Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts are re-signing RB Marlon Mack


Recommended Posts

  • MTC changed the title to Colts are re-signing RB Marlon Mack

This is perfect for him to get some carries and prove he is healthy. It brings me joy to see him in a colts uniform for another season. This was the logical move after that injuries.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn’t think they’d bring him back since didn’t see the need really.  Maybe a reward for his previous cheap years by giving a parting 2 million and a rehab season before he finds greener pastures

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not all that surprised he is back given his injury.

 

It's a major injury and I hope he can bounce back and play at a high level. Not only for the Colts but for Mack too. I know it will not be in Indy, if he does bounce back, but I really hope he gets a big contract next offseason. He deserve it. 

 

If the RB group can stay healthy it is going to be really fun to watch.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Great to see this. I hope he is healed with no lingering issues. If Wentz is above average it could be a good time had by all. Now we watch the draft after today's signings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is great news all around. Gives him a year to get back into it and show what he can do without him necessarily having to carry the load.

 

I'd quite like Hooker to do something similar as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MarquisJ said:

Colts with the best runningback room in football and I don’t think it’s close.

 

I think the Browns may have an argument for the best 1-2 punch duo. But, with Taylor, Mack, Hines, and Wilkins that's a pretty solid stable.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Nate! said:

Didn’t think they’d bring him back since didn’t see the need really.  Maybe a reward for his previous cheap years by giving a parting 2 million and a rehab season before he finds greener pastures

True. If anything Mack deserves this.

 

He kept his mouth shut, didn’t hold out, and showed up to work on his final year of a cheap contract. Can’t say that about a lot of these players now.

 

Then his unfortunate injury. I hope he comes back and plays well for his own pride.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, bravo4460 said:

He kept his mouth shut, didn’t hold out, and showed up to work on his final year of a cheap contract.

I believe they did try to extend him last year, but could not reach an agreement.  Unfortunately Mack probably lost a good bit of money by not taking it

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm glad he's back. He's a playmaker. Wish he was getting more money, he deserves to be rewarded.

Maybe in 2022 he'll get a better contract for himself and his family. 

 

Our backfield is solid and the best unit on team. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

After the season ending press conference and other media events, Ballard told us that he wanted to bring Mack back. It’s really not hard to read between the lines on what he tells us. He has even said, that it’s easy to read between the lines on the things he says. 
 

What an incredible backfield for the Colts, especially if Mack can return to original form from his injury. 
 

Taylor, Mack, Hines, and Wilkins. That’s just amazing. 
 

We know that injuries will happen and we need to be strong in the playoffs. This move just provided us the depth we need to excel at the time when it will matter the most. 
 

Mack at 2 million for a year? Outstanding job by Chris Ballard! And my hats off to Mack for being a team player!

 

By the way, I have met Mack (when he was a rookie) and he is a great dude. I’m very happy to have him back on a deal that makes sense for the Colts. Just a superb job from both camps. Well done!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes sense for both sides.  If Mack can return to pre-injury form the backfield of Mack, Taylor, and Hines might be the best in the NFL and with this offensive line (assuming they find a good tackle in the draft) is going to win this team a lot of games.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only 2mil for a great team guy and a great RB if he gets back to where he was? Yes please! Great job Ballard.

 

As a side note, I would bet that his attitude toward mentoring JT this last season really raises him in the FO’s eyes, and I’ll bet it’s part of the reason they resigned him

Link to post
Share on other sites

Called this in the other thread, and phenomenal re-sign.

 

Helps keep miles off Taylor, allows Mack to slowly get back to form if needed and more attractive for a bigger contract next year, and likely allows for some two back sets that will allow Hines or Taylor to be more dangerous in the passing game (if not even line up at slot). 

 

Great guy, and I love having him back.

 

Now lets go get a short and cheap contract with Hooker. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Positions that are clear (real and perceived) QB1, X-WR, RB1, APB, RT, RG, C, LG, 3T, NT, CB1 (Rhodes), NB (Moore), WILL, TE1 and TE2.   The rest, have some element of fog (real or perceived) IMO.   Offense QB2 - If Eason is clearly #2, not sure whey we waste a draft pick on another QB. I didn't get it then, and not now lol. Z - Hilton his aging. Pretty clear the plan when drafting Campbell was that he would gradually work outside. Slot - PC is the obvious guy if healthy, but if he is healthy, and they start moving him outside, we still have questions.  LT - Fisher is clear if he returns to form. If not, a lot of fog. TE3 - Granson is a wildcard but assuming they want to use him as a move-slot-TE like they tried to use Burton. Not really a true TE   Defense L and RDE - time share here. There are several rotations I can see here, and likely won't be set early. MIKE - Oke is the clear leader, but there will be a lot of eyes on his run D. A time share here would not shock me. SAM - we don't use it a lot, so who knows. I could even see Oke playing SAM and Franklin handling MIKE on those SAM downs. LB Depth - who knows. Will we ever see Speed emerge? CB2 and CB Detph - RYS vs Carrie vs Tell vs Rogers. Nothing would surprise me. FS - Blackmon needs to take a big step forward in deep coverage. If not, I could see a rotation here. SS - Willis is very solid, but I could see him getting pushed by Shawn Davis.  
    • I think the QB position is a little unique in terms of depth expectation and planning.  And it depends on your expectations of the team.  See below in my response to CR91 for more.   Not sure I understand. How was letting Walker go an "answer".      Couple points here...  Hoyer's loss vs Miami was 99% on Reich. After Hoyer played pretty well vs Pitt (coming in cold) in which he had 3 TDs / 1 INT and completed 65% of passes, Reich chose to 1) not practice Hoyer with the 1s leading up to the Miami game, and 2) chose to throw it all over the school yard (around 40 attempts) vs a team that was horrible vs the run. Just super bad game plan and prep. I agree that a pricey vet QB, or spending much on a backup QB in general is pretty much a waste. That is, unless you are a true SB contender going into the year (and can afford it). I've always felt if your starting QB goes down for the year, might as well accept things and embrace a higher draft pick come next draft. It's extremely rare to go deep with a backup. Even Foles wasn't seen as a high end backup. He was just off a cheap one year deal, and was contemplating retirement. He came back to Philly for a moderate deal, which most thought was even too much. That was purely luck. Just my opinion, but I like riding out Eason and trying to develop him along the way. And trade him (if he's not in contention for starting job) later if you can get picks, or keep him if he's decent and cheap. I, like you, like what the Pats do most years.
    • I don’t think a decision can be made until the preseason when we all see if Eason can play.  There are guys out there like Barkley, who can get you through a game or two in a pinch.  From what I read the Bears will probably keep Foles simply because his contract makes it easy for them   But my point was that it’s interesting that most of of aren’t really concerned about the backup QB even though it’s the position that we have least experience.  
  • Members

    • Moe

      Moe 50

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Wentzszn

      Wentzszn 11,138

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 10,827

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoColts8818

      GoColts8818 5,222

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Behle

      Behle 49

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 5,742

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rock8591

      rock8591 565

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 216

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WentzinRome

      WentzinRome 182

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 7,998

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...