Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Easiest/hardest position for rookies to play?


Recommended Posts

For easiest, I'd have to say TE by far, it's not even close.

 

- It's the only position where routinely, players with no football experience try to play and do it well. e.g. Antonio Gates, Jimmy Graham. You don't see basketball players do well at D-Line, O-Line, or QB.

- TEs have an innate advantage on the field by their size and length. They have a size and length advantage over LBs, Safeties, and CBs. 50/50 balls oftentimes go well with little effort. They don't need to be a speed burner or have a catch for huge yardage, but instead, just run a route with enough distance (oftentimes 3-6 yards) to move the chains.

- Strength and speed does not vastly affect the position like other positions. Bad bench press numbers won't prevent one from doing his job. Poor 40 time at the combine won't rapidly drop his draft stock like that of a WR.

- They can block, but don't need to be a primary blocker; instead, be a "chip" blocker. Not very difficult. Even a fully untrained football player can throw a chip block.

- You don't see many extreme busts at the position. Rarely do you see a bad TE as the reason a team is struggling.

 

I place TE as easier ahead of Guard because lineman can oftentimes encounter a strength learning curve when transitioning from the NCAA to NFL.

 

 

For hardest, I'd have to say CB by far.

 

- Rules favoring offenses, physical contact, PI have made that position almost impossible to play if you do as much as hiccup at the receiver.

- Job is heavily affected by the front 7; struggling pass rush = struggles at CB.

- Even the best will get beat routinely. See Jalen Ramsey in the super bowl as an example. Or Vontae Davis vs. Antonio Brown games from 2014-2017.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Easiest I would say is RB, G, TE on offense, DT, MLB, and S on defense, and P on special teams.

Hardest are QB, WR, C, LT, EDGE, CB, and K

 

Notice that the harder positions are the more premium positions. That's why teams draft them higher and we have had a harder time getting good ones ourselves.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming we’re excluding kicker and Punter?
 

On offense, running back is the easiest and by a wide margin.  I think if we’re talking about Tight End then we should make a distinction between the Y (inline, next to the tackle) and the F, split out to be a jumbo receiver to use his body in a mismatch. 

 

Of the two, the F, the receiving tight end, is the easier of the two.   But the Y, is hard.   Really hard.   Because you’ve got to be two different players.  You have to be a very good blocker, almost like an additional lineman, and another receiving option.   There’s very little overlap in those two skill sets.  
 

Based on Ballard’s comments at the pre-draft presser, I’d say we’re in the market for a Y.  Someone that can block at a high level, like Doyle.   If MAC gets hurt, we have no real backup that I’m aware of.   Ballard said if your offense doesn’t have a good Y your running game isn’t the same.   Call it insurance to protect JT. 


Plus,  Ballard spoke well of Granson and thinks he’ll show improvement this season.  We invested a 4 in him last year.  He needs the opportunity to show what he can or can’t do. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if your blessed with the right height, build and can run a bit, TE is one of the easiest positions in sports to make it professionally..... however I think Guard & RB are the easiest positions to adjust to coming out of college and play as a NFL rookie.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having played every position across the OL up to semi-pro level, I can speak to my experience with OL. I would say in terms of difficulty based on transitions i have seen guys make over increase in levels of competition (though admittedly not at the NFL level):

 

Easiest O:  RB, G, Y (slot WR), Z (WR), U (TE...also called "F" TE...I knew it as "U")

Hardest: QB, C, OT, Y (TE), X (WR)

 

QB goes without saying. So damn difficult as you move up in any level of competition. 

 

Along the OL, Center for me was the most mentally and physically demanding. I had to set the protections (some teams the QB does and it takes the burden off the C). I had to make the adjustments. On one play I was blocking a 350lb NT in the 0 gap, head-up, one-on-one. The next play a 250lb quick, fast, strong blitzing ILB. The following play, a shaded NT in the 1 gap. The play later a 3-T DT who was strong and quick cutting inside. Not to mention twists and the fact that I had to maintain the snap count while also checking down to the last minute and couldn't allow pressure up the middle or it would ruin everything.

 

At OT I actually did quite well against speed guys. I was a quick-twitch type of OT and had quick feet. I could easily ride a fast edge out wide and deep and get him by the QB as the QB stepped up. The harder guys were those speed-to-power guys that had a great bull rush too. Those guys could put me on skates sometimes if I guessed wrong or over-committed. 

 

Y TE was damn hard. They have to block at times on-on-one against a DE. When they run routes they need to be strong enough to win against DBs but quick enough to win against LBs. And you have so many responsibilities especially if the C or QB checks you into a protection role pre-snap.

 

X WR was also damn difficult for people. Since they are on the line they have to deal with jams a lot more. They have less room to operate. They also can't go into motion. Definitely have to be stronger and yet also have to be quick/fast enough to win in their route. Plus they are often the team's WR1 and can see double teams. 

 

 

Defensively it is harder to say. All depends on scheme. in general i would say:

 

Easier: DT, DE, S, OLB

 

Harder: CB, NT, ILB

 

NT is just a tough, tough job and as you step up in competition level you can get washed out quicker.

 

CBs are on islands and facing way better WRs than many had at previous level and the only way you learn is through experience and that means getting burnt often. And yet having to not lose your confidence but also correct your mistakes and not get in your own head. 

 

ILB it can depend. But if you are a team that plays a lot of zone and also are the player calling the defense then you have tons to handle mentally and yet also need to physically be able to drop and cover some bigger zones. Read and react, but not overreact too. 

