Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

What position do we address with the First round pick


Recommended Posts

As we all know we had some glaring needs to address with the retirement of both Rivers and Castanzo. But with the recent trade of Wentz what position do you think the front office will address with the first pick? Will it be Left Tackle? Will it be a Edge Rusher? Will it be a cornerback or will it be a Wide Receiver.  I know we must wait to see how free agency plays out. But I’m curious as to what folks think we will address in the upcoming draft. My guess is it will be Left Tackle. This draft is deep and full of good high quality prospects. There are some line man that are expected to slide  to the latter of the first round potentially being available even in the second round. I think we will grab a LT to sure up that offensive line for years to come.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Ballard is trading back, I'm 76% sure of it.

LT or Edge

This is a great Offensive Tackle class. Teams drafting a QB in the top 15 will push some Blue chip prospects to us at 21.    I actually think Ballard will stay put at 21 and draft an OT. Samuel

It’s LT or DE, and we will likely have a clearer answer by the start of April at the latest.

 

Because we might elect to sign a FA LT in mid-March...    if we haven’t signed a LT or announced we’re moving Q to LT, then that will point to taking a LT with our first round pick. 
 

But if we do sign someone, or move Q, then it would point to DE. 
 

We still have lots of questions...  but the answers are going to start coming much, much faster now.   We are less than a month away from the start of free agency.  Answers coming soon!  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we pick one of: LT, Edge, WR, TE, or CB.

 

I think it is more likely that we draft a LT or Edge in the first round than anything else.

 

The fact that 4 QB's, possibly 5, are going before our pick helps a ton. 
 

A top 10-15 player should fall to us.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rookie tackles, I do not see Ballard taking a chance on, I have a feeling we go after Trent Williams or Alejandro Villaneuva for a couple of years. It does not mean he won't draft a tackle with his first pick but if we get our LT in free agency, there is a good chance our first pick is for pass defense, period, regardless of whether we stay put at No.21 or move back.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, chad72 said:

Rookie tackles, I do not see Ballard taking a chance on, I have a feeling we go after Trent Williams or Alejandro Villaneuva for a couple of years. It does not mean he won't draft a tackle with his first pick but if we get our LT in free agency, there is a good chance our first pick is for pass defense, period, regardless of whether we stay put at No.21 or move back.

I think I agree with this. Ballard is smart. He knows that the teams to beat are KC, Buffalo, CLE, and Baltimore. 
 

In order to do that, we need an improved pass rush and CB room, as well as offensive playmakers. 
 

This off-season should be INTERESTING

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the way I believe the draft will fall, I’m expecting LT in round 1 and EDGE in round 2. That’s where I see the most value. Beyond that, I expect us to go CB in round 3, and WR or EDGE again in round 4. The later rounds will see us drafting oline depth.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DattMavis said:

With the way I believe the draft will fall, I’m expecting LT in round 1 and EDGE in round 2. That’s where I see the most value. Beyond that, I expect us to go CB in round 3, and WR or EDGE again in round 4. The later rounds will see us drafting oline depth.

They no longer have a 3rd

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jvan1973 said:

They no longer have a 3rd

Ahh, you are correct. My bad. It completely slipped my mind. I could see Ballard trading back into the 2nd to secure a 3rd. The depth for LT in this draft is impressive, and the gap between a late 1st and an early 2nd LT won’t be wide. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still wonder if we trade one pick for Lattimore and solve cornerback. If not, we draft a corner and offensive tackle. We need to sign Lawson at defensive end. We don't draft defensive ends well, so we need to sign one.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Orioles22 said:

I still wonder if we trade one pick for Lattimore and solve cornerback. If not, we draft a corner and offensive tackle. We need to sign Lawson at defensive end. We don't draft defensive ends well, so we need to sign one.

 

I would be totally on board with that. There are some good DEs available in free agency this offseason so hopefully that is Ballard's plan. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DattMavis said:

Ahh, you are correct. My bad. It completely slipped my mind. I could see Ballard trading back into the 2nd to secure a 3rd. The depth for LT in this draft is impressive, and the gap between a late 1st and an early 2nd LT won’t be wide. 

 

They won't have to trade into the 2nd just to pick up a 3rd. They could slightly trade down a few spots, and add a 3rd rounder that way. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a great Offensive Tackle class. Teams drafting a QB in the top 15 will push some Blue chip prospects to us at 21. 
 

I actually think Ballard will stay put at 21 and draft an OT. Samuel Cosmi, OT, Texas and Christian Darrisaw, OT, Virginia Tech are two names that we will hear a lot about near the draft. 
 

