Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Mel Kiper compares Mac Jones to Tom Brady


Recommended Posts

Two crazy things about this article. 
 

1. Had a great season but the Senior Bowl helped sale his draft status. I have mentioned a few times that I see him being solid and having a good career. Also I think he is drafted higher than expected. 
 

2. it’s crazy that in 2000 the 7th QB (Tom Brady) was taking in the 6th round. In today’s NFL every year you have 6 or 7 drafted within the first four rounds. The league has definitely changed. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, DaColts85 said:

Two crazy things about this article. 
 

1. Had a great season but the Senior Bowl helped sale his draft status. I have mentioned a few times that I see him being solid and having a good career. Also I think he is drafted higher than expected. 
 

2. it’s crazy that in 2000 the 7th QB (Tom Brady) was taking in the 6th round. In today’s NFL every year you have 6 or 7 drafted within the first four rounds. The league has definitely changed. 

I think he ends up in Carolina or Washington. Maybe SF takes him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly I think it's ridiculous to compare a rookie to Brady, more to the fact it puts way to high expectations on the rookie and I don't think you can accurate say Mac Jones has the intangibles and sole football focus that Brady has because no one does

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

As a headline,  it looks ridiculous.    Any rookie would like silly being compared to Brady.

 

But we're all measuring any given rookie to 7-time Super Bowl winner, Tom Brady.    Everyone looks bad in that comparison.

 

But if you measure him against the 199th overall pick 20 plus years ago,  then it doesn't look quite so bad.

 

I think Jones is a hard eval....   because it's hard to know if he's good because of his ability,  or the fact that he was surrounded by 5 and 4 star talent everywhere.    In a 2-year window,  Alabama is going to have 4 first round draft pick wide receivers!   And they will all be pretty highly selected.    That will help any QB.    I think it makes for a much harder evaluation.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, danlhart87 said:

I think he ends up in Carolina or Washington. Maybe SF takes him. 

Carolina for sure. Rhule had a week with him and got to start his process already. I think he is shooting for him for sure. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

As a headline,  it looks ridiculous.    Any rookie would like silly being compared to Brady.

 

But we're all measuring any given rookie to 7-time Super Bowl winner, Tom Brady.    Everyone looks bad in that comparison.

 

But if you measure him against the 199th overall pick 20 plus years ago,  then it doesn't look quite so bad.

 

I think Jones is a hard eval....   because it's hard to know if he's good because of his ability,  or the fact that he was surrounded by 5 and 4 star talent everywhere.    In a 2-year window,  Alabama is going to have 4 first round draft pick wide receivers!   And they will all be pretty highly selected.    That will help any QB.    I think it makes for a much harder evaluation.

 

I hate to hear this because last year you were not saying this about Burrow. He only had 1 year of solid production. Had 3 top WR’s and a good TE plus a stud RB. Jefferson and Hellaire solid draft picks. Now you have Chase and Marshall. But yet nothing said about him just Alabama guys. 
 

Look I get Burrows should promising traits and had more athleticism but still people around here try to use that top talent stuff to much for Jones. Just my thoughts. 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

He'll be lucky to even win half the amount of super bowls brady has.

To expect any QB to win more than 2 is asking a lot. 2 is the gold standard for being a great winner when you consider only 12 QB's have won 2 or more. Nobody will even come close to Brady's 7. I seriously doubt even Rodgers will ever win 2 and I would almost bet my years salary Brees won't win 2 as a starter and those 2 QB's are 1st ballot Hall of Famers.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DeathByEagle said:

Who the hell is Mel Kiper? 

I think that question has been answered.   
 

Mel is closing in on doing this for 40 years.  He’s the Dean of media analysts.    And Tobin was out of the football business not too many years later. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/2/2021 at 9:42 AM, 2006Coltsbestever said:

To expect any QB to win more than 2 is asking a lot. 2 is the gold standard for being a great winner when you consider only 12 QB's have won 2 or more. Nobody will even come close to Brady's 7. I seriously doubt even Rodgers will ever win 2 and I would almost bet my years salary Brees won't win 2 as a starter and those 2 QB's are 1st ballot Hall of Famers.

 

Like I said he'll be lucky to win half as many lol.......actually I was being sarcastic but didn't use the emoji haha

 

Of course he won't win half as many or seriously doubt he wins 2 and probably wins zero

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/2/2021 at 1:49 PM, Mel Kiper's Hair said:

 

He's the man with the best hair on this forum or on any draft night coverage!

 

Mel-Kiper-Feature.jpg?itok=AFzSIP-m

 

 

 

My neighbor knows more about football than Mel Kiper....and he's a mailman.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, cdgacoltsfan said:

My neighbor knows more about football than Mel Kiper....and he's a mailman.

