Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 205
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

20 minutes ago, TheNextGM said:

I’d be in on Tyrod Taylor if he doesn’t land a starting job somewhere.

 

Mobile, could be used in certain packages.

I agree about Tyrod. He appears to be a good luck charm when it comes to franchise qbs lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, TheNextGM said:

I’d be in on Tyrod Taylor if he doesn’t land a starting job somewhere.

 

Mobile, could be used in certain packages.

I never liked “package” or gimmicky QBs.  JB on 4th & 1 was fine, but i think it affects the flow.

  I like Tyrod, but i think it makes more sense to have a backup with similar style to the starter.  If thats Tyrod, then fine.  But no “special play” QB that will just give Reich too many distractions.  He gets a little off-track as it is at times.

  We have a solid team, no reason for packages or trick plays.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

given Wentz's injury history, I'd be more comfortable w/ the idea of "Eason = backup QB" if the Colts had a 3rd, inexpensive vet QB on the bench as well

 

Hoyer's a free agent FWIW...dunno if Reich and Ballard want to go in that direction again or not. IIRC Colt McCoy's a free agent too.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate the idea of a 3rd QB. It’s such a waste of a roster spot. Bring in either a vet QB and/or another young QB with arm talent to compete with Eason in training camp. If Eason holds his own, keep him as the back up. 
 

I do agree the backup spot is probably more important this year than in years past. If Wentz sucks it up the first half of the year then he gets pulled to save our 1st round pick next year. Or if he goes down with an injury which is not an unlikely scenario given his history. 
 

If Eason is as talented as Ballard thinks - at least from a backup QB standpoint -burying him in the depth chart and not giving him reps isn’t going to help his development.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I hope it's Eason.    I hope with the start of the new year we are testing him in zoom meetings on what he knows and doesn't know.   How much has he learned.   Can he audible audible out of a bad play and into a good one depending on what the defense shows?     We have to learn this ASAP.

 

Otherwise, if it's not JE,  then I'm interested in all of the usual suspects, including Brissett.   Or Fitzpatrick, or Smith,  or Taylor.   All the usual suspects.    Well...   my exception would be Hoyer.   I think we don't want to go there again.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its probably going to be JB.  The FO keeps saying what a great "locker room guy" he is.  Whatever that means.

 

If we're in a playoff hunt, a bye week hunt, and one game matters, I don't think the FO will want to put that game into the hands of JE.

 

Ballard has not changed his comments about JB or Eason in about a year.  If the tone of the comments change with the acquisition of Wentz, then we'll have more clarity.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't imagine the Colts signing Hoyer after he was benched for an injured Brissett in the middle of a game and then subsequently released. I'd take Brissett if he'd want to come back. Fitzpatrick would be another good option.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, DougDew said:

Its probably going to be JB.  The FO keeps saying what a great "locker room guy" he is.  Whatever that means.

 

If we're in a playoff hunt, a bye week hunt, and one game matters, I don't think the FO will want to put that game into the hands of JE.

 

Ballard has not changed his comments about JB or Eason in about a year.  If the tone of the comments change with the acquisition of Wentz, then we'll have more clarity.

I have to agree.  We are a SB contender now just like last year.  I don't Ballard will put the team in the hands of a 4th rd rookie if Wentz should go down.  I think JB is the clear front runner unless he signs elsewhere.  Have to hope they keep the rosters big enough so we can carry three QB's. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, DougDew said:

Its probably going to be JB.  The FO keeps saying what a great "locker room guy" he is.  Whatever that means.

 

If we're in a playoff hunt, a bye week hunt, and one game matters, I don't think the FO will want to put that game into the hands of JE.

 

Ballard has not changed his comments about JB or Eason in about a year.  If the tone of the comments change with the acquisition of Wentz, then we'll have more clarity.

brissett is the best choice

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t think we will know until after training camp.  If Eason’s performance is iffy, CB will shop the waiver wire or free agents.  If he were to sign someone right now, any confidence Eason may have would go in the crapper....

