Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Aaron Rodgers could become available/Rodgers in Indy (Merge)


Recommended Posts

Just now, chad72 said:

 

Why need a 4th down when you can run it in for a TD on 3rd down? At worst, he might be stopped at the 1 yard line and can do a QB sneak or FB handoff. 

I completely agree man. For someone whos pretty damn mobile it was out of character imo. Ive been going through different reasons in my head but still a perplexing choice. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

By restructuring his contract for salary cap purposes at the end of 2019 season, $14.26 million of Rodgers' 2020 $21.55 million salary was converted into a signing bonus and prorated over his 2019-202

Rodgers only has himself to blame for not running that ball in on 3rd down. He had a clear lane to the EZ.   The decision to go for it should have been mostly irrelevant because 4th down wou

I would rather trade for Love. Rodgers is solid but has 2 to 3 years tops left.

Posted Images

On 1/24/2021 at 10:46 PM, richard pallo said:

I would rather have Stafford thank you.  Rogers is a prima donna that thinks only about himself.  He got bent just because they decided to draft an eventual replacement in Love.  Can you imagine the nerve of them?  Expect the same reaction wherever he goes. Too much drama. Ballard said our team will never be about one player.  Good luck with that with Rogers as our QB.    I'll take Stafford he's 5 years younger too.  San Fran and NE and the rest of them can have at it.  Please Ballard get the Stafford deal done asap so we can plan our subsequent moves for the off season.  Thank you very much. 

I would get bent too. They made it to the NFC championship game, hes still playing at an MVP level, and they draft a replacement for him that might not start for a few years? Then they make it to the NFC championship again, and instead of having a 1st round rookie playmaker out there contributing, they have their 1st round investment sitting on the bench. When you're that close to winning a superbowl you gotta add more weapons in the draft, not build for the future.

 

Also Stafford 5yrs younger is nowhere close to the level Rodgers is now. How many MVPs has Stafford won? How many playoff games has he won? How many pro bowls & all pros? Give Megatron to Rodgers and watch what happens. Rodgers gives us a 2-3 year window to win a superbowl. Stafford gives us a 4 - 6 year window to make the playoffs and get bounced in the 1st/2nd round. He will never outperform Mahomes or Allen.. Rodgers can.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/25/2021 at 4:33 AM, Smoke317 said:

Rodgers may blame the coach but I distinctly remember Rodgers going Adams Happy and missing a wide open Lazard for an easy TD in the first half when the Packers were forced to settle for a field goal (similar to Rivers crucially missing Pittman twice in the Buffalo game).  I also remember the Packers abandoning the running game way too early when they got back into the game in the 3rd quarter. A sure fire Hall of Fame QB like Rodgers (just like Rivers) isn’t free of blame in that loss. 

That's because Adams was mad from the play before and probably chirped at Rodgers. It was still a good pass for Adams, he just didnt get his feet down..and he couldve. Lazard was wide open tho.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm guessing 7pm tonight.
    • I think society has proven the science behind this saying is completely ancient and incorrect, albeit in some situations it might work. Being there are way more words that actually go against that rule than ones that do, you would of probably just been better off to say receiver was misspelled. The deficiency is this statement makes it almost seem counterfeit, to the point even mentioning it doesn't seem to be an efficient way to get your point across. At this point I would probably forfeit your argument, as by the time I am finished here will be at least eight times the words I list that don't follow this rule as well. At some point it will all seem foreign to those that are reading but it will feel like a weight that's as heavy as a glacier will of been lifted of their shoulders.   It's weird that I am continuing this for so long. I will wrap it up soon, as my neighbor needs my help doing something. The importance of that outweighs this as his wife has had multiple pregnancies to the point she is very proficient in these regards. I am going to stop and get a protein drink before heading over as I could use a boost of energy, just wanted to reiterate that your rule of thumb here, has been proven very insufficient when put to the test. Maybe you could pass this knowledge down through future generations, it could become an heirloom of sorts. The power of knowledge has reigned down on you today, hope you secure it in your beige luggage and let the concierge service keep it safe.    Think I am going to seize the moment tonight and have a rare steak as it is much juicier than a well done streak and taste so much better.   I won't unveil anymore words here, just know the list is much larger than I have mentioned.
    • I love the Terry and Forrest picks   But I wouldn't draft Turner at 75 let alone 35..
    • But JAC is an example of what? The downside to being aggressive?    In the past 10 seasons, they didn’t win more than 6 games in a season outside of that one year where they pushed. They don’t even sniff the playoffs, let alone a SB, without making the push that they did. If anything, it shows how much impact it can have on a team.   The Colts and JAC are very different org’s though. The Colts aren’t going to suddenly be bad...because they weren’t bad before.    
  • Members

    • w87r

      w87r 5,351

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 2,136

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 9,397

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MPStack

      MPStack 3,448

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Clem-Dog

      Clem-Dog 137

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BlueShoe

      BlueShoe 682

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pgt_rob

      pgt_rob 731

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SOMDColtsfan

      SOMDColtsfan 106

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JediXMan

      JediXMan 519

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 8,407

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...