 

Now please do not confuse this with "what positions can you come in and put up numbers quickest?"

 

That is a different story. You can make plays and stack numbers at some of the "hard" positions before you could the easier ones.

 

But actually playing and grading out well at those harder positions, in my opinion, is a lot more difficult. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m old enough to remember the 2021 season. 
    • My top 15 would be: Based on eye test (except Graham, Starr, and Unitas as I was too young to watch them live but I have seen film on them), stats, MVP's, over all win shares, longevity, talent, and clutchness, etc..   1. Tom Brady - eventhough I feel weary putting him here because there have been a couple of cheating scandals. 7 SB wins, 5 SB MVP's, 3 League MVP's, and his stats are among the best ever. His longevity is so impressive as well. He didn't cheat when the Bucs won it all in 2020, so there is that.   2. Joe Montana - 4 SB wins, 3 SB MVP's, 2 League MVP's. He had 0 INT's in 4 SB games, that is unbelievable.    3. Peyton Manning - 2 SB wins, 1 SB MVP,  5 League MVP's - most ever by any NFL player in history. He holds the record for most Yards (5477) and TD's (55) in 1 season = 2013. He was 3-1 vs Brady in AFC Title Games. I would put him in my top 3 all day. He is Mr. 12 wins a year.   4. Johnny Unitas - 1 SB win (1970) as an older starter but 2 NFL Championships in 1958 and 1959. He put up great stats for a QB that played in the 50's and 60's. He actually won a League MVP in the SB era (1967).   5. John Elway - Could do it all. Run, had a cannon for an arm. Once he got a running game in 1997 it wasn't fair. Won SB's in 1997 and 1998. Won League MVP in 1987. Stats wise not too shabby either = 50,000 yards passing and 300 TD's.   6. Aaron Rodgers - 1 SB win, 1 SB MVP, 4 League MVP's. He wins 12 or 13 games every year it seems in his sleep     7. Otto Graham - In his era, he dominated. Won several Championships. He belongs here at worse. I know how great he was but I just feel the other 6 QB's were better.   8. Drew Brees - Stats king, 1 SB win, he would be higher but no League MVP's.   9. Brett Favre - 1 SB win, he is the only NFL player to win 3 straight League MVP's in a row = 1995-1997. He put up huge numbers as well and was an iron man. He would be higher on this list but his total INT's has him here. He is still top 10 and fun to watch.   10. Dan Marino - the only QB I have in my top 10 that didn't win a SB/Championship. By eye test and talent alone he was top 10. He lost to Montana in his only SB appearance (1984), won the League MVP that season in 1984. He set records with TD passes and yards in 1984 that were video game numbers. He never had a defense or run game in his entire career.   11. Terry Bradshaw - He helped the Steelers to 4 SB wins, his stats weren't elite but he did win 1 League MVP, unlike lets say a Ben Roethlisberger who never won a League MVP. He had a stacked team but 4 is 4.   12. Steve Young - As a starter won 1 SB, had it not been for the Cowboys he probably wins 3. He won 2 League MVP's, Aikman never won an League MVP.   13. Roger Staubach - I think he was better than Aikman by the eye test who was also a Cowboys QB. He did win 2 SB's and went to 4 like Peyton as a starter. He was like Steve Young, he could run and scramble really well.   14. Troy Aikman - He helped the Cowboys win 3 SB's. Like Bradshaw on stacked teams but in big games his accuracy was spot on. IMO Emmitt Smith was the best player on his teams but without Troy they don't win 3 SB's either.   15. Patrick Mahomes - as a starter, has made 4 straight AFC Championships games, has won a SB and been too 2. He has won a League MVP, SB MVP, and has had a season where he threw for 5000 yards and 50 TD's = 2018. He is the best QB over the last 4 seasons easily and going into 2022 I have him #1. Even without Hill, they will still win the AFC West IMO.      - Omissions, people will say where in the hell is Sammy Baugh? Sammy is top 20 = great QB, here is the deal with Sammy. He was known as a top 20 football player of all-time because of his defense and punting ability along with his QB play, just not for his QB play. Was he a great QB, hell yes but not better than my top 15. Overall player he is arguably top 10 because of his defensive play and Punting ability's.    Where is Bart Starr? I say Top 20. He wasn't better than Mahomes though IMO.
    • Yup, after I posted, I looked it up. Looks like Coutee only had 2 weeks on the 53 last year, which he needs 6 min for an accrued season.    If TY isn't resigned, I think Coutee stands a decent chance of sticking on the 53. We're over stocked on bigs, not so much on Z/slot types. That is, unless they start running 6-3+ guys from Z... 
    • I think Coutee has one more year to accrue.
    • Coutee was a late waive (last cut day) by Houston that surprised a lot of folks, and we jumped on him quickly (I think it was around the time we knew TY would miss time). I don't mean necessarily that someone will grab him for a starter roll, but he'll get grabbed by someone (PS or 53). He's been in the league 4 seasons, but not sure he's met the accrued 4 year stipulation (weeks on 53). Strachan and Patmon both have a little film out there which will interest teams. Patmon has a bit of a rep for not being a my-ball guy, so that likely hurts him. Strachan is seen as raw with a high ceiling so teams are more likely to romanticize lol. All three would at least make it to a team, 53 or PS. But I think Strachan is the most likely claimed for a 53 spot. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...