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, WoolMagnet said:

I never liked “package” or gimmicky QBs.  JB on 4th & 1 was fine, but i think it affects the flow.

  I like Tyrod, but i think it makes more sense to have a backup with similar style to the starter.  If thats Tyrod, then fine.  But no “special play” QB that will just give Reich too many distractions.  He gets a little off-track as it is at times.

  We have a solid team, no reason for packages or trick plays.

I enjoyed JB coming in on 3rd and 4th and short, it was entertaining but most importantly it worked 90% of the time. We had a complete team last year and was good but not good enough to make a deep run. We had 2 or 3 crucial mistakes at Buffalo that cost us unfortunately. Can't do that against very good or great teams.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Derakynn said:

I can't imagine the Colts signing Hoyer after he was benched for an injured Brissett in the middle of a game and then subsequently released. I'd take Brissett if he'd want to come back. Fitzpatrick would be another good option.

think Wentz might be looking over his shoulder at Fitz....need someone who's not a "threat"

 

McCoy? old enough, and cheap enough, to not be a threat

 

or just go rogue and say "Wentz and Eason or bust, baby!"?

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, poilucelt said:

think Wentz might be looking over his shoulder at Fitz....need someone who's not a "threat"

 

McCoy? old enough, and cheap enough, to not be a threat

 

or just go rogue and say "Wentz and Eason or bust, baby!"?

McCoy might work

Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I enjoyed JB coming in on 3rd and 4th and short, it was entertaining but most importantly it worked 90% of the time. We had a complete team last year and was good but not good enough to make a deep run. We had 2 or 3 crucial mistakes at Buffalo that cost us unfortunately. Can't do that against very good or great teams.

Agree with 3rd or 4th and ONE.  But we saw what happened when JB ran plays when we needed 2 or more yards...... nothin.  I like JB ..... alot.... i even think he can still be a starter with development.  I just think this team deserves more production at the position....... NOW.

 

  I’m not sure what i think of Wentz.  He didnt excite me All that much when he was drafted, and he has a “different” personality.  I was never crazy about some of Luck’s personality traits either.  Not as people, as I see or like a QB to act.  Not saying i’m right, just my taste. I like a PM, Brady in your face type.

  However, I’ve seen really good things from Wentz in past (i’m in Pa), he certainly has the tools, and i’ll wait and see if Reich can get him to be the guy we need.  I think they did a good job with Rivers tools, so i’m optimistic.

  As a backup, i’m ok with JB (less $), or Eason. I dont see JB making Carson nervous.  However, a surprise vet at a good deal that can mesh, mentor, or coddle Wentz could work too.

  It will be interesting to see if JB gets any interest around the league.  I expect not as a starter, so he may be back on a sweet deal.

  Wonder if Ballard called Belichek about a trade for JB?  Who’s their LT?  Haha

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Eason.

 

