Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Gavin Flash Mock: Trade Discussion and Approval Thread


Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, NFLfan said:

New draft positions/picks due to trades during the draft:

(Will update as trades are made.)

 

First Round -- completed

#11: Raiders (from Giants)

#17: Giants (from Raiders)

#21 Browns (from Colts)

#22 Chiefs (from Titans)

#25 Green Bay (from Jacksonville)

#26 Colts (from Browns)

#29 Jacksonville (from GB)

#31 Titans (from Chiefs)

 

Second Round -- Tuesday, April 20th, start 7pm ET

 

#33 Bengals ( from Jacksonville)

#38 Jacksonville (from Bengals)

#63 Titans (from Chiefs)

 

Future rounds:

 

#79 Giants (from Raiders)

#80 Giants (from Raiders)

#91 Colts (from Browns)

#92 Jacksonville (from GB)

 

#100 Chiefs (from Titans)

#106 Green Bay (from Jacksonville)

 

#111 Jacksonville (from Bengals)

#116 Raiders (from Giants)

 

 

#165 Browns (from Colts)

#175 Titans (from Chiefs)

 

 

@EastStreet @chad72 Updated with Jags-Bengals trade.

 

Taking walk with a friend. Will be back home by 7. Ttyl

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jared Cisneros said:

You're good. I understand by your pick. We'll see what happens later! :thmup:

Yeah man this isn't a draft I feel comfortable trading back and praying. lol. It's been pretty cutthroat so far.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Coltsman1788 said:

The Washington Football Team selects Pat Freiermuth, TE Penn State.

 

Wrong thread, do it in the Round 2 thread. This is just for trade/draft discussions and trade announcements.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

@NFLfan @chad72

 

Here's what I have thus far

Bolded the trades 

 

 

Round 3

-----------session 1----------
65) Jacksonville Jaguars
66) New York Jets
67) Houston Texans
68) Atlanta Falcons
69) Cincinnati Bengals
70) Philadelphia Eagles
71) Denver Broncos
72) Detroit Lions

-----------session 2----------
73) Carolina Panthers
74) Washington Football Team (from San Francisco 49ers)
75) Dallas Cowboys
76) New York Giants
77) Los Angeles Chargers
78) Minnesota Vikings
79) Giants via Las Vegas Raiders (from Arizona Cardinals)
80) Giants via Las Vegas Raiders

-----------session 3----------
81) Miami Dolphins
82) Washington Football Team
83) Chicago Bears
84) Philadelphia Eagles (from Indianapolis Colts)
85) Tennessee Titans
86) New York Jets (from Seattle Seahawks)
87) Pittsburgh Steelers
88) Los Angeles Rams

-----------session 4----------
89) Cleveland Browns
90) Minnesota Vikings (from Baltimore Ravens)
91) Colts via Cleveland Browns (from New Orleans Saints)
92) Jaguars via Green Bay Packers
93) Buffalo Bills
94) Kansas City Chiefs
95) Tampa Bay Buccaneers
96) New England Patriots (compensatory selection)

-----------session 5----------
97) Los Angeles Chargers (compensatory selection)
98) New Orleans Saints (compensatory selection)
99) Dallas Cowboys (compensatory selection)
100) KC via Tennessee Titans (compensatory selection)
101) Detroit Lions (from Los Angeles Rams; compensatory selection)
102) San Francisco 49ers (special compensatory selection)
103) Los Angeles Rams (special compensatory selection)
104) Baltimore Ravens (special compensatory selection)
105) New Orleans Saints (special compensatory selection)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Summary of trades so far:

 

TRADE 1:

Titans get picks No. 31 63 and 175

Chiefs get picks No. 22 and 100

 

 

TRADE 2:

NY Giant receive picks No.17, 79 and 80 from Raiders

Raiders receive pick No.11 and No. 116 from Giants

 

 

TRADE 3:

Colts trade; 21 & 165 
Browns trade: 26 & 91 

 

 

TRADE 4:

Jaguars get Pick No.29 ( value 640) and 3rd round Pick No.92 (132)

Packers get Pick No.25 (700) and Jaguars 4th round Pick No.106 (82)

 

 

TRADE 5:

Bengals get Pick No.33

Jaguars get Pick No.38 and Pick No.111

 

 

TRADE 6:

Chiefs get Pick No. 65

Jaguars get Picks No. 94, 100 and 136

 

@EastStreet @NFLfan

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Updated list of Picks traded

