Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts Sign Nt Brandon Mckinney [Merge]


Nobody
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So, I see in the post above it's now around 12 million and that's after quite a few signings, so I was correct, the Colts had and still have a lot of cap space to work with.

As of right now, yeah. But we're going to draft 10 players, and we'll still need another 20 players to fill out the 80 man roster. Based on projections, we don't have lots of cap space to work with. There's flexibility with a couple players on the roster, so there's not a whole lot of concern. I think our front office has been very prudent with their signings and resignings this offseason. To this point, I give the offseason a B+. But with the dead cap hits from our released players, going back to training camp of last year, we're up against it on the cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of right now, yeah. But we're going to draft 10 players, and we'll still need another 20 players to fill out the 80 man roster. Based on projections, we don't have lots of cap space to work with. There's flexibility with a couple players on the roster, so there's not a whole lot of concern. I think our front office has been very prudent with their signings and resignings this offseason. To this point, I give the offseason a B+. But with the dead cap hits from our released players, going back to training camp of last year, we're up against it on the cap.

I'm not complaining about the signings (I'm not ready to tag them as great signings yet, either). This is from LaConforna on March 30

Indianapolis Colts

Current contracts: 51

Previous year carryover: $2,508,682.00

Adjustments: $5,252,623.00

Adjusted cap: $128,361,305.00

Team cap: $117,736,787.00

Cap room: $10,624,518.00

Team cash: $86,801,572.00

Now, according to an article at 49ernation they have about $4 million going to the 1st year rookie cap. Even if you double that for the Colts since they have higher draft picks, that still elaves about 2.6 million in cap space. That is a bunch. The 20 guys to fill out an 80 man roster don't count because only the top 51 salaries count towards the cap during the offseason/preseaon(whatever this time of year is called).

Again, I don't know all the ins and outs of the caps and contracts, but I do know the Colts had only about 1 tp 1.5 million in cap space the year they signed Corey Simon to a big contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not complaining about the signings (I'm not ready to tag them as great signings yet, either). This is from LaConforna on March 30

Indianapolis Colts

Current contracts: 51

Previous year carryover: $2,508,682.00

Adjustments: $5,252,623.00

Adjusted cap: $128,361,305.00

Team cap: $117,736,787.00

Cap room: $10,624,518.00

Team cash: $86,801,572.00

Now, according to an article at 49ernation they have about $4 million going to the 1st year rookie cap. Even if you double that for the Colts since they have higher draft picks, that still elaves about 2.6 million in cap space. That is a bunch. The 20 guys to fill out an 80 man roster don't count because only the top 51 salaries count towards the cap during the offseason/preseaon(whatever this time of year is called).

Again, I don't know all the ins and outs of the caps and contracts, but I do know the Colts had only about 1 tp 1.5 million in cap space the year they signed Corey Simon to a big contract.

This is from Frog:

Add in Draft pick #1 at $4.2MM

Add in Draft pick #34 at $1.4MM

Add in Draft pick #65 at $0.9MM

That's $6.5 million to the cap for our top three picks next year. Add in the other seven picks at minimum (I think it's $375k), and that's an additional $2.625 million, for a total of $9.125 million for rookie draft picks.

You're right about the top 51 rule for camp, so we should be okay with our 80 man roster. But come cut time, we're talking about a 53 man roster, including Freeney at $19 million. If the numbers shake out okay, then fine. I'm not overly worried about them. I just don't think we should carry Freeney at his current cap hit. It's nonsensical, if you ask me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is from Frog:

Add in Draft pick #1 at $4.2MM

Add in Draft pick #34 at $1.4MM

Add in Draft pick #65 at $0.9MM
The numbers for #34 and #65 are a bit high. If you look at last year pick #34(Williams) his cap hit was .9 and pick #65 (McClain) was .55.
You're right about the top 51 rule for camp, so we should be okay with our 80 man roster. But come cut time, we're talking about a 53 man roster, including Freeney at $19 million. If the numbers shake out okay, then fine. I'm not overly worried about them. I just don't think we should carry Freeney at his current cap hit. It's nonsensical, if you ask me.

