Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Matthew Stafford and the Lions have agreed to work on a trade (Merge)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 500
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Please for the love of god Ballard don't give up a first for a stat QB

Rivers had really good teams, he just failed. Stafford was given the worst of the worst teams and coaches. He's a "stat" guy because that's all he has, just win a shoot out. He's no injury prone at al

You’re nuts if you wouldn’t give up the 21st pick for Stafford.    Sign me up. Pull the trigger, Ballard

Posted Images

Prediction, Indy or New England. I wouldn't be surprised if the Dolphins don't try to get him and use Tua as trade bait..

 

Colts or New England, it would be a 1st and 3rd at least, maybe with Jacob Eason or Jarrett Stidham thrown it. The Dolphins would trade Tua, their own 1st and maybe a 3rd.

 

He went to college in Georgia, Ryan is on the block, could he be in the mix there?

My guess is Indy will make a crazy push..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rivers had really good teams, he just failed. Stafford was given the worst of the worst teams and coaches. He's a "stat" guy because that's all he has, just win a shoot out. He's no injury prone at all, in fact he's one of the toughest QB's in the NFL..

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, New Zealands #1 Colts Fan said:

I agree.....give up 2 x 1sts

matthew stafford celebration GIF by Detroit Lions

 

Youd be a terrible GM

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, ColtJax said:

Rivers had really good teams, he just failed. Stafford was given the worst of the worst teams and coaches. He's a "stat" guy because that's all he has, just win a shoot out. He's no injury prone at all, in fact he's one of the toughest QB's in the NFL..

 

What would you call only two playoff games, zero playoff wins, and 7 losing seasons in 11 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

20M cap hit in 21

23M cap hit in 22

 

I would argue he is a younger Philip Rivers with a better arm and more mobility on a cheaper contract.  This is a no brainer for the Colts.  I would guess that Stafford will get a lot of say in his destination.  My guess is it will cost the Colts a 2nd rounder to get him, unless there is a bidding war, then it might take our first.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, New Zealands #1 Colts Fan said:

I can honestly say I have never applied or have wanted to be a gm, but thanks for your unasked for opinion.

Some people take this board to seriously. U made a simple suggestion and get called out. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, IndyD4U said:

You’re nuts if you wouldn’t give up the 21st pick for Stafford. 
 

Sign me up. Pull the trigger, Ballard

 

You do realize he'll be 33 this year with no playoff success and 7 losing seasons. You really think that's worth the 21st pick?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, CR91 said:

 

You do realize he'll be 33 this year with no playoff success and 7 losing seasons. You really think that's worth the 21st pick?

For a proven NFL QB with a friendly deal already in place with 5+ years to play.... yes

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, IndyD4U said:

For a proven NFL QB with a friendly deal already in place with 5+ years to play.... yes

 

Proven? What has Stafford done in this league? Has he won anything?

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, tvturner said:

Are you insane?

Partially ...lol.  Would I trade a player who is going to demand a monster contract at a postion that can be filled later in the draft for a possible 5 year franchise qb?  Yup

Link to post
Share on other sites

The story is on ESPN.coms front page.   League sources say the Lions expect at least a first round pick. 
 

OK...   it’s out there.   Let the bidding begin.   I have no idea if the Colts have any interest?  I only know one option is now public for all interested buyers. 
 

I’ll try to add the link in a minute.... 

 

And here's your link: 

 

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/30766102/detroit-lions-actively-seek-trade-qb-matthew-stafford-sources-say

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Proven? What has Stafford done in this league? Has he won anything?

Proven to be a consistent top 12 QB in the league with consistent bottom 5 rosters and coaches

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • NewColtsFan changed the title to Stafford goes public: Asks to be traded; Lions open to offers
4 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Proven? What has Stafford done in this league? Has he won anything?

Come on now. He’s stuck in the swamp called Detroit. Last time I checked football was a team sport. What did Andrew Luck win?

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, IndyD4U said:

Come on now. He’s stuck in the swamp called Detroit. Last time I checked football was a team sport. What did Andrew Luck win?

 

Andrew Luck beat Peyton 3 times and went to the AFC championship. First three seasons he won 11 games each season. That a joke

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, tvturner said:

Proven to be a consistent top 12 QB in the league with consistent bottom 5 rosters and coaches

 

The last three seasons, hardly. Only last season he got 4000 yards and he's been injured two of the last three seasons.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

To me this lowers their leverage on return value in a trade. 

