-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Popular Now
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
By Dobbinblitz · Posted
Very True. I just think there is a much higher level of accountability and a culture shift to go along with it. -
Steichen was here during the JT saga. It's not the same, but my point is Steichen doesn't solve every problem just by being in the building. I agree, it's Ballard's responsibility to find Kelly's successor, and the fact that everyone else has been re-upped except for him is probably a concern of his. You can expect that concern to multiply significantly if we draft a center early. Should we care? Maybe... if you have someone throwing off the vibes, it could be problematic, and issues like this can snowball. Not that it would stop me from drafting anyone, but they should be prepared for whatever happens next. -
-
By Dobbinblitz · Posted
Reich is no longer here. I do not see Steichen putting up with it if that were the case. -
The real question is... should we care if he does(in the long-term that is)? This is his last year under contract and he will be 32 by the start of the 2025 season... Ballard is absolutely within his rights to prepare the team with Kelly's successor, especially if we are feeling like we need to budget the expenses on the OL with impending contract for Raimann...
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.