Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Mike tanenbaum says colts have worst qb in the division.


Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, PRnum1 said:

I would rank them

 

Watson

Tannehill

Wentz

Lawrence

 

Frank's got some work to do to get Wentz to pass the other two

I would prefer to have Wentz over Tannehill.  Therefore, I rank Wentz above Tannehill.  Lawrence is currently unrankable, imho.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

This coming from one if the worst GMs in the league. There's a reason he's on ESPN and not a GM.

As of today, what Tannenba said may be true.   But it doesn’t matter.   We’re not playing games today.   We’re playing games in 6 and a half months.  A lot can and will change between now and then. 

Mike knows QBs. He was the former GM of the Jets....look at all the great QBs they have had.

He might be right.  We're still gonna play the games tho.  There are alot of "media guys" who are gonna be backpedaling on Wentz hot takes imo......recency bias be danged.  I'm optimistic.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Stephen said:

I wonder if Seahawks  and Texans may switch qbs like the cutler  trade a while back

I hadn't seen that idea floated... I think that might have some attraction to 3 out of the 4 variables, but I dunno that Russ is agreeing to go to Houston.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Stephen said:

I disagree about tannehill  being  on 2017 wentz level this past year. 2017 wentz would have finished  with many more tds if he had played in all 16 games


Sure...if you cherry pick passing TDs. Wentz had a slightly higher TD % in 2017 (7.5%) vs. Tannehill in 2020 (6.9%). So assuming Wentz maintained that % (which is an outlier for his career)...he would have had 7 more passing TDs that season (so 40 vs. 33 for Tannehill). 
 

But he also would have had 60 more PAs. Give Tannehill 60 more PAs...and he throws 4 more TDs...so that difference is 3 TDs...since we are just extrapolating. 

And Wentz had 0 rushing TDs in 2017 and Tannehill had 7 in 2020...so that more than makes up the difference in passing TDs.
 

Also, Tannehill’s TD% in 2019 was even higher than Wentz’s in 2017. Tannehill has maintained a high % over nearly two seasons...and it was high in 2018 as well.

 

There is an argument for which of those two QBs was better...but it gets really subjective because Tannehill was awesome last season. To say otherwise is silly.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Flash7 said:

I personally would rather address a person's arguments rather than attack the person themselves.

 

:scoregood: 

 

I don't agree with Mike Tannenbaum and he probably said it to boost ratings and get folks riled up as we see here, but the personal attacks are unnecessary. It is the ad hominem logical fallacy.

 

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Lawrence - Jax has a lot of draft capital and can make TL's rook year/life much easier if they want. Will they? Anyway, I'm sure he flashes some, but doubt he looks pro-bowl first year. Now second year....

 

They have one of the worst defenses in the league, but I still think it would be smart to get Trevor some help on offense.  They are obviously not in super bowl or bust mode, might as build around the franchise player before worrying too much about defense 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, BlackTiger said:

 

They have one of the worst defenses in the league, but I still think it would be smart to get Trevor some help on offense.  They are obviously not in super bowl or bust mode, might as build around the franchise player before worrying too much about defense 

They've got some good WRs, so I don't think they need to do a lot for him. 

 

And they have:

1, 25, 33, 45, 65, 97, 121, 129, 154, 193, 214

 

That's a HUGE haul. 

 

Their primary and secondary needs are

QB, OT, CB, TE

S, EDGE, WR

 

Given they have the 22nd ranked OL, I think they have to use 2 of the 5 early picks on OL to protect their investment.

I'd go 

1 - QB

25 and 33 - OT and CB'/DE

45 - OL

65 - TE

97 - S

 

I'd solve for CB/DE (whatever I don't draft with 25/33) in FA. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, ColtStrong2013 said:

Call me crazy, but I’d take this quarterback with this team over Andrew Luck and the rosters he had around him, and he was better than all of them. This is looking like a damn good team. 

Imagine if we had both.....

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, NFLfan said:

 

:scoregood: 

 

I don't agree with Mike Tannenbaum and he probably said it to boost ratings and get folks riled up as we see here, but the personal attacks are unnecessary. It is the ad hominem logical fallacy.

 

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem

I seriously doubt MT was trying boost ratings or upset anyone.   QB is the most important position and in his view we have the 4th best QB in a 4-team conference.   There are very few ratings to boost in the AFC South.   Houston is the only major market.  The other three cities don’t move the needle much. 
 