Penei Sewell is regarded as the best OT prospect ever and he’s projected to go 5th because teams will reach for QB’s. An elite prospect should fall to us at 21. 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

If CB doesn't see a player he has ranked on his board falling I also believe he will trade back .   In either situation he will take BPA  (on his big board)   

 

I know he will take BPA because he says it every yr and every yr he does it.   

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see this years draft strategy being similar to last years.  Same circumstances.  Last year and this year we acquired a QB that we thought we could win a SB with.  Rivers and now Wentz.  The team is still in a win now mode with a very strong roster that just made the playoffs.  After signing Rivers last year what did Ballard do with our 1st pick?  He traded it for Buckner and filled an immediate hole.  Then he used our 2nd rd picks to fill skill position needs in Taylor and Pittman. I think we will follow the same blueprint.  I can see Ballard trading our 1st pick for a CB like Lattimore and solidifying a need.  No need to trade it for an ER or WR because FA will have many good players available there.  So I think he will sign an ER and WR in FA and use our 2nd. rd pick to get a LT or G and move Q to LT if the top LT's are gone.  Regardless I can see us trading our 1st for an impact starter again.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO, we either take a DE or trade back. T is a deep position this year, and I doubt Ballard would use a first on CB unless one of the top/elite guys fail (which they likely won't). 

 

My guess though is they trade back, because they'll keep Houston and Autry, or one and sign another FA...

 

I wouldn't be surprised to see the Colts end up with 3x 2R picks, or 2x 2R, and 2x 3Rers. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, coltsfanatic24 said:

This is a great Offensive Tackle class. Teams drafting a QB in the top 15 will push some Blue chip prospects to us at 21. 
 

I actually think Ballard will stay put at 21 and draft an OT. Samuel Cosmi, OT, Texas and Christian Darrisaw, OT, Virginia Tech are two names that we will hear a lot about near the draft. 
 

Penei Sewell is regarded as the best OT prospect ever and he’s projected to go 5th because teams will reach for QB’s. An elite prospect should fall to us at 21. 

 

Yes, even if we sign a LT in free agency, I can see Ballard doubling down on a strength for the future. Tomorrow is never assured and we saw what happened when we did not plan for a post-Castanzo plan in the draft, even after he waffled about retirement last off season. However, this draft is deep in tackle that we can drop to the top of the 2nd round to get a good one, IMO.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Gotta go LT 1st round! I dont see them getting a FA WR which most of them may be too expensive, so they need to draft an early WR! Im not sure of the Harris situation(if hes still under contract or not) and I dont see Dulin doing anything other than ST! I am not trusting the Suckeye until he proves he can stay healthy and hopefully Patmon can show something, but after Pittman, Maybe TY, and Pascal, depth kind of falls off at WR! 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Superman said:

Ballard is trading back, I'm 76% sure of it.

That's what I was gonna say, this is a great year for trading back since there won't be a combine and overall less information about players.

 

Now if we are gonna select someone in the 1st I expect it to be a LT, but I would say I'm 85% sure it will be a trade back.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, coltsfanatic24 said:

This is a great Offensive Tackle class. Teams drafting a QB in the top 15 will push some Blue chip prospects to us at 21. 
 

I actually think Ballard will stay put at 21 and draft an OT. Samuel Cosmi, OT, Texas and Christian Darrisaw, OT, Virginia Tech are two names that we will hear a lot about near the draft. 
 

Penei Sewell is regarded as the best OT prospect ever and he’s projected to go 5th because teams will reach for QB’s. An elite prospect should fall to us at 21. 

- Darrisaw is my pipedream pick, but I don't see him falling to 21.

- Comsi I don't see being a good fit. He'll most likely need to start at RT and eventually make the move to LT. He needs more development and to get stronger before he can start at LT.

- Eichenberg is one that I like, but I'm not sure if I'd take him at 21 or look to trade back a bit to get him.

- Walker Little is really interesting since he was thought of as a potential top 5 pick before getting injured and missing last season. If he can get back to his prior elite level, he's a steal regardless of which pick we use to get him. A lot will be riding on his medicals and his private workouts.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, buccolts said:

I agree. I may even go to 88%.

Gotta find the 3rd we just gave to Philly.

And, he loves his 2nds

I think we trade back for a second  this year and a second next

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jvan1973 said:

What are you basing that on?  Also,  how would that work compensation wise?