If they don't think he can handle back up duties after camp, cut him, and go get one of a billion guys that will still be looking for a job. There's a glut in the market, so I assume we'll have several QBs at camp.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Jacoby Brissett is a free agent, and I can't imagine him willingly re-signing here to back up Carson Wentz. This could be the last NFL contract he signs, and I think he'll go somewhere where he has a good chance to start, unless there's  just no interest in him leaguewide or he's backing up one of the NFL's better quarterbacks like Brady, Rodgers, Wilson or Jackson.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It would make the most sense to roll with Eason bc of his low salary.  We need to go all in on signing our own players to extensions and adding FA’s that can help us make a playoff push.  If Wentz goes down we are screwed anyways. Yeah I get his former backup won a SB but that is the perfect example of the exception.  I would rather sign another CB than a higher profile backup.  Eason needs to do his job and make the next step.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I hope it is Jacob Eason.  Because if we sign another veteran to be the backup, that likely means Eason is toast.  I doubt they would keep 3 QBs on the active roster for another year.  Eason would be picked up if he were on practice squad.  I predict a low level veteran is signed and Eason beats him out.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So you really wanted a LT which is still being addressed. Got it. 
    • Nice breakdown, I also graded the overall draft a C+, just a tad above average, not quite in the B range. According to Ian Rappaport, Dayo may be ready by late September which is good news. I also loved the Paye pick. I wanted a LT in round 1 or 2 but no harm is done if we sign Fisher or Leno. 
    • In the Ballard years, during the regular season as we have a 53 man roster, CB wants a maximum of 10 defensive lineman.  It’s been 5 and 5 sometimes.  But it has also been 6 ends and 4 tackles.    But I don’t believe we’ve ever had more than 6 DE’s.  Not to my knowledge.  
    • After doing a little research and letting things settle in for almost a week since Day 1..........   Day 1 Overall Grade: A Pick: Edge Kwity Paye 1-21 My thoughts that night: Great pick. A little surprised he dropped to 21, but stoked he did. Aside from checking all the boxes in terms of potential, he's a walk off grand slam in terms of "story" and character. Only thing I didn't like is that he was Michigan product lol, but he's all Blue now.  My thoughts now: Unchanged. 2021 Impact: Will be at minimum early contributor 1-2 downs Long term impact:  Likely to develop into a 3 down guy by year 2 if not earlier. Has the size and speed to be a really well rounded pass and run defender. Financial impact: Fantastic impact to the cap with 4-5 years of value while on his rook contract. That's huge at the DE position if he turns into the guy most think he is. What EastStreet would have done at 21: The exact same thing What made me chuckle: Ojulari dropping to 50 after some of the board talk.   Day 2 Overall Grade: C Pick: DE Dayo Odeyingbo 2-54 My thoughts that night: Surprised we took a second DE. Surprised we didn't try to grab a OT. I really "liked" Dayo pre-draft. While a lot of other folks liked Boogie Basham in the 2nd, Dayo was one of my favorite targets. That said, I preferred other Day 2/second round guys simply because of the injury timing, and the fact he likely won't contribute much if at all in 2021. Overall, I like him as a long term prospect, but I don't like him as a Colts second round pick in 2021. My thoughts now: Unchanged. Likely won't change until we're into the 2022 season and we see what have. He's a raw guy, that really shouldn't be so raw after being a 3 year starter. The good news is he won't be pressed into action early, and should have a year to work on technique. Bad news is he's likely not a factor in 2021, and that's just not good for a 2nd round pick. Had he been healthy, the grade would have been B, maybe B+. I did not let the fact we didn't get an OT impact my grading. My gut says it will be year 3 before we see production worthy of a 2nd rounder, but I love his ceiling/potential. A much much better pick than Banogu in the 2nd last year in terms of risk. I could see him being a versatile guy. Not necessarily as tweener-ish as Autry or Lewis, but still someone you can move around and could be a terror on the interior in passing downs.  2021 Impact: Little to none Long term impact: High ceiling dice roll with injury and layoff concerns...., but my gut says he'll be good in year 3. Financial impact: Not harmful, but not helpful earlier. If he doesn't produce well until year 3, we'll have missed out on half the benefit of his rook contract. What EastStreet would have done at 54: After Little was picked at 45, I started hoping Ballard would trade up a few to get Cosmi or Radunz. After JOK didn't get picked in the first 10 picks of the 2nd, I also was halfway hoping we move up to get him. Still surprised he dropped to 2-20. Once 54 came, I would have taken WR Terrace Marshall Jr., DE Payton Turner, or OTs Spencer Brown or a short list of others. What made me chuckle: Colts passing on a TE that was still there after a lot of the talk on the board.    