Third round:

#65 Chiefs (from Jaguars)

#79 Giants (from Raiders)

#80 Giants (from Raiders)

#91 Colts (from Browns)

#92 Jacksonville (from GB)

#94 Jacksonville (from Kansas City)

#100 Jacksonville (via trade with Kansas City from Titans)

 

4th round and later

#106 Green Bay (from Jacksonville)

#111 Jacksonville (from Bengals)

#116 Raiders (from Giants)

#127 Dolphins (from Colts)

$136 Jacksonville (from Kansas City)

 

#165 Browns (from Colts)

#175 Titans (from Chiefs)

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Summary of trades so far:

 

TRADE 1:

Titans get picks No. 31 63 and 175

Chiefs get picks No. 22 and 100

 

 

TRADE 2:

NY Giant receive picks No.17, 79 and 80 from Raiders

Raiders receive pick No.11 and No. 116 from Giants

 

 

TRADE 3:

Colts trade; 21 & 165 
Browns trade: 26 & 91 

 

 

TRADE 4:

Jaguars get Pick No.29 ( value 640) and 3rd round Pick No.92 (132)

Packers get Pick No.25 (700) and Jaguars 4th round Pick No.106 (82)

 

 

TRADE 5:

Bengals get Pick No.33

Jaguars get Pick No.38 and Pick No.111

 

 

TRADE 6:

Chiefs get Pick No. 65

Jaguars get Picks No. 94, 100 and 136

 

 

TRADE 7:

Colts get Pick No.81

Dolphins get Picks No.91 and Pick No.127

 

 

TRADE 8: 

Jaguars get Pick No.89

Browns get Pick No.92 and Pick No.145

 

@EastStreet @NFLfan

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, chad72 said:

TRADE 8 TO ANNOUNCE:

 

Jaguars trade Pick No.92 and Pick No.145 To Browns For Pick No.89

 

@EastStreet @NFLfan - should give you ample time during the break for adjustments, LOL

 

Just seeing this. Was on the break. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

@NFLfan @chad72

Here's what I have after looking through the trades thus far

 

Round 4

 

Session 1
106) Green Bay (Jaguars) 700
107) New York Jets 705
108) Atlanta Falcons 710
109) Houston Texans 715
110) Cleveland Browns (Eagles) 720
111) Jacksonville Jaguars (Bengals) 725
112) Detroit Lions 730
113) Carolina Panthers 735
-----mini break------

 

Session 2
114) Denver Broncos 750
115) Dallas Cowboys 755
116) Raiders (Giants) 800
117) San Francisco 49ers 805
118) Los Angeles Chargers 810
119) Minnesota Vikings 815
120) New England Patriots 820
121) Las Vegas Raiders 825
-------break------

 

Session 3
122) New England Patriots (Cardinals via Texans) 900
123) Philadelphia Eagles (Dolphins) 905
124) Washington Football Team 910
125) Minnesota Vikings (Bears) 915
126) Tennessee Titans 920
127) Miami Dolpins (Colts) 925
128) Pittsburgh Steelers 930 
129) Seattle Seahawks 935
-----mini break--------

 

Session 4
130) Jacksonville Jaguars (Rams) 950
131) Baltimore Ravens 955
132) Cleveland Browns 1000
133) New Orleans Saints 1005
134) Minnesota Vikings (Bills) 1010
135) Green Bay Packers 1015
136) Jacksonville Jaguars (Chiefs) 1020
137) Tampa Bay Buccaneers 1025
------mini break------

 

Session 5
138) Dallas Cowboys (comp) 1040
139) New England Patriots (comp) 1045
140) Pittsburgh Steelers (comp) 1050
141) Los Angeles Rams (comp) 1055
142) Green Bay Packers (comp) 1100
143) Minnesota Vikings (comp) 1105
144) Kansas City Chiefs (comp) 1110

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, JoeThornburg said:

The Pittsburgh Steelers offer picks #128 and #140 in trade to move up in the 4th round.

 

40 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Sold! I have 127

:headspin:

I can beat him! I have 126! Trust me, you don't want to get sniped by the Titans! :) 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, JoeThornburg said:

The Pittsburgh Steelers offer picks #128 and #140 in trade to move up in the 4th round.