A simple straight forward opinion.  He’s likely doing the same thing for the other 7 divisions.   It’s just the usual off-season talk,  nothing more. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, PRnum1 said:

I would rank them

 

Watson

Tannehill

Wentz

Lawrence

 

Frank's got some work to do to get Wentz to pass the other two

This is how I would rank them as well. Lawrence IMO will be very good eventually, perhaps great but not until like year 3 or so. He has a lousy team around him. Watson is the best QB by a landslide (top 5 in the league) but he may get traded. To me Tannehill and Wentz are close but Tannehill has played well for a year and a half now. I would say Tannehill is above average which is better than average. He does have Henry however which helps. If Wentz can get back to even 2019 Wentz he is basically on par with Tannehill at that point.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

seriously doubt MT was trying boost ratings or upset anyone.   QB is the most important position and in his view we have the 4th best QB in a 4-team conference.   There are very few ratings to boost in the AFC South.   Houston is the only major market.  The other three cities don’t move the needle much. 
 

A simple straight forward opinion.  He’s likely doing the same thing for the other 7 divisions.   It’s just the usual off-season talk,  nothing more. 

 

I get what you are saying. My point was that the personal attacks against Mike Tannenbaum were not necessary. We see that too often when someone has an opinion with which we disagree.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, ColtStrong2013 said:

Call me crazy, but I’d take this quarterback with this team over Andrew Luck and the rosters he had around him, and he was better than all of them. This is looking like a damn good team. 

 

Good point. It is about the team, not any one player. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Stephen said:

Mike said watson, tannehill,  and Lawrence  are all better than Wentz and we gave up too much to get him. He's  a former  nfl gm and said it on espn.

Well he’s not wrong about us having the worst QB. And I don’t fully agree with him about giving up too much but it really depends on how Carson plays this year. 
 

that said, we’ve beaten two of those three QBs and I still don’t trust the Jags not to screw up Lawerence. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

I seriously doubt MT was trying boost ratings or upset anyone.   QB is the most important position and in his view we have the 4th best QB in a 4-team conference.   There are very few ratings to boost in the AFC South.   Houston is the only major market.  The other three cities don’t move the needle much. 
 

A simple straight forward opinion.  He’s likely doing the same thing for the other 7 divisions.   It’s just the usual off-season talk,  nothing more. 

He absolutely was IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know we can’t really rank or rate Lawrence or whatever, but if I had to start a franchise with one of those four guys I’d either pick him or Watson. No idea if the Jags will actually win games, but I think he’ll clearly look the part.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, csmopar said:

Well he’s not wrong about us having the worst QB. And I don’t fully agree with him about giving up too much but it really depends on how Carson plays this year. 
 

that said, we’ve beaten two of those three QBs and I still don’t trust the Jags not to screw up Lawerence. 

 

 

Does anyone actually think Tanny would be Tanny without that incredible assault weapon in his backfield?

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Fisticuffs111 said:

I know we can’t really rank or rate Lawrence or whatever, but if I had to start a franchise with one of those four guys I’d either pick him or Watson. Think he’ll be good right away, expecting a Herbert kind of rookie season for him. No idea if they’ll actually win games though.

I'm surprised more people can't look at it that way.  I would pick one of Watson or Lawrence and move on.

 

Honestly I would not even consider Carson for this one, though I think he will be fine for us.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, groundnpound said:

 

 

Does anyone actually think Tanny would be Tanny without that incredible assault weapon in his backfield?

No but he does have him at the moment so I’d still put him above Wentz at the moment 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How is this even a hot take, let alone a controversial one? Watson is great...Tannehill has been playing at a top 7 level for the past 1.7 seasons...and Lawrence is the most highly-regarded QB prospect since Luck.

 

The only question mark is Lawrence. But given how Herbert and Burrow were playing last season, I can see why there would be a very rosy outlook for Lawrence. 
 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, groundnpound said:

 

Fair enough, but i hear 2000 yd rushers have a bearing on your success level.

Very very true. But regardless, the stats stand. I mean Wentz May end up being best in the division or he may be the worst. No one can really say with any degree of accuracy, it’s all speculation at this point. Yeah, there’s a variety of factors involved. My point is, who really cares what some talking head says at this point in the off-season. No one knows. And the NFL is mostly unpredictable and anything can and will happen. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, groundnpound said:

 

 

Does anyone actually think Tanny would be Tanny without that incredible assault weapon in his backfield?

 

Probably not. But does it matter? Henry isn't going anywhere...so we have to assume that Tannehill will be Tannehill next season, as he has been for the past two seasons. And if we are looking at the QB situations in the AFCS...it's fair to say that the Colts could have the 4th-best.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, groundnpound said:

Based on last season, yep, I would agree. But any QB that played last season even one snap is better than Luck was last season cause Luck is sitting on his couch or on his snow board and not playing. 

Just now, shasta519 said:

 

Probably not. But does it matter? Henry isn't going anywhere...so we have to assume that Tannehill will be Tannehill next season, as he has been for the past two seasons. And if we are looking at the QB situations in the AFCE...it's fair to say that the Colts could have the 4th-best.

AFCE? You mean AFCS right?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, csmopar said:

Based on last season, yep, I would agree. But any QB that played last season even one snap is better than Luck was last season cause Luck is sitting on his couch or on his snow board and not playing. 

