Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Irsay was not at fault for moving the colts?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

- lets get out of Baltimore as quick as possible Mr Irsay, ok watch this maneuvering.

We've talked about this so much

But its a story that must be brought up from time to time to remind us blessed we are to have this team  

Yeah, the state wanted to seize the team. Maryland politics is awesome.. Baltimore fans of a certain age say "nu uh, Irsay was a drunk!". Productive debate fodder.

 

But why is this a thing right now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO, hilarious situation. Gov overreach at it's finest lol. 

 

I only wonder if the NFL made Maryland sign off on something (saying they wouldn't seize) before they gave them a new franchise. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Nadine said:

We've talked about this so much

 

4 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

Very old news

 

Sorry. First time I was aware of this. You can lock it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

 

Sorry. First time I was aware of this. You can lock it.

It is old news for most, but I don't recall seeing it discussed on the site before (at least the senate aspects of it).

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's ancient history.  The Colts have been in Indianapolis longer than they were in Baltimore.  People 45 and under have no memory of the Baltimore Colts.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing I wonder about is did the colts really sneak out of Baltimore in the Mayflower Van's in the middle of the night??

Yeah we seen the video, so 

maybe the city didn't know ?...but what about the league? Isn't there a vote by other owners that need a majority to allow a team relocating? Or it wasn't in place then?

It's hard to think Pete Rozelle didn't know about it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

The thing I wonder about is did the colts really sneak out of Baltimore in the Mayflower Van's in the middle of the night??

Yeah we seen the video, so 

maybe the city didn't know ?...but what about the league? Isn't there a vote by other owners that need a majority to allow a team relocating? Or it wasn't in place then?

It's hard to think Pete Rozelle didn't know about it. 

very different days back then. much more "corporate" these days.

 

can you imagine a city trying to seize a team these days. or a team leaving in the middle of the night. 

 

these days, the NFL teams have power over their cities, get free stadiums built, tax breaks, etc.. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CR91 said:

 

 

Sorry. First time I was aware of this. You can lock it.

 

I've been fan for 60 years and somehow I never knew about the threat of using eminent domain by the state of Maryland. If that's true and was a legit threat to Robert Irsay , IMO he had every right to pull out in the middle of the night. That said , the man was a devil according to his mother. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Nadine said:

We've talked about this so much

Basically a once a year all out dogfight, every year, in the early internet days on forums like indystar, sporting news  etc. that then went into hyperdrive when Modell moved the Browns

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

 

Sorry. First time I was aware of this. You can lock it.

No need to lock.  I didn't mean that.

I didn't know that there were people that didn't know this story.

 

Baltimore fans were heart broken but, these days, everything has worked out for the best.

 

Thankfully

 

Although there is still disagreement on who has rights to the franchise history before the move.  But, even that is fading

 

Time heals

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, ColtV said:

Basically a once a year all out dogfight, every year, in the early internet days on forums like indystar, sporting news  etc. that then went into hyperdrive when Modell moved the Browns

 

I always wondered why Modell did not take such coaching talent and staff like Belichick, Saban, Kirk Ferentz, Jim Schwartz, Scott Pioli, Newsome, Michael Lombardi etc. with him when he moved the Browns. Did any of the players/staff become part of the new franchise automatically? Or were they all out of work just like the coaches?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

I always wondered why Modell did not take such coaching talent and staff like Belichick, Saban, Kirk Ferentz, Jim Schwartz, Scott Pioli, Newsome, Michael Lombardi etc. with him when he moved the Browns. Did any of the players/staff become part of the new franchise automatically? Or were they all out of work just like the coaches?

All of the players went.   Model fired Belichick before the move

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

I always wondered why Modell did not take such coaching talent and staff like Belichick, Saban, Kirk Ferentz, Jim Schwartz, Scott Pioli, Newsome, Michael Lombardi etc. with him when he moved the Browns. Did any of the players/staff become part of the new franchise automatically? Or were they all out of work just like the coaches?