Actually, value wise, moving up to the #111 pick that the Jaguars (yours truly) got from The Bengals (stick it to your division rival), gives you best value for #128 and #140. Let me know if that works for you. Cheers!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, chad72 said:


Actually, value wise, moving up to the #111 pick that the Jaguars (yours truly) got from The Bengals (stick it to your division rival), gives you best value for #128 and #140. Let me know if that works for you. Cheers!!!

I can't pass that up. Sold.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, chad72 said:

Approved.

Another trade:

 

Jaguars get pick No.113

Pantgers get pick No.128 and No.136

Got it, and thank you.

PS... I am updating things on my PC, so they'll be reflected at each session.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Changes in draft picks due to trades Updated):

 

4th round and later

#106 Green Bay (from Jacksonville)

#111 Steelers [from Jacksonville (from Bengals)]

#113 Jaguars (from Panthers)

#116 Raiders (from Giants)

#127 Dolphins (from Colts)

#128 Panthers (from Jaguars (from Steelers)

#136 Panthers (from Jacksonville (from Kansas City)

#140 Jaguars (from Steelers)

#144 Dolphins (Kansas City)

#156 Chiefs (from Dolphins)

#165 Browns (from Colts)

#175 Titans (from Chiefs)

 

#231  Chiefs (from Dolphins)

 

#258 Chiefs (from Dolphins)

 

 

 

@EastStreet @chad72

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • NFLfan unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL. Sound an awful lot like Patmon.
    • RBs are devalued these days. APBs if elite, can have better value than a RB2. Hines could be elite if use the right way IMO. If we're going to let a guy like Mack, who we drafted, walk and test things.... I think we'd let Hines do the same. And given that our new RB1 was very good at catching, the need for Hines isn't as big, so the leverage shifts a bit.   I love Hines, and hope we resign him. If Taylor stays healthy at RB1, and Campbell finally stays healthy at slot, I can see Ballard telling him to test the market. Hope he blows up, but that may mean he asks for too much lol.    And I don't care what Reich says. Our RBs are not interchangeable, and Hines isn't a RB1 type of guy. He's best used as an APB.
    • Yup. I would have loved to resign Houston, but reduced his snap counts. That's basically what they tried to do with Kerrigan last year, it just didn't help. I think it would absolutely help Houston.   I read this (below) article from Mock on Stampede Blue last night. It draws from Hicks and another guys. I thought it was pretty lazy lol. https://www.stampedeblue.com/2021/5/5/22420698/claims-the-indianapolis-colts-are-worse-than-a-season-ago-premature-overstated   It left out intangibles. It brought up that sacks were higher vs poorer teams, but that's the case for every DE or 3T. It also said both Autry and Houston benefited from Buckner's presence. IMO, there's only so much to eat, and adding Buckner means there's less to eat. It also didn't address the fact that we are the 2nd least blitzing team in the league, which doesn't help in the pressure category. And didn't mention that Buckner had arguably his best year ever despite having his lowest snap count ever. Might that have something to do with the DEs? lol.  Also ignores the fact Houston was still top 10 in pass rush win rate, which I believe is vid analytics driven instead of subjective eye grading. 
    • That's why I think it was a wasted pick. Weak arm, poor pocket presence. If they just wanted competition, there  are FAs available on the cheap. Heck, I'd take Hoyer who took 1M last year. He'll likely end up signing somewhere for the vet min, and wouldn't have costed a draft pick. Just a prediction. Has happened every year, and will happen again every year lol. Just part of the entertainment. I like Dayo a lot, just not this year coming off an injury with other needs.   On Granson. He's a Burton clone that doesn't block as well. Just envision Burton, or a big-slot WR. Doubt we ask him to block much.    On SE. If he makes the 53, that means Eason was a bust and total waste of a pick. Due to his lack of traits, I'd be very surprised if he made the 53.  Love Paye. Really like the long term value of Dayo but less than enthused about the pick for 2021 production given other needs and injury. Doubt Granson will have a big impact this year either. Could be wrong.    The Fries pick was OK. Low risk, low expectation. IMO, will need time to develop on the PS. Flex guy, but pretty meh physical traits. 
  • Members

    • SMITTY46953

      SMITTY46953 2

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ztboiler

      ztboiler 308

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Misty_B

      Misty_B 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Captain_Colts1317

      Captain_Colts1317 6

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeytsBlocker

      PeytsBlocker 15

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • #12.

      #12. 1,124

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TonyBungee

      TonyBungee 185

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • White shoes

      White shoes 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • conklincolt

      conklincolt 33

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pgt_rob

      pgt_rob 765

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...