Yeah, Freeney restructuring will help and they will probably get it done it since it would be better for Freeney to convert his 2012 salary to a signing bonus. It's probably that right now, his new agent is busy working with draft prospects.

Plus, I can guarantee that the salary cap is not going to prevent them from signing any free agent they want to sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No good all round player Now you got it!! :rolleyes:

Now that I got the laughter out of my system, anytime you want to do an in depth technical breakdown and explain to us how Gary Brackett was/is a good run defender, the same way I did an in depth technical breakdown to explain exactly why he WASN'T/ISN'T a good run defender (at all), then i'll be all ears. You saying so doesn't make it so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CBS Sports has an interesting take on a possible nose tackle prospect for the Colts

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/blog/rob-rang/18471790/projecting-the-draft-indianapolis-colts

NT Josh Chapman, Alabama (NFLDraftScout.com ranking: 108)

As the Colts transition to coach Pagano's 3-4 defensive scheme, the addition of a nose tackle to anchor the middle of that three-man front is imperative to the overall defensive success. The Colts' currently have Antonio Johnson and Brandon McKinney slated to share the nose tackle duties, but neither is considered the long-term answer and depth at this position is never a bad thing. Chapman (6-1, 316) manned the middle of Nick Saban's 3-4 defense in college and might be the most natural nose tackle in this draft class. He has been somewhat of an afterthought during the pre-draft process because he has been shelved after tearing his ACL, despite playing through the pain for several weeks. Chapman is still rehabbing from the injury, but would be a nice pick in the fourth round for Indy to groom as their nose tackle of the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that I got the laughter out of my system, anytime you want to do an in depth technical breakdown and explain to us how Gary Brackett was/is a good run defender, the same way I did an in depth technical breakdown to explain exactly why he WASN'T/ISN'T a good run defender (at all), then i'll be all ears. You saying so doesn't make it so.

Well certainly you re entitled to your opinion. No Brackett was not Ray Lewis or Urlacker, but he was good. I think he did a good job especially given the quality & size of our DT's. TECHNICAL BREAKDOWN NOW I am LAUGHING PLEASE :lol:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well certainly you re entitled to your opinion. No Brackett was not Ray Lewis or Urlacker, but he was good. I think he did a good job especially given the quality & size of our DT's. TECHNICAL BREAKDOWN NOW I am LAUGHING PLEASE :lol:

Yep.....just as I thought: you can't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep.....just as I thought: you can't.

Nope no time right this second to respond to nonsense, but the comment of our DT's could go a long way starting one. When your DT's are CONSISTENTLY MANHANDLED Playing MLB gets amazingly tough, because there is always someone free on him. Allowing HUGE running lanes to GASH us. I am guessing you haven't played much ball. heck we can just take the hit Brackett but on Bettis in the playoff game at the goal line which caused a fumble & which almost turned the game in our favor as you could play the run OK!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope no time right this second to respond to nonsense, but the comment of our DT's could go a long way starting one. When your DT's are CONSISTENTLY MANHANDLED Playing MLB gets amazingly tough, because there is always someone free on him. Allowing HUGE running lanes to GASH us. I am guessing you haven't played much ball. heck we can just take the hit Brackett but on Bettis in the playoff game at the goal line which caused a fumble & which almost turned the game in our favor as you could play the run OK!

Yeah....earlier in this thread, the way that I broke down EXACTLY the techniques involved in playing MLB, clearly i've never played the game before. Especially not MLB.

You, on the other hand, have obviously played alot of football in your day. You're a walking encyclopedia of the game. rotflmao

I'm done with you and this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah....earlier in this thread, the way that I broke down EXACTLY the techniques involved in playing MLB, clearly i've never played the game before. Especially not MLB.

You, on the other hand, have obviously played alot of football in your day. You're a walking encyclopedia of the game. rotflmao

I'm done with you and this thread.