Newsome stayed on, he moved into the front office immediately after he retired from playing.

 

As far as Belichick, I think even if they hadn't moved he was out. Browns had been a wild card team in 94, but disappointed in 95 with Vinny Testaverde being benched midway through the season.Bichick did have an a set of coached who really went on to success there, including Nick Saban who was defensive coordinator up to 94

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, The Fish said:

Yeah, the state wanted to seize the team. Maryland politics is awesome.. Baltimore fans of a certain age say "nu uh, Irsay was a drunk!". Productive debate fodder.

 

But why is this a thing right now?

My guess is the good old youtube algorithm is getting this video around because i know it got me this past week lol

 

 

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, twfish said:

My guess is the good old youtube algorithm is getting this video around because i know it got me this past week lol

 

 

Holy crap?! A real answer!

 

That would be it. Thanks for the heads up.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not only that, but the stadium was in such a terrible state and deeply in need of massive upgrades.  As I understand it, the upgrades wouldn't happen without some serious concessions, hence the legislature trying to seize the team under eminent domain.  Legal?  Probably not.  Desparate?  Absolutely.  The fact that some Baltimore fans are still salty about it, but then take in the 95 Cleveland Browns by storm and rename them the Ravens is really the only argument you'll ever need against said salty fans.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, twfish said:

My guess is the good old youtube algorithm is getting this video around because i know it got me this past week lol

 

 

"they already had a cracker barrel"

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, EastStreet said:

It is old news for most, but I don't recall seeing it discussed on the site before (at least the senate aspects of it).

It has. Everytime its come up. It’s a well known fact. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Time cures all. Baltimore fans were mad understandably so they lost their team. I dont think it was public knowledge at the time that the city was attempting to some what illegally seize the team. 

 

Although it is funny as heck that some STILL remain upset to this day given that this info has become public knowledge. As well as others have mentioned the Colts have been in Indy longer than Baltimore at this point and Bal embraced a new team from another city, Its kind of contradictory to cheer for the current Ravens and still be upset about the old colts, but those people are out their.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - heard/read all of this before.  Even if Daddy Irsay was a drunken jerk it doesn't give the state the right to seize the team.  There would be a whole lot of businesses "seized" by government entities in this in this country if that was legal!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

Time cures all. Baltimore fans were mad understandably so they lost their team. I dont think it was public knowledge at the time that the city was attempting to some what illegally seize the team. 

 

Although it is funny as heck that some STILL remain upset to this day given that this info has become public knowledge. As well as others have mentioned the Colts have been in Indy longer than Baltimore at this point and Bal embraced a new team from another city, Its kind of contradictory to cheer for the current Ravens and still be upset about the old colts, but those people are out their.

It was public knowledge from the beginning

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

Time cures all. Baltimore fans were mad understandably so they lost their team. I dont think it was public knowledge at the time that the city was attempting to some what illegally seize the team. 

 

Although it is funny as heck that some STILL remain upset to this day given that this info has become public knowledge. As well as others have mentioned the Colts have been in Indy longer than Baltimore at this point and Bal embraced a new team from another city, Its kind of contradictory to cheer for the current Ravens and still be upset about the old colts, but those people are out their.

They held highly publicized and open to the public hearings on it for months

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

truck GIF- lets get out of Baltimore as quick as possible Mr Irsay, ok watch this maneuvering.

 

Wish I could drive like that!

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, OffensivelyPC said:

Not only that, but the stadium was in such a terrible state and deeply in need of massive upgrades.  As I understand it, the upgrades wouldn't happen without some serious concessions, hence the legislature trying to seize the team under eminent domain.  Legal?  Probably not.  Desparate?  Absolutely.  The fact that some Baltimore fans are still salty about it, but then take in the 95 Cleveland Browns by storm and rename them the Ravens is really the only argument you'll ever need against said salty fans.

I can attest to the fact that Memorial Stadium was in really bad shape.

I was stationed at Aberdeen Proving Grounds for AIT for the Army. in 1973. 

