Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts News - Fisher and Teamer


Recommended Posts

Colts waived another guy that I didn't know was on the roster - Roderic Teamer, a safety who didn't play in 2020.

 

Also the Colts want to work out a long term deal with Fisher, according to the article.  Which makes sense to do soon, assuming they think he can play.  If he comes back and has a great year, he's going to be in high demand next season.

 

 

https://www.profootballrumors.com/

Link to post
Share on other sites

The media picked up the Fisher news yesterday when they had the film session with Ballard.  Ballard said they want to do a long term deal once Fisher proves he can come back from his injury.  Don’t look for anything soon.  Honestly I expect Leonard and Smith extensions before the season starts and Fisher at some point in the season if he comes back.  If they can’t get one done in season it wouldn’t shock me to see the Colts tag him and then do one if he recovers.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

The media picked up the Fisher news yesterday when they had the film session with Ballard.  Ballard said they want to do a long term deal once Fisher proves he can come back from his injury.  Don’t look for anything soon.  Honestly I expect Leonard and Smith extensions before the season starts and Fisher at some point in the season if he comes back.  If they can’t get one done in season it wouldn’t shock me to see the Colts tag him and then do one if he recovers.  

 

 

You're probably right.  But a franchise LT is the more important position.  More than RT, and even an All Pro LB.

 

I'm not saying he'll sacrifice either of them in order to sign Fisher long term.  But I think that once they see that Fisher can play, they'll want to wrap him up long term.  He won't be cheap either.

 

I think it was on one of the podcast they pointed out where all of the LTs for the playoff teams were drafted.  Getting one that works out past the first round is pretty rare.  And we probably won't even have a first rounder next year.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

 

 

You're probably right.  But a franchise LT is the more important position.  More than RT, and even an All Pro LB.

 

I'm not saying he'll sacrifice either of them in order to sign Fisher long term.  But I think that once they see that Fisher can play, they'll want to wrap him up long term.  He won't be cheap either.

 

I think it was on one of the podcast they pointed out where all of the LTs for the playoff teams were drafted.  Getting one that works out past the first round is pretty rare.  And we probably won't even have a first rounder next year.

Age and health would be the argument for Smith and Leonard right now.  It’s not all about position.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently it's a two year deal for Fisher, however the second year can be voided by the colts.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

Age and health would be the argument for Smith and Leonard right now.  It’s not all about position.

 

No doubt.  I'm not saying they won't sign them.  I'm just saying that getting a franchise LT is more important.

 

You're right, they have to take into account how many years Fisher can play at a high level.  We were so lucky with AC.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

 

No doubt.  I'm not saying they won't sign them.  I'm just saying that getting a franchise LT is more important.

 

You're right, they have to take into account how many years Fisher can play at a high level.  We were so lucky with AC.

Well like Ballard said they need to see if Fisher can come back from this injury before they extend him.  Leonard and Smith don’t have that question mark right now.  That’s why I expect their extensions done around the same time Kelly’s was last year where as Fisher will wait.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

 

 

You're probably right.  But a franchise LT is the more important position.  More than RT, and even an All Pro LB.

 

I'm not saying he'll sacrifice either of them in order to sign Fisher long term.  But I think that once they see that Fisher can play, they'll want to wrap him up long term.  He won't be cheap either.

 

I think it was on one of the podcast they pointed out where all of the LTs for the playoff teams were drafted.  Getting one that works out past the first round is pretty rare.  And we probably won't even have a first rounder next year.

 

That is incorrect, Andrew Whitworth started for the Rams, unless they mean were UDFA, otherwise Whitworth signed with the rams in FA

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, PuntersArePeopleToo said:

 

That is incorrect, Andrew Whitworth started for the Rams, unless they mean were UDFA, otherwise Whitworth signed with the rams in FA

 

Why is it incorrect?  Whitworth was a 2nd round pick.  He is one of the rare ones.  It's not impossible to find a franchise LT outside of the first round, it's just very rare.  Apparently Ballard didn't think any of the guys available by our 2nd round pick were worth it.

