Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

They did a mock recently alternating picks on ESPN

 

Kiper at 21 Jaelan Phillips

 

I can't believe this is the first edge rusher off the board. Phillips has a history of injuries -- he medically retired from football when he was at UCLA -- but there's no denying his pass-rush traits. And that's the Colts' biggest need.

 

McShay at 54 Dillon Radunz

 

Remember when new Colts QB Carson Wentzwas under fire every Sunday last season in Philadelphia? It didn't go so well. And left tackle Anthony Castonzo just retired.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, danlhart87 said:

They did a mock recently alternating picks on ESPN

 

Kiper at 21 Jaelan Phillips

 

I can't believe this is the first edge rusher off the board. Phillips has a history of injuries -- he medically retired from football when he was at UCLA -- but there's no denying his pass-rush traits. And that's the Colts' biggest need.

 

McShay at 54 Dillon Radunz

 

Remember when new Colts QB Carson Wentzwas under fire every Sunday last season in Philadelphia? It didn't go so well. And left tackle Anthony Castonzo just retired.


Question:    What is a 105 mock?

 

Update:   Never mind.   I’ve seen their article so I know what 105 means.   Number of players thru a 3-round mock draft.    Remember, words can be your friend!       :thmup:

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

Not a bad haul. Idk if Radunz is my favorite OT prospect in the 2nd round though, but I like the concept.

Who do you like if we go OT in the 2nd?

 

Eichenberg?   
 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

Who do you like if we go OT in the 2nd?

 

Eichenberg?   
 

I like Walker Little or even Spencer Brown. I just think size and strength is important. I know Spencer Brown is a small school guy but he had elite testing and he had a good showing at the Senior Bowl. He’s one of the guys who handled Patrick Jones all day long in the one-on-one’s. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

No thanks on Phillips.  I player who retires after three (I think) concussions in college doesn't sound like a player here for the long term.  We've already had a QB retire, so I wonder if Phillips is even on Ballard's board.

 

Radunz is athletic and is almost 6.6, has 34 inch arms, a physical attitude...and has been a true LT starter.  His issue is weight and overall strength.  One of his knocks is that he's not a hard practicer (I'm talkin bout practice) and did only 24 reps at his pro day.  An NFL weight program should correct his main weakness fairly quickly.

 

If we could trade down into the top of the second, I'm all for getting Radunz there.  He may be gone by 54.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, DougDew said:

No thanks on Phillips.  I player who retires after three (I think) concussions in college doesn't sound like a player here for the long term. 


I thinks it’s important to know that UCLA has a policy that forces players to medically retire if they suffer at least 3 concussions. That’s something that seems to get swept under the rug by the media. It has created this false narrative that he’s a quitter when the decision was out of his hand.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, DougDew said:

No thanks on Phillips.  I player who retires after three (I think) concussions in college doesn't sound like a player here for the long term.  We've already had a QB retire, so I wonder if Phillips is even on Ballard's board.

 

Radunz is athletic and is almost 6.6, has 34 inch arms, a physical attitude...and has been a true LT starter.  His issue is weight and overall strength.  One of his knocks is that he's not a hard practicer (I'm talkin bout practice) and did only 24 reps at his pro day.  An NFL weight program should correct his main weakness fairly quickly.

 

If we could trade down into the top of the second, I'm all for getting Radunz there.  He may be gone by 54.

Philadelphia 76Ers Basketball GIF

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:


I thinks it’s important to know that UCLA has a policy that forces players to medically retire if they suffer at least 3 concussions. That’s something that seems to get swept under the rug by the media. It has created this false narrative that he’s a quitter when the decision was out of his hand.

I didn't mean to suggest quitter for no reason (kinda like Luck, but not really?). 

 

I mean't that three concussions portends future concussions, then retirement out of good judgment/safety.

Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:


I thinks it’s important to know that UCLA has a policy that forces players to medically retire if they suffer at least 3 concussions. That’s something that seems to get swept under the rug by the media. It has created this false narrative that he’s a quitter when the decision was out of his hand.

Thanks.   I had not heard that before, and I live roughly 20 miles from the UCLA campus. 

That said, I don’t follow either the UCLA or USC programs nearly as closely as I do a certain program that’s about 350 miles North of me!        :thmup:

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, DougDew said:

I didn't mean to suggest quitter for no reason (kinda like Luck, but not really?). 

 

I mean't that three concussions portends future concussions, then retirement out of good judgment/safety.

Doug, while I’d be fine with Phillips if he’s medically cleared, on balance, I’m with you.

 

I think Irsay and our medical team are very conservative by nature and I seriously doubt Phillips is on our board.   I’ve always felt that way.  
 

We passed repeatedly on Maurice Hurst, a DT with a heart issue, who went in R5 and he fit our scheme very well.   And we passed on Montez Sweat, a top-10 level pass rushing DE that suited Ballard’s wish list perfectly.   He too had a heart issue, and we passed even though his medical people put out a report saying it was a mis-diagnosis.  


We are conservative about such things.   I’m not complaining, just observing. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

Thanks.   I had not heard that before, and I live roughly 20 miles from the UCLA campus. 

