Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

For the Move Quenton Nelson to LT Crowd.... Way outside the Box.


Recommended Posts

 

So....    over at Stampede Blue,  they've got a story saying we've shown lots of interest in Quinn Meinerz.

 

And that got me to thinking....    (I know, I know....   Uh-oh...)

 

If the Colts front office thinks its best play is to move Nelson to LT,  but worries how to replace him,  maybe the answer is Quinn Meinerz.

 

To me, he's a mini-version of Q.     So...    how to do this?

 

You'd start by trying to find a trading partner at the top of the 2nd round.   Top 4-5 picks.    You'd expect to get that team's 3rd round pick as well.   Maybe even more?

 

From there,  you'd draft Meinerz with that first pick.   Just as we took Leonard and Smith with picks 36 and 37 in 2018.    Meinerz not only played exceptionally well in the Senior Bowl,  according to Zierlein,  he showed tremendous improvement on film from when he last played, which was 2019.    His 2020 was lost due to Covid.   

 

To those of you screaming that's too high for Meinerz, here's the deal.    If the plan is to move Nelson to LT,  and you want a plug and play guy to replace him at guard,  and you believe Meinerz is the guy,  then you HAVE to secure him.    You can't wait and hope he'll be there at pick 54.    Because if he's taken before you,  then your plan has just been blown up.   If we can take Leonard and Smith where we did,  we can take Meinerz that high as well,  if,  IF the plan is to move Quenton to LT.  

 

You don't have to use a pick on a LT.    Your second pick can go to Edge,  or to CB,  or to WR,  whichever you prefer.

 

Don't get me wrong,  I'm NOT in favor of moving Nelson.   I'd prefer to keep him at LG.    But if the plan is to move him,  and Meinerz is Q's replacement,  than I think this is how it would be done.   

 

OK, peeps,  let me have it!!     INCOMING!!!       :hide:       :peek:

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • NewColtsFan changed the title to For the Move Quenton Nelson to LT Crowd.... Way outside the Box.
8 hours ago, danlhart87 said:

I love Meinerz but I'm not in favor of moving Q honestly. I know it is possible since Q will soon get LT money. 


Don’t fear change. I’m glad the FO, is even considering this, although it may not be popular with the fans. It’s shows that Ballard is willing to get out his “comfort zone” and make a change to better the team. 

 

There are a lot of good reasons to potentially move Nelson outside. 
1. He can fix the LT position 

2. Money

3. Allow Ballard to trade back and acquire additional pick and draft Nelson’s replacement.  (Q. Meinerz)

 


 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It say mentioned this was still possible but last ditch effort. Said they all want an actualLT and to keep Nelson at his dominant position. This is all overblown in my eyes. But to your point @NewColtsFan we have better options at Guard in the early rounds IMO than him if we are dead set moving Nelson. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not in favor of moving Nelson to LT unless we're out of options. That doesn't seem to be the case, as Indy can draft a tackle and keep Nelson where his strength is.  I hope that's what they do. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the reason you look at Meinerz is because he can also play C.  Replaces Glow and can fill in /replace Kelly if Kelly continues to get hurt. 

 

I don't think Meinerz has anything to do with moving Nelson.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually like the idea of trading back into the top of the 2nd and at least getting a 3rd rd pick that would not be a compensatory pick.  IF we wanted to move Q to LT Meinerz would be an ideal choice to pull it off.  That said picking at the top of the 2nd could still have Eichenberg and Little still available to mention a few LT’s.  I would rather go that route still taking a LT then take WR or CB with our 2nd and we have a nice 3rd rd pick to boot.  Then we could move up higher in the 2nd if we want as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, richard pallo said:

I actually like the idea of trading back into the top of the 2nd and at least getting a 3rd rd pick that would not be a compensatory pick.  IF we wanted to move Q to LT Meinerz would be an ideal choice to pull it off.  That said picking at the top of the 2nd could still have Eichenberg and Little still available to mention a few LT’s.  I would rather go that route still taking a LT then take WR or CB with our 2nd and we have a nice 3rd rd pick to boot.  Then we could move up higher in the 2nd if we want as well.

Gotta get a DE early as well. That has to rate higher than WR or CB right now. Much higher. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Hoose said:

Gotta get a DE early as well. That has to rate higher than WR or CB right now. Much higher. 

The way I see it is that ER might rate higher but if a CB or WR is rated higher on our board at the time of the pick I don’t think Ballard would force the ER pick strictly on need.  I don’t see him passing on either of those positions under those circumstances.  It would seem very un Ballard like to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Discussed a lot in many other threads already...    But, IMO, worth discussing if the topic if it's about Indy's willingness to roll the dice on injuries in general.   Fisher - big gamble on a huge position of need. Early schedule could be ugly if Tevi has to start the first month. Huge gamble.   Dayo - good value in the 2nd. Young and should heal. It's a long term play, one that I'm not sure we should have taken given other needs. Good gamble.   Mack - pretty easy decision IMO. Cheap, and short term. Any production will be great. Good loyalty sign to set him with another team in 2022. If he heals well, he'll be a fantastic RB2. Almost zero risk and lots of upside. No risk gamble. 
    • The bolded is basically my opinion. Good way of putting it.    Edit: Structured scheduling is gonna be really hard. Shared arenas, other events scheduled, TV obligations, etc.    I'll get back to you on AZ.
    • I think what it boils down to, is that there is a significant number of teams that get to enjoy that advantage of being rested over a team that is not. While the Colts have not enjoyed that benefit.    Essentially, the other teams in our division and conference could get +1 for a better % chance of winning their game off a bye.   That probably reads even more confusing, and if so I apologize. It's May, which in teaching terms means my mind is quite nearly a puddle on the floor. 
    • Pro days replaced the combine. NFL established guidelines and some funding I believe. Combine was limited to medicals. Measurables are easy for most players, but Dayo's injury prohibited him from the team's pro day.   BTW, Dayo's pre injury 40 was 4.7. Not great, but he's bigger, and he's more about power than KP.   Here's KP's RAS  
    • A lot of time. A lot of things can happen.   Full disclosure, I'm not a huge fan of spending much on back up QBs unless you're a perennial SB fav, or have a really iffy starting QB. If QB1 goes down, your expectation should be "you'll be .500" over a few games. If you count on a backup for longer than that, it doesn't matter. If your backup needs to play in the playoff, it doesn't matter.   Colts are all in on Wentz. They've used 2 middle round picks on back ups. Purely my opinion, but they need to get value of either JE or SE. If not, the draft capital was a waste.    I'm perfectly fine though if late in camp they decide to pick up a vet like Hoyer on the cheap.       JE has traits. SE is very limited. If they think either can go .500 over the course of 1-4 games, I'm good. If not, get Hoyer or another on the cheap that can manage well, not screw up, and go .500 with a solid team around them.      Blackmon has great traits. Pros - absolutely all pro with what's in front of him.  Cons - started his career at CB and was awful. moved to FS and still struggling with the backend coverage.   I think 75% of his issue is mental. It's simply choices. He chooses instinctually the big play over solid and conservative choice. If he can be more disciplined, he could be great. If he can't, move him to SS where he can be more instinctual and great. I think he's a natural SS fit, but would love to see him make it at FS. We need, and rely on, FS more than SS in our scheme.
  • Members

    • GoColts8818

      GoColts8818 5,030

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jmac_48

      jmac_48 377

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 9,646

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • British_Colt

      British_Colt 2

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • buccolts

      buccolts 2,576

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • The Fish

      The Fish 1,199

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 2,801

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Orioles22

      Orioles22 297

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Two_pound

      Two_pound 273

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 2,146

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...