Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2021 PFF post Game 3


EastStreet
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Eye test are always suspect. But I place eye tests done by trained individuals (like at PFF) that do it all day everyday in higher regard than fans and media. But watching guys get burnt for example over and over, doesn't really require a lot of training to form a basic opinion. 

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, physicist, bongo player and really smart guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/28/2021 at 1:34 PM, PRnum1 said:

I think we should use 2 back sets at the goal line.  Other teams do if for short yardage.

 

If its 3rd and 1 or 4th and 1, use a bigger body like an extra Oline (like a fullback) to block and let JT run it in.

 

That would be a far better 4th down  play than what we've seen.

 

We've been wanting Hines and Mack on the field at the same time for years. 

 

I always said have Hines up on the line as a receiver and JT at RB. 

 

I wouldn't be upset if Mack and JT were in at RB and Hines was lined up at WR....but it'll never happen. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, lollygagger8 said:

 

We've been wanting Hines and Mack on the field at the same time for years. 

 

I always said have Hines up on the line as a receiver and JT at RB. 

 

I wouldn't be upset if Mack and JT were in at RB and Hines was lined up at WR....but it'll never happen. 

No one has tried 2 backs in a long time. Not two RBs.  Some teams have FB still some times.  I really think they possibly find some things to exploit with the lighter D's with Nickel packages being the base of most teams.  

 

I'd certainly like to see us try it.  what do we have to lose?  It puts pressure on a D if you don't know which back is getting the FB.  and all 3 of our backs can run out to catch it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Nickster said:

No one has tried 2 backs in a long time. Not two RBs.  Some teams have FB still some times.  I really think they possibly find some things to exploit with the lighter D's with Nickel packages being the base of most teams.  

 

I'd certainly like to see us try it.  what do we have to lose?  It puts pressure on a D if you don't know which back is getting the FB.  and all 3 of our backs can run out to catch it.  

 

Yeah they lined up JT and Hines on one play the last game (JT as FB) and JT got the handoff and did pretty well. 

 

It's just enough to keep the D guessing on who's getting the ball and I'd love to see it done more often. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, lollygagger8 said:

 

Yeah they lined up JT and Hines on one play the last game (JT as FB) and JT got the handoff and did pretty well. 

 

It's just enough to keep the D guessing on who's getting the ball and I'd love to see it done more often. 

Yeah I remember.  That was an old fashioned Belly play man and it worked.  More of that please. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/28/2021 at 11:58 AM, EastStreet said:

Will try to keep this going every week with updates so we can follow along performance peaks and valleys
As always, if you don't like PFF... just don't click.. 

 

Keeping it simple
Rounding up
Under 50 - Red
Over 70 -  Blue


PFF grades are year to date
Snap count % are per game

 

Format 
Player - comments 
Snap count %
PFF grades (year to date, not per game)
 

 

 

QB Note - While not great, not bad at all given pressure/hits ranking

  • C Wentz QB - Still grading decent despite our OL woes.
    • 100% / 93% / 100% / 
    • 60.1 / 67.8 / 68.5 / 
  • J Eason QB - 
    • NA / 7% / NA / 
    • NA / 29.6 / NA / 
       

RB Note - I just don't get the usage %s

  • J Taylor RB - Better grade, still low usage. Less than Hines this game??
    • 55% / 45% / 48% / 
    • 60.3 / 60.5 / 64.1 / 
  • N Hines RB - Still grading solid, up from last game.
    • 45% / 37% / 56% / 
    • 69.6 / 60.9 / 67.9 / 
  • M Mack RB 
    • NA / 19% / NA / 
    • NA / 53.8 / NA / 
       

TE Note - I think the blocking needs (due to OL woes) is hurting this group

  • J Doyle TE
    • 59% / 70% / 57% / 
    • 64.7 / 71.2 / 68.1 / 
  • M Alie-Cox TE
    • 51% / 40% / 46% / 
    • 50.0 / 51.2 / 56.1 / 
  • K Granson TE
    • 9%  / 9% / 20% / 
    • NA / NA / NA / 
       

WR Note 

  • M Pittman WR - grades still trending up
    • 97% / 90% / 93% / 
    • 60.8 / 68.8 / 72.7
  • Z Pascal WR - down game for Zach. Leads the team in drops
    • 91% / 91% / 89% / 
    • 64.9 / 62.0 / 57.7
  • P Campbell WR - not the best game
    • 61% / NA / 80% / 
    • 62.6 / NA / 56.9 / 
  • M Strachan WR
    • 24% / 51% / NA / 
    • 75.2 / 62.3 / NA / 
  • A Dulin WR
    • 8% / 39% / 11% / 
    • NA / 59.5 / 58.6 / 
  • D Harris WR
    • NA / 3% / NA / 
    • NA / NA / NA / 
       

