.com - #42 Tyler Smith (#43 Bernhard Raimann)

PFF.com - None

B/report - None

CBS.com - #40 Daniel Faalele

SP/news - None

Walter's - None (#36 Nick Petit-Frere)

 

IOL

 

NFL.com - None (#36 Kenyon Green)

PFF.com - None

B/report - #42 Kenyon Green

CBS.com - None

SP/news - #39 Zion Johnson

Walter's - None

 

 

DT

 

NFL.com - #37 Travis Jones

PFF.com - None

B/report - #39 Phidarian Mathis

CBS.com - None (#36 Devonte Wyatt)

SP/news - None

Walter's - #42 DeMarvin Leal

 

CB has a few more options.

 

NFL.com - None

PFF.com - #37 Daxton Hill

B/report - None

CBS.com - #37 Kyler Gordan

SP/news - #40 Jalen Pitre (#36 Roger McCreary)

Walter's - #37 Kaiir Elam, #40 Andrew Booth Jr.

 

 

NFL.com - #39 Lewis Cine

PFF.com - #41 Jalen Pitre (Also listed as a CB earlier)

B/report - None

CBS.com - #38 Kerby Joseph

SP/news - #38 Daxton Hill, #40 Jalen Pitre

Walter's - None

 

LB even more

 

NFL.com - #38 Christian Harris

PFF.com - None (#36 Leo Chenal)

B/report - #38 Devin Lloyd

CBS.com - #39 Chad Muma

SP/news - None (#43 Christian Harris)

Walter's - #39 Quay Walker

 

So in consensus, LB and EDGE are positions hitting their sweet spot between 36 and 48. We'll have to see what they do.......here is Edge to make my point...

 

NFL.com - None (#44 Nik Bonitto)

PFF.com - #38 Nik Bonitto (#43 Drake Jackson, #44 Josh Paschal)

B/report - #40 David Ojabo (#46 Drake Jackson)

CBS.com - #42 Jermaine Johnson (#44 David Ojabo, #45 Travon Walker, #46 Myjai Sanders)

SP/news - None

Walter's - #38 Logan Hall (#46 Drake Jackson)

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, NorthernColt said:

At this rate, I would think we trade back, but if we don't I like at 42:

Tariq Woolen CB

Christian Watson WR

George Pickens WR

 

Other than that, I'd rather trade back at this point.

Agree.  At this point, my preference will likely be a trade-back unless my top pick is there, but my top 4 if we can’t trade are:

 

Christian Watson

Travis Jones

Kyler Gordon

George Pickens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Archer said:

Agree.  At this point, my preference will likely be a trade-back unless my top pick is there, but my top 4 if we can’t trade are:

 

Christian Watson

Travis Jones

Kyler Gordon

George Pickens

Oh, Travis Jones is my 5th, and my trade down targets would be Abraham Lucas, Calvin Austin, and Skyy Moore...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/27/2022 at 9:24 PM, Four2itus said:

Of course, these rankings have little to do with Ballard's board, but it's all I have to go with....

 

Obviously, if they trade out, this becomes moot. I studied 6 "Big Board" rankings. B/R, PFF, D. Jeremiah, CBS, Sporting News, and Walter's. I would like to start with the TE position. Here is where each had their first TE slotted. It is obviously not a high end year for talent at the TE position. Based on these rankings, I would guess that TE will not be the pick at #42.

 

NFL.com - #60

PFF.com - #60

B/report - #51

CBS.com - #72

SP/news - #42

Walter's - #64

 

I also rule out RB, QB. Edge is unique in that there are a lot of talent available between 35-48...but I don't see them going d-line again this draft early. Not because they are only drafting for need, but because those positions will lose out to those needed (If they're =, go with the need). 

 

Wr is kind of odd. I looked at trade value, and moving up 5 spots from the #42 spot to get "that WR" that might fall, is a 50 point jump. That is the exact value of our 4th rounder at #122. Do I think Ballard would give a 4th to move up 5 spots? Really doubting it....but let's look at it anyway. Here is the same sites and where they place WR from #37 - #42... One slot outside that is put in ( ). 