That said, I don’t follow either the UCLA or USC programs nearly as closely as I do a certain program that’s about 350 miles North of me!        :thmup:

STANFORD!!!!

As for Phillips, I have to share the concern others have over his concussion history. He’s apparently prone to them, and the odds only go up that you’ll get one on the NFL. He can’t be but a few more away from having to step away from the game permanently. There’s no denying his talent, but I’d much rather see the Colts maneuver their way into getting Payton Turner in the second round. That guy is an intriguing, 3 down type DE. Relentless motor, pterodactyl arms.  

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, hoosierhawk said:

According to the article that LJpalmbeacher2 posted he had a concussion his Freshman and Sophomore years.  Is the article wrong or did he have a concussion in HS also?


For whatever it’s worth.....

 

I’ve read one of Phillios concussions came not from football, but from a car accident. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, MPStack said:

The talent 

What the fans and media may consider "less talented" players at a position, Ballard may not agree with. It's not like we would be in the top 15 picking an EDGE. The EDGE talent starts getting ranked around the 2nd half of round 1, and we pick at 21. There's nothing that would be odd about that according to any media source or draft analyst that ranks these guys if Ballard selected an EDGE at 21. Any position like OT, EDGE, or CB is completely in play honestly.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think Wilkins is underated, he would a solid #2 RB on any team.  He did have some starts for us and didn't he his 1st game as a rookie for us.  Mack coming of his injury, being brought back slowly could be #3/4 with Wilkins,  Plus Wilkins contributes on special teams.  Jackson my be able to save on the practice squad. Hopefully Mack makes it back to his pre-injury form.    I was at the game when Mack made the 56 yard TD runs against the Chargers in there temp Carson, California stadium.  My wife was screaming go, go, GO! during that run, around the Charger fan who was yelling when impressive Austin Eckler made his catch and TD run, getting pass Darius Leonard who hit him but did not wrap up.  We lost in OT but should have won as Vinateri missed a PAT and 2 makeable FG's.
    • Fisher can want longer term but I don’t think he will get it coming off the injury. I am ok with 2 years if the  colts can protect themselves if he doesn’t come back strong from that injury. 
    • @EastStreet - Payton Turner was gone in Round 1 to the Saints, might want to scratch him off the list of mentions for No. 54, it is the draft mock commish in me speaking.  
    • As i told the individual who baited me into comparing their speeds when that wasnt what i was focused on I said the way they play the game is similar. I dont really care about the 4.3 versus 4.4/4.5 stuff bc they both rely on speed as an assett. Jackson is faster yes but to me his running style and what he does im the passing game is similar. I feel like im watching Mack when i watch him play. I can tell they picked him up just in case things dont work out with Macks achilles. He appears to bring just about everything Mack has although the caveat here is hes inexperienced and a UDFA.
    • I genuinely hope you are right on multiple fronts.   That said, if Leno signs in Denver he is not going to be a LT there w Garett Bolles making $17M a year as a top-7 paid OT. So Leno would have to play a new position for him (NFL-wise) and Denver would have to make him a top-5 paid RT to get in that $10M range (which they may if they just use the James money and don't pay James after his injury off-site). Now Leno played some RT at Boise (about 1/3 of his starts), but still I would not want to move to RT if I were him unless Denver made it financially worth it. Maybe they will. But so far whispers are Denver is bringing in guys like Dennis Kelly and the other cut Bears Tackle Bobby Massie for visits. I could see them going w one of them before Leno.     As for Fisher, I think he is much more likely to take a 2-3 year deal for longer term security if the annual money is right. I just do not think it would be right w the Colts. So if it is a cheaper deal based on his injury then I could see him only being willing to commit to it for a year. I agree it is risky for him to sign a 1 year deal and look Meh. But at this point I also do not think there are going to be many (maybe any?) teams out there willing to give him a multi-year deal at perceived market value w him coming off that injury. So he will either have to take a multi year deal below market or take a prove it deal and bet on himself. I hope it is a multi-year below market deal for us, but I am not convinced. I will be happy if so.   Leno is definitely the more interesting case being slightly younger and much healthier.   I personally am not a big Okung fan as an option and have not really seen us linked to him yet. But if the best ability is availability, he falls a distant third for me with his missing 10 and 9 games the last two seasons. If you twisted my arm and all the contracts were equal I would probably say for 1 year I'd rank them Leno, Fisher, Okung.   For 2-3 years I would probably flip it and go Fisher, Leno, Okung just because I have a slight preference for Fisher long-term even if that injury and recovery are a risk. I woulnd't want to take that on for 1 year but I would for multiple years if it is for $10M a year or less.  
  • Members

    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 1,707

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • gspdx

      gspdx 639

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TonyBungee

      TonyBungee 185

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nickster

      Nickster 913

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fisticuffs111

      Fisticuffs111 2,005

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TomDiggs

      TomDiggs 532

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Caffrey

      Caffrey 145

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 1,140

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DiogoSales

      DiogoSales 106

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...