Day 3 Grade Overall Grade: C  Pick: TE Kylen Granson 4-127 Pick Grade: C+ My thoughts that night: Not shocked, but thought he would have been there in the 5th or 6th. He's one of the guys I liked for late rounds as a pure move TE, but too small that early. My thoughts now: Not much change. Still a bit of a reach IMO. He's somewhat of a Burton clone, that likely doesn't block as well. I thought Reich featured Burton too much last year out of the slot, but also thought it was because we were lacking Campbell. Hoping Campbell stays healthy this year, and hope Granson doesn't steal snaps from either Campbell or MAC. Impact - Overall, low to medium. I think he'll be a 3rd TE option. He's really not a prototypical TE, and will play in that fuzzy space between TE, HB, and slot. Not a big fan of the hybrid position if it's going to steal snaps from true TE or true slot. What EastStreet would have done at 127: Once the pick came, definitely OT Jaylon Moore. If he can't cut it at OT, he'll be a capable OG. At worst, he'll be high end flex backup. If Josh Ball's character issue checked out, would have taken him as well.  Pick : SAF Shawn Davis 5-165 Pick Grade: B- My thoughts that night: Huh? You take a SAF and didn't move up a few spots to grab Jamar Jackson, who was graded my to be a top 3 safety in the draft. I even though about Jackson at 127. My thoughts now: Warming up. Davis does offer some potential. Good flex option that should come in and compete with Willis early on. Our scheme doesn't ask much of Willis or SSs in general, so early PT isn't out of the question. Davis has range in the 2 deep sets as well. After watching film and reading reviews, he's more gifted physically and a better hitter, but less instinctual perhaps than Willis. He's likely better deep, but not as good underneath as Blackmon. Impact - If he picks up the scheme, could compete early with Willis at SS1, or as FS2 with Odum or even FS1 duties on 3rd and longs. What EastStreet would have done at 165: No brainer OT/OG Trey Smith. If you want a SAF... move up a few spots (give up a 6th or 7th) and get Jamar Jackson, or stay and take Christian Uphoff. I also liked OT Forsythe.  Pick: QB Sam Ehlinger 6-218 Pick Grade: F My thought that night: Wow, they must not think much of Eason at all. My thoughts now: You either have to say last year's 4th pick was bad, or this year's 6th was bad lol. Weak arm, short, poor pocket presence. Not going to lose sleep over a 6th round pick, but this seemed like a waste of a pick. There will be tons of vet FAs that will be available on the cheap if you're not happy with Eason.  Impact: Practice squad guy or simply cut What EastStreet would have done at 218: There's typically no obvious or no brainer picks in the 6th or 7th. I really like WR Cade Johnson at this point, but my first choice would have been OT/OG Trey Smith or CB Shakur Brown. Pick: WR Mike Strachan 7-229 Pick Grade: C My thought that night: Another big WR project? Are they giving up on Patmon already? My thoughts now: Hasn't changed much. Aside from initial thoughts, perhaps they think he can pack some weight on a play jumbo WR/TE hybrid. Still just a raw small school guy. Impact: Practice squad guy What EastStreet would have done at 229: At this point I'm pounding the table for CB Shakur Brown or LB Dylan Moses as both could end up at minimum ST studs. I'm even thinking Ballard might take a 3rd DE and was eying Charles Snowden. If we hadn't taken Davis though in the 5th, my first choice would have been SAF Uphoff. Pick: OG Will Fries 7-248 Pick Grade: C My thought that night: We improved the OL depth guys already, didn't take an early LT, so why a very limited OG prospect? My thoughts now: unchanged. Impact: Practice squad guy What EastStreet would have done at 7-248: see above at 229 lol...    Overall Draft Grade: C+
    • And his production fell sharply this past year.  Only played 38% of defensive snaps for WFT.  He had been seeing double that many.  Still had about the same sack percentage, though.   But as a depth guy, I can see some sense in it.  Local product, outside chance for HoF, mentor for Kwity and Dayo, won’t be expensive, won’t demand high snap count.
  • Members

    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 22,534

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • esmort

      esmort 433

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jeddy88

      Jeddy88 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 9,721

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • wig

      wig 157

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeytsBlocker

      PeytsBlocker 15

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DEFENSE

      DEFENSE 302

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 9,241

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts89

      colts89 69

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JediXMan

      JediXMan 620

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...