I went to a couple of games and I have nothing to say but it was trashy and dirty. 

The two games I went to were the Bills (loss) and the Dolphins (win). 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

He is the king whoever was driving that semi, I seen that Gif and couldn't stop laughing. That takes skills.

I think the trailer had to be empty. It wouldn't have made that maneuver had it had any substantial weight in it. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

You have to admit though that is still awesome skills and it took balls doing that lmao 

It looks like he was forced to make that move.   The suv in front of him was slowing down to fast.      He certainly didn't want to make that move in traffic

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, crazycolt1 said:

I think the trailer had to be empty. It wouldn't have made that maneuver had it had any substantial weight in it. 

 

It looks like a trick video. :) 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, #12. said:

Yeah, it's ancient history.  The Colts have been in Indianapolis longer than they were in Baltimore.  People 45 and under have no memory of the Baltimore Colts.  

They most certainly do. They would be 8 or 9 when the move happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, #12. said:

Yeah, it's ancient history.  The Colts have been in Indianapolis longer than they were in Baltimore.  People 45 and under have no memory of the Baltimore Colts.  

I am 39 and know the Baltimore Colts history very well just because they were the Colts.  If you mean no memory of the team playing in Baltimore I think that age is closer to 40 that don’t remember the Colts playing there.  However, the history of the Baltimore Colts hasn’t been forgotten it’s celebrated, as it should be, by both the Colts and the city of Baltimore.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve been a Colts fan since the Sixties and believe a 1000% the move was justified and absolutely had to go down like it did. I was born in Indiana, though, so I’m sure it was easier for me than some others. It still makes me laugh that when we play Baltimore in their house they won’t put “Colts” or even “Indianapolis” on the scoreboard... just “Visitors”. Lol: let it go.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

I think the trailer had to be empty. It wouldn't have made that maneuver had it had any substantial weight in it. 