AFCE? You mean AFCS right?

 

Yes. Fat-fingered it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, shasta519 said:
24 minutes ago, csmopar said:

AFCE? You mean AFCS right?

 

Yes. Fat-fingered it.

Ah, ok. I thought you'd traveled 19 years back in time. :P

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, NFLfan said:

 

I get what you are saying. My point was that the personal attacks against Mike Tannenbaum were not necessary. We see that too often when someone has an opinion with which we disagree.

“The personal attacks against Mike Tannenbaum”.  ???

 

I assume you meant BY Mike Tannenbaum?

 

MT is an analyst.   He’s analyzing the quarterbacks in our division.  His comments, whether anyone agrees with them or not, are NOT personal attacks.   They’re just analysis. That’s all.   Nothing more.  Nothing less. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, shasta519 said:

How is this even a hot take, let alone a controversial one? Watson is great...Tannehill has been playing at a top 7 level for the past 1.7 seasons...and Lawrence is the most highly-regarded QB prospect since Luck.

 

The only question mark is Lawrence. But given how Herbert and Burrow were playing last season, I can see why there would be a very rosy outlook for Lawrence. 
 

 

 

 

Given how gadner minshew  looked like tom brady in our first game last year I could see Lawrence  beating  us in atleast one of our two matchups. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, groundnpound said:

He absolutely was IMO.

Mike Tannenbaum doesn’t have that kind of juice.    People don’t tune in for him.

 

He’s an analyst.  Offering opinions is the definition of his job.  What he said is NOT controversial.   It’s not a “hot take”.   

Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

“The personal attacks against Mike Tannenbaum”.  ???

 

I assume you meant BY Mike Tannenbaum?

 

MT is an analyst.   He’s analyzing the quarterbacks in our division.  His comments, whether anyone agrees with them or not, are NOT personal attacks.   They’re just analysis. That’s all.   Nothing more.  Nothing less. 

 

No, you read it correctly; I meant against Mike Tannenbaum. If you go back to my original point, perhaps it will be easier to understand. Someone wrote that instead of attacking Mike Tannenbaum the person for what he said, it is better to attack what he said. I agreed. Many have written that because Tannenbaum failed as a GM, he should not make judgments on QBs in the AFC South (I'm paraphrasing). 

 

Anyway, I will leave it at that. There is no point in going back and forth.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol... I love country, so love all things Nashville (except the Titans).  TN in general is one of favorite states to go along with FL, TX, and AZ (of course IN is in there too lol).
    • Yup, total wildcard. I don't think we carry both on the 53. I first thought Patmon was a no-brainer. The more I dig and the more film I watch, I'm starting to lean towards Strachan. Ballard commented on both. Said Patmon had upside on the outside. Said Strachan wasn't near as raw as one would think coming from a small school.    I'm probably totally reading too much into those comments, but they got me thinking. The bag on Patmon was that he didn't play to his size, and needed to improve a lot on route running. The outside comment seemed a bit limiting to me. Like he still isn't playing physical enough to play on the inside. And the only real bag on Strachan was that he would be raw coming from a small school. He was already physical and not horrible at routes. So thinking he might be a bit more well rounded, and more physical than Patmon. Like I said, likely reading too much into it, but it also goes hand and hand with the film.  It's going to be another close/tough decision for what will be RB3 (I count Hines as an APB). Last year it was Wilkins/Williams, this year Wilkins/Jackson. I like Wilkins as he does well late in games, and is patient with his reads. But I also think a lot of RBs will do well late in games behind our OL. From a money side of things, only 300k more for Wilkins, but Wilkins is in a contract year, and I doubt we'll want to pay him much more after this year. Jackson, if near in talent, might be the more attractive long term choice. At the same time, might just keep Wilkins this last year, stash Jackson on the PS, and then move Jackson up next season. Of course you run the risk of waivers though.
    • Yep labrum and hernia ”WalterFootball.com was first to report that Hooker would be out 4-6 months after surgeries to repair a hernia and labrum injury. That could cause Hooker to slide some in the first round and maybe not be the first safety selected. The injury kept Hooker from working out at the combine. ”
    • Rodgers is a player. He's a great returner and when he played , showed some really good coverage skills. He's not getting cut. You don't like MAC as well ?  
    • Yeah he did. It’s why he fell. He had a shoulder injury, I think it was either his labrum or rotator cuff and then a hip injury.
  • Members

    • Behle

      Behle 49

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BlueShoe

      BlueShoe 846

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Gigc

      Gigc 273

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jimmy g

      jimmy g 371

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • The Oopty Oop

      The Oopty Oop 51

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 10,357

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfeva

      coltsfeva 1,189

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Sikma

      Sikma 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 705

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • LJpalmbeacher2

      LJpalmbeacher2 2,118

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...