Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Ballard Press Conference


IrsaysArmy

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, JediXMan said:


Huh he’s not thrilled with him. I’m annoyed how he can say the WR core is talented though it’s not at all.

 

I can't fathom he actually believes this.  That would be reason to fire him before he leaves the building. 

 

It's gotta be GM speak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 758
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 minutes ago, MPStack said:


You waste a 1st and 3rd on a band aide? Asking for a friend.

 

I did not see the beginning of the presser.  Some are saying that he praised Wentz.  The part I saw indicated that he had to be thinking the shortcomings on O were on the QB, but that's my take.

 

He also said that this is a spread the ball around offense, and that we did less of that this year than last year.  etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stitches said:

Irsay: there will be changes!

 

Ballard: Reich is amazing, Eberflus is amazing, Wentz is amazing(just needs to make the layups), all our coaches are great. Our roster is great, we got 7 pro bowlers, WRs are great group, DEs are young and need time, OL is great, CBs are young and getting better... 

 

So yeah... this is kind of a slap in the face of every Colts fan that has been angry and distraught with what happened last two weeks. Not that I expected him to publicly roast the roster but yeah... that was kind of tone deaf to say the least. 

 

 

I'm gonna have to agree with this assessment, mostly.

 

Summary of the conference --

Ballard:  This was an embarrassment, and changes must be made.

Press Corp:  What changes will that be?

Ballard:  None.  Carson will be back.  Fisher will be back.  Eberflus will be back...

 

Yeah, I had to chuckle too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DougDew said:

 

I did not see the beginning of the presser.  Some are saying that he praised Wentz.  The part I saw indicated that he had to be thinking the shortcomings on O were on the QB, but that's my take.

 

To me, we all have to end up "reading between the lines" to an extent in these generic pressers.

 

"Wentz has to play better", "We have to be able to pass in this league...", "Gotta make the layups", "Hines and Pascal had 800 and 600 last year, Pascal had more than 600 yards 2 years in a row..."

 

were countered with "Wentz also did a few good things" like throwing a bone in the other direction.

 

So, to me, the overall verdict was, he is not too thrilled with the performance of Wentz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, John Hammonds said:

I'm gonna have to agree with this assessment, mostly.

 

Summary of the conference --

Ballard:  This was an embarrassment, and changes must be made.

Press Corp:  What changes will that be?

Ballard:  None.  Carson will be back.  Fisher will be back.  Eberflus will be back...

 

Yeah, I had to chuckle too.

Fish will be gone trust me but your post is funny, I love it haha 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DougDew said:

Ballard has acknowledged that neither Carson or Fisher are the long term solutions.  He used the term "band aid" when talking about those positions.

He never said that about Wentz. He said he wants Wentz to be the answer or another  guy for ten years. Was asked about QB bandaids and said sometimes you can’t find the long term  right away. Never called Wentz a bandaid.

Can someone tell me what was said about Pittman. I missed that part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ego gets in Ballard’s way. He won’t change. Asked about his lack of helping the team through free agency, he cited his acquisition of … Buckner, who wasn’t a free agent. He said he’s not going to sign a FA just because the media is “clamoring” for one. It’s absurd. Ballard thinks you either blow your cap on an overpriced free agent or you don’t sign any — there is middle ground and many successful teams find it. And if actually thinks we have a talented group of WR w great upside then he’s more overrated than I thought. Other than that, a lot of “look, man” and “you know me” and cursing dropped in so the media will call him “honest and transparent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

"Short passing game" - make the layups. He said it several times. Wentz has to make the layups within the system, doesn't need to play hero.

I refuse to believe Frank hasn’t told him this a million over the season, so why should it all of a sudden stick because the GM said it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Wentzszn said:

He never said that about Wentz. He said he wants Wentz to be the answer or another  guy for ten years. Was asked about QB bandaids and said sometimes you can’t find the long term  right away. Never called Wentz a bandaid.

Can someone tell me what was said about Pittman. I missed that part.

 

Of the good things that happened this season, he said JT emerged as one of the best players in this league and still has room to be better (also said he got lucky with JT's pick), and Pittman really emerged this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Solid84 said:

I refuse to believe Frank hasn’t told him this a million over the season, so why should it all of a sudden stick because the GM said it?

 

...only because the media wanted to hear it. Frank never told that to the media, right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

To me, we all have to end up "reading between the lines" to an extent in these generic pressers.

 

"Wentz has to play better", "We have to be able to pass in this league...", "Gotta make the layups"

 

were countered with "Wentz also did a few good things" like throwing a bone in the other direction.

 

So, to me, the verdict was, he is not too thrilled with the performance of Wentz.