The fact that he says he wants out? I would disagree. It's not like the lions HAVE to trade him. Worst case scenario, lions draft a QB at #7 and sit Stafford until a team gets desperate enough to ante up the offer. I could see your point if Stafford said he only wants to play for team X (e.g. Paul George situation with pacers), but it isn't the case. 

 

Similar situation with DW4. It's clear DW4 wants out, but the texans will still clearly get a haul for DW4 if/when they trade him since the NFL is generally a seller's market when it comes to QB's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of the options available, I like getting Stafford the best.   We have to be realistic.  There is no way the Colts can get high enough in the draft to get Lawrence or Wilson.  I think Fields and Lance are overrated.  And I don't know that Jones and Trask are any better prospects than Jacob Eason.  And there is no way the Colts would go into next season playing a rookie QB.  So that leaves Free Agents or a trade. Free agents aren't really inspiring.  The Colts need someone at the level of Rivers or better. So I would like Stafford/Eason next year.

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, New Zealands #1 Colts Fan said:

He's won more than any other available quarterback or rookie. Our team is ready to win now,why wait and hope we draft a rookie who ends up being decent. Glad you are not our gm :jump:

 

Win now? Do you see all the holes we have right now? No QB1. No LT. No DE. A ton of our players are free agents. 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Proven? What has Stafford done in this league? Has he won anything?

The only QBs in NFL history with 45,000+ passing yards and less than 150 INT:

• Aaron Rodgers

• Matthew Stafford

end of list

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Shive changed the title to Matthew Stafford and the Lions have agreed to work on a trade (Merge)
  • Shive locked and unlocked this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So sounds like it’s the Colts’ year to finally make it rain in FA and sign some big name players.
    • Another reason why I think the Steelers might be ideal second trade partners is that they have a 4th Round compensation pick 13 picks later but no pick in Round 5.   Do like the Walker Little pick and hope he does slide to say the 4th and we could nab him.
    • JB is not my favorite QB. But even I would never compare him to the likes of the guys on that list. He is much more in the Hasselback group.    But I also disagree with putting Grigs on that list as well. He wasn’t a disaster or an embarrassment...he was just a disappointment in the end. A guy who couldn’t evaluate talent nearly as well as he did early in his career. And he was an unlikeable guy (which has always made me wonder how he sold Irsay on giving him the job).    But plenty of GMs fail to get there with a star QB...especially early in that QB’s career. Only one team gets to win the SB each year.    I mean...just look at Polian. He got there eventually...but he was gifted PFM...and didn’t win a playoff game until the 6th season. Grigs had won 3 by his 3rd season...and had just as many playoff appearances (3) as Polian over their first 5 seasons. Polian is a HOFer...but my point is that it’s not easy even when you get a great QB.   And as I have said before...Luck was great and my favorite player of all time...but he wasn’t quite Mahomes or Rodgers good...they are true Ferraris. He made mistakes and also didn’t exactly light it it up in January either. I think his prime would have been something to behold and maybe he would have taken his game to a new level...but injuries unfortunately derailed that (which I think many parties are to blame for...not just Grigs).   The guys on that list brought nothing to this org...Grigs at least managed to oversee a winning roster for years. A 49-31 record (.612 winning %) with a 3-3 playoff record, in 5 years, is far from a disaster. If you want to see what a true disaster looks like...it’s what has happened in HOU...where their FO has wasted a QB who (IMO) might be even better than Luck.   So far, Ballard has been superior in just about every facet. But the results are still the results. We can discount 2017...but without it the Colts are still just 28-20 (a .583 winning %) and 1-2 in the playoffs so far. Yes, he has only had Luck for one of those seasons...but that’s just another way of saying he needed Luck to win more games (to win more playoff games). And that’s the argument I always hear to vilify Grigs...that he only won because of Luck. Seems like a double standard...and not the only one.   I think most Colts fans have become huge fans of the process...and that’s great. It’s might be my favorite part of sports. But there are those that are still results-oriented...and I can understand why some might be asking what does it all without the results? This season will be huge to answering that question. 
    • Relax....i was paraphrasing a Bill Tobin quote . Tobin went off on Kiper when the Colts drafted Trev Alberta instead of Trent Dilfer. 
  • Members

    • Kangaroo

      Kangaroo 98

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DaColts85

      DaColts85 403

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEric07

      IndyEric07 109

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr.NotSoCreative

      Mr.NotSoCreative 266

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • OhioColt

      OhioColt 99

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DiogoSales

      DiogoSales 75

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 6,430

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 576

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...