Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

BR Darius Leonard Contract Projection


Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, Nickster said:

I edited it.  That’s not what I meant.  He’s worth way more than 2nd round money.  I’m talking about the 5/95 money being discussed.

He ain't making that.   Who knows what CB does when the time comes

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Anyone thinking Leonard doesn’t deserve a big contract or that we won’t be giving him one has lost their mind. 

He’s not worth that.

So he’s good at his job leading the league in tackles and you turn it into a negative!   Now it’s a wear and tear issue.    You’ve created a scenario where there’s no reason to keep h

3 hours ago, J@son said:

 

 You can absolutely find linebackers for this defense in later rounds of the draft.....if you're OK with them being the caliber of Gilbert Gardner rather than Darius Leonard and you're OK with the defense being infinitely worse lol

Gary Brackett...

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Gary Brackett...

 

For some reason, you refuse to let this go....

 

You seem to think there's one 4-3 defense and that every team that's playing it is playing the exact same defense.   They're not.   

 

When Ballard was hired, he said the key to his 4-3 defense was the 3-tech.   That spot was the engine that made it go.  It's not that way for every 4-3 team.    For some,  it's the RDE that drives it.    Ballard also said the 2nd key spot was the WILL.   It was the most important linebacker spot,  and the 2nd most important spot on the defense.    That roughly translates into....   not every WILL will fit his defense.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

From time to time, I often wonder if those who work on Colts.com watch what is posted here.    And the latest example of that came yesterday.    I know that's a LONG time ago for some here.

 

Because yesterday, on the front of this website,  was this story about....    Darius Leonard.

 

And for the "Darius Leonard is overrated" crowd,  you have to deal with this....

 

https://www.colts.com/news/darius-leonard-lavonte-david-brian-urlacher-ray-lewis-fun-fact-friday

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

For some reason, you refuse to let this go....

 

You seem to think there's one 4-3 defense and that every team that's playing it is playing the exact same defense.   They're not.   

 

When Ballard was hired, he said the key to his 4-3 defense was the 3-tech.   That spot was the engine that made it go.  It's not that way for every 4-3 team.    For some,  it's the RDE that drives it.    Ballard also said the 2nd key spot was the WILL.   It was the most important linebacker spot,  and the 2nd most important spot on the defense.    That roughly translates into....   not every WILL will fit his defense.  

Wooton...slow down. 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

From time to time, I often wonder if those who work on Colts.com watch what is posted here.    And the latest example of that came yesterday.    I know that's a LONG time ago for some here.

 

Because yesterday, on the front of this website,  was this story about....    Darius Leonard.

 

And for the "Darius Leonard is overrated" crowd,  you have to deal with this....

 

https://www.colts.com/news/darius-leonard-lavonte-david-brian-urlacher-ray-lewis-fun-fact-friday


The numbers don’t lie... 

 

A few all pro’s to back the stat sheet that he fills is nice... He has a hall of fame start to his career. Lock him down and continue supporting him so we can have the privilege of watching the rest of his career with the shoe. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

From time to time, I often wonder if those who work on Colts.com watch what is posted here.    And the latest example of that came yesterday.    I know that's a LONG time ago for some here.

 

Because yesterday, on the front of this website,  was this story about....    Darius Leonard.

 

And for the "Darius Leonard is overrated" crowd,  you have to deal with this....

 

https://www.colts.com/news/darius-leonard-lavonte-david-brian-urlacher-ray-lewis-fun-fact-friday

There is a reason teams don’t make personal decisions based on fans opinions.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have mixed thoughts on this topic.

 

  • I love Leonard as a tackler and fumbler forcer. 
  • Coverage he's just OK. 2020 was his worst by far year in coverage IMO. No INTs and 109 passer rating allowed.
  • Yes, his combined stats for his first three years are outstanding, but:
    • His stats year 1 are clearly better than years two and three. If you take away his year 1 sacks and FFs, his averages and totals are far less intimidating. Scheme tweaks or opponents adjusting after year one, or just freak outlier in year 1, I don't know.
    • It's hard to compare guys today, with guys like 10-20+ years ago like Bickett or Urlacher. Ds, and LB position are just really really different right now. 
    • The fact that our 4-3 only uses 3LBs a third or less of the time, the WILL in our system naturally is in position to get a lot of Ts. Even Walker at MIKE has been a T machine who's averaged over 100 Ts a year the last 3.
  • Overall, I think Leonard is easily a top 10 LBer, but not sure he's top 3 or 4. Do I want to set the market on his contract? Nope. Will I be mad if he gets Bobby Wagner (currently the #1 paid LB) level pay at 18M/year. Nope. Overall, I'm sure he'll get 17-20. Hopefully closer to 17 than 20.