 

BTW, if you look at the waaaay too early draft prospects for 2022, LTs are pretty sparse.  Things will change in 11 months, I'm sure.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

 

Why is it incorrect?  Whitworth was a 2nd round pick.  He is one of the rare ones.  It's not impossible to find a franchise LT outside of the first round, it's just very rare.  Apparently Ballard didn't think any of the guys available by our 2nd round pick were worth it.

 

BTW, if you look at the waaaay too early draft prospects for 2022, LTs are pretty sparse.  Things will change in 11 months, I'm sure.

 

 

I meant the part that all were drafted, which the way it was stated made it seem like they were saying drafted by that team, wasn't so much the draft round

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, PuntersArePeopleToo said:

I meant the part that all were drafted, which the way it was stated made it seem like they were saying drafted by that team, wasn't so much the draft round

 

Got it.  No, the point was that every franchise LT was found in the first (or rarely, second) round.  

 

There's an argument to be made that we should be drafting LTs in the later rounds, not to start but to develop.  Maybe that's a pipe dream because the good ones are a different animal.

 

Joe Reitz said something to the effect that Offensive linemen are made,  but Left Tackles are born that way.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

Got it.  No, the point was that every franchise LT was found in the first (or rarely, second) round.  

 

There's an argument to be made that we should be drafting LTs in the later rounds, not to start but to develop.  Maybe that's a pipe dream because the good ones are a different animal.

 

Joe Reitz said something to the effect that Offensive linemen are made,  but Left Tackles are born that way.

Ah okay, I was thinking they were saying it was with that team. 

 

And I mean plus Fisher was number 1 overall too. Hopefully that pedigree holds true

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Smonroe said:

Colts waived another guy that I didn't know was on the roster - Roderic Teamer, a safety who didn't play in 2020.

 

Also the Colts want to work out a long term deal with Fisher, according to the article.  Which makes sense to do soon, assuming they think he can play.  If he comes back and has a great year, he's going to be in high demand next season.

 

 

https://www.profootballrumors.com/

Maybe the reason Teamer was waived is because we were awarded DaeSean Hamilton off waivers.  Wouldn’t that be a surprise.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CR91 said:

Apparently it's a two year deal for Fisher, however the second year can be voided by the colts.

That's potentially a big deal. Wonder why it hasn't been more widely reported that way. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Maybe the reason Teamer was waived is because we were awarded DaeSean Hamilton off waivers.  Wouldn’t that be a surprise.

 

They implied it was because of drafting Davis.  That makes no sense to me.  Hamilton is definitely an upgrade.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, CR91 said:

Apparently it's a two year deal for Fisher, however the second year can be voided by the colts.

Haven't seen this. I hope its true. Can you share the source?

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Hoose said:

Haven't seen this. I hope its true. Can you share the source?

It's in the linked story in the first post above at https://www.profootballrumors.com/

 

Quote

For what it’s worth, Fisher’s contract technically has a voidable year in 2022, according to Zak Keefer of The Athletic. The extra year puts some of the obligation on next year’s books, which gives the Colts extra incentive to extend the pact.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Hoose said:

Haven't seen this. I hope its true. Can you share the source?

 

Holder mentioned it. Can't find the tweet

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I read, the second year is voidable in that it is essentially a one-year deal which gives some flexibility in spreading his cap hit over this year and next. It is an automatically voiding second year (he is only under contract to actually play for this year, would need a contract extension to play here beyond 2021).

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, CR91 said:

Apparently it's a two year deal for Fisher, however the second year can be voided by the colts.

I haven’t seen that

Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, csmopar said:

I haven’t seen that

See the post above yours.  That poster did a really good job explaining how it’s technically a two year deal but it’s really a one year deal.  The second year is just a book keeping move.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.google.com/amp/s/coltswire.usatoday.com/2021/05/14/indianapolis-colts-eric-fisher-contract-voidable-year-2022/amp/

Quote

 

While it was reported that Fisher would be signing a one-year deal—and that’s essentially what happened—there is a voidable year on the deal for 2022, which helps the Colts keep a bit more of salary-cap space, per Zak Keefer of The Athletic.

And the 30-year-old Fisher, who’s recovering from a torn Achilles and spoke to reporters Thursday for the first time, doesn’t sound like a player arriving in Indianapolis thinking he’ll be here for a few short months. (His contract is technically for two years but automatically voids in 2022, essentially making it a one-year deal.) If Fisher fully recovers from the injury and plays well down the stretch, he could be here for multiple seasons.