I was hoping you'd give a professional opinion on that driving.  So impressive even with an empty trailer.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This kid could make things really interesting and turn that flat-butt 4-3 into something really special with corners who can press. The scheme could be really sneaky good with that personnel. 
    • I don't know who else we really need to have a bounce back year, especially on D.  Along our DL, we either need to bring back Houston and Autry or figure out how to replace them - but both had pretty solid years.  Lewis was better than he had been his first couple years.  Buckner was a stud and Stewart was solid.  Having Turay come back healthy and seeing Banogu improve would be helpful, but they both played so little last year and hadn't done enough previously to indicate last year was a 'down year'.  At LB, Leonard was a first-team all pro again and very solid.  Walker was solid but saw his snap count decrease and Oke had his ups and downs while seeing his snap count dramatically increase (as @EastStreet pointed out,  not only did his snaps go way up compared to his rookie year but the way he was used was different).  I doubt we see Walker back, so it'd be nice to see Oke improve for sure.  Then in the secondary we had solid play from Rhodes, Carrie, Willis and Moore for the most part.  Blackmon was solid (especially early on, but he seemed to digress as the year went on - IMO, to be expected as he was raw coming in and was coming off a knee injury, I don't think he was supposed to get near the snaps he did last year, but we know what happened with Hooker and sort of forced Blackmon into the fire).  RYS had a down year, but I don't see why he can't bounce back - he's got the physical traits - I tend to think he battled some mental demons after some P-Int penalties, and hopefully he can refine his technique some and come back strong.     In all, on the D, I think we're in good shape.  Keep in mind, it seemed like 'Flus called the D a bit differently last year than he had in earlier years here.  We are, overall (aside from Houston, Autry, Rhodes) very young on D.  We had a very weird off-season last year, which (IMO) is critical for younger guys.  I can't help but think it didn't help the likes of guys like RYS and Oke who saw their roles increase and change (IMO, OKe's change was more than a 'slight' change) between their rookie year and year 2.     On O, ideally we'll see solid QB play from Wentz (I won't go as far as to saying he needs a 'bounce back' year as he hasn't been in Indy before and it sounds like there was a lot of toxicity in Philly, hopefully all he needs in a change of scenery and a reunion with Reich).  Our OL was solid, so as long as we can replace AC at LT I think we'll be OK there.  We had pretty consistent play from Hines and Wilkins throughout the year and JT got dramatically better as the season wore on -- I think if those guys can start up where they left off, we're more than fine at RB.  TY didn't have his best year, but he's be declining for about 3 years now, so if we bring him back, all we can do is hope he stays healthy and I think we'll be in OK shape.  Pittman missed some time with his leg compartment syndrome, but was solid down the stretch, so I don't think we need him to 'bounce back', just continue on his trajectory and he's gonna be solid.  Pascal was solid and I think we've pretty much seen his ceiling, so he just needs to stay solid.  It would be sweet to see Campbell and/or Patmon to emerge, but don't think we need them to 'bounce back' as we've never gotten high level results from them to begin with.     Then on STs, we were pretty solid all around.  Would like to see Blankenship add a bit more umphf to his kicks, but he was solid and Sanchez was solid punting.  The coverage and return units were solid overall.   So really, I think we need a comeback or bounce back year from RYS and maybe Oke... but overall, I don't think we need a 'bunch of them.'       I agree, pretty much  have to temper expectations on Speed being from a small school.  He did really improve on STs last year and he got his praise any time Ballard or any coaches spoke about him.  I get the feeling Ballard and staff are willing to use patience with project players (Ballard states that fairly regularly).  With Oke, Walker, Leonard and then Franklin who has more playing experience at LB - I don't think there was really much need to rush Speed into an LB role last year.  He got plenty of ST snaps and did well there, hopefully boosting his confidence that he can play at NFL level while still refining his LB technique in practices and the film room.     While I would rather see guys like Adams and Glasgow on STs - I don't think it is terrible to have them on the roster primarily as STers but being our 5th and 6th ranked LBs on the depth chart as well.  Meaning, if we went into the season with Leonard, Oke, Speed and Franklin as our top 4 with Adams and Glasgow as STers but listed as 5 and 6 on depth chart, I don't think it'd be the worst thing (especially considering we predominantly play with only 2 LBers on the field).  So, sure it'd be nice to bring in a mid-late round draft pick or sign a decent FA for fairly cheap, but I'd rather see us dishing out money to bring in a solid LT, a playmaker at TE (and maybe WR), retain Rhodes, ensure the DL was solid (either by bringing back Houston and Autry or by getting a guy like Bud Dupree/JJ Watt/etc.), and add OL depth.  In otherwords, regardless of if we bring Walker back or not, I don't think LB is a top 5 position of concern right now.   I don't think Walker is going to command a ton, but he was 15th in the NFL in tackles in 2018 (124), tied for 28th (105) in 2019 and in the top 50 in 2020 (92).  He's a pretty productive player and a solid one - so he's going to demand significantly more than he was getting as a 5th round pick on his rookie contract.  And yes, he definitely wants to play more and I think his biggest issue here is his lack of athleticism.  You're right, he'll probably play more in a 3-4 D and he will likely be offered more money by a team where he'll play a lot than what Ballard will offer him.    See the last line from Ballard in this article:  https://www.colts.com/news/chris-ballard-philip-rivers-ty-hilton-xavier-rhodes-2020-season-press-conference (Ballard on Linebacker Anthony Walker: "I have a special relationship with Anthony Walker. Selfless. Team guy. Rare leader. I hope he gets into coaching one day or scouting. Mark my words on this: if Anthony Walker gets into coaching, he will be a head football coach in the National Football League. And if he gets into scouting, he'll be a general manager. He's brilliant — absolutely brilliant, and he's made of the right stuff. I know Anthony wants to play more. We value Anthony. We'll see how it works out. I want good for Anthony."   My guess is Walker is gone.  
    • It's basically just monitoring one thread (general thread), then updating the big board and pick thread with every pick. So 32ish real time updates per night. Not hard, just tedious.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...