Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts are re-signing RB Marlon Mack


Recommended Posts

I like this, hopefully he can get back to pre injury form and he can be the number 2 back.  With as much as we want to run the ball we should have a good number 2 back.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CanuckColt said:

Good news on keeping Mack...he seems like a tremendous selfless person.

I hope he returns to top playing form.

Yup. Didn't whine when we drafted Taylor. Has always kept his head down and worked his bottom off. Not flashy, and carries a lunch pail. I love those guys.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprising to me. I really figured some team would take a chance on him for 4-6 million and see how it goes. 
 

I already have the best fantasy advice of 2021 for everyone, though:

 

Do not draft Colts RBs. Do not roster Colts RBs. You’ll thank me in December. With Mack, Taylor, and Hines owners are going to be playing a weekly game of Russian roulette. When one goes off, that means that at least one, and likely two, of the others aren’t. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, John Waylon said:

Surprising to me. I really figured some team would take a chance on him for 4-6 million and see how it goes. 
 

I already have the best fantasy advice of 2021 for everyone, though:

 

Do not draft Colts RBs. Do not roster Colts RBs. You’ll thank me in December. With Mack, Taylor, and Hines owners are going to be playing a weekly game of Russian roulette. When one goes off, that means that at least one, and likely two, of the others aren’t. 

Taylor is going to get his. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Yup. Didn't whine when we drafted Taylor. Has always kept his head down and worked his bottom off. Not flashy, and carries a lunch pail. I love those guys.

Absolutely agree.  This is the type of guy you love to have on your team and to brag about the fact that he represents us.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, joecolts said:

Absolutely agree.  This is the type of guy you love to have on your team and to brag about the fact that he represents us.  

 

I know he'll likely be gone next year if he looks good/healthy this season, but still love it that he's back. Such a good guy, and this worked out very well for both parties. I hope he kills it as a one-two punch. I love Hines, but he's not an every down back, and we rotated him in last year like he was. I think this will allow Indy to be more creative. I still want Hines to get a ton of touches, just not as many between the Ts RB carries.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

 

I know he'll likely be gone next year if he looks good/healthy this season, but still love it that he's back. Such a good guy, and this worked out very well for both parties. I hope he kills it as a one-two punch. I love Hines, but he's not an every down back, and we rotated him in last year like he was. I think this will allow Indy to be more creative. I still want Hines to get a ton of touches, just not as many between the Ts RB carries.

One way or another he will be gone next year.  If he reverts back to his pre-injury self he will finally get his payday.  If he struggles the Colts won’t re-sign him.  This is about what I said would make sense for both sides when he got hurt last year.  Colts keep him on a one year prove it deal and he gets to stay in the system he knows rather than adding learning a new system to things he has to do beyond his rehab.  Makes perfect sense for both sides.  

 

I think this will let Hines be a true third down back or passing package back.  Maybe it will FINALLY eliminate the draw to Hines up the gut play that still hasn’t worked.  Outside of that one play I am with you in being a big fan of Hines too.  His role is just that of passing package back and there is nothing wrong with that.  He’s deadly at it and you could argue he’s the Colts best skill position player when used in that role.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

we have the best RB trio in the league since who knows when

8 minutes ago, TimetobringDfence! said:

I guess I'll be the first to say Really? I like Mack but we really need a CB 1... our D is gonna be hurting if we dont get a vet there.

what does singing Mack to a 2 mil dollar deal have to do with getting a CB1?

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

One way or another he will be gone next year.  If he reverts back to his pre-injury self he will finally get his payday.  If he struggles the Colts won’t re-sign him.  This is about what I said would make sense for both sides when he got hurt last year.  Colts keep him on a one year prove it deal and he gets to stay in the system he knows rather than adding learning a new system to things he has to do beyond his rehab.  Makes perfect sense for both sides.  

 

I think this will let Hines be a true third down back or passing package back.  Maybe it will FINALLY eliminate the draw to Hines up the gut play that still hasn’t worked.  Outside of that one play I am with you in being a big fan of Hines too.  His role is just that of passing package back and there is nothing wrong with that.  He’s deadly at it and you could argue he’s the Colts best skill position player when used in that role.

I think there's a place in the middle that would allow him to be back. If he stays healthy, doesn't revert to his pre-injury form, but is a better option than Wilkins, I could see him coming back. Achilles can be tricky and take time to trust. So there's another situation where he just takes time, and reverts to form late in the season, is back for one more.

 

I agree this let's Hines be the weapon he's supposed to be. He did well at times as a rotational RB, but he just lacks the power for a lot of situations. He did better than I thought to be honest. I'd absolutely love to see him line up at slot with Taylor in the backfield, on 3rd down between the 20s. That opens up all kinds of possibilities for the O. Or even just a simple two back set.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, TimetobringDfence! said:

I guess I'll be the first to say Really? I like Mack but we really need a CB 1... our D is gonna be hurting if we dont get a vet there.