 

NFL.com - None

PFF.com - None

B/report - #41 Alec Pierce (#36  Justyn Ross.....#43 Khalil Shakir)

CBS.com - None

SP/news - #41 John Metchie

Walter's - None (#43 George Pickens)

 

OT is similar

 

NFL.com - #42 Tyler Smith (#43 Bernhard Raimann)

PFF.com - None

B/report - None

CBS.com - #40 Daniel Faalele

SP/news - None

Walter's - None (#36 Nick Petit-Frere)

 

IOL

 

NFL.com - None (#36 Kenyon Green)

PFF.com - None

B/report - #42 Kenyon Green

CBS.com - None

SP/news - #39 Zion Johnson

Walter's - None

 

 

DT

 

NFL.com - #37 Travis Jones

PFF.com - None

B/report - #39 Phidarian Mathis

CBS.com - None (#36 Devonte Wyatt)

SP/news - None

Walter's - #42 DeMarvin Leal

 

CB has a few more options.

 

NFL.com - None

PFF.com - #37 Daxton Hill

B/report - None

CBS.com - #37 Kyler Gordan

SP/news - #40 Jalen Pitre (#36 Roger McCreary)

Walter's - #37 Kaiir Elam, #40 Andrew Booth Jr.

 

 

NFL.com - #39 Lewis Cine

PFF.com - #41 Jalen Pitre (Also listed as a CB earlier)

B/report - None

CBS.com - #38 Kerby Joseph

SP/news - #38 Daxton Hill, #40 Jalen Pitre

Walter's - None

 

LB even more

 

NFL.com - #38 Christian Harris

PFF.com - None (#36 Leo Chenal)

B/report - #38 Devin Lloyd

CBS.com - #39 Chad Muma

SP/news - None (#43 Christian Harris)

Walter's - #39 Quay Walker

 

So in consensus, LB and EDGE are positions hitting their sweet spot between 36 and 48. We'll have to see what they do.......here is Edge to make my point...

 

NFL.com - None (#44 Nik Bonitto)

PFF.com - #38 Nik Bonitto (#43 Drake Jackson, #44 Josh Paschal)

B/report - #40 David Ojabo (#46 Drake Jackson)

CBS.com - #42 Jermaine Johnson (#44 David Ojabo, #45 Travon Walker, #46 Myjai Sanders)

SP/news - None

Walter's - #38 Logan Hall (#46 Drake Jackson)

 

Great analysis but this makes me think we will trade down for more picks ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
    • Sir, I was just trying to help you out. No good deed goes unpunished! 
    • Not the least bit surprised to hear from you at this moment.   You see me in an uncomfortable conversation (with a moderator no less) and you seize the moment to take a shot at me.  And you try to act like you’re giving me a sincere explanation of what you’re doing.   Like you have an ounce of credibility with me.      This is not the first time you’ve done this.  While I may not be surprised, I’m certainly disappointed.   
    • Things have now gone from bad to worse.     After I explained myself, I was kind of hoping you’d simply come back with “I’m sorry, I misunderstood you,  may bad.”  And we’d be done with this.  It would be over.      But instead, you double down on the roommate issue and follow up by questioning everything I said by breaking down some of my comments and what you think I really meant by them.     In other words, you’re telling me my motive, my meaning, as if you know my meaning better than I do.    It’s interesting to me…. I was recently told there’s an unofficial moderator policy:  don’t attack the poster, attack the argument.    Well, I don’t see that here.  You attacked me personally the first time and instead of a simple apology, you’ve double downed on a bad hand by attacking me personally AGAIN.      Why you’re comfortable telling me you know my meaning , my intention, better than I do is mystifying to me.  And frankly, I think you’re comfortable doing this because one of us is a moderator, and it certainly is NOT me.     I’ll say it again: you misunderstood my meaning, and intention,  the first time, and you’ve misunderstood me even worse the second time.   As I said before, I’m happy to withdraw and apologize for “go figure”, but the negative inference was not my intention.  Poorly phrased, I give you (in two posts now).   I don’t know what else to say…. I’m hoping this brings this very unfortunate exchange to an end.       
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...