 

However you want to look at it, Leonard is a stud vs the run. And LBs in a 4-3 are devalued. Both are true. Given his shortcomings vs the pass, should he get top pay? I don't know. Would we ever give him his walking papers, doubt it. I wouldn't doubt if Ballard made him an offer and told him to explore the market though. Not that many teams are in a position, or willing, to spend 20/year on a LB.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, EastStreet said:

I have mixed thoughts on this topic.

 

  • I love Leonard as a tackler and fumbler forcer. 
  • Coverage he's just OK. 2020 was his worst by far year in coverage IMO. No INTs and 109 passer rating allowed.
  • Yes, his combined stats for his first three years are outstanding, but:
    • His stats year 1 are clearly better than years two and three. If you take away his year 1 sacks and FFs, his averages and totals are far less intimidating. Scheme tweaks or opponents adjusting after year one, or just freak outlier in year 1, I don't know.
    • It's hard to compare guys today, with guys like 10-20+ years ago like Bickett or Urlacher. Ds, and LB position are just really really different right now. 
    • The fact that our 4-3 only uses 3LBs a third or less of the time, the WILL in our system naturally is in position to get a lot of Ts. Even Walker at MIKE has been a T machine who's averaged over 100 Ts a year the last 3.
  • Overall, I think Leonard is easily a top 10 LBer, but not sure he's top 3 or 4. Do I want to set the market on his contract? Nope. Will I be mad if he gets Bobby Wagner (currently the #1 paid LB) level pay at 18M/year. Nope. Overall, I'm sure he'll get 17-20. Hopefully closer to 17 than 20.

 

However you want to look at it, Leonard is a stud vs the run. And LBs in a 4-3 are devalued. Both are true. Given his shortcomings vs the pass, should he get top pay? I don't know. Would we ever give him his walking papers, doubt it. I wouldn't doubt if Ballard made him an offer and told him to explore the market though. Not that many teams are in a position, or willing, to spend 20/year on a LB.

U said it better than I ever could lol.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

From time to time, I often wonder if those who work on Colts.com watch what is posted here.    And the latest example of that came yesterday.    I know that's a LONG time ago for some here.

 

Because yesterday, on the front of this website,  was this story about....    Darius Leonard.

 

And for the "Darius Leonard is overrated" crowd,  you have to deal with this....

 

https://www.colts.com/news/darius-leonard-lavonte-david-brian-urlacher-ray-lewis-fun-fact-friday

When I say overrated I mean he’s not the best Lb in the league and is not worth 5/95.

 

I think he’s a good player, a really good linebacker.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Nickster said:

When I say overrated I mean he’s not the best Lb in the league and is not worth 5/95.

 

I think he’s a good player, a really good linebacker.  

I understand.   

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, EastStreet said:

I have mixed thoughts on this topic.

 

  • I love Leonard as a tackler and fumbler forcer. 
  • Coverage he's just OK. 2020 was his worst by far year in coverage IMO. No INTs and 109 passer rating allowed.
  • Yes, his combined stats for his first three years are outstanding, but:
    • His stats year 1 are clearly better than years two and three. If you take away his year 1 sacks and FFs, his averages and totals are far less intimidating. Scheme tweaks or opponents adjusting after year one, or just freak outlier in year 1, I don't know.
    • It's hard to compare guys today, with guys like 10-20+ years ago like Bickett or Urlacher. Ds, and LB position are just really really different right now. 
    • The fact that our 4-3 only uses 3LBs a third or less of the time, the WILL in our system naturally is in position to get a lot of Ts. Even Walker at MIKE has been a T machine who's averaged over 100 Ts a year the last 3.
  • Overall, I think Leonard is easily a top 10 LBer, but not sure he's top 3 or 4. Do I want to set the market on his contract? Nope. Will I be mad if he gets Bobby Wagner (currently the #1 paid LB) level pay at 18M/year. Nope. Overall, I'm sure he'll get 17-20. Hopefully closer to 17 than 20.

 

However you want to look at it, Leonard is a stud vs the run. And LBs in a 4-3 are devalued. Both are true. Given his shortcomings vs the pass, should he get top pay? I don't know. Would we ever give him his walking papers, doubt it. I wouldn't doubt if Ballard made him an offer and told him to explore the market though. Not that many teams are in a position, or willing, to spend 20/year on a LB.

You hit that one onto Waveland.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/24/2021 at 11:47 PM, EastStreet said:

I have mixed thoughts on this topic.