Who is a long term spread the ball around QB who can hit the easy layups that Ballard says that is a big part of Frank's game?

 

Eihlinger?

 

Anybody in the draft or FA?    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ShuteAt168 said:

Ego gets in Ballard’s way. He won’t change. Asked about his lack of helping the team through free agency, he cited his acquisition of … Buckner, who wasn’t a free agent. He said he’s not going to sign a FA just because the media is “clamoring” for one. It’s absurd. Ballard thinks you either blow your cap on an overpriced free agent or you don’t sign any — there is middle ground and many successful teams find it. And if actually thinks we have a talented group of WR w great upside then he’s more overrated than I thought. Other than that, a lot of “look, man” and “you know me” and blah blah blah. 

 

Just noticed your screen name.  I'd tell Grigs (I meant Ballard) that he can't hold his mud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DougDew said:

Who is a long term spread the ball around QB who can hit the easy layups that Ballard says that is a big part of Frank's game?

 

Eihlinger?

 

Anybody in the draft or FA?    

 

Jimmy G with a quick release is outstanding at it in the 10-20 yard range. He relies on YAC from Deebo and Kittle all the time along with his running game, much like Rivers except he can use his legs a bit more like Wentz. Problem is he is more fragile than Wentz on the injury front, would need an incentive laden contract.  That is just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much what I expected for the most part. Was more critical of Wentz than I figured, but nothing outlandish. More just interesting that he acknowledged the importance of QB, no matter the talent elsewhere.

 

Surprised he was bullish on the WR’s. Kind of on the DL too, but acknowledges it wasn’t enough. Seems like he’s talking more about depth there though, which makes sense with the recent workouts.

 

Think the thing he goes after most is a LT, then just more of the same at other positions. Wouldn’t be surprised if he adds a WR, but definitely not the top tier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Nickster said:

 

You must have missed the middle of Manning's career and last 2 years then. 


This years OLINE was far from special.  You can simply see that by watching games or look at grades. 

 

Our Oline was not very good this year.  Lot's of different reasons for this, but I don't believe you think this OLINE was great.


Kelly played hurt

Nelson played hurt

Fisher played hurt

 

When very good to great players grade out well below their normal performance, they’re hurt.  What part of hurt don’t you understand?
 

Your attitude is they’re no good, get rid of them.    That’s the view of a frustrated fan.   This line has been great in the past, there’s no reason to think they can’t be great again.

 

Taylor didn’t run for 1800 yards by himself.    Wentz had the fewest sacks in a number of years.   The O-Line may not have been great, but they weren’t as bad as you try to make them out to be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, stitches said:

Irsay: there will be changes!

 

Ballard: Reich is amazing, Eberflus is amazing, Wentz is amazing(just needs to make the layups), all our coaches are great. Our roster is great, we got 7 pro bowlers, WRs are great group, DEs are young and need time, OL is great, CBs are young and getting better... 

 

So yeah... this is kind of a slap in the face of every Colts fan that has been angry and distraught with what happened last two weeks. Not that I expected him to publicly roast the roster but yeah... that was kind of tone deaf to say the least. 

 

 

He definitely didn’t say Wentz was amazing. If anything he all but said he was very unhappy with his performance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

To me, we all have to end up "reading between the lines" to an extent in these generic pressers.

 

"Wentz has to play better", "We have to be able to pass in this league...", "Gotta make the layups", "Hines and Pascal had 800 and 600 last year, Pascal had more than 600 yards 2 years in a row..."

 

were countered with "Wentz also did a few good things" like throwing a bone in the other direction.

 

So, to me, the overall verdict was, he is not too thrilled with the performance of Wentz.

spot on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

To me, we all have to end up "reading between the lines" to an extent in these generic pressers.

 

"Wentz has to play better", "We have to be able to pass in this league...", "Gotta make the layups", "Hines and Pascal had 800 and 600 last year, Pascal had more than 600 yards 2 years in a row..."

 

were countered with "Wentz also did a few good things" like throwing a bone in the other direction.

 

So, to me, the overall verdict was, he is not too thrilled with the performance of Wentz.

Right.    When asked about a player directly, a GM is not gong to throw someone under the bus and will tend to support the player. 

 

But when speaking sincerely about where he thinks things went wrong, you can tell that he must be thinking the QB was responsible for a lot of the issues on offense, just based upon where he says the team needs to be better at.  Direct vs. Nuance 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Jimmy G with a quick release is outstanding at it in the 10-20 yard range. He relies on YAC from Deebo and Kittle all the time along with his running game, much like Rivers except he can use his legs a bit more like Wentz. Problem is he is more fragile than Wentz on the injury front, would need an incentive laden contract.  That is just my opinion.