I have played alot of ball D1 to be exact & clearly you can't or wont see the Brackett actually was pretty good. Good enough that we got to 2 Super bowls & won 1. & know I didn't need an encyclopedia to see the obvious. Honestly I don't care! I am now done with your Technical breakdown Of nothing! :facepalm: I guess Brackett only had one play verse the run which I have mentioned in his whole career & lasted this long because :thanks: he sucked GOT IT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CBS Sports has an interesting take on a possible nose tackle prospect for the Colts

http://www.cbssports...ianapolis-colts

NT Josh Chapman, Alabama (NFLDraftScout.com ranking: 108)

As the Colts transition to coach Pagano's 3-4 defensive scheme, the addition of a nose tackle to anchor the middle of that three-man front is imperative to the overall defensive success. The Colts' currently have Antonio Johnson and Brandon McKinney slated to share the nose tackle duties, but neither is considered the long-term answer and depth at this position is never a bad thing. Chapman (6-1, 316) manned the middle of Nick Saban's 3-4 defense in college and might be the most natural nose tackle in this draft class. He has been somewhat of an afterthought during the pre-draft process because he has been shelved after tearing his ACL, despite playing through the pain for several weeks. Chapman is still rehabbing from the injury, but would be a nice pick in the fourth round for Indy to groom as their nose tackle of the future.

If Chapman is still there in the 4th then I hope we take him and never look back. Honestly I'd be willing to spend the 3rd round pick on him. He was at one time considered first round talent but a sub-par year led to his stock dropping, until it came out he was playing injured.

An article was written earlier this year ranking the strongest college players and Josh Chapman came in at #1 with Dontari Poe coming in 2nd. That's pretty impressive, especially considering Poe has 20-30 lbs on Chapman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CBS Sports has an interesting take on a possible nose tackle prospect for the Colts

http://www.cbssports...ianapolis-colts

NT Josh Chapman, Alabama (NFLDraftScout.com ranking: 108)

As the Colts transition to coach Pagano's 3-4 defensive scheme, the addition of a nose tackle to anchor the middle of that three-man front is imperative to the overall defensive success. The Colts' currently have Antonio Johnson and Brandon McKinney slated to share the nose tackle duties, but neither is considered the long-term answer and depth at this position is never a bad thing. Chapman (6-1, 316) manned the middle of Nick Saban's 3-4 defense in college and might be the most natural nose tackle in this draft class. He has been somewhat of an afterthought during the pre-draft process because he has been shelved after tearing his ACL, despite playing through the pain for several weeks. Chapman is still rehabbing from the injury, but would be a nice pick in the fourth round for Indy to groom as their nose tackle of the future.

I would much rather have Nicolas Jean Baptiste. Chapman coming off an ACL tear does not bode well IMO. The Colts have had enough bad luck trying to get a decent DT. Now, for a 4th rder. I wouldn't complain too much about it, but like I said Baptiste would be better IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That would be the worst move of Ballard’s tenure IMO. Kenny is a top slot CB, Q is the best guard in football, and Hines is an excellent second RB when used properly. Kittle is a top three TE, sure, but that doesn’t equate. Also, Jimmy G is literally just the west coast Carson Wentz.
    • I was trying to be funny by showing my own cuss storm. My failed humor gets out of control sometimes.....
    • You can’t trade Q. It goes against everything Ballard has preached since day one. Ballard has always talked about building through the draft, paying your own guys what they deserve, and having high quality guys in the locker room. Q embodies all three of those philosophies. What does it say to our current guys and any potential free agents/guys looking to be traded to us if we trade a guy just because he deserves to be paid by us? It ruins everything our locker room has built up and everything it stands for. I agree that I don’t want to pay a guard premium money when we could use that money for someone like a star FA WR, but this is the bed the Colts FO has made, and we must all lie in it. And really that’s not all that bad, Q is expensive yes, but he’s also the best guard in football. It’s a win-lose scenario, not a lose-lose scenario.
    • Its just not realistic. That would be a great draft.   You list a bunch of positions, but the team isnt gonna have that many new starters. Thats a complete overhaul. Its just not gonna happen.   That only happens on teams who are rebuilding. We arent rebuilding. 
  • Members

    • STH2000

      STH2000 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • FRW

      FRW 172

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoatBeard

      GoatBeard 986

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JlynRN

      JlynRN 494

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • smittywerb

      smittywerb 386

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IrsaysArmy

      IrsaysArmy 677

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • legend300

      legend300 66

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan98

      Coltsfan98 302

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Four2itus

      Four2itus 7,044

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 10,308

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...