Fisher signed a one-year, $9.4 million deal with the Colts earlier this week. Depending on how much the signing bonus is for Fisher, the Colts could use this voidable year to help spread the cap hit over two years.

 

Still haven't seen details but I imagine if it structured like reported it would look something like this.

 

2021: $1m base, $4.2m signing bonus, 

2022: $4.2m signing bonus(voidable year, dead cap)

 

Maybe a little smaller signing bonus, but I would think if you were going to go that route you would maximize the 2021 cap savings. This does it based on $9.4m reported contract.

 

Saves us money this year for extensions

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, w87r said:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/coltswire.usatoday.com/2021/05/14/indianapolis-colts-eric-fisher-contract-voidable-year-2022/amp/

Still haven't seen details but I imagine if it structured like reported it would look something like this.

 

2021: $1m base, $4.2m signing bonus, 

2022: $4.2m signing bonus(voidable year, dead cap)

 

Maybe a little smaller signing bonus, but I would think if you were going to go that route you would maximize the 2021 cap savings. This does it based on $9.4m reported contract.

 

Saves us money this year for extensions

I hate fake years, but might as well play the game all the other teams are playing. Typically I wouldn't push off that much, but given this years lower restraints, extensions, and the likelihood of increased cap next year, I get it. Personally I would hope his base or per game pay check amount is higher, or at least has some type of conditional dollars for playing time, and perhaps some incentives. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, EastStreet said:

I hate fake years, but might as well play the game all the other teams are playing. Typically I wouldn't push off that much, but given this years lower restraints, extensions, and the likelihood of increased cap next year, I get it. Personally I would hope his base or per game pay check amount is higher, or at least has some type of conditional dollars for playing time, and perhaps some incentives. 

Yeah Im not a big fan of them either. I would like to see those same contractual conditions, that you listed.

 

I just think, that if the reports are true(2022 void year) the Colts are going to go this route to save money in 2021? They might as well max out the most cap space they can.?

 

Void years are rarely a good thing for teams future cap. Won't hurt us that much, and if Fisher is coming back in 2022 and beyond, it will be well worth it to not take the whole cap hit in 2021.

 

At the end of the day the immediate goals should be/ Im sure are, to secure Leonard and Smith and Nelson next year for their 2nd contract. I think it is taken as a given, that we bring all 3 back. Will be a good achievement and hopefully Ballard gets that done. Im sure he will

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, w87r said:

Yeah Im not a big fan of them either. I would like to see those same contractual conditions, that you listed.

 

I just think, that if the reports are true(2022 void year) the Colts are going to go this route to save money in 2021? They might as well max out the most cap space they can.?

 

Void years are rarely a good thing for teams future cap. Won't hurt us that much, and if Fisher is coming back in 2022 and beyond, it will be well worth it to not take the whole cap hit in 2021.

 

At the end of the day the immediate goals should be/ Im sure are, to secure Leonard and Smith and Nelson next year for their 2nd contract. I think it is taken as a given, that we bring all 3 back. Will be a good achievement and hopefully Ballard gets that done. Im sure he will

Agree with all of the above. The only thing that worries me intermediate and long term is the total cash that will be spent on OL. 

We'll likely be paying top 5 pay 4 guys. Really hope it's win-now time lol. At least we'll have 2 rook contracts on the DL to ride for a bit. Just wish we had a rook LT contract to ride too. Oh well. Sure will be interesting to see all the pushes and pulls over the next few years.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/14/2021 at 4:09 PM, Derakynn said:

From what I read, the second year is voidable in that it is essentially a one-year deal which gives some flexibility in spreading his cap hit over this year and next. It is an automatically voiding second year (he is only under contract to actually play for this year, would need a contract extension to play here beyond 2021).