 

8 minutes ago, bestQBever said:

we have the best RB trio in the league since who knows when

what does singing Mack to a 2 mil dollar deal have to do with getting a CB1?

I second that comment. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

I think there's a place in the middle that would allow him to be back. If he stays healthy, doesn't revert to his pre-injury form, but is a better option than Wilkins, I could see him coming back. Achilles can be tricky and take time to trust. So there's another situation where he just takes time, and reverts to form late in the season, is back for one more.

 

I agree this let's Hines be the weapon he's supposed to be. He did well at times as a rotational RB, but he just lacks the power for a lot of situations. He did better than I thought to be honest. I'd absolutely love to see him line up at slot with Taylor in the backfield, on 3rd down between the 20s. That opens up all kinds of possibilities for the O. Or even just a simple two back set.

What about a 3 RB set, Mack, Taylor and Hines in the slot? Wouldn’t that be unique 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, csmopar said:

What about a 3 RB set, Mack, Taylor and Hines in the slot? Wouldn’t that be unique 

I'd be down with that. Taylor and Hines are capable catchers, and that would freak some Ds out lol. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, csmopar said:

So is Mack. 

For whatever reason, they just really never threw it to Mack. I don't see him as electric as Hines and Taylor though. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the signing for both Mack and the Colts....Mack gets to work his way back from the Achilles with a one year deal and move on for more cash, the Colts get a one year rental on a proven commodity that knows the system......should help Wentz too confidence wise having excellent 3 headed attack on the ground with Hines.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't see how this was a surprise. Injury history and he's coming off another injury. Mack wasn't gonna get a top dollar offer.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, CR91 said:

I really don't see how this was a surprise. Injury history and he's coming off another injury. Mack wasn't gonna get a top dollar offer.

Just my opinion, but I don't think many expected him to get a big offer from anyone. I think the only surprise (and it's not a huge surprise) for some, is that they signed him when the RB room was already looking pretty good with Taylor, Hines, and Wilkins. I personally thought we'd bring him back cheap as did others. He's a luxury though, given all the other holes we have. I personally hope we can bring Hooker back on a cheap deal too if they think he's healthy and can contribute.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EastStreet said:

Just my opinion, but I don't think many expected him to get a big offer from anyone. I think the only surprise (and it's not a huge surprise) for some, is that they signed him when the RB room was already looking pretty good with Taylor, Hines, and Wilkins. I personally thought we'd bring him back cheap as did others. He's a luxury though, given all the other holes we have. I personally hope we can bring Hooker back on a cheap deal too if they think he's healthy and can contribute.

 

I don't think it's a luxury. Mack and Taylor is a way better combo then Taylor and Wilkins

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

I don't think it's a luxury. Mack and Taylor is a way better combo then Taylor and Wilkins

I agree when talking about Wilkins, but it's more about what Reich inferred when he was talking about Hines and Taylor, about them being interchangeable. I called nonsense then, and still do. Bringing back Mack reinforces it was nonsense. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Waste of 2mil. Never been a Mack fan, still not. Wouldn't of cared if they signed him for 2 cents. was happy to finally have him gone and he gets reeled back in.

 

Nothing personal as I don't know him, I'm sure he is a great human being. Just never thought he was all that. He's like Tevin Coleman-ish and these guys are a dime a dozen. Nothing special about them.

 

Sorry, just not excited for what that's worth

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Myles said:

Any updates on where Mack is on his rehab?   Will he be ready to start the season?

 

 

I thought I read a tweet claiming the ankle/tendon was about 90%. Can't speak on the validity of the tweet though.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Indeee said:

Waste of 2mil. Never been a Mack fan, still not. Wouldn't of cared if they signed him for 2 cents. was happy to finally have him gone and he gets reeled back in.

 

Nothing personal as I don't know him, I'm sure he is a great human being. Just never thought he was all that. He's like Tevin Coleman-ish and these guys are a dime a dozen. Nothing special about them.

 

Sorry, just not excited for what that's worth

I think you are the only one who feels that way.   I am thrilled to have him back for only $2.  Low risk, high reward.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if hes going to be healthy to start the year. If the Colts and Mack know he wont be ready to go until week 8 (for example)  why not stay in Indy get healthy and contribute down the stretch. Great depth for the Colts that, when healthy, can do some real damage and would be hitting his stride when we'd need him the most.

I like it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I realy am glad we resigned Marlon. It is a win win situation. Marlon can regain his confidence and we have a dynamite weapon.  Marlon can help JT and JT can also help by extending Marlon's recovery and play. The NFL 17 games is a tear on anyone's body and so having these four RB, we are pretty much set. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Mitch Connors said:

I wonder if hes going to be healthy to start the year. If the Colts and Mack know he wont be ready to go until week 8 (for example)  why not stay in Indy get healthy and contribute down the stretch. Great depth for the Colts that, when healthy, can do some real damage and would be hitting his stride when we'd need him the most.

I like it.