 

  • I love Leonard as a tackler and fumbler forcer. 
  • Coverage he's just OK. 2020 was his worst by far year in coverage IMO. No INTs and 109 passer rating allowed.
  • Yes, his combined stats for his first three years are outstanding, but:
    • His stats year 1 are clearly better than years two and three. If you take away his year 1 sacks and FFs, his averages and totals are far less intimidating. Scheme tweaks or opponents adjusting after year one, or just freak outlier in year 1, I don't know.
    • It's hard to compare guys today, with guys like 10-20+ years ago like Bickett or Urlacher. Ds, and LB position are just really really different right now. 
    • The fact that our 4-3 only uses 3LBs a third or less of the time, the WILL in our system naturally is in position to get a lot of Ts. Even Walker at MIKE has been a T machine who's averaged over 100 Ts a year the last 3.
  • Overall, I think Leonard is easily a top 10 LBer, but not sure he's top 3 or 4. Do I want to set the market on his contract? Nope. Will I be mad if he gets Bobby Wagner (currently the #1 paid LB) level pay at 18M/year. Nope. Overall, I'm sure he'll get 17-20. Hopefully closer to 17 than 20.

 

However you want to look at it, Leonard is a stud vs the run. And LBs in a 4-3 are devalued. Both are true. Given his shortcomings vs the pass, should he get top pay? I don't know. Would we ever give him his walking papers, doubt it. I wouldn't doubt if Ballard made him an offer and told him to explore the market though. Not that many teams are in a position, or willing, to spend 20/year on a LB.

I agree with everything. However; I would be flabbergasted if Ballard let Leonard even come close to testing the market. 

 

Not only is he a stud, he is the unquestioned leader on this team. That is worth more than people realize. 
 

I think he'll get 5/85-90 million with record in guarantees. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Colts1324 said:

I agree with everything. However; I would be flabbergasted if Ballard let Leonard even come close to testing the market. 

 

Not only is he a stud, he is the unquestioned leader on this team. That is worth more than people realize. 
 

I think he'll get 5/85-90 million with record in guarantees. 

I'd be good with 5/85.

I love Leonard. Just not the player, the personality too.

I think his agent will be pushing for more though, and I won't be shocked if Ballard let's him test the market.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, EastStreet said:

I'd be good with 5/85.

I love Leonard. Just not the player, the personality too.

I think his agent will be pushing for more though, and I won't be shocked if Ballard let's him test the market.

If by test the market you mean non exclusive Franchise Tag maybe, but he isn't just letting him test the market with the chance of losing him for nothing.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, w87r said:

If by test the market you mean non exclusive Franchise Tag maybe, but he isn't just letting him test the market with the chance of losing him for nothing.

Yes, the NEFT.

I expect them to try and work through an extension first though.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, stitches said:

 

Hope that guy never plays for another team.

 

 

This is why we just set back and let Ballard work. Total faith in his vision.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade a known unknown for a 5th. CB would have to.   Can't believe it would be offered, now.
    • The 10 day isolation is based on incubation periods, timeframes of serious/visible symptoms appearing and ability of the test to catch it at certain times. Not on availability of vaccine or whether the virus is 0.5% deadly or 0.6%. If a player is not vaccinated, it doesn't matter whether the others are. He still carries a much larger chance to get infected and spread it around... in the ~10 days it takes to confirm he has caught it(or not) after exposure. This is especially true for the new variants that might be more contagious. Even if they have no symptoms they can still transfer it to both unvaccinated teammates and a fair bit less likely(but still possible) to vaccinated teammates. That's what the isolation is for. To prevent further spread.   No. It's them being a threat to spread a deadly virus around...  Because the relevant conditions are not that different. The biggest difference this year compared to last year is the availability of a highly effective, safe vaccines. Part of the players just don't want to take it. Which is... fair enough. They can refuse to take it. At the same time the league has the right to implement rules to attempt to reduce the spread among its employees. BTW The rules about safety and the precautions taken are almost identical to last year's ( the isolation, the daily tests, the masks, distancing, etc. (except for forfeiting games and paychecks now)) when everybody was in that group of unvaccinated players.  There is no new burden on unvaccinated players(besides potentially losing paychecks if they don't play due to catching the virus). If anything the NFL has relaxed its rules for majority of its players(the vaccinated ones). IMO this is the right way to look at it. It's a bonus and relief to vaccinated players rather than punishment to the not vaccinated players. You cannot expect the league to just lift its hands and not implement any safety measures when significant part of its players don't want to do the bare minimum to reduce the risks for teammates and employees.
    • Would trade Mack for a 5th without hesitation.  RBs coming off an Achilles don’t have the best track record.  
    • But what trade value would Wilkins have if any?
  • Members

    • JlynRN

      JlynRN 298

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 8,879

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Four2itus

      Four2itus 5,501

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 810

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 4,179

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • legend300

      legend300 64

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 1,321

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 9,770

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 453

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...