Jimmy G has 3 pro bowlers as offensive skill players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

What is funny is, how does a team like the Rams just get Von Miller and Odell and we can't do nothing? No way they could that if there was a true Salary Cap. I have looked at the numbers, they over the Salary Cap. Do the math.

This is actually true, has anyone looked at those 2 guys contract's. No way that should've been allowed. Math baby!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Wentzszn said:

Jimmy G has 3 pro bowlers as offensive skill players. 

 

Yeah, who threw to them to get the production in an accurate manner? Having TY with Luck and JB produced different results, we know that first hand. It takes two to tango. Lance only started 1 or 2 games. Jimmy G is accurate in the short passing game. Look at the fast slants he threw vs some of the best Rams DBs in their first game and some darts he threw in the second game, it showed me all I needed to know about his accuracy which is far better than Wentz in the 10-20 range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

What is funny is, how does a team like the Rams just get Von Miller and Odell and we can't do nothing? No way they could that if there was a true Salary Cap. I have looked at the numbers, they over the Salary Cap. Do the math.


Dear God…   :facepalm:

 

So what are you saying?   That there’s a conspiracy going on?   That someone is cheating?   That Irsay is cheap?   Make your point clearly.   Say what you mean. 
 

Im likely going to regret this post if I don’t already…..   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, HungarianColtsFan said:

 

"would like Carson Wentz to be the long term answer but sometimes it doesn't work out that way"

 

“I’d like to quit band-aiding it. I’d like for Carson to be the long-term answer or for somebody to be here for the next 10 years.”

 

Hmm...he doesn't seem commited to Wentz.

 

 

That wasn’t the quote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NewColtsFan said:


Dear God…   :facepalm:

 

So what are you saying?   That there’s a conspiracy going on?   That someone is cheating?   That Irsay is cheap?   Make your point clearly.   Say what you mean. 
 

Im likely going to regret this post if I don’t already…..   

No just look at it. How did they get those guys? Just asking. I am looking at it and Salary Cap wise it is impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • AR proved in his first game that he is going to be very good. 
    • Yes, this QB class can survive because of their athletic ability that translates well to the modern NFL. But, I'm trying to find a QB in the class who can do all the running (which most of them are good at) AND also be able to understand what defenses try to do, and make or change plays within the pocket.   By the virtue of Penix having played inside the pocket almost all the plays, he should've developed an innate ability to do just that, so maybe he'll translate well mentally. Though his tape seems to show concerns about his touch and accuracy in short and intermediate levels. You may be proven right if he could develop into a more accurate passer that can throw with anticipation. 
    • Also the reason  you go wr is to make sure you have the right  qb. If he stinks with an star cast of offensive  weapons  then you know you need another qb
    • Very true.  Josh Allen is another one.  The Bills traded for Diggs to help him out and they took off.  Now he’s gone.  I expect the Bills to do something big again to help him out.  Once you get your quarterback the next step is making sure he has the weapons around him.  Right now AR has some real quality weapons.  Getting him another one could really set the team up for a nice run.
    • Yes, if I'm forced to choose, I'd go with Williams, despite him earning some reputation with all the garbage talk from his camp even since the year before the actual draft. I read a scout saying that the PR guys (including his father) Williams has led him to those bad reputation and decisions, when he should've gone under the radar with much more good vibes surrounding him. Anyway, it's on him now to prove by his play in the NFL.   I'd also go with Daniels, as Williams seems just out of reach for anyone other than Bears. Concerns with Daniels are about his durability and the ability to dissect NFL defenses, but if he becomes injury prone in the NFL, at least that'd help the team to move on to finding the next franchise QB.   My overall gripe with this QB class is that no one stands out as being strong in his ability to go through progressions and reads, as many of their offenses seemed to involve limited reads. So it falls squarely on the individual's intelligence to be able to translate at the highest level, and there's no way any fan like us would get to know without working him out and bringing him in for interviews - which teams are doing with those QBs. So, NFL teams will need to figure out who among this class can consistently pick apart NFL defenses or at least grow into that level.   This QB class is different because the tape of them doesn't tell that part of the story due to the offenses they played in. 
  • Members

    • krunk

      krunk 8,283

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moosejawcolt

      Moosejawcolt 5,087

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • VikingsFanInChennai

      VikingsFanInChennai 2,968

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RDNScot

      RDNScot 27

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Blueblood23

      Blueblood23 999

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • csmopar

      csmopar 16,138

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jason_

      Jason_ 2,266

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,210

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 1,910

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...