Ballard  loves  to trade back so if alot of prospects  he likes are there at 21 he'll  trade out the first or to the back of the first  to get extra picks

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Stephen said:

Ballard  loves  to trade back so if alot of prospects  he likes are there at 21 he'll  trade out the first or to the back of the first  to get extra picks

I understand that.   How does he end up with 2 seconds?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's wrong with #15? Is it an unlucky #? Just saying and why#1?
    • BINGO!  This staff realized our #1 deficiency and that is our lack of getting to the QB.  We can no longer wait for Turray to become that force and they went out and spent our 1st and 2nd rd picks of the 2021 draft on edge rushers.  If Turray gives us anything in 2021 it will be a bonus and actually give our 2nd rd pick time to recover from injury before he is counted on.  We may have finished 15th but it felt like 32nd with the lack of an aggressive blitz game plan and a true legit pass rusher.  I hope Irsay is correct in stating he has never in his life seen this type of edge rushing talent go back to back but I like the fact this team sees there biggest weakness and addresses it.  If only they saw the weakness at the wr position like I do but if you have a back like Taylor and a top 5 OL, who cares about the qb or wr position.
    • That is how I look at it as well. There is only 1 Tier 1 team in the AFC that is KC. There are a lot of Tier 2 teams though = Bills, Ravens, Titans, Browns, Colts, Steelers, and Dolphins. The Pats might even be Tier 2 but their QB play is still a mystery in how well Cam will play or will Jones be any good. 
    • Regarding Wentz, with the way this team is built we don't need him to be great just efficient.  Top 5 running game, top 10 defense all we need is him to play to the level of a top 15 qb, which is not a lot to ask honestly.  He has MVP capabilities with the right supporting cast so I trust Coach Reich in rectifying any mechanical flaws he may have.  We dont need an MVP qb to win in Indy but we do need him to be in the top 15.  That will be the telling tale of our season is if we have a top 15 qb.
    • At the end of the day it comes down to if the team is better. And @CR91 and others hit it on the head w identifying Wentz as really the centerpiece here.   - Our RBs are the same and should maybe be a tick better as Taylor continues to progress and as we get anything out of Mack this season compared to being without him last year.   - Our OL basically will be the same with some significant depth improvement. Reed is a huge huge improvement at OG if we have a need to play him. Pinter will be another year in and hopefully another year better. OT depth w Tevi and Davenport to add to Holden is way better. So really it comes down to how close to vintage Fisher we get and when. But it is a current concern.   - Our TE room is basically the same w hopefully some more chances for Allie-Cox (which would be an improvement w his ceiling) and replacing Burton who we got nothing out of w the speed and shiftiness of Granson. I think thats a slight upgrade.   - WR room is the same. Hilton cannot be utilized much less than he was last year. He should be a bit better at a minimum, especially w us able to throw downfield more. Pittman is a year more polished. Campbell is the big thing here. People that complained in the media or fan-wise about the Colts not doing much at WR seem to forget we are basically adding a talent in Campbell that would be right up there w top market assets if he can just stay on the field. Basically this group should be slightly better than last year just w depth improvements at the bottom of the roster and the better utilization of Hilton and could be a huge improvement if Campbell manages to stay on the field for the first time.   - QB all comes down to which Wentz we get. 2017 Wentz and its a grand slam. 2018 or 2019 Wentz and it is still a home run as a top-half of the league QB. 2020 Wentz and it is  a strikeout.    Defense:   Secondary remains pretty much the same with Tell coming back, Davis and Davis added for depth. The loss at DB coach is the biggest loss here. But likely we are around the same.   LB again remains almost the same. Walker out hurts the depth and the leadership but it is time for Okereke to get more time and to step up. It could be addition by subtraction but for the leadership alone I'll say we got slightly worse here,   DL is the mystery. Are the additions in Paye and Dayo better than the losses in Houston and Autry? Will a hopefully healthy Turay be better than the loss of one? Will Lewis finally reach his potential w more playing time in the Autry role? Can Banogu show anything? My gut says the DL got better. But they have to produce. it is time for the young bucks to put up or shut up.      At the end of the day my net sum makes me feel like the Defense is around the same with the DL dictating if we got better or worse. We invested in the DL to get better. Now they either show it or its a loss.   Offensively we are weaker at LT until Fisher is healthy. But we are better prepared to handle it than last year. And Campbell really could make a huge huge difference for the offense. It obviously comes down to Wentz. My gut says we are actually better offensively but that we will have some rocky times with Wentz's propensity to fumble and leave our defense on a short field.   I think the real challenge here is that most people see the Chiefs, Browns and Bills as being clearly better. Maybe the Ravens too. So if the Colts aren't "definitely" better than it looks like we lost ground.    But today I feel a lot better than i did yesterday before we had at least the option of Fisher at some point to help on the blindside. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...