 

Your neighbor may know more about football but there is no way he has flowing locks of hair like Mel Kiper!

 

I always crack up whenever they play that Tobin video. 

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, cdgacoltsfan said:

My neighbor knows more about football than Mel Kiper....and he's a mailman.

I don’t know why after so many years there are so many people who still believe Kiper  doesn’t know what he’s talking about?


The exact opposite is true.   Always has been.   He’s lasted more than 35 years and for very good reason. 
 

But I’ve been reading this here since I showed up nearly nine years ago.  Some falsehoods die slowly around here. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

I don’t know why after so many years there are so many people who still believe Kiper  doesn’t know what he’s talking about?


The exact opposite is true.   Always has been.   He’s lasted more than 35 years and for very good reason. 
 

But I’ve been reading this here since I showed up nearly nine years ago.  Some falsehoods die slowly around here. 

 

I have to agree. His draft order is not always spot on but his ability to evaluate talent is always in the ballpark as to what GMs agree on. 

As it turned out Tobin's rant ended up being pretty lame after Trev Alberts ended up being one of the Colts all time bust. Not only was Alberts a bust, so was Tobin. :dunno:

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NewColtsFan said:

I don’t know why after so many years there are so many people who still believe Kiper  doesn’t know what he’s talking about?


The exact opposite is true.   Always has been.   He’s lasted more than 35 years and for very good reason. 
 

But I’ve been reading this here since I showed up nearly nine years ago.  Some falsehoods die slowly around here. 

 

Relax....i was paraphrasing a Bill Tobin quote . Tobin went off on Kiper when the Colts drafted Trev Alberta instead of Trent Dilfer. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasn't A J McCarron also compared to Brady or was it he that did it when he dropped all the way? Not every QB that drops to Round 6 going to be Brady and while Brady might be the gold standard w.r.t accomplishments, I think the comparisons to existing QBs in the NFL only hurts college QBs by placing a false unrealistic expectation on them. I would rather them say "I want to be the first Joe Burrow" etc. and make their own mark. That is what Mahomes did. You have to make your own mark in your own way. 

 

When I heard Jordan Love could be the next Mahomes like arm talent in a QB, I thought "hmmm...". :peek:

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Interesting theory. However, knowing what we know about Ballard, I don't see this as the approach he will take.   One big reason is that the UDFA pool will be thinner this year...for many of the reasons you mentioned. COVID has really created a lot of unknowns and hampered players from rising up draft boards. And since the NCAA allowed an additional year of eligibility...many players are returning for a "super senior" to increase their draft stock for next year. This will create more competition for UDFAs...so if you want to ensure that you get a certain player...it's best to have and use a late pick on him.   So what I think you will actually see is an opposite approach where Ballard will look to acquire a few more late Day 3 picks, that he can use in lieu of competing for priority UDFAs from a list that isn't as strong as year's past. So you will probably see late Day 3 picks attached to any trade backs.   And then for significant draft capital via trade, I think he will be eyeing picks from next year's draft. I know people love to mock the Colts getting back all of these additional Day 2 picks this year in a trade back. And that makes sense...since they don't have a 3rd round pick. But they are down a (likely) 1st next year (at least a 2nd). And that's in a class where the player pool will be larger. Some might argue that it makes losing that pick sting a little less, but I don't think Ballard sees it that way. He wants to be able to pick from as large of a pool as possible.    So I think Ballard will look to recoup as much draft value, if not increase it, to take advantage of next year's class. That inactivity in FA is likely in part because of next year's draft. In a larger draft class, even late comp picks will have some value. If he can get a couple of extra picks back for next year...plus a late comp pick or two...I think they will prefer that method. 
    • One of two things:   Take Brady in round 5 of the 2000 draft and let him hold a clipboard for a decade or hire Ballard in 2012.  Grigson was younger and no more established than Ballard at the time.
    • I don't know what to think. Purely scheme-wise and experience with simialar offense-wise IMO Lance makes the most sense... but I can see Shannahan liking Fields in that same role too.  That's the weirdest of smokescreen/smoke signals I've seen recently in the draft. 
    • Ballard isn’t going to trade back every year. It’s just become an obsession with a lot fans that he will.       
  • Members

    • #12.

      #12. 1,093

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Two_pound

      Two_pound 263

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MPStack

      MPStack 3,491

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Derakynn

      Derakynn 126

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bravo4460

      bravo4460 562

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dw49

      dw49 725

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 313

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Archer

      Archer 660

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 1,131

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 8,422

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...