Adam Shefter is reporting that it's a one-year deal at $9.4 million. There may be some cap management voodoo going on with it though, so the details could still be a bit murky. If he comes back close to his Pro Bowl form, it's a bargain, and if not, there isn't any long-term cap damage. I think he is certainly worth the gamble.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, HarryTheCat said:

Adam Shefter is reporting that it's a one-year deal at $9.4 million. There may be some cap management voodoo going on with it though, so the details could still be a bit murky. If he comes back close to his Pro Bowl form, it's a bargain, and if not, there isn't any long-term cap damage. I think he is certainly worth the gamble.

Likely 2-5M pushed. 

 

There are three risks. 2 this season, one next.

 

1) his return is delayed and we work ourselves out of the playoffs early with a tough stretch the first 5 games

2) he's just not the same regardless of when he comes back.

3) #2 plus we're in the same place next year, and either need to spend big in FA while already spending #1 on OL, or gambling on a 2nd round LT. Doubt the class next year will be better than this year.

 

Hopefully he's great when he comes back, we don't tank early, and he signs for a few extra years and doesn't want a king's ransom.... a boy can dream.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jason Peters was undrafted out of Arkansas - he turned out pretty good. Exception to the policy of course.

 

I'm a bit bummed by the Teamer release, though the drafting of Shawn Davis more or less took his best position. He was uber productive as a rookie though for the Chargers.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wentz had 1 great season 3 good seasons and 1 bad one.     With our roster we just need him to have a good season.  He doesn't have to get back to the 2017 form.  2018 or 2019 Wentz works just fine. 
    • You know that some folks view making an informed decision to NOT get the vaccine as leading by example too right?  I don't agree with choosing not to get it, I think it's best for society that as many get vaccinated as possible.     That's the thing though, we often automatically assume others feel the way we do (or worse, that they would if they were as intelligent, thoughtful, skilled, or experienced in whatever the subject is as we are ourselves,).    All that to say, maybe Carson isn't vaccinated.  If that's the case, maybe the team has guys who see that as positive leadership by example.   Just because a decision might not be ours, or one we would endorse or make... We shouldn't fall into the human nature trap of assuming it's an incorrect or I'll informed view.     Even if not getting vaccinated ends up being the "wrong" decision, people can still make informed decisions and choose "wrongly"   Rambling on... But yeah, leadership comes in all forms, shapes, and sizes.... We don't always like or admire it.... Stalin and Hitler were accomplished leaders after all ...
    • The skill set isn't really that hard to replace. Guys like JD McKissic and Boston Scott have similar yards/touch...and one was an UDFA and the other a 6th round pick. Give a guy like Scott the same volume as Hines last year...and he probably puts up similar (or even more) production, based on his averages.   There are athletic scat backs in every draft. And RB is devalued anyways. There is sort of a range for contracts for players like Hines: Jamaal Williams, who has similar career averages as Hines, got $3M/year Ekeler, who put up 1,500+ yards from scrimmage and has much higher career averages, got $6M  I think Ballard will bring him back. But even with the cap going up, a 3/$15M deal seems about the max threshold. If he can get more than that elsewhere, Ballard probably lets him (but I don't think he will get it or even get to FA anyways).    I am interested to see if CLE gives Chubb his new contract before the season. He is eligible now and if they don't, then Chubb would be the RB1, but making less than RB2 when he's eligible to make more.  If the Colts do extend Hines, they will face this same scenario in 2023 with Taylor.
    • Just remember how Rivers looked the 1st 5 games or so.  The naysayers are likely going to have their day early in the season because there will be timing and touch issues for awhile.  If we have one of the better ground games, which i expect, and a defense that can give up 22-23 points a game, we will be over .500. Takeaways, field goals, effeciency in the red zone, and bounces of the ball will determine how much above .500. 9-12 wins and lace'em up. 
    • He wasn't MVP when they drafted Love. He completely tanked the season prior with McCarthy to get him fired and then whined about LaFleur's system not giving him enough freedom at the line of scrimmage. He has been a royal pain to the FO for years and they tired of him. That is why they were more than happy to void the final year of his contract and trade him next year. I don't blame them at all. He has been a brat/drama queen this entire off-season.  No one's job is guaranteed in the NFL. Every player has to compete and earn it every year. He thought that didn't apply to him for some reason.  Every player is a lame duck in the NFL. No contracts are fully guaranteed. He acts like it is just him or somehow he should just be above the rules that apply to everyone else.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...