He is 80 to 90 percent recovered and will be ready by training camp.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

He earned one more year and a chance to set himself up for that bigger payday that he missed. Thanks Ballard for doing him a solid in return for his dedication to the Shoe. Hope he balls out like a mutha. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This says a lot about marlon Mack. He’s coming back on a one year contract for 2 million dollars and he’s playing one of the more important positions on the field. Meanwhile, we got George odum, crying after being paid as the highest special team player who doesn’t kick a football at 2.1 million. I really think marlon Mack, even recovering from a devastating injury, could’ve found a team to pay him 4-5 million for one year but he stayed with the colts. Marlon Mack is one of my favorites. I hope he balls out this year and earns himself that big contract. It’ll be bittersweet because I know he won’t be a colt anymore but he’ll get what he very much deserves and I’m all for that. We need more teammates and players in the nfl like Mack who isn’t all about himself and is more about the benefit of the team and earning his worth. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, joecolts said:

Mack is a hard worker, great teammate and just a good person.  This is a win/win!

What I love about Mack is he’s a team player. I’m sure, even with his injury history, a team would’ve been willing to take a chance on him for more than 2 million. On the other hand, we got George odum, who is upset about being paid the highest paid special team player in the nfl that doesn’t kick the football. He’s making 2.1 million dollars to be on the field, 6-10 times a game. Wish there were more players like Mack who are team oriented and want to prove themselves. Don’t get me wrong, I like odum. Great special teamer. But him being upset about being paid 2.1 million dollars and is the highest paid ST player than doesn’t kick the ball is ridiculous. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You have to NOT Believe in getting better, and try as i might i can't get the Bracket comparison. Bracket became pretty decent against the run but his height/length was a weakness dropping in coverage.  Oke seems the opposite. As of today.  Some think he has a brain and that experience should benefit him in all areas of his game. This should be a really good learning year for him.
    • Positions that are clear (real and perceived) QB1, X-WR, RB1, APB, RT, RG, C, LG, 3T, NT, CB1 (Rhodes), NB (Moore), WILL, TE1 and TE2.   The rest, have some element of fog (real or perceived) IMO.   Offense QB2 - If Eason is clearly #2, not sure whey we waste a draft pick on another QB. I didn't get it then, and not now lol. Z - Hilton his aging. Pretty clear the plan when drafting Campbell was that he would gradually work outside. Slot - PC is the obvious guy if healthy, but if he is healthy, and they start moving him outside, we still have questions.  LT - Fisher is clear if he returns to form. If not, a lot of fog. TE3 - Granson is a wildcard but assuming they want to use him as a move-slot-TE like they tried to use Burton. Not really a true TE   Defense L and RDE - time share here. There are several rotations I can see here, and likely won't be set early. MIKE - Oke is the clear leader, but there will be a lot of eyes on his run D. A time share here would not shock me. SAM - we don't use it a lot, so who knows. I could even see Oke playing SAM and Franklin handling MIKE on those SAM downs. LB Depth - who knows. Will we ever see Speed emerge? CB2 and CB Detph - RYS vs Carrie vs Tell vs Rogers. Nothing would surprise me. FS - Blackmon needs to take a big step forward in deep coverage. If not, I could see a rotation here. SS - Willis is very solid, but I could see him getting pushed by Shawn Davis.  
    • I think the QB position is a little unique in terms of depth expectation and planning.  And it depends on your expectations of the team.  See below in my response to CR91 for more.   Not sure I understand. How was letting Walker go an "answer".      Couple points here...  Hoyer's loss vs Miami was 99% on Reich. After Hoyer played pretty well vs Pitt (coming in cold) in which he had 3 TDs / 1 INT and completed 65% of passes, Reich chose to 1) not practice Hoyer with the 1s leading up to the Miami game, and 2) chose to throw it all over the school yard (around 40 attempts) vs a team that was horrible vs the run. Just super bad game plan and prep. I agree that a pricey vet QB, or spending much on a backup QB in general is pretty much a waste. That is, unless you are a true SB contender going into the year (and can afford it). I've always felt if your starting QB goes down for the year, might as well accept things and embrace a higher draft pick come next draft. It's extremely rare to go deep with a backup. Even Foles wasn't seen as a high end backup. He was just off a cheap one year deal, and was contemplating retirement. He came back to Philly for a moderate deal, which most thought was even too much. That was purely luck. Just my opinion, but I like riding out Eason and trying to develop him along the way. And trade him (if he's not in contention for starting job) later if you can get picks, or keep him if he's decent and cheap. I, like you, like what the Pats do most years.
  • Members

    • ColtsBlueFL

      ColtsBlueFL 4,655

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BlackTiger

      BlackTiger 156

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Four2itus

      Four2itus 5,502

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • The Fish

      The Fish 1,261

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 10,828

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cgi4life

      cgi4life 74

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • life long

      life long 238

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 2,317

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fisticuffs111

      Fisticuffs111 2,009

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • legend300

      legend300 64

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...