OL Note - Feel like 2020 Philly OL 

  • E Fisher LT - Played 100% this week, gave up 2 more sacks. Too fast?
    • NA / 73% / 100% / 
    • NA / 62.0 (1 Sack) / 54.1 (3 total sacks, not 3 in the game) / 
  • B Smith RT - need him back
    • 100% / NA / NA / 
    • 60.8 (1) / NA / NA / 
  • J Davenport T - bit better, still bad
    • 100% / 100% / 72% / 
    • 59.8 (2) / 43.0 (2) / 47.4 (2) / 
  • M Glowinski G - Guessing Smith's absence is impacting him big time
    • 100% / 100% / 100% / 
    • 50.7 / 45.3 / 43.4 (1) / 
  • Q Nelson G - Was trending better before injury
    • 100% / 100% / 21% / 
    • 72.7 / 63.9 / 69.3 / 
  • R Kelly C - still good, not great
    • 100% / 100% / 100% / 
    • 67.9 / 68.8 (1) / 68.2 (1)
  • M Pryor OT - would like to see his snap count increase, and less JD.
    • NA / 27% / 28% / 
    • NA / 62.3 / 66.5 / 
  • C Reed OG - Nice job stepping in for Q
    • NA / NA / 79% / 
    • NA / NA / 68.6 / 

 

 

iDL Note -  

  • D Buckner DT - doesn't seem to be himself this year so far.
    • 87% / 88% / 76% / 
    • 59.6 / 71.3 / 66.9 (1 total sack)
  • G Stewart NT - snap counts are decreasing, which I think is good. 75+ is too much for a NT
    • 81% / 75% / 69% / 
    • 62.9 / 66.9 / 65.8 / 
  • T Stallworth DT - 
    • 13% / 27% / NA / 
    • 44.2 / 39.4 / NA / 
  • C Williams - Not great, but not bad. 
    • NA / NA / 18% / 
    • NA / NA / 55.5 / 
  • A Woods - Like Williams, not great, but not Stallworth level bad.
    • NA / NA / 18% / 
    • NA / NA / 54.3 / 

 

DE Note - 

  • K Paye DE - still grading strong though limited snaps
    • 76% / 69% / 10% / 
    • 77.7 / 75.1 / 74.2
  • A Muhammad DE - Still very solid and consistent.
    • 70% / 61% / 78% / 
    • 68.0 (1)  / 67.7 (2) / 66.7 (2)
  • T Lewis DE - Huge grading uptick at the same time as his snaps go up. Need more Lewis.
    • 54% / 54% / 78% / 
    • 66.7 / 69.7 / 79.5
  • B Banogu DE - not a bad day
    • 11% / 7% / 19% / 
    • 54.1 / 59.5 / 60.2 / 
  • K Turay DE - Little better with the increased snap count. 
    • NA / 19% / 34% / 
    • NA / 44.4 / 49.5 / 
       

LB Note - 

  • B Okereke LB - need improvement. Grades still descending. Leads team in missed Ts
    • 100% / 100% / 100% / 
    • 58.3 / 57.4 / 53.1 / 
  • D Leonard LB - back to 70s, still need more given his pay
    • 100% / 100% / 100% / 
    • 71.3 / 69.5 / 70.1
  • Z Franklin LB
    • 24% / 5% / 31% / 
    • 52.9 / 58.9 / 50.3 / 
  • EJ Speed - decent day back from injury
    • NA / NA / 9% / 
    • NA / NA / 64.6 / 
       

CB Note - Rock still easily the best DB through 3 weeks.

  • R Ya-Sin CB - Great grading last week to bring his year grade to 73.2. Hope it continues. Best DB easily on the team.
    • 100% / 98% / 49% / 
    • 63.7 / 62.5 / 73.2
  • K Moore CB - Better game over last week, still need more.
    • 96% / 97% / 99% / 
    • 56.1 / 42.9 / 48.7 /
  • T Carrie CB - 
    • 69% / 69% / 
    • 60.6 / 58.8 / NA / 
  • I Rodgers CB - trending back up. 
    • 11% / 31% / 22% / 
    • 46.7 / 33.9 / 43.2 /
  • Rhodes - ouch. Guessing still not 100%
    • NA / NA / 91% / 
    • NA / NA / 41.2
       

Safety Note - Sendejo has a nice first day. More please.

  • K Willis SS - Didn't get torched like in weeks prior, but still grading very low.
    • 100% / 100% / 68% / 
    • 40.6 / 47.0 / 41.1
  • J Blackmon FS - Not bad
    • 100% / 100% / 97% / 
    • 53.4 / 64.6 / 64.4 / 
  • A Sendejo - Great 1st game coming in to relieve Willis
    • NA / NA / 32% / 
    • NA / NA / 69.3 / 
  • G Odum
    • NA / NA / 3% / 
    • NA / NA / 60.0 / 

Wow lol. Those numbers are stinky 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...